Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Academic publishing gender gap has been surprisingly under covered across all disciplines and over a longer timeframe. Our study fills this gap, by analyzing how the proportions of women authors change in academic publications over 20 years in all fields from 31,219 journals from 2001 to 2021. Our results indicate that the ratio of female to male authors keeps increasing steadily across disciplines. The increases are field-neutral—in other words, they are not bigger, for example, in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, in spite of multiple initiatives focusing specifically on STEM. The increases are also decelerating in time, which could suggest that the equilibrium of female to male authors may be plateauing. Finally, although the within-field gender gap is decreasing, it actually widened between fields. Thus, our results have major consequences for science policy in the area of the gender gap.

Keywords

gender gap academic publishing glass ceiling women in academia

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andersen

J. P.

(2023). Field-level differences in paper and author characteristics across all fields of science in Web of science, 2000–2020. Quantitative Science Studies, 4(2), 394–422. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00246

Anlar

Phillips

(2023). Addressing the ‘hidden curriculum’ in political science publishing. Politics and Gender, 19(2), 611–615. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x23000156

Beaudry

Larivière

(2016). Which gender gap? Factors affecting researchers’ scientific impact in science and medicine. Research Policy, 45(9), 1790–1817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.05.009

Bell

M. P.

Berry

Leopold

Nkomo

(2021). Making black lives matter in academia: A black feminist call for collective action against anti‐blackness in the academy. Gender, Work and Organization, 28(S1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12555

Berg

(2019). Examining author gender data. Science, 363(6422), 7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw4633

Bol

de Vaan

van de Rijt

(2022). Gender-equal funding rates conceal unequal evaluations. Research Policy, 51(1), 104399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104399

Budrikis

(2020). Growing citation gender gap. Nature Reviews Physics, 2(7), 346. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-020-0207-3

Ceci

S. J.

Kahn

Williams

W. M.

(2023). Exploring gender bias in six key domains of academic science: An adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science in the Public Interest: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 24(1), 15–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/15291006231163179

Editorial . (2012). “Nature’s sexism”. Nature, 491(November), 495.

10.

Editorial . (2017). Gender imbalance in science journals is still pervasive. Nature.

11.

Filardo

da Graca

Sass

D. M.

Pollock

B. D.

Smith

E. B.

Martinez

M.A.-M.

(2016). Trends and comparison of female first authorship in high impact medical journals: Observational study (1994-2014). BMJ, 352, i847. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i847

12.

Górska

A. M.

Kulicka

Staniszewska

Dobija

(2021). Deepening inequalities: What did COVID-19 reveal about the gendered nature of academic work?” Gender. Gender, Work and Organization, 28(4), 1546–1561. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12696

13.

Holman

Stuart-Fox

Hauser

C. E.

(2018). The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented? PLoS Biology, 16(4), Article e2004956. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004956

14.

Huang

Gates

A. J.

Sinatra

Barabási

A.-L.

(2020). Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(9), 4609–4616. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1914221117

15.

Jemielniak

Sławska

Wilamowski

(2022). COVID-19 effect on the gender gap in academic publishing. Journal of Information Science, 49(6), 1587–1592. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515211068168

16.

Kaatz

Gutierrez

Carnes

(2014). Threats to objectivity in peer review: The case of gender. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 35(8), 371–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2014.06.005

17.

Kim

Smith

D. S.

Hofstra

McFarland

D. A.

(2022). Gendered knowledge in fields and academic careers. Research Policy, 51(1), 104411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104411

18.

Larivière

Gingras

Cronin

Sugimoto

C. R.

(2013). Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science. Nature, 504(7479), 211–213. https://doi.org/10.1038/504211a

19.

Lerchenmueller

M. J.

Sorenson

(2018). The gender gap in early career transitions in the life sciences. Research Policy, 47(6), 1007–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.009

20.

Lisanne

V. H. D.

Laura

D. D.

Steijn

Willemijn

V. M.

(2023). Career implications of career shocks through the lens of gender: The role of the academic career script. Career Development International, 28(1), 19–32.

21.

Liu

Holme

Chiesa

AlShebli

Rahwan

(2023). Gender inequality and self-publication are common among academic editors. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(3), 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01498-1

22.

Lundine

Bourgeault

I. L.

Clark

Heidari

Balabanova

(2018). The gendered system of academic publishing. Lancet (London, England), 391(10132), 1754–1756. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30950-4

23.

Özkazanç-Pan

Pullen

(2020). Gendered labour and work, even in pandemic times. Gender, Work and Organization, 27(5), 675–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12516

24.

Parish

A. J.

Boyack

K. W.

Ioannidis

J. P. A.

(2018). Dynamics of Co-authorship and productivity across different fields of scientific research. PLoS One, 13(1), Article e0189742. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189742

25.

Plotnikof

Bramming

Branicki

Christiansen

L. H.

Henley

Kivinen

de Lima

J. P. R.

Kostera

Mandalaki

O'Shea

Özkazanç-Pan

Pullen

Stewart

Ybema

van Amsterdam

(2020). Catching a glimpse: Corona-life and its micro-politics in academia. Gender, Work and Organization, 27(5), 804–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12481

26.

Remery

Petts

R. J.

Schippers

Yerkes

M. A.

(2022). Gender and employment: Recalibrating women’s position in work, organizations, and society in times of COVID-19. Gender, Work, and Organization, 29(6), 1927–1934. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12872

27.

Ross

M. B.

Glennon

B. M.

Murciano-Goroff

Berkes

E. G.

Weinberg

B. A.

Lane

J. I.

(2022). Women are credited less in science than men. Nature, 608(7921), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04966-w

28.

Santamaría

Mihaljević

(2018). Comparison and benchmark of name-to-gender inference services. PeerJ. Computer Science, 4(July), Article e156. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.156

29.

Schiermeier

(2019). Huge study documents gender gap in chemistry publishing. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03438-y

30.

Son

J.-Y.

Bell

M. L.

(2022). Scientific authorship by gender: Trends before and during a global pandemic. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 348. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01365-4

31.

Song

Xian

Yang

(2022). CEO’s name uniqueness and audit fee. China Journal of Accounting Studies, 10(4), 459–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2022.2143681

32.

Squazzoni

Bravo

Farjam

Marusic

Mehmani

Willis

Birukou

Dondio

Grimaldo

(2021). Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals. Science Advances, 7(2), Article eabd0299. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd0299

33.

Squazzoni

Bravo

Grimaldo

García-Costa

Farjam

Mehmani

(2021). Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 elsevier journals. PLoS One, 16(10), Article e0257919. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257919

34.

van den Brink

Benschop

(2012). Slaying the seven-headed dragon: The quest for gender change in academia. Gender, Work and Organization, 19(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00566.x

35.

Wadia

(2021). Gender gap in authorship. British Dental Journal, 231(114). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-021-3286-3

36.

Woolston

(2020). Male authors boost research impact through self-hyping studies. Nature.

37.

Zehetbauer

von Haugwitz

Seifert

(2022). Gender-specific analysis of the authors and the editorial board of naunyn-schmiedeberg’s archives of Pharmacology from 2000 to 2020. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology, 395(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-021-02166-3

Gender Gap in All Academic Fields Over Time

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References