Based on the case of the national electronic identification card (New eID) policy in Taiwan, this study integrated the government’s components with a privacy calculus model to analyze factors which affect personal data disclosure intention. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to analyze the survey data and explore how citizens balance benefits and risks associated with the New eID issue. The research results suggested that financial compensation, personalized services, and service compatibility can enhance cognition of privacy-related benefits of citizens, while this cognition will further increase willingness to authorize their personal data. Moreover, the impact of government elements on citizens’ willingness to authorize their personal information also has statistical backings. Citizens’ cognition of privacy-related risks, however, has no statistical effect within the model, which is contrary to findings from previous studies. The study attempted to make contributions to supplementing the connotation of an extant theoretical framework, and discussed the privacy-related questions concerning digital government.
Abu-ShanabE.Al-AzzamA. (2012). Trust dimensions and the adoption of E-government in Jordan. International Journal of Information Communication Technologies and Human Development (IJICTHD), 4(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.4018/jicthd.2012010103
2.
AcquistiA.GrossklagsJ. (2007). What can behavioral economics teach us about privacy? In AcquistiA.GritzalisS.LambrinoudakisC.di VimercatiS. (Eds.), Digital Privacy: Theory, Technologies, and Practices (pp. 363–377). New York: Auerbach Publications. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420052183
3.
BansalG.ZahediF. M.GefenD. (2010). The impact of personal dispositions on information sensitivity, privacy concern and trust in disclosing health information online. Decision Support Systems, 49(2), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.01.010
4.
BarthS.De JongM. D. (2017). The privacy paradox–Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior–A systematic literature review. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1038–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.013
5.
BélangerF.CarterL. (2008). Trust and risk in e-government adoption. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.002
6.
BeldadA.van der GeestT.de JongM.SteehouderM. (2012). Shall I tell you where I live and who I am? Factors influencing the behavioral intention to disclose personal data for online government transactions. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(3), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2011.572331
CarterL.BélangerF. (2005). The utilization of e‐government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x
9.
CarterL.McBrideA. (2010). Information privacy concerns and e-government: A research agenda. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 4(1), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506161011028777
10.
ChiouA.ChenJ. C. V.BissetC. (2009). Cross cultural perceptions on privacy in the United States, Vietnam, Indonesia, and Taiwan. In ChenKuanchinAdamFadlalla (Eds), Online consumer protection: Theories of human relativism (pp. 284–299). IGI Global.
CulnanM. J.ArmstrongP. K. (1999). Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organization Science, 10(1), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.1.104
13.
CulnanM. J.BiesR. J. (2003) (Submitted for publication). Consumer privacy: Balancing economic and justice considerations. Journal of Social Issues, 59(2), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00067
14.
DebatinB.LovejoyJ. P.HornA. K.HughesB. N. (2009). Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(1), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01494.x
15.
DillmanD. A.SmythJ. D.ChristianL. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th Ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
16.
DinevT.BellottoM.HartP.RussoV.SerraI. (2006). Internet users' privacy concerns and beliefs about government surveillance: An exploratory study of differences between Italy and the United States. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 14(4), 57–93. https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.2006100103
17.
DinevT.HartP. (2006). An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Information Systems Research, 17(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0080
18.
DinevT.HartP.MullenM. R. (2008). Internet privacy concerns and beliefs about government surveillance–An empirical investigation. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(3), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.09.002
19.
EtzionH.PangM. S.George Mason University (2014). Complementary online services in competitive markets: Maintaining profitability in the presence of network effects. MIS Quarterly, 38(1), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2014/38.1.11
20.
FernandesT.PereiraN. (2021). Revisiting the privacy calculus: Why are consumers (really) willing to disclose personal data online?Telematics and Informatics, 65, 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101717.
21.
HagelJ.RayportJ. F. (1997). The coming battle for customer information. The McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 64–76.
22.
HairJ. F.,JrHultG. T. M.RingleC.SarstedtM. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
23.
HenselerJ.RingleC. M.SinkovicsR. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1474-7979(2009)0000020014
24.
HildebrandtM.O’HaraK.WaidnerM. (Eds), (2013). Digital enlightenment yearbook 2013: The value of personal data. IOS Press.
25.
HuiK. L.TanB. C.GohC. Y. (2006). Online information disclosure: Motivators and measurements. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT), 6(4), 415–441. https://doi.org/10.1145/1183463.1183467
26.
HuiK. L.TeoH. H.LeeS. Y. T. (2007). The value of privacy assurance: An exploratory field experiment. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148779
JanowskiT. (2015). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001
29.
JarvenpaaS. L.TractinskyN.VitaleM. (2000). Consumer trust in an Internet store. Information Technology and Management, 1(1–2), 45–71. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1019104520776
30.
KehrF.KowatschT.WentzelD.FleischE. (2015). Blissfully ignorant: The effects of general privacy concerns, general institutional trust, and affect in the privacy calculus. Information Systems Journal, 25(6), 607–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12062
31.
KeithM. J.ThompsonS. C.HaleJ.LowryP. B.GreerC. (2013). Information disclosure on mobile devices: Re-examining privacy calculus with actual user behavior. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71(12), 1163–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.08.016
32.
KimD.ParkK.ParkY.AhnJ. H. (2019). Willingness to provide personal information: Perspective of privacy calculus in IoT services. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.022
33.
KimM. S.KimS. (2018). Factors influencing willingness to provide personal information for personalized recommendations. Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.031
34.
KokolakisS. (2017). Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon. Computers & Security, 64, 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2015.07.002
LiH.WuJ.GaoY.ShiY. (2016). Examining individuals’ adoption of healthcare wearable devices: An empirical study from privacy calculus perspective. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 88, 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.12.010
37.
LiH.SarathyR.XuH. (2010). Understanding situational online information disclosure as a privacy calculus. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 51(1), 62–71.
38.
LiY. (2012). Theories in online information privacy research: A critical review and an integrated framework. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 471–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.06.010
39.
LwinM.WirtzJ.WilliamsJ. D. (2007). Consumer online privacy concerns and responses: A power–responsibility equilibrium perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(4), 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-006-0003-3
40.
MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffP. M.JarvisC. B. (2005). The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 710–730. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.710
41.
MeinertD. B.PetersonD. K.CriswellJ. R.CrosslandM. D. (2006). Privacy policy statements and consumer willingness to provide personal information. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), 4(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/jeco.2006010101
42.
MergelI. (2016). Agile innovation management in government: A research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 516–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.07.004
43.
MiltgenC. L.SmithH. J. (2015). Exploring information privacy regulation, risks, trust, and behavior. Information & Management, 52(6), 741–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.06.006
44.
Ministry of the Interior (2019). The planning, functions and budget of New eID. Ministry of the Interior. https://reurl.cc/Z7zj4g
MutimukweC.KolkowskaE.GrönlundÅ. (2020). Information privacy in e-service: Effect of organizational privacy assurances on individual privacy concerns, perceptions, trust and self-disclosure behavior. Government Information Quarterly, 37(1), 101413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101413
47.
National Development Council (2019). Smart government action plan. National Development Council. https://reurl.cc/0oy9zM
48.
NorbergP. A.HorneD. R.HorneD. A. (2007). The privacy paradox: Personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41(1), 100–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x
49.
PhelpsJ.NowakG.FerrellE. (2000). Privacy concerns and consumer willingness to provide personal information. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 19(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.19.1.27.16941
50.
PoikolaA.KuikkaniemiK.HonkoH. (2015). Mydata a nordic model for human-centered personal data management and processing. Finnish Ministry of Transport and Communications.
51.
RubinsteinI. S.NojeimG. T.LeeR. D. (2014). Systematic government access to personal data: A comparative analysis. International Data Privacy Law, 4(2), 96–119. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipu004
ShadboltN. (2013). Midata: Towards a personal information revolution. In O'HaraK.WaidnerM.HildebrandtM. (Eds), Digital enlightenment yearbook 2013: The value of personal data (pp. 202–224). IOS Press.
54.
ShibchurnJ.YanX. (2015). Information disclosure on social networking sites: An intrinsic–extrinsic motivation perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.059
55.
SmithH. J.DinevT.XuH. (2011). Information privacy research: An interdisciplinary review. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 989–1016. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409970
56.
StoneE. F.StoneD. L. (1990). Privacy in organizations: Theoretical issues, research findings, and protection mechanisms. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 8(3), 349–411.
57.
StoycheffE. (2016). Under surveillance: Examining Facebook’s spiral of silence effects in the wake of NSA internet monitoring. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(2), 296–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016630255
58.
StoycheffE.LiuJ.XuK.WibowoK. (2019). Privacy and the Panopticon: Online mass surveillance’s deterrence and chilling effects. New Media & Society, 21(3), 602–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818801317
SunY.WangN.ShenX. L.ZhangJ. X. (2015). Location information disclosure in location-based social network services: Privacy calculus, benefit structure, and gender differences. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.006
61.
TeoT. S.SrivastavaS. C.JiangL. (2008). Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 99–132. https://doi.org/10.2753/mis0742-1222250303
WangJ. C.ChangC. H. (2013). How online social ties and product-related risks influence purchase intentions: A Facebook experiment. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(5), 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2013.03.003
64.
WangJ. H. (2007). From technological catch-up to innovation-based economic growth: South Korea and Taiwan compared. The Journal of Development Studies, 43(6), 1084–1104. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380701466609
65.
WangT.DuongT. D.ChenC. C. (2016). Intention to disclose personal information via mobile applications: A privacy calculus perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 36(4), 531–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.03.003
66.
WarkentinM.GefenD.PavlouP. A.RoseG. M. (2002). Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust. Electronic Markets, 12(3), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/101967802320245929
67.
WellsC.ThorsonK. (2017). Combining big data and survey techniques to model effects of political content flows in Facebook. Social Science Computer Review, 35(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315609528
68.
WuK. W.HuangS. Y.YenD. C.PopovaI. (2012). The effect of online privacy policy on consumer privacy concern and trust. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 889–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.008
69.
XuH.LuoX. R.CarrollJ. M.RossonM. B. (2011). The personalization privacy paradox: An exploratory study of decision-making process for location-aware marketing. Decision Support Systems, 51(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.11.017
70.
XuH.TeoH. H.TanB. C.AgarwalR. (2009). The role of push-pull technology in privacy calculus: The case of location-based services. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(3), 135–174. https://doi.org/10.2753/mis0742-1222260305
