Over the past decade, smartphones have permeated all domains of adolescents’ everyday lives, with research dominated by “smartphone addiction.” This study compares one of the most used measures of smartphone addiction with a new alternative measure, the Smartphone Pervasiveness Scale for Adolescents (SPS-A), which focuses on the frequency of smartphone use at key social and physiological moments of daily life. A sample of 3,289 Italian high school students was used to validate the two constructs and compare their suitability for research on academic performance. SPS-A was moderately correlated with smartphone addiction, showed measurement invariance (across ethnic origins, parental education, and gender), and negatively predicted language and math test scores. SPS-A is a nonpathologizing instrument suitable for analyzing the role of smartphone use in academic achievement in combination with students’ social backgrounds.
AkınA.AltundağY.TuranM. E.AkınU. (2014). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Smart Phone Addiction Scale-Short Form for Adolescent. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 74–77.
2.
Al BaghalT.SloanL.JessopC.WilliamsM. L.BurnapP. (2020). Linking Twitter and survey data: The impact of survey mode and demographics on consent rates across three UK studies. Social Science Computer Review, 38(5), 517–532.
AmezS.BaertS. (2019). Smartphone use and academic performance: A literature review (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3483961). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3483961
5.
AndrewsS.EllisD. A.ShawH.PiwekL. (2015). Beyond self-report: Tools to compare estimated and real-world smartphone use. PLoS One, 10(10), e0139004.
CameriniA. L.GerosaT.MarcianoL. (2020). Predicting problematic smartphone use over time in adolescence: A latent class regression analysis of online and offline activities. New Media & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820948809
9.
CheeverN. A.MorenoM. A.RosenL. D. (2018). When does Internet and smartphone use become a problem? In MorenoM. A.RadovicA. (Eds.), Technology and adolescent mental health (pp. 121–131). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69638-6_10
10.
ChenC.ZhangK. Z.GongX.ZhaoS. J.LeeM. K.LiangL. (2017). Examining the effects of motives and gender differences on smartphone addiction. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 891–902.
11.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
12.
ChenR. S.JiC. H. (2015). Investigating the relationship between thinking style and personal electronic device use and its implications for academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 177–183.
13.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
14.
ChotpitayasunondhV.DouglasK. M. (2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 9–18.
15.
ChotpitayasunondhV.DouglasK. M. (2018). The effects of “phubbing” on social interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(6), 304–316.
16.
ChristensenM. A.BettencourtL.KayeL.MoturuS. T.NguyenK. T.OlginJ. E.PletcherM. J.MarcusG. M. (2016). Direct measurements of smartphone screen-time: relationships with demographics and sleep. PLoS One, 11(11), e0165331.
17.
Davis-KeanP. E. (2005). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: The indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 294.
18.
DemirciK.AkgönülM.AkpinarA. (2015). Relationship of smartphone use severity with sleep quality, depression, and anxiety in university students. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(2), 85–92.
19.
DewaldJ. F.MeijerA. M.OortF. J.KerkhofG. A.BögelsS. M. (2010). The influence of sleep quality, sleep duration and sleepiness on school performance in children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 14(3), 179–189.
20.
ElhaiJ. D.LevineJ. C.DvorakR. D.HallB. J. (2016). Fear of missing out, need for touch, anxiety and depression are related to problematic smartphone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 509–516.
21.
ErnalaS. K.BurkeM.LeavittA.EllisonN. B. (2020, April). How well do people report time spent on Facebook? An evaluation of established survey questions with recommendations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376435
22.
FelisoniD. D.GodoiA. S. (2018). Cell phone usage and academic performance: An experiment. Computers & Education, 117, 175–187.
23.
GerosaT. (2021). Measurement invariance with ordered categorical variables: applications in longitudinal survey research. In CernatA.SakshaugJ. (Eds.), Measurement error in longitudinal data (pp. 265–278). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198859987.003.0011
24.
GlickJ. E.Hohmann-MarriottB. (2007). Academic performance of young children in immigrant families: The significance of race, ethnicity, and national origins. International Migration Review, 41(2), 371–402.
25.
GuiM.BüchiM. (2021). From use to overuse: Digital inequality in the age of communication abundance. Social Science Computer Review, 39(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319851163
26.
GuiM.GerosaT. (2020). Smartphone pervasiveness in youth daily life as a new form of digital inequality. In HargittaiE. (Ed.), The handbook of digital inequality. Edward Elgar Publishing.
27.
GuiM.GerosaT.GaravagliaA.PettiL.FasoliM. (2018, November). Digital well- being. Validation of a digital media education programme in high schools. Report. Research Center on Quality of Life in the Digital Society. University of Milano-Bicocca.
28.
HarrisB.ReganT.SchuelerJ.FieldsS. A. (2020). Problematic mobile phone and smartphone use scales: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00672
29.
HaugS.CastroR. P.KwonM.FillerA.KowatschT.SchaubM. P. (2015). Smartphone use and smartphone addiction among young people in Switzerland. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(4), 299–307.
30.
Hooft GraaflandJ. (2018). New technologies and 21st century children: Recent trends and outcomes(OECD Education Working Paper No. 179). https://doi.org/10.1787/e071a505-en
31.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
32.
HuangH.LeungL. (2009). Instant messaging addiction among teenagers in China: Shyness, alienation, and academic performance decrement. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 675–679. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0060
33.
HughesN.BurkeJ. (2018). Sleeping with the frenemy: How restricting “bedroom use” of smartphones impacts happiness and wellbeing. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 236–244.
JürgensP.StarkB.MaginM. (2020). Two half-truths make a whole? On bias in self-reports and tracking data. Social Science Computer Review, 38(5), 600–615.
36.
KimI.KimR.KimH.KimD.HanK.LeeP. H.MarkG.LeeU. (2019). Understanding smartphone usage in college classrooms: A long-term measurement study. Computers & Education, 141, 103611.
37.
KlineR. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling(4th ed.). Guilford Publications.
38.
KreuterF.HaasG. C.KeuschF.BährS.TrappmannM. (2020). Collecting survey and smartphone sensor data with an app: Opportunities and challenges around privacy and informed consent. Social Science Computer Review, 38(5), 533–549.
39.
KushlevK.ProulxJ.DunnE. W. (2016, May). “Silence your phones” smartphone notifications increase inattention and hyperactivity symptoms. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858359
40.
KwonM.KimD. J.ChoH.YangS. (2013). The Smartphone Addiction Scale: Development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLoS One, 8(12), e83558.
41.
LeeJ.ChoB.KimY.NohJ. (2015). Smartphone addiction in university students and its implication for learning. In ChenG.KumarV.KinshukR. H.KongS. C. (Eds.), Emerging issues in smart learning (pp. 297–305). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-44188-6_40
42.
LemolaS.Perkinson-GloorN.BrandS.Dewald-KaufmannJ. F.GrobA. (2015). Adolescents’ electronic media use at night, sleep disturbance, and depressive symptoms in the smartphone age. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(2), 405–418.
43.
LeppA.BarkleyJ. E.KarpinskiA. C. (2014). The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety, and satisfaction with life in college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 343–350.
44.
LiuD.BaumeisterR. F.YangC.HuB. (2019). Digital communication media use and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 24(5), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz013
45.
Lopez-FernandezO. (2017). Short version of the Smartphone Addiction Scale adapted to Spanish and French: Towards a cross-cultural research in problematic mobile phone use. Addictive Behaviors, 64, 275–280.
46.
MahapatraS. (2019). Smartphone addiction and associated consequences: Role of loneliness and self-regulation. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(8), 833–844.
47.
MarksG. N. (2008). Accounting for the gender gaps in student performance in reading and mathematics: Evidence from 31 countries. Oxford Review of Education, 34(1), 89–109.
48.
MascheroniG.ÓlafssonK. (2016). The mobile Internet: Access, use, opportunities and divides among European children. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1657–1679.
OrbenA.PrzybylskiA. K. (2019). Screens, teens, and psychological well-being: Evidence from three time-use-diary studies. Psychological Science, 30(5), 682–696.
PancaniL.GerosaT.GuiM.RivaP. (2020). “Mom, dad, look at me”: The development of the Parental Phubbing Scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520964866
54.
PanekE. (2014). Left to their own devices: College students’ “guilty pleasure” media use and time management. Communication Research, 41(4), 561–577.
55.
ParentN.ShapkaJ. (2020). Moving beyond addiction: An attachment theory framework for understanding young adults’ relationships with their smartphones. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.180
56.
PrzybylskiA. K.WeinsteinN. (2013). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512453827
57.
PrzybylskiA. K.WeinsteinN. (2017). A large-scale test of the Goldilocks hypothesis: Quantifying the relations between digital-screen use and the mental well-being of adolescents. Psychological Science, 28(2), 204–215.
RobertsJ. A.DavidM. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134–141.
60.
RohrerJ. M. (2018). Thinking clearly about correlations and causation: Graphical causal models for observational data. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 24(2), 251524591774562. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917745629
61.
SamahaM.HawiN. S. (2016). Relationships among smartphone addiction, stress, academic performance, and satisfaction with life. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 321–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.045
62.
SassD. A. (2011). Testing measurement invariance and comparing latent factor means within a confirmatory factor analysis framework. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(4), 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911406661
63.
SassD. A.SchmittT. A.MarshH. W. (2014). Evaluating model fit with ordered categorical data within a measurement invariance framework: A comparison of estimators. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.882658
64.
SeligJ. P.LittleT. D. (2012). Autoregressive and cross-lagged panel analysis for longitudinal data. In LaursenB.LittleT. D.CardN. A. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 265–278). The Guilford Press.
65.
SewallC. J.BearT. M.MerrankoJ.RosenD. (2020). How psychosocial well-being and usage amount predict inaccuracies in retrospective estimates of digital technology use. Mobile Media & Communication, 8(3), 2050157920902830.
66.
StevensJ. P. (2012). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Routledge.
67.
StierS.BreuerJ.SiegersP.ThorsonK. (2020). Integrating survey data and digital trace data: Key issues in developing an emerging field. Social Science Computer Review, 38(5), 503–516.
68.
TokunagaR. S. (2015). Perspectives on Internet addiction, problematic Internet use, and deficient self-regulation: Contributions of communication research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 39(1), 131–161.
69.
TurkleS. (2016). Reclaiming conversation: The power of talk in a digital age. Penguin Press.
70.
VandenbergR. J.LanceC. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
71.
van der SchuurW. A.BaumgartnerS. E.SumterS. R.ValkenburgP. M. (2015). The consequences of media multitasking for youth: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 204–215.
72.
WaiteB. M.LindbergR.ErnstB.BowmanL. L.LevineL. E. (2018). Off-task multitasking, note-taking and lower- and higher-order classroom learning. Computers & Education, 120, 98–111.
73.
WentzelK. R. (2005). Peer relationships, motivation, and academic performance at school. In ElliotA. J.DweckC. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 279–296). Guilford Press.
74.
WidamanK. F.ReiseS. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In BryantK. J.WindleM. (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281–324). American Psychological Association.
75.
WilcocksonT. D.EllisD. A.ShawH. (2018). Determining typical smartphone usage: What data do we need?Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(6), 395–398.
76.
WolfsonA. R.CarskadonW. (2003). Understanding adolescents’ sleep patterns and school performance. Sleep Medicine Review, 7, 491–506.
77.
WoodE.ZivcakovaL.GentileP.ArcherK.De PasqualeD.NoskoA. (2012). Examining the impact of off-task multi-tasking with technology on real-time classroom learning. Computers & Education, 58(1), 365–374.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
