Public discourse about overuse as an undesired side effect of digital communication is growing. This article conceptually develops and empirically analyzes users’ perceived digital overuse (PDO) as a widespread social phenomenon sensitive to existing inequalities. In an age of digital communication abundance and closing Internet access divides, overuse has not been systematically investigated nor are its social disparities known. In a first step, PDO is demarcated from Internet addiction, theoretically defined, and operationalized. Then, the prevalence of perceived overuse is assessed in a representative population sample of Italian Internet users (N = 2,008) and predictors of digital overuse are tested. Results show that digital communication use and the level of social pressure to function digitally are positively related to PDO. Education is negatively associated with PDO and positively with digital communication use and social digital pressure. Overuse is emerging as a new dimension of digital inequality with implications for theory and future research in digital well-being.
Amichai-HamburgerY.HayatZ. (2011). The impact of the Internet on the social lives of users: A representative sample from 13 countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 585–589.
2.
AyyagariR.GroverV.PurvisR. (2011). Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 35, 831–858.
3.
BaumeisterR. F.SparksE. A.StillmanT. F.VohsK. D. (2008). Free will in consumer behavior: Self-control, ego depletion and choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18, 4–13.
BlankG.GroseljD. (2014). Dimensions of Internet use: Amount, variety, and types. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 417–435.
6.
BollenK. A. (1987). Total, direct, and indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 17, 37–69.
7.
BrandtzaegP. B.HeimJ.KarahasanovicA. (2011). Understanding the new digital divide—A typology of Internet users in Europe. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69, 123–138.
8.
BüchiM.JustN.LatzerM. (2016). Modeling the second-level digital divide: A five-country study of social differences in Internet use. New Media & Society, 18, 2703–2722.
9.
CaplanS. E. (2002). Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: Development of a theory-based cognitive–behavioral measurement instrument. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 553–575.
10.
CaplanS. E. (2010). Theory and measurement of generalized problematic Internet use: A two-step approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1089–1097.
11.
DavidP.KimJ. H.BrickmanJ. S.RanW.CurtisC. M. (2015). Mobile phone distraction while studying. New Media & Society, 17, 1661–1679.
12.
DickinsonJ. E.HibbertJ. F.FilimonauV. (2016). Mobile technology and the tourist experience: (Dis)connection at the campsite. Tourism Management, 57, 193–201.
13.
DiMaggioP.BonikowskiB. (2008). Make money surfing the web? The impact of Internet use on the earnings of US workers. American Sociological Review, 73, 227–250.
14.
DiMaggioP.HargittaiE.CelesteC.ShaferS. (2004). From unequal access to differentiated use: A literature review and agenda for research on digital inequality. In NeckermanK. M. (Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 355–400). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
15.
DiMaggioP.HargittaiE.NeumanW. R.RobinsonJ. P. (2001). Social implications of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 307–336.
16.
Google. (2018, December10). Great technology should improve life, not distract from it. Retrieved fromhttps://wellbeing.google
17.
GreenfieldD. (2011). The addictive properties of Internet usage. In YoungK. S.Nabuco de AbreuC. (Eds.), Internet addiction: A handbook and guide to evaluation and treatment (pp. 135–153). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
18.
GuiM.ArgentinG. (2011). Digital skills of internet natives: Different forms of digital literacy in a random sample of northern Italian high school students. New Media & Society, 13, 963–980.
19.
GuiM.FasoliM.CarradoreR. (2017). “Digital well-being.” Developing a new theoretical tool for media literacy research. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 9, 155–173.
20.
GuiM.GerosaT. (in press). Smartphone pervasiveness in youth daily life as a new form of digital inequality. In HargittaiE. (Ed.), The handbook of digital inequality. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
21.
HargittaiE. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First Monday, 7. doi:10.5210/fm.v7i4.942
22.
HargittaiE.HinnantA. (2008). Digital inequality: Differences in young adults’ use of the Internet. Communication Research, 35, 602–621.
23.
HelsperE. J.Van DeursenA.EynonR. (2015). Tangible outcomes of Internet use: From digital skills to tangible outcomes project report. Retrieved fromwww.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/projects/?id=112
24.
HerreroJ.UrueñaA.TorresA.HidalgoA. (2019). Socially connected but still isolated: Smartphone addiction decreases social support over time. Social Science Computer Review, 37, 73–88.
25.
HofmannW.BaumeisterR. F.FörsterG.VohsK. D. (2012). Everyday temptations: An experience sampling study of desire, conflict, and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1318–1335.
26.
HofmannW.ReineckeL.MeierA.OliverM. B. (2017). Of sweet temptations and bitter aftertaste: Self-control as a moderator of the effects of media use on well-being. In ReineckeL.OliverM. B. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being: International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects (pp. 211–222). New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
28.
KahnemanD.KruegerA. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 3–24.
29.
Karr-WisniewskiP.LuY. (2010). When more is too much: Operationalizing technology overload and exploring its impact on knowledge worker productivity. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1061–1072.
30.
KazakovaS.CaubergheV.PandelaereM.De PelsmackerP. (2015). Can’t see the forest for the trees? The effect of media multitasking on cognitive processing style. Media Psychology, 18, 425–450.
31.
KimbroughA. M.GuadagnoR. E.MuscanellN. L.DillJ. (2013). Gender differences in mediated communication: Women connect more than do men. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 896–900.
32.
KirkcaldyB. D.MartinT. (2000). Job stress and satisfaction among nurses: Individual differences. Stress Medicine, 16, 77–89.
33.
KnoblochS.ZillmannD. (2002). Appeal of love themes in popular music. Psychological Reports, 93, 653–658.
34.
KrautR.PattersonM.LundmarkV.KieslerS.MukophadhyayT.ScherlisW. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?American Psychologist, 53, 1017–1031.
35.
KubeyR.CsikszentmihalyiM. (2002). Television addiction. Scientific American, 286, 74–81.
36.
KussD. J.GriffithsM. D.KarilaL.BillieuxJ. (2014). Internet addiction: A systematic review of epidemiological research for the last decade. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 20, 4026–4052.
37.
KussD. J.Van RooijA. J.ShorterG. W.GriffithsM. D.Van de MheenD. (2013). Internet addiction in adolescents: Prevalence and risk factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1987–1996.
38.
KwonM.KimD. J.ChoH.YangS. (2013). The smartphone addiction scale: Development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLoS One, 8, e83558.
39.
LaRoseR. (2010). The problem of media habits. Communication Theory, 20, 194–222.
40.
LaRoseR.LinC. A.EastinM. S. (2003). Unregulated Internet usage: Addiction, habit, or deficient self-regulation?Media Psychology, 5, 225–253.
41.
LeungL.LeeP. S. N. (2012). Impact of internet literacy, internet addiction symptoms, and internet activities on academic performance. Social Science Computer Review, 30, 403–418.
42.
LewisJ.GiullariS. (2005). The adult worker model family, gender equality and care: The search for new policy principles and the possibilities and problems of a capabilities approach. Economy and Society, 34, 76–104.
43.
LingR. (2016). Soft coercion: Reciprocal expectations of availability in the use of mobile communication. First Monday, 21. doi:10.5210/fm.v21i9.6814
44.
MeierA.ReineckeL.MeltzerC. E. (2016). “Facebocrastination”? Predictors of using Facebook for procrastination and its effects on students’ well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 65–76.
45.
NaldiniM. (2004). The family in the Mediterranean welfare states. London, England: Routledge.
46.
NansenB.ChakrabortyK.GibbsL.MacDougallC.VetereF. (2012). Children and digital wellbeing in Australia: Online regulation, conduct and competence. Journal of Children and Media, 6, 237–254.
OphirE.NassC.WagnerA. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 15583–15587.
49.
PanekE. (2012). Immediate media: How instant gratification, self-control, and the expansion of media choice affect our everyday lives (Doctoral dissertation).University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
50.
PanekE. (2014). Left to their own devices: College students’ “guilty pleasure” media use and time management. Communication Research, 41, 561–577.
51.
ParkS. K.KimJ. Y.ChoC. B. (2008). Prevalence of Internet addiction and correlations with family factors among South Korean adolescents. Adolescence, 43, 895–909.
52.
PénardT.PoussingN.SuireR. (2013). Does the Internet make people happier?The Journal of Socio-Economics, 46, 105–116.
53.
PrzybylskiA.MurayamaK.DeHaanC. R.GladwellV. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1841–1848.
ReineckeL.AufenangerS.BeutelM. E.DreierM.QuiringO.StarkB.…MüllerK. W. (2017). Digital stress over the life span: The effects of communication load and Internet multitasking on perceived stress and psychological health impairments in a German probability sample. Media Psychology, 20, 90–115.
56.
ReineckeL.MeierA.AufenangerS.BeutelM. E.DreierM.QuiringO.…MüllerK. W. (2016). Permanently online and permanently procrastinating? The mediating role of Internet use for the effects of trait procrastination on psychological health and well-being. New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444816675437
57.
ReineckeL.KlimmtC.MeierA.ReichS.HefnerD.Knop-HuelssK.…VordererP. (2018). Permanently online and permanently connected: Development and validation of the Online Vigilance Scale. PloS one, 13, e0205384.
58.
RigbyC. S.RyanR. M. (2016). Motivation for entertainment media and its eudaimonic aspects through the lens of self-determination theory. In ReineckeL.OliverM. B (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being: International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects (pp. 34–48). New York, NY: Routledge.
59.
RobinsonL.CottonS. R.OnoH.Quan-HaaseA.MeschG.ChenW.…SternM. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 569–582.
60.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36.
61.
SaloM.PirkkalainenH.KoskelainenT. (2017, August). Technostress and social networking services: Uncovering strains and their underlying stressors. In StigbergS.KarlsenJ.HoloneH.LinnesC. (Eds.), Nordic contributions in IS research. SCIS 2017. Lecture notes in business information processing (pp. 41–53). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
62.
Schermelleh-EngelK.MoosbruggerH.MüllerH. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23–74.
63.
SchroederR.LingR. (2014). Durkheim and Weber on the social implications of new information and communication technologies. New Media & Society, 16, 789–805.
64.
ScottS. B.Graham-EngelandJ. E.EngelandC. G.SmythJ. M.AlmeidaD. M.KatzM. J.SliwinskiM. J. (2015). The effects of stress on cognitive aging, physiology and emotion (ESCAPE) project. BMC Psychiatry, 15, 146.
65.
SpadaM. M. (2014). An overview of problematic Internet use. Addictive Behaviors, 39, 3–6.
66.
SparksC. (2013). What is the “digital divide” and why is it important?Javnost—The Public, 20, 27–46.
67.
StephensK. K.MandhanaD. M.KimJ. J.LiX.GlowackiE. M.CruzI. (2017). Reconceptualizing communication overload and building a theoretical foundation. Communication Theory, 27, 269–289.
68.
StrattonM. T. (2010). Uncovering a new guilty pleasure: A qualitative study of the emotions of personal web usage at work. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17, 392–410.
69.
SuttonT. (2017). Disconnect to reconnect: The food/technology metaphor in digital detoxing. First Monday, 22. doi:10.5210/fm.v22i6.7561
70.
TarafdarM.D’ArcyJ.TurelO.GuptaA. (2015). The dark side of information technology. MIT Sloan Management Review, 56, 61–70.
71.
ThatcherA.WretschkoG.FridjhonP. (2008). Online flow experiences, problematic Internet use and Internet procrastination. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2236–2254.
72.
TokunagaR. S. (2015). Perspectives on Internet addiction, problematic Internet use, and deficient self-regulation: Contributions of communication research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 39, 131–161.
73.
TokunagaR. S.RainsS. A. (2016). A review and meta-analysis examining conceptual and operational definitions of problematic Internet use. Human Communication Research, 42, 165–199.
74.
ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ. (2007). Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43, 267–277.
75.
Van Der SchuurW. A.BaumgartnerS. E.SumterS. R.ValkenburgP. M. (2015). The consequences of media multitasking for youth: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 204–215.
76.
Van DeursenA.Van DijkJ. (2014). Digital skills: Unlocking the information society. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
77.
Van DijkJ. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
78.
VohsK. D.HeathertonT. F. (2000). Self-regulatory failure: A resource-depletion approach. Psychological Science, 11, 249–254.
79.
WangJ. L.GaskinJ.RostD. H.GentileD. A. (2018). The reciprocal relationship between passive Social Networking Site (SNS) usage and users’ subjective well-being. Social Science Computer Review, 36, 511–522.
80.
WitteJ. C.MannonS. E. (2010). The Internet and social inequalities. New York, NY: Routledge.
81.
YellowleesP. M.MarksS. (2007). Problematic Internet use or Internet addiction?Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1447–1453.
82.
YeykelisL.CummingsJ. J.ReevesB. (2014). Multitasking on a computer: Arousal and the frequency, anticipation, and prediction of switching between media content on a computer. Journal of Communication, 64, 167–192.
83.
ZuckermanM. (2009). Sensation seeking. In LearyM. R.HoyleR. H. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 355–456). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
