New technologies raise fears in public discourse. In terms of digital media use and youth, the advice has been to monitor and limit access to minimize the negative impacts. However, this advice would also limit the positive impacts of digital media. One such positive impact is increased engagement in civic and political life. This article uses meta-analysis techniques to summarize the findings from 106 survey-based studies (965 coefficients) about youth, digital media use, and engagement in civic and political life. In this body of research, there is little evidence to suggest that digital media use is having dire impacts on youth’s engagement. We find that the positive impacts depend on directly political uses of digital media, such as blogging, reading online news, and online political discussion. These online activities have off-line consequences on participation, such as contacting officials, talking politics, volunteering, and protesting. We also find a very strong relationship between online political activities, such as joining political groups and signing petitions, with off-line political activities, which undermine claims of slacktivism among youth. Finally, while research generally assumes a causal flow from digital media to participation, the evidence for the alternative causal flow is strong and has very different implications on interventions designed to address youth’s levels of engagement in civic and political life.
BennettL. W. (2012). The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644, 20–39.
2.
BodeL.VragaE. K.BorahP.ShahD. V. (2014). A new space for political behavior: Political social networking and its democratic consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 414–429. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12048
3.
BoulianneS. (2009). Does internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26, 193–211. doi:10.1080/10584600902854363
4.
BoulianneS. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 524–538. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542
5.
BoulianneS. (2016). Online news, civic awareness, and engagement in civic and political life. New Media & Society, 18, 1840–1856. doi:10.1177/1461444815616222
6.
BoulianneS. (2019). Transforming the disengaged: Social media and youth in Canada. In LalancetteM.RaynauldV.CrandallE. (Eds.), What’s #trending in Canadian politics? Understanding transformations in power, media, and the public sphere. Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press.
7.
BureanT.BadescuG. (2014). Voices of discontent: Student protest participation in Romania. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 47, 385–397. doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2014.10.004
8.
CammaertsB.BruterM.BanajiS.HarrisonS.AnsteadN. (2014). The myth of youth apathy young Europeans’ critical attitudes toward democratic life. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 645–664. doi:10.1177/0002764213515992
9.
ChaeY.LeeS.KimY. (2018). Meta-analysis of the relationship between Internet use and political participation: Examining main and moderating effects. Asian Journal of Communication, 1–20. Online first. doi:10.1080/01292986.2018.1499121
10.
ChanM.ChenH. T.LeeF. L. F. (2016). Examining the roles of mobile and social media in political participation: A cross-national analysis of three Asian societies using a communication mediation approach. New Media & Society, 1–19. Online first. doi:10.1177/1461444816653190
11.
EkströmM.OlssonT.ShehataA. (2014). Spaces for public orientation? Longitudinal effects of Internet use in adolescence. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 168–183. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.862288
12.
EkstromM.OstmanJ. (2015). Information, interaction, and creative production: The effects of three forms of internet use on youth democratic engagement. Communication Research, 42, 796–818. doi:10.1177/0093650213476295
13.
EllisP. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
14.
FilsingerM.FreitagM. (2018). Internet use and volunteering: Relationships and differences across age and applications. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 1–11. Online first. doi:10.1007/s11266-018-0045-4
GrassoM. T. (2016). Generations, political participation and social change in Western Europe. New York, NY: Routledge.
17.
HarpD.BachmannI.Cantrell Rosas-MorenoT.LokeJ. (2010). Wave of hope: African American youth use media and engage more civically, politically than Whites. Howard Journal of Communications, 21, 224–246. doi:10.1080/10646175.2010.496662
JenkinsH.ItoM.boydD. (2016). Participatory culture in a networked era. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
20.
KahneJ.BowyerB. (2018). The political significance of social media activity and social networks. Political Communication, 35, 1–24. doi:10.1080/10584609.2018.1426662
21.
KahneJ.LeeN. J.FeezellJ. T. (2013). The civic and political significance of online participatory cultures among youth transitioning to adulthood. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 10, 1–20. doi:10.1080/19331681.2012.701109
22.
KahneJ.MiddaughE.EvansC. (2009). The civic potential of video games. Cambridge: MIT.
23.
KimY.RussoS.AmnaE. (2016). The longitudinal relation between online and offline political participation among youth at two different developmental stages. New Media & Society, 1–19. Online first. doi:10.1177/1461444815624181
24.
KruikemeierS.ShehataA. (2016). News media use and political engagement among adolescents: An analysis of virtuous circles using panel data. Political Communication, 34, 221–242.
25.
LeeN. J.ShahD. V.McLeodJ. M. (2013). Processes of political socialization: A communication mediation approach to youth civic engagement. Communication Research, 40, 669–697.
26.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
MaherT. V.EarlJ. (2017). Pathways to contemporary youth protest: The continuing relevance of family, friends, and school for youth micromobilization. In EarlJenniferRohlingerDeana A. (Eds.), Social movements and media (studies in media and communications) (pp. 55–87, Vol. 14). Bingley, England: Emerald.
28.
MartinA. J. (2012). Young people and politics: Political engagement in the Anglo-American democracies. New York, NY: Routledge.
29.
NorrisP. (2000). A virtuous circle: Political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
QuintelierE. (2008). Who is politically active: The athlete, the Scout member or the environmental activist? Young people, voluntary engagement and political participation. Acta Sociologica, 51, 355–370. doi:10.1177/0001699308097378
32.
QuintelierE.VissersS. (2008). The effect of internet use on political participation: An analysis of survey results for 16-year-olds in Belgium. Social Science Computer Review, 26, 411–427. doi:10.1177/0894439307312631
33.
RaynauldV.LalancetteM.Touring-KonebS. (2016). Social media and the 2012 Student strike. French Politics, 14(1), 1–29.
34.
ShahD.KwakN.HolbertR. L. (2001). “Connecting” and “disconnecting” with civic life: Patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital. Political Communication, 18, 141–162. doi:10.1080/105846001750322952
35.
ShahD. V.McLeodJ. M.LeeN. J. (2009). Communication competence as a foundation for civic competence: Processes of socialization into citizenship. Political Communication, 26, 102–117. doi:10.1080/10584600802710384
36.
ShahD.McLeodJ. M.YoonS. H. (2001). Communication, context, and community: An exploration of print, broadcast, and Internet influences. Communication Research, 28, 464–506. doi:10.1177/009365001028004005
37.
ShehataA.EkstromM.OlssonT. (2016). Developing self-actualizing and dutiful citizens: Testing the AC-DC model using panel data among adolescents. Communication Research, 43, 1141–1169. doi:10.1177/0093650215619988
38.
SkoricM.ZhuQ.GohQ.PangN. (2016). Social media and citizen engagement: A meta-analytic review. New Media & Society, 18, 1817–1839. doi:10.1177/1461444815616221
39.
SloamJ. (2016). Diversity and voice: The political participation of young people in the European Union. British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 18, 521–537. doi:10.1177/1369148116647176
TheocharisY. (2011a). The influence of postmaterialist orientations on young British people’s offline and online political participation. Representation, 47, 435–455. doi:10.1080/00344893.2011.611160
42.
TheocharisY. (2011b). Young people, political participation and online postmaterialism in Greece. New Media & Society, 13, 203–223. doi:10.1177/1461444810370733
43.
TheocharisY. (2012). Cuts, tweets, solidarity and mobilisation: How the internet shaped the student occupations. Parliamentary Affairs, 65, 162–194. doi:10.1093/pa/gsr049
44.
TheocharisY.LoweW. (2016). Does Facebook increase political participation? Evidence from a field experiment. Information Communication & Society, 19, 1465–1486. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1119871
45.
TheocharisY.QuintelierE. (2016). Stimulating citizenship or expanding entertainment? The effect of Facebook on adolescent participation. New Media & Society, 18, 817–836. doi:10.1177/1461444814549006
46.
TheocharisY.van DethJ.W. (2018). Political participation in a changing world: Conceptual and empirical challenges in the study of citizen engagement. New York, NY: Routledge.
47.
TownerT. (2013). All political participation is socially networked? New media and the 2012 Election. Social Science Computer Review, 31, 527–541. doi:10.1177/0894439313489656
48.
TwengeJ. M. (2017). iGen: Why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy—And completely unprepared for adulthood. New York, NY: Atria Books.
49.
van Der MeerT. W. G.van IngenE. J. (2009). Schools of democracy? Disentangling the relationship between civic participation and political action in 17 European countries. European Journal of Political Research, 48, 281–308. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00836.x
50.
van DethJ. W. (1998). Private groups and public life: Social participation and political involvement in representative democracies. London, England: Routledge.
51.
van IngenE.van der MeerT. (2016). Schools or pools of democracy? A longitudinal test of the relation between civic participation and political socialization. Political Behavior, 38, 83–103. doi:10.1007/s11109-015-9307-7
52.
VilhelmsonB.EllderE.ThulinE. (2017). What did we do when the Internet wasn’t around? Variation in free-time activities among three young-adult cohorts from 1990/1991, 2000/2001, and 2010/2011. New Media & Society, 20, 2898–2916. doi:10.1177/1461444817737296
53.
VissersS.StolleD. (2014). Spill-over effects between Facebook and on/offline political participation? Evidence from a two-wave panel study. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11, 259–275. doi:10.1080/19331681.2014.888383
54.
VromenA. (2007). Constructing Australian youth online: Empowered but dutiful citizens? In LoaderB.MerceaD. (Eds.), Social media and democracy: Innovations in participatory politics (pp. 190–206). New York, NY: Routledge.
55.
WattenbergM. (2008). Is voting for young people? With a postscript on citizen engagement. Princeton, NJ: Pearson Education.
56.
XenosM.VromenA.LoaderB. D. (2014). The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 151–167. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.871318
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
