While college students traditionally exhibit low levels of political participation and interest in politics, they are more likely to engage in some forms of political expression than their elders. Their greater familiarity with online forms of political expression and engagement potentially lowers their barriers for political involvement. In turn, this potentially draws more young adults into the political process. The authors compare the precursors of expressive forms of online political engagement to those of talking to someone off-line and trying to persuade them to vote for or against a candidate or party among college students. They find that both activities are positively connected with politically oriented activity on social media as well as the frequency with which one reads blogs. They also discover that the mechanisms that explain online political expression are both similar to and different from those that explain off-line attempts at persuasion in several key ways.
AlbericiA. I.MilesiP. (2016). Online discussion, politicized identity, and collective action. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 19, 43–59.
2.
ArmstrongC. L.McAdamsM. J. (2011). Blogging the time away? Young adults’ motivations for blog use. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 19, 113–128.
3.
BaumM. A. (2005). Talking the vote: Why presidential candidates hit the talk show circuit. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 213–234.
4.
BestS. J.KruegerB. S. (2005). Analyzing the representativeness of internet political participation. Political Behavior, 27, 183–216.
5.
BynnerJ.AshfordS. (1994). Politics and participation: Some antecedents of young people’s attitudes to the political system and political activity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 223–236.
6.
CantijochM.CuttsD.GibsonR. (2016). Moving slowly up the ladder of political engagement: A ‘spill-over’ model of internet participation. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18, 26–48.
7.
ConoverP. J.FeldmanS. (1989). Candidate perception in an ambiguous world: Campaigns, cues, and inference processes. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 912–940.
8.
ConroyM.FeezellJ. T.GuerreroM. (2012). Facebook and political engagement: A study of online political group membership and offline political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1535–1546.
9.
DavisR. H. (2009). Typing politics: The role of blogs in American politics. New York City, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.
Delli CarpiniM. X.CookF. L.JacobsL. R. (2004). Public deliberations, discursive participation and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 315–344.
EkdaleB.NamkoongK.FungT. K. F.PerlmutterD. D. (2010). Why blog? (Then and now): Exploring the motivations for blogging by popular American political bloggers. New Media and Society, 12, 217–234.
14.
GainousJ.WagnerK. M. (2013). Tweeting to power: The social media revolution in American politics. New York City, NY: Oxford University Press.
15.
GelmanA. (2007). Struggles with survey weighting and regression modeling. Statistical Science, 22, 153–164.
16.
GibsonR.CantijochM. (2013). Conceptualizing and measuring political participation in the age of the internet: Is online political engagement really different to offline?Journal of Politics, 75, 701–716.
17.
Gil de ZunigaH.JungN.ValenzuelaS. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 319–336.
18.
Gil de ZunigaH.Puig-I-AbrilE.RojasH. (2009). Weblogs, traditional sources online and political participation: An assessment of how the internet is changing the political environment. New Media & Society, 11, 553–574.
19.
HargittaiE.GalloJ.KaneM. (2008). Cross-ideological discussion among conservative and liberal bloggers. Public Choice, 134, 67–86.
20.
HillygusD. S. (2005). Campaign effects and the dynamics of turnout intention in election 2000. The Journal of Politics, 67, 50–68.
21.
JohnsonT. J.KayeB. K. (2004). Wag the blog: How reliance on traditional media and the internet influence credibility perceptions of weblogs among blog users. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 622–642.
22.
JonesS.FoxS. (2009). Generations Online in 2009. Data Memo. January 28. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
23.
KenskiK.StroudN. J. (2006). Connections between internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 50, 173–192.
24.
KerbelM. R.BloomJ. D. (2005). Blog for America and civic involvement. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10, 3–27.
25.
KimY.ChenH.-T. (2016). Social media and online political participation: The mediating role of exposure to cross-cutting and like-minded perspectives. Telematics and Informatics, 33, 320–330.
26.
KingG.TomzM.WittenbergJ. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. The American Journal of Political Science, 44, 341–355.
27.
KushinM. J.YamamotoM. (2010). Did social media really matter? College students’ use of online media and political decision making in the 2008 election. Mass Communication and Society, 13, 608–630.
28.
LawrenceE.SidesJ.FarrellH. (2010). Self-segregation or deliberation? Blog readership, participation, and polarization in American politics. Perspectives on Politics, 8, 141–157.
29.
LenhartA.FoxS. (2006). Bloggers: A portrait of the internet’s new storytellers. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project Data Memo, July 19.
30.
LewisM. (2011). An analysis of the relationship between political blog reading, online political activity, and voting during the 2008 presidential campaign. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 6, 11–28.
31.
MattesK.RedlawskD. P. (2015). The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32.
MillerW. E.ShanksJ. M. (1996). The new American voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
MoffettK. W.RiceL. L. (2016). Web 2.0 and the political mobilization of college students. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
PriorM. (2005). News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 577–592.
39.
RiceL. L. (2005). Campaigns matter: Advertising effects on potential voters in the 2000 presidential primary. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego, CA.
40.
RiceL. L.MoffettK. W.MadupalliR. (2013). Campaign-related social networking and the political participation of college students. Social Science Computer Review, 31, 257–279.
41.
RogersT.GreenD. P.TernovskiJ.YoungC. F. (2017). Social pressure and voting: A field experiment conducted in a high-salience election. Electoral Studies, 26, 87–100.
42.
RosenstoneS. J.HansenJ. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York, NY: Longman.
43.
SchlozmanK. L.VerbaS.BradyH. E. (2012). The unheavenly chorus: Unequal political voice and the broken promise of American democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
ShahD. V.ChoJ.EvelandW. P.KwaN. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32, 531–565.
45.
SobierajS.BerryJ. M. (2011). From incivility to outrage: Political discourse in blogs, talk radio, and cable news. Political Communication, 28, 19–41.
TownerT. L. (2013). All political participation is socially networked?: New media and the 2012 election. Social Science Computer Review, 31, 527–541.
48.
VerbaS.NieN. H. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
49.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50.
WallstenK. (2007). Agenda setting and the blogosphere: An analysis of the relationship between mainstream media and political blogs. Review of Policy Research, 24, 567–587.
51.
WinshipC.RadbillL. (1994). Sampling weights and regression analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 23, 230–257.
52.
XenosM.VromenA.LoaderB. D. (2014). The great equalizer? Patterns of social media and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication and Society, 17, 151–167.
53.
ZukinC.KeeterS.AndolinaM.JenkinsJ.Delli CarpiniM. X. (2006). A new engagement? Political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
