A survey of anthropology projects on the web finds little overall evolution of the field’s scholarly products to capitalize on the medium’s potential. However, a few of the most recent innovations appear to provide a glimpse of changes soon to come. Several new forms of nonrefereed scholarship have appeared, and an important theme running through them is the blurring of conventional boundaries. Within the refereed literature, few journals have ventured beyond the delivery of facsimile journal pages in portable document format (PDF) files. An important exception is the just-published online version of Current Anthropology, which offers numerous enhancements possible only through the web.
Ciolek, T. M. (1996). Today’s WWWŠTomorrow’s MMM? The specter of multi-media mediocrity. Computer, 29, 106-108 [Online]. Available: http://computer.org/computer/co1996/r1toc.htm
2.
Fox, R. G. (2000). Editorial: A new CA+ treatment. Current Anthropology, 41(1).
3.
Harnad, S. (1990). Scholarly skywriting and the prepublication continuum of scientific inquiry. Psychological Science, 1, 342-343 [Online]. Available: ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/harnad92.interactivpub
4.
Owens, E. (1999, April). Strategies (and tactics) for electronic archiving. Presentation at the Fifth Annual National Electronic Publishing Seminar, Library of Congress.
5.
Rushton, J. P. (1999). Race: Evolution and behavior (special abridged ed.). Somerset, NJ: Transaction.
6.
Sheets, P. (n.d.). Before the eruption: Household and village life at the Ceren archaeological site in El Salvador. Manuscript under review.
7.
Stoffle, R., Loendorf, L., Austin, D., Halmo, D., & Bulletts, A. (2000). Ghost dancing the Grand Canyon: Southern Paiute rock art, ceremony, and cultural landscapes. Current Anthropology, 41(1), 11-38.
8.
Stone, G. D. (1998). Anthropology: Implications for form and content of web-based scholarship. Social Science Computer Review, 16, 4-15 [Online]. Available: http://artsci.wustl.edu/%7Eanthro/research/sscr.html
