This research presents a case study of the first-time experience of the instructor-researcher in teaching an online class. Through thematic analysis and grounded metaphor, evolution was identified as the metaphor used to illuminate the emerging themes in creating a narrative. Advantageous and less-than-advantageous characteristics of online instruction were identified. The advantageous characteristics identified were (a) students actively involved in their own education, assessing their own learning and seeking additional information; (b) students constructing knowledge; (c) measured responses by students; (d) an increase in the quality of students work because of open access to peers' work; and (e) students' increases in technological confidence. The less-than-advantageous characteristics found were (a) concerns for clarity, (b) concerns for loss of personal or intimate interactions, and (c) misinterpretations resulting from communicating online. It is hoped that this work will assist the in understanding and the continued investigation of online instruction.
Aronson, J. (1994). A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. Qualitative Report, 2(1). Retrieved November 29, 2005, from www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/BackIssues/QR2-1/aronson.html
2.
Cavanaugh, J. (2005). Teaching online: A time comparison. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(1), 1-1.
3.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser(pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
Dexter, S. (n.d.). Developing & using grounded metaphor in case studies. Retrieved December 7, 2005, from www.coe.uga.edu/%20quig/proceedings/Quig98_Proceedings/dexter.html
5.
DiPardo, A. (2004). Learning for our lives: Sustaining the wise child in an era of high-stakes testing. English Leadership Quarterly, 26(3), 2-6.
6.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
7.
Eisner, E. W. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York: Macmillan.
8.
Freebody, P. (2003). Qualitative research in education: Interaction and practice. London: Sage.
9.
Glahn, R., & Gen, R. (2002). Progenies in education: The evolution of online teaching. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 26(10), 777-785.
10.
Maston, H. (2006, July). The evolution of distance education: 2.400 years in the next 50 minutes. Presentation at the University of California College Prep Online (UCCP) Online Teaching and Learning Institute, Santa Cruz, CA.
11.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
13.
National Research Council. (2000). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14.
No Child Left Behind Act, P.L.107-110 (2001).
15.
Nye, K. (2005). What all teachers hope for. Education Digest, 70(8), 4-5.
16.
Rezits, J. (2002). Cherished tradition. American Music Teacher, 52(3), 34-38.
17.
Skyler, A., Higgins, K., & Boone, R. (2005). Distance education: An exploration of alternative methods and types of instructional media in teacher education. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(3), 25-33.
18.
Smith, R. (1992). Elements of ecology (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
19.
Steinweg, S., Davis, M., & Thomson, W. (2005). A comparison of traditional and online instruction in an introduction to special education course. Teacher Education and Special Education, 28(1), 62-73.
20.
Stephen, V., & Barford, J. (2005). A journey through cyberspace: Technology and course adaptation. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 71(4), 47-52.
21.
Summers, J., Waigandt, A., & Whittaker, T. (2005). A comparison of student achievement and satisfaction in an online versus a traditional face-to-face statistics class. Innovative Higher Education, 29(3), 233-250.
22.
Verdi, M., & Johnson, J. (2005). Teaching educational psychology in an online environment. Clearing House, 78(5), 235-238.
23.
Vonderwell, S., & Turner, S. (2005). Active learning and pre-service teachers' experiences in an online course: A case study. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(1), 65-84.
24.
Weedman, J. (1999). Conversation and community: The potential of electronic conferences for creating intellectual proximity in distributed learning environments. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(10), 907-928.
25.
Weiner, J. (1994). The beak of the finch. New York: Vintage.
26.
Weld, J. (2002). Learner-centered teaching. In R. W. Bybee (Ed.), Learning science and the science of learning (pp. 77-84). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
27.
What makes an exemplary course? (2003). Distance Education Report, 7(20), 5-6.
28.
Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice?Science Education, 87(1), 112-143.
29.
Wyatt, G. (2005). Satisfaction, academic rigor and interaction: Perceptions of online instruction. Online Instruction, 125(3), 460-468.
30.
Yager, R. E. (1997). Science education a science?Electronic Journal of Science Education, Retrieved November 27, 2005, from http://unr.edu/homepage/jcannon/ejse/yager.html
