Engaging in early and ongoing self-reflection during interpretive phenomenological research is critical for ensuring trustworthiness or rigor. However, the lack of guidelines and clarity about the role of self-reflection in this methodology creates both theoretical and procedural confusion. The purpose of this article is to describe key philosophical underpinnings, characteristics, and hallmarks of the process of self-reflection in interpretive phenomenological investigation and to provide a list of guidelines that facilitate this process. Excerpts from an interpretive phenomenological study are used to illustrate characteristics of quality self-reflection. The guidelines are intended to be particularly beneficial for novice researchers who may find self-reflective writing to be daunting and unclear. Facilitating use of self-reflection may strengthen both the interpretive phenomenological body of work as well as that of all qualitative research.
BevanM. T. (2014). A method of phenomenological interviewing. Qualitative Health Research, 24(1), 136-144.
2.
CarperB. A. (2012). Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. In ReedP. G.Crawford ShearerN. B. (Eds.), Perspectives on nursing theory (pp. 200-206). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. (Originally published 1978)
3.
ClancyM. (2013). Is reflexivity the key to minimizing problems of interpretation in phenomenological research?Nurse Researcher, 20(6), 12-16.
4.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
5.
CrottyM. (1996). Phenomenology and nursing research. South Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Churchhill Livingstone.
6.
de WittL.PloegJ. (2006). Critical appraisal of rigour in interpretive phenomenological nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 55(2), 215-229.
7.
GearingR. E. (2004). Bracketing in research: A typology. Qualitative Health Research, 14(10), 1429-1452.
8.
HeideggerM. (2006). Mindfulness (EmadP.KalaryT., Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group. (Original work published 1997)
9.
JohnsC. (1995). The value of reflective practice for nursing. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 4, 23-30.
10.
JohnsonM. E. (2000). Heidegger and meaning: Implications for phenomenological research. Nursing Philosophy, 1, 134-146.
11.
JootunD.McGheeG.MarlandG. R. (2009). Reflexivity: Promoting rigour in qualitative research. Nursing Standard, 23(23), 42-46
12.
KochT. (1995). Interpretive approaches in nursing research: The influence of Husserl and Heidegger. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 21(5), 827-836.
13.
KochT.HarringtonA. (1988). Reconceptualizing rigour: The case for reflexivity. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(4), 882-889.
14.
LavertyS. M. (2003). Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of historical and methodological considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(3), 1-29.
15.
Merriam-Webster’s collegiate dictionary (11th ed.). (2009). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster, Inc.
16.
MunhallP. (2012). Nursing research: A qualitative perspective (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
17.
ParseR. R.CoyneA. B.SmithM. J. (1985). Nursing research: Qualitative methods. Bowie, MD: Brady Communications Company, Inc.
18.
PillowW. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175-196.
19.
QuinnJ. (2014). The integrated nurse: Wholeness, self-discovery, and self-care. In KreitzerM. J.KoithanM. (Eds.), Integrative nursing (pp. 17-32). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
20.
ReinersG. M. (2012). Understanding the differences between Husserl’s (descriptive) and Heidegger’s (interpretive) phenomenological research. Journal of Nursing Care, 1(5), 1-3.
21.
RodgersB. L. (2005). Developing nursing knowledge: Philosophical traditions and influences. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
22.
TuohyD.CooneyA.DowlingM.MurphyK.SixmithJ. (2013). An overview of interpretive phenomenology as a research methodology. Nurse Researcher, 20(6), 17-20.
23.
van ManenM. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
van ManenM. (2014). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, Inc.
