In this this essay, the author addresses the close connection between mixed methods research and nursing practice. If the assertion that research and practice are parallel processes is accepted, then nursing practice may be considered “invisible mixed methods research,” in that almost every encounter between a nurse and a patient involves collection and integration of qualitative (word) and quantitative (number) information that actually is single-case mixed methods research.
ChinnP. L.KramerM. K. (2011). Integrated theory and knowledge development in nursing (8th ed.). St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier.
2.
CreswellJ. W. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
3.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
4.
FawcettJ. (2013). Thoughts about multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary research. Nursing Science Quarterly, 26, 376-379.
5.
FawcettJ. (2014). Thoughts about collaboration—or is it capitulation?Nursing Science Quarterly, 27, 260-261.
6.
FawcettJ.GarityJ. (2009). Evaluating research for evidence-based nursing practice. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
7.
FlorczakK. L. (2014). Purists need not apply: The case for pragmatism in mixed methods research. Nursing Science Quarterly, 27, 278-282.
8.
FlorczakK. L.PoradziszM.KostovichC. (2104). Traditional or translational research for nursing: More PhDs please. Nursing Science Quarterly, 27, 195-200.
9.
KaganP. N.SmithM. C.CowlingW. R.IIIChinnP. L. (2009). A nursing manifesto: An emancipatory call for knowledge development, conscience, and praxis. Nursing Philosophy, 11, 67–84.
10.
NewmanM. A. (2008). Transforming practice: The difference that nursing makes. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis
11.
RolfeG. (2006). Nursing praxis and the science of the unique. Nursing Science Quarterly, 19, 39-43.
