Increased pressure for evidence-based practice in nursing necessitates that researchers use effective approaches. Mixed-methods research (MMR) has potential to improve the knowledge and implementation of evidence-based nursing (EBN) by generating outcome-based and contextually-focused evidence.
Aims
To identify methodological trends in how MMR is used in EBN research.
Methods
Searches were completed in PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar using the terms “nursing”, “mixed-methods”, and “evidence-based”. Seventy-two articles using MMR to address EBN and published 2000–2021 were reviewed across content themes and methodological domains of the Socio-Ecological Framework for MMR.
Results
Mixed-methods research has been used to study how EBN strategies are perceived, developed and assessed, and implemented or evaluated. A few studies provided an MMR definition reflecting the methods perspective, and the dominant MMR rationale was gaining a comprehensive understanding of the issue. The leading design was concurrent, and half of studies intersected MMR with evaluation, action/participatory, and/or case-study approaches. Research quality was primarily assessed using criteria specific to quantitative and qualitative approaches.
Conclusions
Mixed-methods research has great potential to enhance EBN research by generating more clinically useful findings and helping nurses understand how to identify and implement the best available research evidence in practice.
AilingerRL (2003) Contributions of qualitative research to evidence-based practice in nursing. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem11(3): 275–279.
2.
AdiewerePGillisRBImran JiwaniS, et al. (2018) A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient education in preventing and reducing the incidence or recurrence of adult diabetes foot ulcers (DFU). Heliyon4(5): e00614.
3.
AmacherAENastIZindelB, et al. (2016) Experiences of general practitioners, home care nurses, physiotherapists and seniors involved in a multidisciplinary home-based fall prevention programme: A mixed method study. BMC Health Services Research16.
4.
American Nurses Association (2015) Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice. 3rd ed.Silver Spring, MD: Nursesbooks.org.
5.
BarbourRS (2000) The role of qualitative research in broadening the ‘evidence base’ for clinical practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice6(2): 155–163.
6.
BlackTABalneavesGLGarossinoHC, et al. (2015) Promoting evidence-based practice through a research training program for point-of-care clinicians. The Journal of Nursing Administration45(1): 14–20.
7.
BlackAAliSBaumbuschJ, et al. (2019) Practice-based nursing research: evaluation of clinical and professional impacts from a research training programme. Journal of Clinical Nursing28(13–14), 2681–2687.
8.
BreimaierHEHalfensRJGLohrmannC, et al. (2015) Effectiveness of multifaceted and tailored strategies to implement a fall-prevention guideline into acute care nursing practice: a before-and-after, mixed-method study using a participatory action research approach. BMC Nursing14, 18(1).
9.
BressanVBagnascoAAleoG, et al. (2017) Mixed-methods research in nursing – a critical review. Journal of Clinical Nursing26(19–20): 2878–2890.
10.
CamargoFCIwamotoHHGalvãoCM, et al. (2018) Competences and barriers for the evidence-based practice in nursing: an integrative review. Revista brasileira de enfermagem71(4): 2030–2038.
CurryLNunez-SmithM (2015) Mixed Methods in Health Sciences Research: A Practical Primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
CurryLAO’CathainAPlano ClarkVL, et al. (2012) The role of group dynamics in mixed methods health sciences research teams. Journal of Mixed Methods Research6(1) 5–20.
14.
DaleSLeviCWardJ, et al. (2015) Barriers and enablers to implementing clinical treatment protocols for fever, hyperglycaemia, and swallowing dysfunction in the Quality in Acute Stroke Care (QASC) Project‐ A mixed methods study. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing12(1): 41–50.
15.
De La Rue-EvansLNesbittKOkaRK. (2013) Sleep hygiene program implementation in patients with traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Nursing38(1): 2–10.
16.
EatonLHMeinsARMitchellPH, et al. (2015) Evidence-based practice beliefs and behaviors of nurses providing cancer pain management: A mixed-methods approach. Oncology Nursing Forum42(2): 165–173.
17.
ErsekMJablonskiA. (2014) A mixed-methods approach to investigating the adoption of evidence-based pain practices in nursing homes. Journal of Gerontological Nursing40(7): 52–60.
18.
FlemmingK (2007) The knowledge base for evidence-based nursing: a role for mixed methods research?Advances in Nursing Science30(1): 41–51.
19.
GiffordWADaviesBLGrahamID, et al. (2013) Developing leadership capacity for guideline use: A pilot cluster randomized control trial. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing10(1): 51–65.
20.
GorsuchCPFGallagher FordLKoshy ThomasB, et al. (2020) Impact of a formal educational skill-building program based on the ARCC model to enhance evidence-based practice competency in nurse teams. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing17(4): 258–268.
HarperMGGallagher-FordLWarrenJI, et al. (2017) Evidence-based practice and U.S. healthcare outcomes: findings from a national survey with nursing professional development practitioners. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development33(4): 170–179.
23.
HorwoodJBranganEManleyP, et al. (2020) Management of chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections diagnosed in primary care using a centralised nurse-led telephone-based service: mixed methods evaluation. BMC Family Practice21(1): 265.
24.
IngersollGL (2000) Evidence-based nursing: what it is and what it isn’t. Nursing Outlook48(4): 151–152.
25.
IvankovaNVHerbeyIIRousselLA, et al. (2018) Theory and practice of using mixed methods in translational research: a cross-disciplinary perspective. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches10: 356–372.
26.
IvankovaNVKawamuraY (2010) Emerging trends in the utilization of integrated designs in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. In: TashakkoriATeddlieC (eds). SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 581–612. Available at:http://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193 (accessed 27 Oct 2021).
27.
KiddLTwycrossA (2019) EBN perspectives: nursing issues. Evidence Based Nursing22(4): 101–104.
28.
Laibhen-ParkesNKimbleLPMelnykBM, et al. (2018) An adaptation of the original Fresno test to measure evidence-based practice competence in pediatric bedside nurses. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing15(3): 230–240.
29.
LamCKSchubertC (2019) Evidence-Based Practice Competence in Nursing Students: An Exploratory Study With Important Implications for Educators. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing16(2): 161–168.
30.
LinFMarshallAPGillespieB, et al. (2020) Evaluating the implementation of a multi-component intervention to prevent surgical site infection and promote evidence-based practice. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing17(3): 193–201.
31.
LesserJ (2017) Guest editorial. Journal of Research in Nursing, 22(4): 261–263.
32.
MathiesonAGrandeGLukerK, et al. (2018) Strategies, facilitators and barriers to implementation of evidence-based practice in community nursing: a systematic mixed-studies review and qualitative synthesis. Primary Health Care Research and Development20: e6-e6.
33.
MelnykBMGallagher-FordLZellefrowC, et al. (2018) The first U.S. study on nurses’ evidence-based practice competencies indicates major deficits that threaten healthcare quality, safety, and patient outcomes. Worldviews on Evidence Based Nursing15(1): 16–25.
34.
MelnykBMFineout-OverholtE (2019) Critically appraising qualitative evidence for clinical decision making. In: MelnykBMFineout-OverholtE (eds) Evidence-based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice. 4th ed.. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer, 192.
35.
MillerLBBrennan-CookJTurnerB, et al. (2018) Utilizing an evidence-based alcohol screening tool for identification of alcohol misuse. Journal of Addictions Nursing29(2): 90–95.
36.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al. (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Plos Medicine6(7): e1000097.
37.
NobleHShortenA (2018) Nursing issues. Evidence Based Nursing21(1): 4–6.
38.
NordsteienAHorntvedtMTSyseJ, et al. (2017) Use of research in undergraduate nursing students’ theses: a mixed methods study. Nurse Education Today56: 23–28.
39.
O’BrienRMoritzPLuckeyD, et al. (2012) Mixed methods analysis of participant attrition in the nurse-family partnership. Prevention Science13(3): 219–228.
40.
ParsonsVJuszczykDGilworthG, et al. (2021) A case management occupational health model to facilitate earlier return to work of NHS staff with common mental health disorders: a feasibility study. Health Technology Assessment25(12): 1–94.
41.
RussellGLaneRParkerS, et al. (2019) Preventive evidence into practice: What factors matter in a facilitation intervention to prevent vascular disease in family practice? BMC Family Practice20(1): 113.
42.
Plano ClarkVIvankovaN (2016) Mixed Methods Research: A Guide to the Field. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
43.
SackettDLRosenbergWMCGrayJAM, et al. (1996) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal312: 71–72.
44.
ShortenASmithJ (2017) Mixed methods research: expanding the evidence base. Evidence Based Nursing20(3): 74–75.
45.
Storm-VerslootMNKnopsAMUbbinkDT, et al. (2012) Long-term adherence to a local guideline on postoperative body temperature measurement: mixed methods analysis. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice18(4): 841–847.
46.
StrandbergECatrineEldh AForsmanH, et al. (2014) The concept of research utilization as understood by Swedish nurses: Demarcations of instrumental, conceptual, and persuasive research utilization. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing11(1): 55–64.
47.
TashakkoriAJohnsonRBTeddlieC (2021) Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
48.
WisdomJPCavaleriMAOnwuegbuzieAJ, et al. (2012) Methodological reporting in qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods health services research articles. Health Services Research47(2): 721–745.
49.
YounasAPedersenMTayabenJL, et al. (2019) Review of mixed-methods research in nursing. Nursing Research68(6): 464–472.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
