New organizational members can be an essential source to work teams. Yet, it is unclear whether teams can leverage newcomers’ distinct backgrounds, knowledge, and expertise through communicative processes to improve team effectiveness. This study develops and tests a theoretical account of the efficacy of newcomer communicative behavior for boosting team effectiveness. In doing so, this study specified the circumstances in which a positive relationship between the two is likely to occur. Results (N =160 teams) showed that newcomer voices’ positive influence on post-entry team performance was contingent upon individual-, team-, and organization-level boundary conditions, including age dissimilarity, team adaptability, and competitive intensity.
ArgyrisC.SchönD. A. (1978). Organizational learning. Addison-Wesley.
2.
AshforthB. E.SlussD. M.SaksA. M. (2007). Socialization tactics, proactive behavior, and newcomer learning: Integrating socialization models. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70(3), 447–462. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.02.001
3.
AveryD. R.WangM.VolponeS. D.ZhouL. (2013). Different strokes for different folks: The impact of se dissimilarity in the environment-performance relationship. Personnel Psychology, 66(3), 757–784. http://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12032
4.
BargeJ. K.SchlueterD. W. (2004). Memorable messages and newcomer socialization. Western Journal of Communication, 68(3), 233–256. http://doi.org/10.1080/10570310409374800
5.
BauerT. N.ErdoganB. (2011). Organizational socialization: The effective onboarding of new employees. In ZedeckS. (ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Vol. 3. Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization (pp. 51–64). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12171-002
6.
BhaveD. P.KramerA.GlombT. M. (2010). Work–family conflict in work groups: Social information processing, support, and demographic dissimilarity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 145–158. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0017885
7.
BiselR. S.AdameE. A. (2019). Encouraging upward ethical dissent in organizations: The role of deference to embodied expertise. Management Communication Quarterly, 33(2), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318918811949
8.
BiselR. S.MessersmithA. S.KelleyK. M. (2012). Supervisor-subordinate communication: Hierarchical mum effect meets organizational learning. The Journal of Business Communication, 49(2), 128–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943612436972
9.
BoteroI. C.Van DyneL. (2009). Employee voice behavior: Interactive effects of LMX and power distance in the United States and Colombia. Management Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 84–104. http://doi.org/10.1177/0893318909335415
10.
BoyrazM. (2019). Faultlines as the “earth’s crust”: The role of team identification, communication climate, and subjective perceptions of subgroups for global team satisfaction and innovation. Management Communication Quarterly, 33(4), 581–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318919860799
11.
BurkeC. S.StaglK. C.SalasE.PierceL.KendallD. (2006). Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1189–1207. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1189
12.
ChattopadhyayP. (1999). Beyond direct and symmetrical effects: The influence of demographic dissimilarity on organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 42(3), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.2307/256919
13.
ChattopadhyayP.FinnC.AshkanasyN. M. (2010). Affective responses to professional dissimilarity: A matter of status. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 808–826. http://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.52814603
14.
ChoiH.ThompsonL. (2005). Old wine in a new bottle: Impact of membership change on group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98(2), 121–132. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.06.003
15.
DaileyS. L. (2016). What happens before full-time employment? Internships as a mechanism of anticipatory socialization. Western Journal of Communication, 80(4), 453–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2016.1159727
16.
DokkoG.WilkS. L.RothbardN. P. (2009). Unpacking prior experience: How career history affects job performance. Organization Science, 20(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0357
17.
DomagalskiT. A.SteelmanL. A. (2007). The impact of gender and organizational status on workplace anger expression. Management Communication Quarterly, 20(3), 297–315, https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318906295681
18.
EdmondsonA. C. (2003). Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1419–1452. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00386
19.
EdmondsonA. C.BohmerR. M.PisanoG. P. (2001). Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 685–716. http://doi.org/10.2307/3094828
20.
EdmondsonA. C.DillonJ. R.RoloffK. S. (2007). Three perspectives on team learning. Academy of Management Annals1(1), 269–314. http://doi.org/10.5465/078559811
21.
EdwardsJ. R. (1994). The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58(1), 51–100. http://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1029
22.
EllisA. M.BauerT. N.ErdoganB. (2014). New employee organizational socialization. In GrusecJ. E.HastingsP. D. (eds.) Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 301–311). Guilford.
23.
FinkelsteinL. M.KulasJ. T.DagesK. D. (2003). Age differences in proactive newcomer socialization strategies in two populations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(4), 473–502. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023400201387
24.
FlanaginA. J.WaldeckJ. H. (2004). Technology use and organizational newcomer socialization. Journal of Business Communication, 41(2), 137–165. http://doi.org/10.1177/0021943604263290
25.
FreseM.FayD. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-3085(01)23005-6
26.
GailliardB. M.MyersK. K.SeiboldD. R. (2010). Organizational assimilation: A multidimensional reconceptualization and measure. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(4), 552–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318910374933
27.
GarnerJ. T. (2015). Open doors and iron cages: Management responses to employee dissent. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(1), 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488414525466
28.
GersickC. J.HackmanJ. R. (1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47(1), 65–97. http://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(90)90047-d
29.
GibsonC. B.SaxtonT. (2005). Thinking outside the black box: Outcomes of team decisions with third-party intervention. Small Group Research, 36(2), 208–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496404270376
GrantA. M.PatilS. (2012). Challenging the norm of self-interest: Minority influence and transitions to helping norms in work units. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 547–568. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0437
32.
GuoY. (2019). ‘Let our emotions tell the story’: An exploration of emotion management in Chinese proactive workgroup socialization. Human Relations, 72(7), 1187–1208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718796154
33.
HarrisonD. A.KleinK. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586096
34.
HartZ. P. (2012). Message content and sources during organizational socialization. Journal of Business Communication, 49(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943612446731
35.
HartZ. P.MillerV. D. (2005). Context and message content during organizational socialization: A research note. Human Communication Research, 31(2), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2005.tb00873.x
36.
HeissS. N.CarmackH. J. (2012). Knock, knock; who’s there? Making sense of organizational entrance through humor. Management Communication Quarterly, 26(1), 106–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318911414914
37.
HornseyM. J.GriceT.JettenJ.PaulsenN.CallanV. (2007). Group-directed criticisms and recommendations for change: Why newcomers arouse more resistance than old-timers. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(7), 1036–1048. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207301029
HudsonD. C.JablinF. M. (1992, May). Newcomer information-giving during organizational entry: Conceptualization and the development of a message categorization scheme [Paper Presentation]. In International Communication Association Annual Meeting, Miami, FL.
40.
JablinF. M. (2001). Organizational entry, assimilation, and disengagement/exit. In JablinF. M.PutnamL. L. (eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 679–740). Sage.
41.
Kammeyer-MuellerJ.WanbergC.RubensteinA.SongZ. (2013). Support, undermining, and newcomer socialization: Fitting in during the first 90 days. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 1104–1124. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0791
42.
KaneA. A.ArgoteL.LevineJ. M. (2005). Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.09.002
43.
KassingJ. W. (2011). Dissent in organizations. Polity.
44.
KatzR.AllenT. J. (2007). Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D project groups. R&D Management, 12(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1982.tb00478.x
KimH. (2018). Differential impacts of functional, geographical, and hierarchical diversity on knowledge sharing in the midst of organizational change. Management Communication Quarterly, 32(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318917728340
48.
KimH.KiuraM. (2020). The influences of social status and organizational justice on employee voice: A case of customer care workers. International Journal of Business Communication. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488420969776
49.
KimH.LeachR. (2020). The role of digitally-enabled employee voice in fostering positive change and affective commitment in centralized organizations, Communication Monographs, 87(4), 425–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2020.1745859
KozlowskiS. W. J.BellB. S. (2008). Team learning, development, and adaptation. In SessaV. I.LondonM. (eds.) Work group learning: Understanding, improving and assessing how groups learn in organizations (pp. 15–44). Taylor & Francis.
52.
KozlowskiS. W. J.BellB. S. (2012). Work groups and teams in organizations. In WeinerI. B. (eds.), Handbook of psychology (pp. 333–375). Wiley.
53.
KozlowskiS. W. J.ChaoG. T.JensenJ. M. (2010). Building an infrastructure for organizational learning: A multilevel approach. In KozlowskiS. W. J.SalasE. (eds.) Learning, training, and development in organizations (pp. 363–403). Taylor & Francis.
54.
KozlowskiS. W. J.GullyS. M.NasonE. R.SmithE. M. (1999). Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In CampbellJ. P.IlgenD. R.PulakosE. D. (eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development (pp. 240–292). Jossey-Bass.
55.
KozlowskiS. W.BellB. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 12, (pp. 333-375). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
56.
KramerM. W. (2011). Toward a communication odel for the socialization of voluntary members. Communication Monographs, 78(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2011.564640
57.
KramerM. W.LeeS. K.GuoY. (2019). Using communication technology to manage uncertainty during organizational assimilation: Information-seeking and information-giving. Western Journal of Communication, 83(3), 304–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2018.1518538
58.
KramerM. W.MillerV. D. (1999). A response to criticisms of organizational socialization research: In support of contemporary conceptualizations of organizational assimilation. Communication Monographs, 66(4), 358–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759909376485
59.
KramerM. W.MillerV. D. (2013). Socialization and assimilation: Theories, processes, and outcomes. In PutnamL. L.MumbyD. K. (eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 525–547). Sage.
60.
KuglerK. G.ReifJ. A. M.KaschnerT.BrodbeckF. C. (2018). Gender differences in the initiation of negotiations: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 144(2), 198–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000135
61.
KurtulusF. A. (2011). What types of diversity benefit workers? Empirical evidence on the effects of co-worker dissimilarity on the performance of employees. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 50(4), 678–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232x.2011.00657.x
62.
LePineJ. A. (2003). Team adaptation and postchange performance: Effects of team composition in terms of members’ cognitive ability and personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.27
63.
LePineJ. A. (2005). Adaptation of teams in response to unforeseen change: Effects of goal difficulty and team composition in terms of cognitive ability and goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1153–1167. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1153
64.
LevineJ. M.ChoiH. S.MorelandR. L. (2003). Newcomer innovation in work teams. In PaulusP. B.NijstadB. A. (eds.) Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 202–224). Oxford University Press.
65.
LichtenthalerU. (2009). Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity of organizational learning processes. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 822–846. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.43670902
66.
ManataB.MillerV. D.DeAngelisB. N.Esther PaikJ. (2016). Newcomer socialization research: The importance and application of multilevel theory and communication. Annals of the International Communication Association, 40(1), 307–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2015.11735264
67.
MathieuJ. E.GilsonL. L.RuddyT. M. (2006). Empowerment and team effectiveness: An empirical test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.97
68.
MillerV. D. (1996). An experimental study of newcomers’ information seeking behaviors during organizational entry, Communication Studies, 47(1–2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979609368460
69.
MillerV. D.JablinF. M. (1991). Information seeking during organizational entry: Influences, tactics, and a model of the process. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 92–120. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4278997
70.
MithasS.TaftiA.MitchellW. (2013). How a firm’s competitive environment and digital strategic posture influence digital business strategy. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 511–536. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2013/37.2.09
71.
MoonH.HollenbeckJ. R.HumphreyS. E.IlgenD. R.WestB.EllisA. P.PorterC. O. (2004). Asymmetric adaptability: Dynamic team structures as one-way streets. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 681–695. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159611
72.
MorrisonE. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373–412. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.574506
MorrisonE. W.MillikenF. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706–725. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.3707697
PerrettiF.NegroG. (2007). Mixing genres and matching people: A study in innovation and team composition in Hollywood. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(5), 563–586. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.464
77.
PulakosE. D.AradS.DonovanM. A.PlamondonK. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.85.4.612
78.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed., Vol. 1). Sage.
79.
RinkF.KaneA. A.EllemersN.Van Der VegtG. (2013). Team receptivity to newcomers: Five decades of evidence and future research themes. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 247–293. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2013.766405
80.
RiordanC. M.WayneJ. H. (2008). A review and examination of demographic similarity measures used to assess relational demography within groups. Organizational Research Methods, 11(3), 562–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106295503
81.
SaksA. M.GrumanJ. A.Cooper-ThomasH. (2011). The neglected role of proactive behavior and outcomes in newcomer socialization. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.12.007
82.
StahlG. K.MaznevskiM. L.VoigtA.JonsenK. (2010). Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4), 690–709. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.85
83.
StephensK. K.DaileyS. L. (2012). Situated organizational identification in newcomers: Impacts of preentry organizational exposure. Management Communication Quarterly, 26(3), 404–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318912440179
84.
SuarezF. F.LanzollaG. (2007). The role of environmental dynamics in building a first mover advantage theory. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24349587
85.
TimmermanT. A. (2000). Racial diversity, age diversity, interdependence, and team performance. Small Group Research, 31(5), 592–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640003100505
86.
TsaiK. H.HsuT. T. (2014). Cross-functional collaboration, competitive intensity, knowledge integration mechanisms, and new product performance: A mediated moderation model. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.08.012
87.
TwengeJ. M.CampbellW. K.FreemanE. C. (2012). Generational differences in young adults’ life goals, concern for others, and civic orientation, 1966–2009. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 1045–1062. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027408
88.
Van DyneL.LePineJ. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.2307/256902
89.
Wåhlin-JacobsenC. D. (2020). Open or closed? A social interaction perspective online managers’ reactions to employee voice. Management Communication Quarterly, 34(1), 32–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318919879901
90.
YeniarasV.UnverS. (2016). Revisiting the mediating effect of entrepreneurial behaviour on proactiveness–performance relationship: The role of business ties and competitive intensity. European Management Review, 13(4), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12084
ZaninA. C.BiselR. S.AdameE. A. (2016). Supervisor moral talk contagion and trust-in-supervisor: Mitigating the workplace moral mum effect. Management Communication Quarterly, 30(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318915619755
93.
ZengerT. R.LawrenceB. S. (1989). Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 353–376. https://doi.org/10.2307/256366
94.
ZhanM. (2020). When to speak up at work: A review of employee voice and silence behavior using a prospect approach. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 28(5), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2020.1720682
