Drawing on insights from Goffman's dramaturgical approach to interaction, this article demonstrates how meetings are team performances routinely concerned with sustaining or challenging interpretations of power relations. The data for this article were collected at a British embassy, relying on participant observation, audio recordings of weekly gatherings of Heads of Section, and interviews with the people that attended the meeting. The analysis focuses on the double role behavior of the Ambassador as the director and central player of a team performance and the conflicting ideologies these shifting roles entail.
Bargiela-Chiappini, F., & Harris, S. (1997). Managing language: the discourse of corporate meetings. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
2.
Bate, S.P. (1997). Whatever happened to organizational anthropology? A review of the field of organizational ethnography and anthropological studies . Human Relations, 50(9), 1147-1175.
3.
Bauman, Z. (1990). Thinking sociologically. Oxford , UK: Blackwell.
4.
Boden, D. (1994). The business of talk: Organizations in action . Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
5.
Buzzanell, P.M., Ellingson, L., Silvio, C., Pasch, V., Dale, B., & Mauro, G. (1997). Leadership processes in alternative organizations: Invitational and dramaturgical leadership. Communication Studies , 48, 285-310.
6.
Castor, T. (2007). Language use during school board meetings: understanding controversies of and about communication. Journal of Business Communication, 44(2), 111-136.
7.
Cicourel, A.V. (1958). The front and back of organizational leadership: A case study. Pacific Sociological Review, 1(2), 54-58.
8.
Clarke, T. (1998). Research on corporate governance. Corporate Governance, 6(1), 57-66.
9.
Cordery, C.J., & Baskerville, R. (2007). An ethnographic study of annual general meetings in not-for-profit organizations (Working Paper No. 51). Wellington, UK: Centre for Accounting, Governance and Taxation Research.
10.
Diamond, J. (1996). Status and power in verbal interaction: A study of discourse in a close-knit social network. Amsterdam : John Benjamins BV.
11.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London : Longman.
12.
Fairhurst, G.T. (2007). Discursive leadership: in conversation with leadership psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Gardner, W.L., & Avolio, B.J. (1998). The charismatic relationship: a dramaturgical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 32-58.
14.
Geertz, C. (1988). Work and lives. The anthropologist as author. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
15.
Giacalone, R.A., & Rosenfeld, P. (1989). Impression management in the organization. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Gilbert, J.R. (1997). Performing marginality: Comedy, identity and cultural critique. Text and Performance Quarterly, 17, 317-330.
17.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor.
18.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. New York : Doubleday.
19.
Goffman, E. (1982). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. In E. Goffman (Eds.), Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior (pp. 5-45). New York, NY: Pantheon.
20.
Gold, R.L. (1958). Roles in social field observation. Social Forces, 36, 217-233.
21.
Guanon, R. (1945). Introduction to the study of Hindu doctrines. London: Luzac.
22.
Hammersley, M. (1990). Reading ethnographic research. A critical guide . London: Longman.
23.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography principles in practice. London: Routledge.
24.
Hay, J. (1995). Gender and humor: Beyond a joke. Victoria, UK: University of Wellington.
25.
Holmes, J., & Marra, M. (2002). Having a laugh at work: How humor contributes to workplace culture. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(12), 1683-1710.
26.
Hübner, H. (2007). The communicating company: Towards an alternative theory of corporate communication. New York: Springer.
27.
Huisman, M. (2001). Decision-making in meetings as talk-in-interaction . International Studies of Management & Organization , 31(3), 69-90.
28.
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
29.
Jenkins, M. (1985). What's so funny? Joking among women. Paper presented at the first Berkeley Women and Language Conference , California.
30.
Jönsson, C. (1990). Communication in international bargaining. London: Pinter.
31.
Koole, T. (1997). The role of ethnography in the analysis of institutional discourse. In L. Lentz & H. Pander Maat (Eds.), Discourse analysis and evaluation: Functional approaches (pp. 59-86). Amsterdam/ Atlanta: Rodopi.
32.
Malone, M.J. (1997). Worlds of talk: The presentation of self in everyday conversation. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
33.
Samra-Fredericks, D. (2000a). An analysis of the behavioural dynamics of corporate governance- a talk-based ethnography of a UK manufacturing `board-in-action .' Corporate Governance, 8(4), 311-326.
34.
Samra-Fredericks, D. (2000b). Doing `boards-in-action' research- an ethnographic approach for the capture and analysis of directors' and senior managers' interactive routines. Corporate Governance, 8(3), 244.
35.
Schlenker, B.R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. city, StatePacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
36.
Schmitt, R. (2006). Interaction in work meetings. Revue Française de linguistique appliquée. 11(2), 69-84.
37.
Schwartzman, D.H.B. (1989). The meeting: gatherings in organizations and communities . New York: Plenum Press.
38.
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S.W. (2003). Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London: Routledge.
39.
Slembrouck, S. (2005). Discourse, critique and ethnography: Class-oriented coding in accounts of child protection. Language Sciences , 27, 619-650.
