This article furthers the recent trend of studying communication during new employee socialization by examining the nature of message content and message sources during this important process. Results from an investigation of 85 newly hired hotel managers’ socialization experiences indicate that newcomers distinguish clearly between the extent they receive different socialization message content. They also receive distinct message content from different sources, suggesting newcomers rely on a variety of sources for socialization information. The implications of these results on the success of newcomer adjustment are also discussed and directions for future research are offered.
AllenN. J.MeyerJ. P. (1990). Organizational socialization tactics: A longitudinal analysis of links to newcomers’ commitment and role orientation. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 847-858.
2.
BakerH. E.III. (1992). Employee socialization strategies and the presence of union representation. Labor Studies Journal, 17, 5-17.
3.
BargeJ. K.SchlueterD. W. (2004). Memorable messages and newcomer socialization. Western Journal of Communication, 68, 233-256.
4.
BauerT. N.BodnerT.ErdoganB.TruxilloD. M.TuckerJ. S. (2007). Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: A meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 707-721.
5.
BauerT. N.GreenS. G. (1994). Effect of newcomer involvement in work-related activities: A longitudinal study of socialization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 211-223.
6.
BermanE. M.WestJ. P.RichterM. N. (2002). Workplace relations: Friendship patterns and consequences (according to managers). Public Administration Review, 62, 217-230.
7.
BrettJ. M. (1984). Job transitions and personal and role development. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 2, 155-185.
8.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2010). Economic news release: Job openings and labor turnover survey news release. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/jolts.htm
9.
ChaoG. T.O’Leary-KellyA. M.WolfS.KleinH. J.GardnerP. D. (1994). Organizational socialization: Its content and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 730-743.
10.
ComerD. R. (1991). Organizational newcomers’ acquisition of information from peers. Management Communication Quarterly, 5, 64-89.
11.
FairhurstG. T. (2001). Dualisms in leadership communication research. In JablinF. M.PutnamL. L., The new handbook of organizational communication (pp. 379-439). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
FairhurstG. T.ChandlerT. A. (1989). Social structure in leader-member interaction. Communication Monographs, 56, 215-239.
13.
GibsonM. K.PapaM. J. (2000). The mud, the blood, and the beer guys: Organizational osmosis in blue-collar groups. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28, 68-88.
14.
GraenG. B.ScanduraT. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. In StawB.CummingsL. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 175-208). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
15.
HanserL. M.MuchinskyP. M. (1978). Work as an information environment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21, 47-60.
16.
HartZ. P.MillerV. D. (2005). Context and message content during organizational socialization: A research note. Human Communication Research, 31, 295-309.
17.
HaueterJ. A.MacanT. H.WinterJ. (2003). Measurement of newcomer socialization: Construct validation of a multidimensional scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 20-39.
18.
JablinF. M. (1982). Organizational communication: An assimilation approach. In RoloffM. E.BergerC. R. (Eds.), Social cognition and communication (pp. 255-286). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19.
JablinF. M. (1984). Assimilating new members into organizations. In BostromR. N. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 8 (pp. 594-626). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
JablinF. M. (1987). Organizational entry, assimilation, and exit. In JablinF. M.PutnamL. L.RobertsK. H.PorterL. W. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 679-740). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
JablinF. M. (2001). Organizational entry, assimilation, and disengagement/exit. In JablinF. M.PutnamL. L. (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 732-818). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22.
JonesG. R. (1986). Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomers’ adjustments to organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 262-279.
23.
KatzR. (1980). Time and work: Toward an integrative perspective. In StawB. W.CummingsL. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 81-128). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
24.
KatzD.KahnR. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
LankauM. J.ScanduraT. A. (2002). An investigation of personal learning in mentoring relationships: Content, antecedents, and consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 779-790.
27.
LouisM.R.PosnerB.Z.PowellG.N. (1983). The availability and helpfulness of socialization practices. Personnel Psychology, 36, 857-866.
28.
MaitlisS. (2005). The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 21-49.
29.
MorelandR. L.LevineJ. M. (1989). Newcomers and oldtimers in small groups. In PaulusP. B. (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 143-186). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
MorrisonE. W. (2002). Information seeking within organizations. Human Communication Research, 28, 229-242.
31.
MyersK. K.OetzelJ. G. (2003). Exploring the dimensions of organizational assimilation: Creating and validating a measure. Communication Quarterly, 51, 438-457.
32.
OstroffC.KozlowskiS. W. J. (1992). Organizational socialization as learning process: The role of information acquisition. Personnel Psychology, 45, 849-874.
33.
RollagK.PariseS.CrossR. (2005). Getting new hires up to speed quickly. MIT/Sloan Management Review, 46, 35-41.
34.
SaksA. M.AshforthB. E. (1997). Organizational socialization: Making sense of the past and present as a prologue for the future. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51, 234-279.
35.
ScottC. R.StephensK. K. (2009). It depends on who you’re talking to . . . : Predictors and outcomes of situated measures of organizational identification. Western Journal of Communication, 73, 370-394.
36.
SiasP. M. (2005). Workplace relationship quality and employee information experiences. Communication Studies, 56, 375-395.
37.
SiasP. M.CahillD. J. (1998). From coworkers to friends: The development of peer friendships in the workplace. Western Journal of Communication, 62, 273-300.
38.
SiasP. M.JablinF. M. (1995). Differential superior-subordinate relations, perceptions of fairness, and coworker communication. Human Communication Research, 22, 5-38.
39.
Staton-SpicerA. Q.DarlingA. L. (1986). Communication in the socialization of preservice teachers. Communication Education, 35, 215-230.
40.
StohlC. (1986). The role of memorable messages in the process of organizational socialization. Communication Quarterly, 34, 231-249.
41.
TaorminaR. J. (2004). Convergent validation of two measures of organizational socialization. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15, 76-94.
42.
TjosvoldD. (1984). Effects of leader warmth and directiveness in subordinate performance on subsequent task. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 422-427.
43.
Van Der VegtG. S.BundersonS. (2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 532-547.
44.
WaldeckJ. H.MyersK. M. (2008). Organizational assimilation theory, research and implications for multiple areas of the discipline: A state of the art review. In BeckC. S. (Ed.), Communication yearbook 31 (pp. 322-369). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45.
WanousJ. P. (1992). Organizational entry: Recruitment, selection, orientation, and socialization of newcomers (pp. 187-235). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
46.
WheelessL. R.WheelessV. E.HowardR. D. (1984). The relationships of communication with supervisor and decision-participation to employee job satisfaction. Communication Quarterly, 32, 222-232.
47.
ZurcherL. A. (1983). Social roles: Conformity, conflict, and creativity. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
