The Link Between Supervisor-Subordinate Computer-Mediated Immediate Behaviors and Organizational Identification in U.S.,English,and Australian Organizations

Abstract

More than 5.89 million people have died from COVID-19. Due to COVID-19, there is a need for organizations to reconsider their structures and systems in response to increased remote working and decreased face-to-face (FTF) interactions. This study analyzes organizational relationships, specifically the supervisor-subordinate relationship. This study examines the link between supervisor-subordinate immediacy and organizational identification in mediated communication. Participants from three nations (n = 1776) were explored to test the assumption that supervisor-subordinate immediacy explains organizational identification. The United States, Australia, and England were chosen as focal nations due to the differing government responses to the COVID-19 outbreak. Results revealed supervisors’ perceived computer-mediated immediate behaviors and subordinates’ perceived immediacy with their supervisors were positive predictors of organizational identity. U.S. supervisors were perceived to use higher levels of computer-mediated immediacy behaviors and have more perceived immediacy than Australian and English supervisors. Australian supervisors had higher levels of perceived immediacy than English supervisors.

Keywords

COVID-19 organizational identification immediacy supervisor-subordinate cross-cultural communication

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Afshari

Young

Gibson

Karimi

(2020). Organizational commitment: Exploring the role of identity. Personnel Review, 49(3), 774–790. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-04-2019-0148

Allen

N. J.

Meyer

J. P.

(1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x

Allen

Witt

P. L.

Wheeless

L. R.

(2006). The role of teacher immediacy as a motivational factor in student learning: Using meta-analysis to test a causal model. Communication Education, 55(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520500343368

Andrews

S. B.

Basler

C. R.

Coller

(1999). Organizational structures, cultures, and identities: Overlaps and divergences. In Andrews

S. B.

Knoke

(Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 16, pp. 213–235). JAI.

Ashforth

B. E.

Harrison

S. H.

Corley

K. G.

(2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316059

Ashforth

B. E.

Rogers

K. M.

Corley

K. G.

(2011). Identity in organizations: Exploring cross-level dynamics. Organization Science, 22(5), 1144–1156. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0591

Barnes

Newton

(2018). Visualizing organizational identity: The history of capitalist enterprise. Management & Organizational History, 13(1), 24–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2018.1431552

Brickson

(2000). The impact of identity orientation on individual and organizational outcomes in demographically diverse settings. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 82–101. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2000.2791604

Cheney

(1983). On the various changing meanings of organization membership: A field study of organizational identification. Communication Monographs, 50(4), 342–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758309390174

10.

Cheney

Christensen

L. T.

Dailey

S. L.

(2014). Communicating identity and identification in and around organizations. In Putnam

L. L.

Mumby

D. K.

(Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 695–716). Sage.

11.

Cheney

Tompkins

P. K.

(1987). Coming to terms with organizational identification and commitment. Central States Speech Journal, 38(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510978709368225

12.

Clegg

S. R.

Rhodes

Kornberger

(2007). Desperately seeking legitimacy: Organizational identity and emerging industries. Organization Studies, 28(4), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606067995

13.

Croucher

S. M.

Kelly

(2019). Measurement issues in intercultural communication. In Mazer

Graham

(Eds.), Communication research measures III: A sourcebook (pp. 141–159). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203730188-10.

14.

Croucher

S. M.

Kelly

Chen

Rocker

K. T.

Cullinane

Homsey

D. M.

Ding

G. G.

Nguyen

Anderson

Green

Ashwell

Wright

Palakshappa

(2021a). Articulated dissent and immediacy: A cross-national analysis of the effects of COVID-19 lockdowns. International Journal of Conflict Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-04-2021-0062

15.

Croucher

S. M.

Nguyen

Ashwell

Spencer

Permyakova

Gomez

(2021b). Prejudice toward Afro-Brazilians. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2021.1957702

16.

Croucher

S. M.

Nguyen

Pearson

Murray

Feekery

Spencer

Gomez

Girardelli

Kelly

(2021c). A comparative analysis of Covid-19 related prejudice: The United States, Spain, Italy, and New Zealand. Communication Research Reports, 38(1), 78-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2021.1885371.

17.

Croucher

S. M.

Nguyen

Rahmani

(2020). Prejudice toward Asian-Americans in the Covid-19 Pandemic: The effects of social media use in the United States. Frontiers in Health Communication, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00039.

18.

Croucher

S. M.

Permyakova

Turdubaeva

(2021d). Prejudice toward Asians and migrants during the COVID-19 pandemic in Russia and Kyrgyzstan. Russian Journal of Communication, 13(3), 289-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/19409419.2021.1958697.

19.

Dauber

Fink

Yolles

(2012). January). A configuration model of organizational culture. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012441482.

20.

Douglas

(1970). Natural symbols, explorations in cosmology. Penguin.

21.

Fall

L. T.

Kelly

Christen

(2011). Revisiting the impact of instructional immediacy: A differentiation between military and civilians. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12(3), 199-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.02.001.

22.

Garcia

Hardy

(2007). Positioning, similarity and difference: Narratives of individual and organizational identities in an Australian university. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 23(4), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2007.09.002

23.

Gaytan

Kelly

Brown

(in press). Writing apprehension in the online classroom: The limits of instructor behaviors. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly.

24.

Giddens

(1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.

25.

Hinkle

L. L.

(2001). Perceptions of supervisor nonverbal immediacy, vocalics, and subordinate liking. Communication Research Reports, 18(2), 128–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090109384790

26.

HM Government (2020). Transparency data. SAGE 58 minutes: Coronavirus (COVID-19) response, 21 September 2020. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/fifty-eighth-sage-meeting-on-covid-19-21-september-2020

27.

L. T.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

28.

Jack

Lorbiecki

(2007). National identity, globalization and the discursive construction of organizational identity. British Journal of Management, 18(s1), S79–S94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00527.x

29.

Jia

Cheng

Hale

C. L.

(2017). Workplace emotion and communication: Supervisor nonverbal immediacy, employees’ emotion experience, and their communication motives. Management Communication Quarterly, 31(1), 69-–87. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0893318916650519

30.

Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center . (n.d.). Covid-19 dashboard to the center for SYSTEMS for science and engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins university. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html.

31.

Johnson

Miller

(2002). A cross-cultural study of immediacy, credibility, and learning in the US and Kenya. Communication Education, 51(3), 280–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520216514

32.

Kelly

Autman

(2015). Effective computer-mediated business communication: Fostering immediacy. The Journal of Research in Business Education, 56(1), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030160304.

33.

Kelly

Gaytan

(2020). The effect of instructors’ immediate behaviors and clarity on student writing apprehension. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 83(1), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490619868822

34.

Kelly

Graham

MacDonald

Goke

(2018). Organizational citizenship behaviors as influenced by supervisor communication: The role of solidarity and immediate behaviors. Business Communication Research and Practice, 1(2), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.22682/bcrp.2018.1.2.61

35.

Kelly

Kotowski

Fall

L. T.

(2010). An examination of computer-mediated instructional immediacy: Scale development and validation. Paper presented at the National Communication Association: 96th Annual Convention. San Francisco, CA, November 2010.

36.

Kelly

Rice

Wyatt

Ducking

Denton

(2015). Teacher immediacy and decreased student quantitative reasoning anxiety: The mediating effect of perception. Communication Education, 64(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1014383

37.

Kelly

Romero

Morrow

J. A.

Denton

Ducking

(2020). Instructor misbehaviors and math anxiety. Communication Reports, 33(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2019.1675737

38.

Kelly

Westerman

C. Y. K.

(2014). Immediacy as an influence on supervisor-subordinate communication. Communication Research Reports, 31(3), 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1014383

39.

Kelly

S. E.

Westerman

D. K.

(2016). New technologies and distributed learning systems. In Witt

P. L.

(Ed.), Communication and learning (pp. 455–480). DeGruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501502446-019

40.

Kopaneva

I. M.

Cheney

(2019). Organizational identity formation in alternative organizations: A study of three benefit corporations. Management Communication Quarterly, 33(4), 484–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/089331891985858684

41.

Kuhn

Nelson

(2002). Reengineering identity: A case study of multiplicity and duality in organizational identification. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318902161001

42.

McCroskey

J. C.

Fayer

J. M.

Richmond

V. P.

Sallinen

Barraclough

R. A.

(1996). A multi‐cultural examination of the relationship between nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Quarterly, 44(3), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529509379019

43.

Mehrabian

(1966). Immediacy: An indicator of attitudes in linguistic communication. Journal of Personality, 34(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1966.tb01696.x

44.

Mehrabian

(1981). Silent messages (2nd ed.). Wadsworth.

45.

Mottet

T. P.

Frymier

A. B.

Beebe

S. A.

(2006). Theorizing about instructional communication. In Mottet

T. P.

Richmond

V. P.

McCroskey

J. C.

(Eds.), Handbook of instructional communication: Rhetorical and relational perspectives (pp. 255–282). Allyn & Bacon.

46.

Pepper

G. L.

Larson

G. S.

(2006). Cultural identity tensions in a post-acquisition organization. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880500420267

47.

Price

Whiteley

(2014). Corporate culture and employee identity: Co-option or commitment through contestation? Journal of Change Management, 14(2), 210–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2014.896391

48.

Richmond

V. P.

Houser

M. L.

Hosek

A. M.

(2018). Immediacy and the teacher-student relationship. In Hosek

A. M.

Houser

M. L.

(Eds.), Handbook of instructional communication: Rhetorical and relational perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 97–111). Routledge.

49.

Richmond

V. P.

McCroskey

J. C.

(2000). The impact of supervisor and subordinate immediacy on relational and organizational outcomes. Communication Monographs, 67(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750009376496

50.

Schrodt

(2002). The relationship between organizational identification and organizational culture: Employee perceptions of culture and identification in a retail sales organization. Communication Studies, 53(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970209388584

51.

Scott

C. R.

Corman

S. R.

Cheney

(1998). Development of a structurational model of identification in the organization. Communication Theory, 8(3), 298–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1998.tb00223.x

52.

South Australia Legislation . (2020). COVID-19 declarations and directions. SA Attorney General’s Department. https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/Web/Information/CV19/CV19.aspx

53.

Teven

J. J.

(2007). Effects of supervisor social influence, nonverbal immediacy, and biological sex on subordinates' perceptions of job satisfaction, liking, and supervisor credibility. Communication Quarterly, 55(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370601036036

54.

Thurston

Glendon

A. I.

(2018). Association of risk exposure, organizational identification, and empowerment, with safety participation, intention to quit, and absenteeism. Safety Science, 105(105), 212-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.02.012.

55.

Tourky

Alwi

S. F. S.

Kitchen

Melewar

T. C.

Shaalan

(2020). New conceptualization and measurement of corporate identity: Evidence from UK food and beverage industry. Journal of Business Research, 109(1), 595–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.056

56.

Troia

G. A.

Graham

(2017). Use and acceptability of writing adaptations for students with disabilities: Survey of grade 3–8 teachers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(4), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12135

57.

Vareberg

K. R.

Luo

Westerman

Bartels

Lindmark

(2020). For a good class, email: Technologically-mediated out-of-class communication and instructional outcomes. The Internet and Higher Education, 47(47), 100761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100761.

58.

Wasserman

Faust

(1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.

59.

World Economic Forum . (2020, August 17). COVID-19: It’s time to rethink where, how, and why we work. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/08/covid-19-future-of-work-employees/