University ombuds serve as a resource for students who want to resolve conflicts with professors. However, little research examines the relationship between individual conflict style preferences, perceptions of procedural justice, and intentions to use ombuds processes. Professor–student conflict is a unique area of study because the relationship is temporary and also the first time that individuals deal with conflict as adults. This study examined the relationship between students’ preferred conflict style, their perceptions of procedural justice, and their intentions to use the ombuds system if involved in a conflict. Individuals with solution-oriented styles had positive perceptions of procedural justice, whereas control and nonconfrontation styles were associated with negative perceptions. In addition, individuals with solution-oriented styles were more likely to indicate intent to use ombuds systems. The findings provide further support for the original literature on conflict styles.
AakhusM. (2007). Communication as design. Communication Monographs, 74, 112-117.
2.
AntonioniD. (1998). Relationship between the Big Five personality factors and conflict management styles. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9, 336-355.
3.
BiesR. J.TrippT. M. (2002). “Hot flashes, open wounds”: Injustice and the tyranny of its emotions. In GilliandS. W.SteinerD. D.SkarlickiD. P. (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on managing organizational justice (pp. 203-224). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
4.
BlakeR. R.MoutonJ. S. (1964). The managerial grid: Key orientations for achieving production through people. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
5.
ColquittJ. A.GreenbergJ.Zapata-PhelanC. P. (2005). What is organizational justice? A historical overview. In GreenbergJ.ColquittJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 3-56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
De DreuC. K. W.EversA.BeersmaB.KluwerE. S.NautaA. (2001). A theory-based measure of conflict management strategies in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 645-668.
7.
DruckerP. F. (1988,January). The coming of the new organization. Harvard Business Review, 66(1), 45-53.
8.
FolgerR.KonovskyM. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115-130.
9.
FriedmanR.TiddS. T.CurrallS. C.TsaiJ. C. (2000). What goes around comes around: The impact of personal conflict style on work conflict and stress. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11, 32-55.
10.
GrazianoW. G.Jensen-CampbellL. A.HairE. C. (1996). Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 820-835.
11.
HarrisonT. R. (2003). Victims, targets, protectors and destroyers: Using disputant accounts to develop a grounded taxonomy of disputant orientations. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 20, 307-329.
12.
HarrisonT. R. (2004). What is success in ombuds processes? Evaluation of a university ombudsman. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 21, 313-335.
13.
HarrisonT. R. (2007). My professor is so unfair: Student attitudes and experiences of conflict with faculty. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 24, 349-368.
14.
HarrisonT. R.DoerfelM. L. (2006). Competitive and cooperative conflict communication climates: The influence of ombuds processes on trust and commitment to the organization. International Journal of Conflict Management, 17, 129-153.
15.
HarrisonT. R.HopeckP.DesrayaudN.ImbodenK. (2013). The relationship between conflict, anticipatory procedural justice, and design with intentions to use ombudsman processes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 24, 56-72.
16.
HarrisonT. R.MorrillC. (2004). Ombuds processes and disputant reconciliation. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 318-342.
17.
JacksonS. (1998). Disputation by design. Argumentation, 12, 183-198.
18.
JonesF. F.ScarpelloV.BergmanT. (1999). Pay procedures—What makes them fair?Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 129-145.
19.
KassingJ. W. (2009). “In case you didn’t hear me the first time”: An examination of repetitious upward dissent. Management Communication Quarterly, 22, 416-436.
20.
KnappM. L.PutnamL. L.DavisL. J. (1988). Measuring interpersonal conflict in organizations: Where do we go from here?Management Communication Quarterly, 1, 414-429.
21.
KorsgaardM. A.SapienzaH. J. (2002). Economic and noneconomic mechanisms in interpersonal work relationships: Toward an integration of agency and procedural justice theories. In GilliandS. W.SteinerD. D.SkarlickiD. P. (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on managing organizational justice (pp. 3-33). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
22.
KuhnT.PooleM. S. (2000). Do conflict management styles affect group decision making?: Evidence from a longitudinal field study. Human Communication Research, 26, 558-590.
23.
KulikC. T.HolbrookR. L.Jr. (2002). Patients and physicians as stakeholders: Justice in the medical context. In GilliandS. W.SteinerD. D.SkarlickiD. P. (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on managing organizational justice (pp. 77-101). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
24.
LeeJ. (2001). Leader-member exchange, perceived organizational justice, and cooperative communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 14, 574-589.
25.
MankinL. D. (1996). The role of the ombudsman in higher education. Dispute Resolution Journal, 51, 46-49.
26.
MarinM. J.SherblomJ. C.ShippsT. B. (1994). Contextual influences on nurses’ conflict management strategies. Western Journal of Communication, 58, 201-228.
27.
MikulaG.PetriB.TanzerN. (1990). What people regard as unjust: Types and structures of everyday experiences of injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 133-149.
28.
MobergP. J. (2001). Linking conflict strategy to the five-factor model: Theoretical and empirical foundations. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 47-68.
29.
MoormanR. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845-855.
30.
MorrillC.ZaldM. N.RaoH. (2005). Covert political conflict in organizations: Challenges from below. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 391-415.
31.
MunduateL.GanazaJ.PeiróJ. M.EuwemaM. (1999). Patterns of styles in conflict management and effectiveness. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10, 5-24.
32.
NettingF. E.PatonR. N.HuberR. (1992). The long-term care ombudsman program: What does the compliant reporting system tell us?The Gerontologist, 32, 843-848.
33.
OhbuchiK.SuzukiM. (2003). Three dimensions of conflict issues and their effects on resolution strategies in organizational settings. International Journal of Conflict Management, 14, 61-73.
34.
PutnamL. L.WilsonC. E. (1982). Communicative strategies in organizational conflicts: Reliability and validity of a measurement scale. In BurgoonM. (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Yearbook 6, pp. 629-652). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35.
RobinsR. W.FraleyR. C.RobertsB. W.TrzesniewskiK. (2001). A longitudinal study of personality change in young adulthood. Journal of Personality, 69, 617-640.
36.
RoloffM. E.WrightC. N. (2009). Conflict avoidance: A functional analysis. In AfifiT. T.AfifiW. (Eds.), Uncertainty and information regulation in interpersonal contexts: Theories and applications (pp. 320-340). New York, NY: Routledge.
37.
RoweM. P. (1987). The corporate ombudsman: An overview and analysis. Negotiation Journal, 3, 127-140.
38.
RoweM. P. (1995). Options, functions, and skills: What an organizational ombudsman might want to know. Negotiation Journal, 11, 103-114.
39.
ScottB. A.ColquittJ. A.Zapata-PhelanC. P. (2007). Justice as a dependent variable: Subordinate charisma as a predictor of interpersonal and informational justice perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1597-1609.
40.
ShapiroD. L.BrettJ. M. (2005). What is the role of control in organizational justice? In GreenbergJ.ColquittJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 155-177). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41.
SkarlickiD. P.FolgerR. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 434-443.
42.
ThibautJ. W.WalkerL. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
VerkuilP. R. (1975). The ombudsman and the limits of the adversary system. Columbia Law Review, 75, 845-861.
44.
VermuntR. (2002). Employee stress, injustice and the dual position of the boss. In GilliandS. W.SteinerD. D.SkarlickiD. P. (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on managing organizational justice (pp. 159-176). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
45.
WagnerM. L. (2000). The organizational ombudsman as change agent. Negotiation Journal, 16, 99-114.
46.
WangQ.FinkE. L.CaiD. A. (2012). The effect of conflict goals on avoidance strategies: What does not communicating communicate?Human Communication Research, 38, 222-252.
47.
WilsonS. R.WaltmanM. S. (1988). Assessing the Putnam-Wilson Organizational Communication Conflict Instrument (OCCI). Management Communication Quarterly, 1, 367-388.
48.
ZiegenfussJ. T.Jr. (1988). Organization troubleshooters: Resolving problems with customers and employees. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
