Employee voice plays a critical role in facilitating positive organizational change and development. This study seeks to identify the antecedents of challenging promotive voice, which indicates constructive challenge geared toward improvement. Specifically, we investigate the influences of formal, informal, and self-perceived status as well as the effects of interpersonal and procedural justice. The results demonstrate that: (a) informal status such as age was positively associated with challenging promotive voice; (b) self-perceived status was positively linked to challenging promotive voice; (c) both interpersonal and procedural justice increased challenging promotive voice; and (d) interpersonal justice moderated the relationship between self-perceived status and challenging promotive voice such that the effect of status was less pronounced when perceptions of interpersonal justice was higher. The findings highlight the significance of structural influences on voice behavior, calling for further research on status disparities, organizational justice climate, and employee engagement.
AndersonC.JohnO.KeltnerD.KringA. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 116–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.116
2.
AngS.SlaughterS. (2001). Work outcomes and job design for contract versus permanent information systems professionals on software development teams. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 321–350. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250920
3.
ArtisticoD.CervoneD.PezzutiL. (2003). Perceived self-efficacy and everyday problem solving among young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 18, 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.18.1.68
4.
AveryD.McKayP.WilsonD.VolponeS.KillhamE. (2011). Does voice go flat? How tenure diminishes the impact of voice. Human Resource Management, 50, 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20403
5.
BiesR. J. (2001). Interactional (in)justice: The sacred and the profane. In GreenbergJ.CropanzanoR. (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 89–118). Standford University Press.
6.
BoteroI. (2013). Individual correlates of employee voice: What do we know so far? Where should we go next? In BurkeR.CooperC. L. (Eds.), Voice and whistleblowing in organizations: Overcoming fear fostering courage and unleashing candour (pp. 72–91). Edward Elgar.
7.
BoteroI.Van DyneL. (2009). Employee voice behavior: Interactive effects of LMX and power distance in the United States and Colombia. Management Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 84–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318909335415
8.
BrinsfieldC. (2014). Employee voice and silence in organizational behavior. In WilkinsonA.DonagheyJ.DundonT.FreemanR. (Eds.), Handbook of research on employee voice (pp. 114–132). Edward Elgar.
9.
ChamberlinM.NewtonD.LePineJ. (2017). A meta-analysis of voice and its promotive and prohibitive forms: Identification of key associations, distinctions, and future research directions. Personnel Psychology, 70, 11–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12185
ColquittJ. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386
12.
ConwayN.BrinerR. (2002). Full-time versus part-time employees: Understanding the links between work status, the psychological contract, and attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1857
13.
CropanzanoR.BowenD.GillilandS. (2007). The management of organizational justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2007.27895338
14.
DetertJ.BurrisE. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open?Academy of Management Journal, 50, 869–884. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279183
15.
DetertJ.TreviñoL. (2010). Speaking up to higher-ups: How supervisors and skip-level leaders influence employee voice. Organization Science, 21, 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0405
16.
FairhurstG. (2007). Discursive leadership. Sage.
17.
FrazierM.FainshmidtS. (2012). Voice climate, work outcomes, and the mediating role of psychological empowerment: A multilevel examination. Group & Organization Management, 37(6), 691–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601112463960
18.
FullerJ.MarlerL.HesterK. (2006). Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: Exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 1089–1120. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.408
19.
GaoL.JanssenO.ShiK. (2011). Leader trust and employee voice: The moderating role of empowering leader behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 787–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.05.015
20.
GoodeW. (1978). The celebration of heroes: Prestige as a control system. University of California Press.
HirschmanA. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Harvard University Press.
23.
JanssenO.GaoL. (2015). Supervisory responsiveness and employee self-perceived status and voice behavior. Journal of Management, 41, 1854–1872. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312471386
KidderD.ParksJ. (2001). The good soldier: Who is s(he)?Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 939–959. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.119
26.
KimH. (2018a). Differential impacts of functional, geographical, and hierarchical diversity on knowledge sharing in the midst of organizational change. Management Communication Quarterly, 32(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318917728340
27.
KimH. (2018b). The mutual constitution of social media use and status hierarchies in global organizing. Management Communication Quarterly, 32, 471–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318918779135
28.
KimH.LeachR. (2020). The role of digitally-enabled employee voice in fostering positive change and affective commitment in centralized organizations. Communication Monograph. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2020.1745859
29.
KimH.ScottC. R. (2018, July). Going anonymous: Uses and perceptions of anonymous social media in an IT organization. In The Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Social Media & Society (pp. 335–339). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3217804.3217940
30.
KimH.ScottC. R. (2019). Change communication and the use of anonymous social media at work: Implications for employee engagement. Corporate Communications, 24(3), 410–424. https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-07-2018-0076
31.
LeeJ. (2001). Leader-member exchange, perceived organizational justice, and cooperative communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 14(4), 574–589. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318901144002
32.
LeeS. K.KimH.PiercyC. W. (2019). The role of status differentials and homophily in the formation of social support networks of a voluntary organization. Communication Research, 46(2), 208–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216641501
LiangJ.FarhC.FarhJ. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 71–92. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0176
35.
LindnerJ.MurphyT.BriersG. (2001). Handling nonresponse in social science research. Journal of Agricultural Education, 42(4), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2001.04043
36.
MageeJ.GalinskyA. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 351–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520802211628
MorrillC.SnydermanE.DawsonE. (1997). It’s not what you do, but who you are: Informal social control, social status, and normative seriousness in organizations. Sociological Forum, 12, 519–543. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022170606380
39.
MorrisonE. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 373–412. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.574506
MorrisonE.Wheeler-SmithS.KamdarD. (2011). Speaking up in groups: A cross-level study of group voice climate and voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020744
42.
NgT.FeldmanD. (2012). Employee voice behavior: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 216–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.754
43.
PhillipsD.ZuckermanE. (2002). Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 379–429. https://doi.org/10.1086/324072
44.
PideritS.AshfordS. (2003). Breaking silence: Tactical choices women managers make in speaking up about gender-equity issues. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1477–1502. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00388
45.
PierceJ.GardnerD.DunhamR.CummingsL. (1993). Moderation by organization-based self-esteem of role condition-employee response relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 271–288. https://doi.org/10.5465/256523
46.
RuppD.ShapiroD.FolgerR.SkarlickiD.ShaoR. (2017). A critical analysis of the conceptualization and measurement of organizational justice. Academy of Management Annals, 11(2), 919–959. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0051
47.
SimonsT.RobersonQ. (2003). Why managers should care about fairness: The effects of aggregate justice perceptions on organizational outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.432
48.
SimpsonR.LewisP. (2005). An investigation of silence and a scrutiny of transparency: Re-examining gender in organization literature through the concepts of voice and visibility. Human Relations, 58, 1253–1275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726705058940
49.
SkvoretzJ.FararoT. J. (2016). Status and interaction: A stochastic model for the measurement of macro-status value and the determination of micro-status ranking in task group interaction. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 2, 237802311562156. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023115621561
50.
SpreitzerG. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442–1465. https://doi.org/10.5465/256865
51.
StamperC.Van DyneL. (2001). Work status and organizational citizenship behavior: A field study of restaurant employees. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.100
TangiralaS.RamanujamR. (2008). Exploring nonlinearity in employee voice: The effects of personal control and organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 1189–1203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.35732719
54.
TangiralaS.RamanujamR. (2012). Ask and you shall hear (but not always): Examining the relationship between manager consultation and employee voice. Personnel Psychology, 65, 251–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01248.x
ThibautJ.WalkerL. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Erlbaum.
57.
Van DyneL.LePineJ. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 108–119. https://doi.org/10.5465/256902
58.
VenkataramaniV.TangiralaS. (2010). When and why do central employees speak up? An examination of mediating and moderating variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 582–591. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018315
59.
WangR.JiangJ. (2015). How abusive supervisors influence employees’ voice and silence: The effects of interactional justice and organizational attribution. Journal of Social Psychology, 155, 204–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2014.990410
60.
WhitesideD.BarclayL. (2013). Echoes of silence: Employee silence as a mediator between overall justice and employee outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 116, 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1467-3
