The use of multilayer flexible food packaging has fundamentally revolutionized the global food system by allowing the product to have an extended shelf life, safer storage and highly efficient distribution of packaged foods on a scale never experienced before. However, the complexity of material that makes such performance in service creates immense difficulties at the end of the service since the combination of several polymers, barrier layers, adhesives, and inks place harsh demands on recyclability. Because of this, bulk post-consumer packaging of snacks is often not recycled through standard recycle streams and instead goes to landfills, incineration, or scattered about in nature. This review critically examines the main recycling options that can be used in the recycling of packaging waste, and they include mechanical recycling, chemical recycling and newer upcycling avenues. The most practical but least energy-intensive recycling method is mechanical recycling, which has limitations due to polymer incompatibility, contamination and degradation of material during recycling. Another path that is provided through chemical recycling is the production of complex laminates into fuels, monomers and virgin-equivalent polymers, though barriers in terms of energy requirements, expenses, and integration of the process still exist. Also, increased upcycling and hybrid recycling designs are addressed as a possible measure of producing functionalized polymers, customized blends and specialty materials with previously unrecyclable waste. The review also explores diverse applications in infrastructure and high-value polymers while establishing a rigorous framework to evaluate the Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) and Operational Expenditure (OPEX) of recycling routes. It identifies the industrial shift toward mono-material design-for-recycle structures as a primary solution to material incompatibility. Ultimately, the study highlights the role of integrated systems and policy in fostering a circular economy and reducing the environmental impact of multilayer packaging.
NcubeLKUdeAUOgunmuyiwaEN, et al.An overview of plastic waste generation and management in food packaging industries. Recycling2021; 6(1): 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling6010012
2.
MorrisBA. Flexible packaging past, present and future: reflections on a century of technology advancement. J Plast Film Sheeting2024; 40(2): 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/87560879241234946
3.
FarmerN. The future: global trends and analysis for the international packaging market in relation to the speed of impact of packaging innovation and likely material changes. In: Trends in Packaging of Food, Beverages and Other Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG), 2013, pp. 288–312.
4.
BauerA-STackerMUysal-UnalanI, et al.Recyclability and redesign challenges in multilayer flexible food packaging—A review. Foods2021; 10(11): 2702. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112702
5.
AnukiruthikaTSethupathyPWilsonA, et al.Multilayer packaging: advances in preparation techniques and emerging food applications. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf2020; 19(3): 1156–1186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12556
6.
PauerETackerMGabrielV, et al.Sustainability of flexible multilayer packaging: environmental impacts and recyclability of packaging for bacon in block. Clean Environ Syst2020; 1: 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2020.100001
7.
HopewellJDvorakRKosiorE. Plastics recycling: challenges and opportunities. Phil Trans Biol Sci2009; 364(1526): 2115–2126. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0311
AnwarMASasongkoNANajibM, et al.Challenges and prospects of multilayer plastic waste management in several countries: a systematic literature review. Case Stud Chem Environ Eng2024; 10: 100911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2024.100911
LebretonLCVan Der ZwetJDamsteegJ-W, et al.River plastic emissions to the world’s oceans. Nat Commun2017; 8(1): 15611. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15611
de Mello SoaresCTEkMÖstmarkE, et al.Recycling of multi-material multilayer plastic packaging: current trends and future scenarios. Resour Conserv Recycl2022; 176: 105905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105905
CabreraGLiJMaazouzA, et al.A journey from processing to recycling of multilayer waste films: a review of main challenges and prospects. Polymers2022; 14(12): 2319. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14122319
JawaidMSultanMTHSabaN. Mechanical and physical testing of biocomposites, fibre-reinforced composites and hybrid composites. Woodhead Publishing, 2018.
21.
KatnamKBDa SilvaLFMYoungTM. Bonded repair of composite aircraft structures: a review of scientific challenges and opportunities. Prog Aero Sci2013; 61: 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2013.03.003
22.
FarrukhAMathraniSSajjadA. A systematic literature review on environmental sustainability issues of flexible packaging: potential pathways for academic research and managerial practice. Sustainability2022; 14(8): 4737. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084737
23.
VincentGAde BruijnTAWijskampS, et al.Process-and material-induced heterogeneities in recycled thermoplastic composites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2022; 35(12): 2530–2551. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705720979347
24.
HenshawJMOwensADHoustonDQ, et al.Recycling of a cyclic thermoplastic composite material by injection and compression molding. J Thermoplast Compos Mater1994; 7(1): 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/089270579400700102
25.
Stieven MontagnaLFerreira de Melo MorgadoGLemesAP, et al.Recycling of carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic and thermoset composites: a review. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2023; 36(8): 3455–3480. https://doi.org/10.1177/08927057221108912
26.
ZeyrekBYAydoganBDilekcanE, et al.Experimental investigation of the recycling of carbon fiber polyetherketoneketone thermoplastic composite. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2024; 37(5): 1859–1876. https://doi.org/10.1177/08927057231200011
PoulakisJGArvanitopoulosCDPapaspyridesCD. A technique for coating aramid fibers by recycling of aramid-based thermoplastic composites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater1995; 8(4): 410–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/089270579500800404
29.
LiuBZhuPXuA, et al.Investigation of the recycling of continuous fiber-reinforced thermoplastics. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2019; 32(3): 342–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705718759388
30.
ŞılbırMSAtalayAB. Packaging materials and technologies for ready-to-eat snacks. Ready-to-Eat Snacks: 381–423.
31.
BarnesDKGalganiFThompsonRC, et al.Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in global environments. Phil Trans Biol Sci2009; 364(1526): 1985–1998. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0205
JanBRizviQu. e. HShamsR, et al.Containers for food packaging application. Micro-and Nano-containers for Smart Applications. Springer, 2022, pp. 105–125.
34.
HaqueA. An exclusive handbook of flexible packaging materials: equipped with raw materials, manufacturing & quality machineries & procedures, case studies and troubleshooting’s.
35.
MorrisBA. A perspective on additives for flexible packaging. J Vinyl Addit Technol2024; 30(6): 1359–1371. https://doi.org/10.1002/vnl.22135
36.
Serna-SaldivarSO. Packaging of snack foods. Snack Foods. CRC Press, 2022, pp. 83–112.
37.
MaddahHA. Polypropylene as a promising plastic: a review. Am J Polym Sci2016; 6(1): 1–11.
38.
AllahvaisiS. Polypropylene in the industry of food packaging(Polypropylene), 2012, pp. 3–22.
39.
BooneJLoxFPottieS. Deficiencies of polypropylene in its use as a food‐packaging material—a review. Packag Technol Sci1993; 6(5): 277–281. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2770060508
40.
MalpassDBBandE. Introduction to industrial polypropylene: properties, catalysts processes. John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
41.
BeckettSTFowlerMSZieglerGR. Beckett's industrial chocolate manufacture and use. John Wiley & Sons, 2017.
42.
ZoccaM. Evaluating mechanical and thermal properties of MDO PE and BOPP films for enhanced food packaging performance. Politecnico di Milano2022.
43.
ZhangKYaoJZhuF, et al.Recent advances in preparation and application of BOPP film for energy storage and dielectric capacitors. Molecules2025; 30(7): 1596. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30071596
44.
BhuniaKSablaniSSTangJ, et al.Migration of chemical compounds from packaging polymers during microwave, conventional heat treatment, and storage. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety2013; 12(5): 523–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12028
45.
SiracusaVBlancoI. Bio-polyethylene (Bio-PE), Bio-polypropylene (Bio-PP) and Bio-poly (ethylene terephthalate)(Bio-PET): recent developments in bio-based polymers analogous to petroleum-derived ones for packaging and engineering applications. Polymers2020; 12(8): 1641. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12081641
46.
SeierM. Mechanical recycling and design of multi-layer packaging: constraints, opportunities and challenges. Technische Universität Wien, 2023.
47.
LehelJMurphyS. Microplastics in the food chain: food safety and environmental aspects. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol2021: 1–49.
48.
BampsBBuntinxMPeetersR. Seal materials in flexible plastic food packaging: a review. Packag Technol Sci2023; 36(7): 507–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2732
49.
RajB. Plastics and their role in food packaging. Plastics in food packaging2018; 20: 17–46.
50.
PatelRM. Polyethylene. Multilayer flexible packaging. Elsevier, 2016, pp. 17–34.
51.
BrazelCSRosenSL. Fundamental principles of polymeric materials. John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
52.
NaYDaiSChenC. Direct synthesis of polar-functionalized linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) and low-density polyethylene (LDPE). Macromolecules2018; 51(11): 4040–4048. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.8b00467
53.
DarasIFSinghSVieiraT, et al. Evaluation of post-industrial polyethylene terephthalate recyclates (rPET) obtained from multilayer polyethylene terephthalate (PET)/Polyethylene (PE) sheets. Aim of the Congress; 28: 21.
54.
MeshramBPLoveAGohatreO. A comprehensive review of recent challenges, opportunities, and future scenarios of recycling multilayer packaging.
55.
RoyPKHakkarainenMVarmaIK, et al.Degradable polyethylene: fantasy or reality. Environ Sci Technol2011; 45(10): 4217–4227. https://doi.org/10.1021/es104042f
56.
RezvanianKShahanHTGhofraniD, et al.Innovative manufacturing and recycling approaches for multilayer polymer packaging: a comprehensive review. Polym Plast Technol Mat2025; 64(10): 1441–1474. https://doi.org/10.1080/25740881.2025.2470852
KannanGGrieshaberSEZhaoW. Thermoplastic polyesters. Handbook of Thermoplastics2016; 41: 319.
59.
SousaAFPatrícioRTerzopoulouZ, et al.Recommendations for replacing PET on packaging, fiber, and film materials with biobased counterparts. Green Chem2021; 23(22): 8795–8820. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1gc02082j
WangYGaoJMaY, et al.Study on mechanical properties, thermal stability and crystallization behavior of PET/MMT nanocomposites. Composites, Part B Eng2006; 37(6): 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.02.014
62.
HedenqvistMS. Barrier packaging materials. Handbook of environmental degradation of materials. Elsevier, 2005, pp. 547–563.
63.
MalikNKumarPShrivastavaS, et al.An overview on PET waste recycling for application in packaging. Int J Plast Technol2017; 21(1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12588-016-9164-1
64.
ÖzkanBYTekinÖUlutasN, et al.A review of the recyclable packaging design in flexible packaging industry. International Journal of Environmental Pollution and Environmental Modelling2023; 6(3): 128–135.
65.
DebeaufortF. Metal packaging. Packaging Materials and Processing for Food, Pharmaceuticals and Cosmetics2021; 2021: 75–96.
66.
BichlerCLangowskiH-CMoosheimerU, et al.Adhesion mechanism of aluminum, aluminum oxide, and silicon oxide on biaxially oriented polypropylene (BOPP), poly (ethyleneterephthalate)(PET), and poly (vinyl chloride)(PVC). J Adhes Sci Technol1997; 11(2): 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856197x00336
67.
RobertsonGL. Food packaging: principles and practice. CRC Press, 2005.
68.
KirwanMJStrawbridgeJW. Plastics in food packaging. Food packaging technology2003; 1: 174–240.
69.
PiringerOGBanerAL. Plastic packaging materials for food: barrier function, mass transport, quality assurance, and legislation. John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
70.
ArvanitoyannisIBosneaL. Recycling of polymeric materials used for food packaging: current status and perspectives. Food Rev Int2001; 17(3): 291–346. https://doi.org/10.1081/fri-100104703
71.
HahladakisJNVelisCAWeberR, et al.An overview of chemical additives present in plastics: migration, release, fate and environmental impact during their use, disposal and recycling. J Hazard Mater2018; 344: 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.10.014
72.
Al-SalemSLettieriPBaeyensJ. Recycling and recovery routes of plastic solid waste (PSW): a review. Waste Manag2009; 29(10): 2625–2643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.06.004
73.
LopezGArtetxeMAmutioM, et al.Thermochemical routes for the valorization of waste polyolefinic plastics to produce fuels and chemicals. A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2017; 73: 346–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.142
EissenbergerKBallesterosADe BisschopR, et al.Approaches in sustainable, biobased multilayer packaging solutions. Polymers2023; 15(5): 1184. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15051184
76.
VollmerIJenksMJFRoelandsMCP, et al.Beyond mechanical recycling: giving new life to plastic waste. Angew Chem Int Ed2020; 59(36): 15402–15423. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201915651
BauerA-SLeppikKGalićK, et al.Cereal and confectionary packaging: background, application and shelf-life extension. Foods2022; 11(5): 697. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11050697
81.
AllenNSEdgeM. Perspectives on additives for polymers. 1. Aspects of stabilization. J Vinyl Addit Technol2021; 27(1): 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/vnl.21807
82.
ThapliyalDTewariKVermaS, et al. Introduction: the evolution of functional coatings from protection to innovation. Functional Coatings for Biomedical, Energy, and Environmental Applications. Wiley, 2024, pp. 1–30.
83.
VilaplanaFKarlssonS. Quality concepts for the improved use of recycled polymeric materials: a review. Macromol Mater Eng2008; 293(4): 274–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.200700393
84.
MacBrideS. Recycling reconsidered: the present failure and future promise of environmental action in the United States. Mit Press, 2013.
Al-SalemSAntelavaAConstantinouA, et al.A review on thermal and catalytic pyrolysis of plastic solid waste (PSW). J Environ Manag2017; 197: 177–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.084
CerettiDVEdelevaMCardonL, et al.Molecular pathways for polymer degradation during conventional processing, additive manufacturing, and mechanical recycling. Molecules2023; 28(5): 2344. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28052344
La MantiaFP. Handbook of plastics recycling. iSmithers Rapra Publishing, 2002.
96.
DubeyDPandeyMPandeS, et al.A study of recycling and waste management strategies for mechanical systems and products with legal aspects. Indian Journal of Science and Research2023; 3(3): 78–83.
JeswaniHKrügerCRussM, et al.Life cycle environmental impacts of chemical recycling via pyrolysis of mixed plastic waste in comparison with mechanical recycling and energy recovery. Sci Total Environ2021; 769: 144483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144483
99.
Galan‐SanchezLDittrichCvan ZijlA, et al.Chemical recycling of mixed plastic waste for the production of aromatics and olefins as monomers for circular polyolefins and polycarbonate. SABIC TRUCIRCLE™(Case Study). In: Industrial Arene Chemistry: Markets, Technologies, Sustainable Processes and Cases Studies of Aromatic Commodities, 2023, vol. 4: 2143–2162.
100.
MiandadRBarakatMAburiazaizaAS, et al.Effect of plastic waste types on pyrolysis liquid oil. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad2017; 119: 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.09.017
101.
SarkarDK. Packaging technology and engineering: pharmaceutical, medical and food applications. John Wiley & Sons, 2020.
WangHLiuSWangH, et al.Thermochemical conversion of biomass to fuels and chemicals: a review of catalysts, catalyst stability, and reaction mechanisms. Catal Rev2025; 67(1): 57–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/01614940.2023.2275093
105.
GiuglianoMCernuschiSGrossoM, et al.Material and energy recovery in integrated waste management systems. An evaluation based on life cycle assessment. Waste Manag2011; 31(9-10): 2092–2101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.02.029
106.
MankinsJC. Technology readiness levels. Nasa Washington, DC, USA, 1995.
107.
HéderM. From NASA to EU: the evolution of the TRL scale in Public Sector Innovation. The Innovation Journal2017; 22(2): 1–23.
108.
SinghRKRujB. Time and temperature depended fuel gas generation from pyrolysis of real world municipal plastic waste. Fuel2016; 174: 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.01.049
109.
La MantiaFP. Recycling of heterogeneous plastics wastes: I—Blends with low-density polyethylene. Polym Degrad Stabil1992; 37(2): 145–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-3910(92)90077-i
110.
ManiasEUtrackiLA. Thermodynamics of polymer blends. Polymer blends handbook2014; 282: 171–289.
111.
SchynsZOShaverMP. Mechanical recycling of packaging plastics: a review. Macromol Rapid Commun2021; 42(3): 2000415. https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.202000415
112.
WangJHeQHuangS, et al.Mechanical recycling and performance characterisation of insert-injection moulded homo-polypropylene single-polymer composites and foams. Compos Commun2025; 53: 102176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2024.102176
113.
JohnsonTNDesVeauxJBhattA, et al.Upcycling of post-consumer mixed polyolefin feedstock: an economic and technical evaluation. J Environ Manag2025; 380: 125069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125069
114.
TratziPGiulianiCTorreM, et al.Effect of hard plastic waste on the quality of recycled polypropylene blends. Recycling2021; 6(3): 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling6030058
115.
LunaCBBda SilvaWAAraújoEM, et al.From waste to potential reuse: mixtures of polypropylene/recycled copolymer polypropylene from industrial containers: seeking sustainable materials. Sustainability2022; 14(11): 6509. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116509
116.
ShahSKGaoYAbdelfatahA. Plastic-waste-modified asphalt for sustainable road infrastructure: a comprehensive review. Sustainability2025; 17(21): 9832. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219832
117.
HeydariSHajimohammadiAJavadiNHS, et al.The use of plastic waste in asphalt: a critical review on asphalt mix design and Marshall properties. Constr Build Mater2021; 309: 125185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125185
118.
AguadoJSerranoDEscolaJ. Fuels from waste plastics by thermal and catalytic processes: a review. Ind Eng Chem Res2008; 47(21): 7982–7992. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie800393w
PaszunDSpychajT. Chemical recycling of poly (ethylene terephthalate). Ind Eng Chem Res1997; 36(4): 1373-1383.
121.
YangTFanQHeH, et al.Closed-loop recycling for poly (ethylene terephthalate)(PET) plastic: depolymerization, monomer separation, and recycled PET (rPET). Chem Eng J2025; 514: 163038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.163038
122.
AbedsoltanH. A focused review on recycling and hydrolysis techniques of polyethylene terephthalate. Polym Eng Sci2023; 63(9): 2651–2674. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.26406
123.
BaluRDuttaNKRoy ChoudhuryN. Plastic waste upcycling: a sustainable solution for waste management, product development, and circular economy. Polymers2022; 14(22): 4788. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14224788
124.
GuselnikovaOSemyonovOSviridovaE, et al.“Functional upcycling” of polymer waste towards the design of new materials. Chem Soc Rev2023; 52(14): 4755–4832. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2cs00689h
125.
VanarajRSuresh KumarSMKimSC, et al.A review on sustainable upcycling of plastic waste through depolymerization into high-value monomer. Processes2025; 13(8): 2431. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13082431
126.
RomeiroATeixeiraCCostaH, et al.Recycling polyethylene/polyamide multilayer films with poly (isoprene-g-maleic anhydride) compatibilizer. Polymers2024; 16(8): 1079. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16081079
127.
JarukumjornKChareunkvunS. Compatibilization of recycled high density polyethylene (HDPE)/polyethylene terephthalate (PET) blends. Suranaree J. Sci. Technol. 2007; 14(1): 1–8.
128.
ChoiSJangSDoG, et al. Optimizing maleic anhydride content to enhance mechanical performance and thermal stability of recycled polyolefin blends. Sci Rep. 2025; 16(1): 1234.
129.
Piedade CestariSRodriguesPVRibeiroAC, et al.Compatibilizer efficiency in enhancing marine plastic waste valorization through simulated recycled plastic blends. Polymers2024; 16(23): 3441. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16233441
Van EygenELanerDFellnerJ. Circular economy of plastic packaging: current practice and perspectives in Austria. Waste Manag2018; 72: 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.040
132.
Czarnecka-KomorowskaDWiszumirskaK. Sustainability design of plastic packaging for the Circular Economy/Zrownowazone projektowanie opakowan z tworzyw sztucznych w gospodarce cyrkularnej. Polimery2020; 65(1): 8–18.
133.
SchynsZOGShaverMP. Mechanical recycling of packaging plastics: a review. Macromol Rapid Commun2021; 42(3): 2000415. https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.202000415
