This research involved the synthesis of secondary nano copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO NPs) at a pH of 9 via the hydrothermal method. Subsequently, the CuO NPs were integrated with a polymer mix of polyacrylonitrile (PAN) and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) using the electrospinning technique to produce fibres from the resulting composite material, which exhibited improved properties and achieved commendable homogeneity between the inorganic and organic phases. The synthesised nanofibers were analysed utilising advanced techniques, including Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM), to examine the surface structure, morphological characteristics, and nanoparticle distribution within the fibres. The results displayed an excellent homogeneous fibrous structure and efficient dispersion of CuO particles within the prepared fibers. Energy-Dispersive X-ray (EDX) an study was conducted to verify the presence of encapsulated CuO, Cu, and O elements, in the PAN-PMMA nanofibers, with other constituent elements. Furthermore, FTIR spectra was conducted to detect functional groups and ascertain potential interactions between the CuO nanomaterial and the PAN-PMMA polymer blend. The results displayed Nanofibers have garnered significant attention over the last two decades owing to their a slight shift in the positions of some peaks, confirming the presence of interactions between the composite components. The optical characteristics of the synthesised fibres were examined by UV-Vis spectroscopy to assess the absorption behaviour and energy gap. The antibacterial efficacy of the synthesised fibres was assessed against Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus, revealing significant inhibitory activity against both species. This phenomenon is ascribed to the CuO NPs, which generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) that undermine the bacterial cell wall and other cellular components. The PAN–PMMA matrix facilitated superior nanoparticle distribution and augmented the effective surface area, hence increasing interaction with bacterial cells. These findings suggest significant potential for these fibres in antibacterial applications.
BrimoNSerdaroğluDÇUysalB. Comparing antibiotic pastes with electrospun nanofibers as modern drug delivery systems for regenerative endodontics. Curr Drug Deliv2022; 19(9): 904–917. https://doi.org/10.2174/1567201819666211216140947
3.
SongXJiangYZhangW, et al.Transcutaneous tumor vaccination combined with anti-programmed death-1 monoclonal antibody treatment produces a synergistic antitumor effect. Acta Biomater2022; 140: 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2021.11.033
4.
TorielloMAfsariMShonHK, et al.Progress on the fabrication and application of electrospun nanofiber composites. Membranes2020; 10(9): 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10090204
5.
WangHXiongYSandersK, et al.Scalable self-assembly of composite nanofibers into high-energy-density Li-Ion battery electrodes. ACS Nano2024; 18(39): 26799–26806. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c07602
6.
AbdulhussainRAdebisiAConwayBR, et al.Electrospun nanofibers: exploring process parameters, polymer selection, and recent applications in pharmaceuticals and drug delivery. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol2023; 90: 105156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2023.105156
7.
ChenWFuZWuX, et al.Micro-phase separation promoted by electrostatic field in electrospinning of alkaline polymer electrolytes: DFT and MD simulations. Chem Eng Sci2022; 248: 117171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2021.117171
8.
SunJChenJLiuK, et al.Mechanically strong proteinaceous fibers: engineered fabrication by microfluidics. Engineering2021; 7(5): 615–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2021.02.005
9.
NaeimiradMKrinsBGruterG-JM. A review on melt-spun biodegradable fibers. Sustainability2023; 15(19): 14474. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914474
10.
ChenLMeiSFuK, et al.Spinning the future: the convergence of nanofiber technologies and yarn fabrication. ACS Nano2024; 18(24): 15358–15386. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c02399
11.
PereiraCV PintoTSantosRM, et al.Sustainable and naturally derived wet spun fibers: a systematic literature review. Fibers2024; 12(9): 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib12090075
12.
XuHYagiSAshourS, et al.A review on current nanofiber technologies: electrospinning, centrifugal spinning, and electro‐centrifugal spinning. Macromol Mater Eng2023; 308(3): 2200502. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.202200502
PanditkarSSGurnuleWBWaghePU, et al.The art and science of electrospinning: a detailed review of process and potential applications. Polym Bull2026; 83(2): 53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-025-06071-0
15.
WangCWangJZengL, et al.Fabrication of electrospun polymer nanofibers with diverse morphologies. Molecules2019; 24(5): 834. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24050834
16.
YangXWangJGuoH, et al.Structural design toward functional materials by electrospinning: a review. E-Polymers2020; 20(1): 682–712. https://doi.org/10.1515/epoly-2020-0068
FouladivandaMKarimi-SabetJAbbasiF, et al.Step-by-step improvement of mixed-matrix nanofiber membrane with functionalized graphene oxide for desalination via air-gap membrane distillation. Sep Purif Technol2021; 256: 117809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117809
20.
PatelPRGundlooriRVN. A review on electrospun nanofibers for multiple biomedical applications. Polym Adv Technol2023; 34(1): 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.5896
21.
ZhangXMaJWangJ, et al.Modifying the fiber structure and filtration performance of polyester materials based on two different preparation methods. Langmuir2023; 39(9): 3502–3511. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c00095
SanchaniyaJVLasenkoIGobinsV, et al.A finite element Method for determining the Mechanical properties of Electrospun nanofibrous mats. Polymers2024; 16(6): 852. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16060852
24.
RashidTUGorgaREKrauseWE. Mechanical properties of electrospun Fibers—a critical review. Adv Eng Mater2021; 23(9): 2100153. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202100153
25.
LiangY-PChanYBAminuzzamanM, et al.Green synthesis and characterization of copper oxide nanoparticles from durian (Durio zibethinus) husk for environmental applications. Catalysts2025; 15(3): 275. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15030275
26.
AhmadianAShafieeAAliahmadN, et al.Overview of nano-fiber mats fabrication via electrospinning and morphology analysis. Textiles2021; 1(2): 206–226. https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles1020010
27.
SanchaniyaJVLasenkoIVijayanV, et al.A novel method to enhance the mechanical properties of polyacrylonitrile Nanofiber mats: an experimental and numerical investigation. Polymers2024; 16(7): 992. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16070992
28.
HuHWangJLiC, et al.Reinforcement strategies to improve the mechanical properties of nanofibrous aerogels: a review. ACS Appl Nano Mater2024; 7(23): 26546–26578. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.4c03465
29.
KhanMTAl MamunMAMiaR, et al.Effect of different solvent systems on fiber morphology and property of electrospun PCL nano fibers. Tekst. ve Mühendis2021; 28(122): 61–76.
30.
Narváez-MuñozCDiaz-SuntaxiDFCarrión-MatamorosLM, et al.Impact of the solvent composition on the structural and mechanical properties of customizable electrospun poly (vinylpyrrolidone) fiber mats. Phys Chem Chem Phys2021; 23(40): 22923–22935. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CP03145G
31.
EmmanuelJ. Critical electrospinning parameters for synthesis control of stabilized polyacrylonitrile nanofibers. Nanomater. Artic2023; 5(33): 21123–21132. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13192648
32.
PalaniappanSKAruchamyKBhuvaneshwaranM, et al.Polyacrylonitrile fiber: composites and applications. Synthetic and Mineral Fibers, Their Composites and Applications. Elsevier, 2024, pp. 269–290.
33.
AslamMKhanTBasitM, et al.Polyacrylonitrile‐based electrospun nanofibers–A critical review. Mater Werkst2022; 53(12): 1575–1591. https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.202200150
34.
VatanpourVPasaogluMEKose-MutluB, et al.Polyacrylonitrile in the preparation of separation membranes: a review. Ind Eng Chem Res2023; 62(17): 6537–6558. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.3c00057
35.
SelvanathanVAminuzzamanMTeyLH, et al.Muntingia calabura leaves mediated green synthesis of CuO nanorods: exploiting phytochemicals for unique morphology. Materials2021; 14(21): 6379. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216379
36.
AliABSlawigDSchlosserA, et al.Polyacrylonitrile (PAN) based electrospun carbon nanofibers (ECNFs): probing the synergistic effects of creep assisted stabilization and CNTs addition on graphitization and low dimensional electrical transport. Carbon N. Y2021; 172: 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.10.033
37.
MoniaTRidhaBC. Polymer-ceramic composites for bone challenging applications: materials and manufacturing processes. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2024; 37(4): 1540–1557. https://doi.org/10.1177/08927057231190066
38.
DanagodyBBoseNRajappanK. Electrospun polyacrylonitrile-based nanofibrous membrane for various biomedical applications. J Polym Res2024; 31(4): 119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-024-03965-x
LiXGuoSZhangS, et al.Preparation of antibacterial antiviral nanofiber and its application in durable and self-cleaning personal protective equipment. Chem Eng J2024; 479: 147770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.147770
41.
HuangCXuXFuJ, et al.Recent progress in electrospun polyacrylonitrile nanofiber-based wound dressing. Polymers2022; 14(16): 3266. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14163266
42.
ChoYBaekJWSagongM, et al.Electrospinning and nanofiber technology: fundamentals, innovations, and applications. Adv Mater2025; 37(28): 2500162. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202500162
43.
AbeykoonNCBonsoJSFerrarisJP. Supercapacitor performance of carbon nanofiber electrodes derived from immiscible PAN/PMMA polymer blends. RSC Adv2015; 5(26): 19865–19873. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra16594b
44.
WongYJSubramaniamHShing WongL, et al.Green synthesis and characterization of CuO/ZnO nanocomposite using Musa acuminata leaf extract for cytotoxic studies on colorectal cancer cells (HCC2998). Green Process Synth2024; 13(1): 20240164. https://doi.org/10.1515/gps-2024-0164
45.
AbdullahSSKadhimMAAl-BermanyE. Graphene-Reinforced the structure and mechanical properties of new PMMA-PVA hybrid nanocomposites. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2021; 1094(1): 012138. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1094/1/012138
46.
RabiaMFadhillahFAbdel-KhalekAA, et al.Single-step fabrication of poly (O-chlorobenzenamine)/silver halide nanosphere composite for pseudocapacitive energy storage. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2026; 39(5): 2550–2565. https://doi.org/10.1177/08927057251391656
47.
KaerkitchaNChuangchoteSSagawaT. Control of physical properties of carbon nanofibers obtained from coaxial electrospinning of PMMA and PAN with adjustable inner/outer nozzle-ends. Nanoscale Res Lett2016; 11(1): 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-016-1416-7
48.
MadunaLPatnaikA. Challenges associated with the production of nanofibers. Processes2024; 12(10): 2100. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12102100
MahmoudHSolimanMEbrahimS, et al.Polydopamine modified with Ag and CuO nanoparticles electrode for glucose sensor. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2026; 39(3): 963–983. https://doi.org/10.1177/08927057251361016
51.
Al-okaidyHSAl-okaidyHS. The effect of electrospinning parameters on morphological and mechanical properties of PAN-based nanofibers membrane the effect of electrospinning parameters on morphological and mechanical properties of PAN-based nanofibers membrane. Baghdad Sci J2023; 20(4): 7309. https://doi.org/10.21123/bsj.2023.7309
52.
PhangY-KAminuzzamanMAkhtaruzzamanM, et al.Green synthesis and characterization of CuO nanoparticles derived from papaya peel extract for the photocatalytic degradation of palm oil mill effluent (POME). Sustainability2021; 13(2): 796. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020796
53.
ShahmiriM, Effect of pH on the synthesis of cuo nanosheets by quick precipitation method. WSEAS Trans Environ Dev2013; 9(2): 137–145.
54.
Surapaneni MeghanaNPKabraPChakrabortyS, et al.Understanding the pathway of antibacterial activity of copper oxide nanoparticles. RSC Adv2015; 5(16): 12293–12299. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra12163e
55.
SaidMIOthmanAAAbdEM. Structural, optical and photocatalytic properties of mesoporous CuO nanoparticles with tunable size and different morphologies. RSC Adv2021; 11(60): 37801–37813. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ra04780a
56.
GuptaDMeherSRIllyaskuttyN, et al.Facile synthesis of Cu 2 O and CuO nanoparticles and study of their structural, optical and electronic properties. J Alloys Compd2018; 743: 737–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.181
57.
AbbasBHAbdalameerNKMohammedRS. Synthesis of copper oxide nanostructures by Ar plasma jet and study of their structural and optical properties. Iraqi J Sci2024; 65(4): 1999–2006. https://doi.org/10.24996/ijs.2024.65.4.18
58.
RadhakrishnanAABeenaBB. Structural and optical absorption analysis of CuO nanoparticles. Indian J. Adv. Chem2014; 2(2): 158–161.
59.
AbbasRASalimETMahdiRO. Deposition time effect on copper oxide nano structures, an analysis study using chemical method. J Mater Sci Mater Electron2024; 35: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-024-12143-0
60.
RamazanovMAShirinovaHANuriyevaSG, et al.Structure and optic properties of the nanocomposites based on polypropylene and amorphous silica nanoparticles. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2023; 36(4): 1762–1774. https://doi.org/10.1177/08927057211028890
61.
BuneaRSaikumarAKSundaramK. A comparison of optical properties of CuO and Cu 2 O thin films for solar cell applications. Mater Sci Appl2021; 2153-1188: 315–329. https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2021.127021
62.
DinMIRaniAAihetashamA, et al.Single step green synthesis of stable copper oxide nanoparticles as efficient photo catalyst material. J. Optoelectron. Biomed. Mater2017; 9(1): 41–48. https://doi.org/10.22401/ANJS.28.2.14
63.
IbrahimSHamdyYMDarwishH, et al.Effect of CuO doping on structural features, optical absorption and photoluminescence behavior of ZnO- based glasses. J Mater Sci Mater Electron2023; 34(10): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-023-10270-8
64.
MohammedYAYAMaFLiuL, et al.Preparation of electrospun polyvinylidene fluoride/amidoximized polyacrylonitrile nanofibers for trace metal ions removal from contaminated water. J Porous Mater2020; 28: 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-020-00995-w
65.
ZadehnazariA. Metal oxide/polymer nanocomposites: a review on recent advances in fabrication and applications. Polym. Technol. Mater2023; 62(5): 655–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/25740881.2022.2129387
66.
BatoolMHaiderMNJavedT. Applications of spectroscopic techniques for characterization of polymer nanocomposite: a review. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater2022; 32(12): 4478–4503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-022-02461-3
67.
OlonisakinKfanMXin-XiangZ, et al.Key improvements in interfacial adhesion and dispersion of fibers/fillers in polymer matrix composites; focus on pla matrix composites. Compos Interfaces2022; 29(10): 1071–1120. https://doi.org/10.1080/09276440.2021.1878441
68.
MousaviMRRafizadehMSharifF, “Effect of electrospinning on the ionic conductivity of polyacrylonitrile/polymethyl methacrylate nanofibrous membranes: optimization based on the response surface method,” Iran Polym J2016; 25(6): 525–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-016-0444-6
69.
JaneneFDhaouadiHArfaouiL, et al.Nanoplate-like CuO: hydrothermal synthesis, characterization, and electrochemical properties. Ionics2016; 22(8): 1395–1403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-016-1660-y
70.
HabibAJewenaNShahabuddinAKM, et al.hydrothermal synthesis of cuo nanoparticles and a study on property variation with synthesis temperature. J. Appl. Fundam. Sci. JAFS|ISSN2020; 6(2): 52.
71.
SiddiquiHQureshiMSHaqueFZ. pH-Dependent single-step rapid synthesis of CuO nanoparticles and their optical behavior. Opt. Spectrosc. (English Transl. Opt. i Spektrosk)2017; 123(6): 903–912. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X17120013
72.
WaheedHIKredyHM. Synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles at various pH values and temperatures by applying green chemistry using bardi plant (Typha domingensis). Univ. Thi-Qar J. Sci2025; 12(2): 1402.
73.
GherasimCPascariuPAsandulesaM, et al.Copper oxide nanostructures: preparation, structural, dielectric and catalytic properties. Ceram Int2022; 48(17): 25556–25568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.235
74.
SaidMIOthmanAAAbd elhakeemEM. Structural, optical and photocatalytic properties of mesoporous CuO nanoparticles with tunable size and different morphologies. RSC Adv2021; 11(60): 37801–37813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.235
75.
Bin ChanYAminuzzamanMTeyLH, et al.Impact of diverse parameters on the physicochemical characteristics of green-synthesized zinc oxide–copper oxide nanocomposites derived from an aqueous extract of Garcinia mangostana L. leaf. Materials2023; 16(15): 5421. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16155421
76.
AkarkenGCengizUBektaşTE. Hydrothermal synthesis of CuO nanoparticles: tailoring morphology and particle size variations for enhanced properties. J. Adv. Res. Nat. Appl. Sci2024; 10(2): 329–336. https://doi.org/10.28979/jarnas.1405595
77.
SuhaiminISAbu KassimSAhmad ZubirS, et al.Effect of bioactive glass on the properties of glass/polymer composite scaffold fabricated by solvent casting/particulate leaching technique. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2025; 38(9): 3490–3508. https://doi.org/10.1177/08927057251314420
78.
KamilaSVenugopalVR, “Synthesis and structural analysis of different CuO nano particles,” Int J Appl Sci Eng2016; 14: 133–146.
79.
SunWCaiQLiP, et al.Post-draw PAN – PMMA nanofiber reinforced and toughened Bis-GMA dental restorative composite. Dent Mater2010; 26(9): 873–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.03.022
80.
DrewCWangXBrunoFF, et al.Electrospun polymer nanofibers coated with metal oxides by liquid phase deposition. Compos. interfaces2005; 11(8–9): 711–724. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568554053148744
81.
AbdelamirAIHashimFS. Nano-structures & nano-objects solvothermal synthesis of CZTS nano-structure based-electrospun PAN nanofibers impact on characterizations and antibacterial activity. Nano-Struct Nano-Objects2025; 43(May): 101517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoso.2025.101517
ShabahNNRahmanTTKGopikaR, et al.Multifunctional polyvinyl alcohol/maranta arundinacea starch/LiAgO nanocomposites: a sustainable approach for antibacterial and optoelectronic applications. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2026; 39(2): 674–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/08927057251359540
84.
MandalCSahuM. Application of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles as potential antibacterial agents. Nanomaterials and nanocomposites for environmental remediation. Springer, 2021, pp. 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3256-3_6
85.
HabeebMAAl-IssaweJMAbdHJ, et al.Probing the electrical and linear/nonlinear optical properties of polyvinyl alcohol–chitosan/graphene oxide nanocomposites for next-generation optoelectronic applications. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2026; 4: 08927057261437749. https://doi.org/10.1177/08927057261437749
86.
ShalabyTHamadHIbrahimE, et al.Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety Electrospun nano fi bers hybrid composites membranes for highly e ffi cient antibacterial activity. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf2018; 162: 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.07.016
87.
Magimai Antoni RajDGeorgeADhayal RajA, et al.The role of pH in enhancing the capacity of CuO nanoparticles for antibacterial activity. Mater Today Proc2019; 36: 504–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.222
88.
LiYZhangWNiuJ, et al.Mechanism of photogenerated reactive oxygen species and correlation with the antibacterial properties of engineered metal-oxide nanoparticles. ACS Nano2012; 6(6): 5164–5173. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn300934k
89.
HabeebMAAbdel-AmirAHAl-IssaweJM, et al.Fabrication and evaluation of PVA/SrTiO3-Co2O3 futuristic films for biomedical and energy storage applications. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2026; 3: 08927057261429035. https://doi.org/10.1177/08927057261429035
