The relationship between chemical microstructure,phase morphology,rheology and physico-mechanical properties of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers synthesized with various reaction stoichiometric ratios
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2026
The relationship between chemical microstructure,phase morphology,rheology and physico-mechanical properties of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers synthesized with various reaction stoichiometric ratios
This research focuses on synthesizing thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers (TPUs) using a reactive mixing method in an internal mixer, aiming to overcome the viscosity-related challenges of traditional synthesis techniques. Two types of polyester polyols based on ethylene glycol (Polyester-E) and butane diol (Polyester-B) along with two diisocyanates (pure 4,4′-MDI and a mixture of 4,4′-MDI/2,4′-MDI), a butane diol (BDO) chain extender, and dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL) catalyst were used. The study examined one-step and two-step feeding methods to investigate how process parameters and reactant ratios affect TPU properties. Tensile testing and FTIR analysis revealed that higher hydrogen bonding index (HBI) improved mechanical strength. AFM images showed increased microphase separation with higher diisocyanate-to-polyol ratios, indicated by larger hard segment domains. DSC results confirmed reduced crystallinity and increased melting temperatures with higher hard segment content. Rheological analysis demonstrated that increasing hard segment content led to greater complex viscosity and storage modulus, suggesting improved rigidity and phase separation.
ShiroleAPerottoCUBalogS, et al.Tailoring the shape memory properties of segmented poly (ester urethanes) via blending. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2018; 10: 24829–24839.
2.
SwartzJLSheppardDTHaugstadG, et al.Blending polyurethane thermosets using dynamic urethane exchange. Macromolecules2021; 54: 11126–11133.
3.
TehranACShelesh-NezhadKBarazandehFJ. Mechanical and thermal properties of TPU-toughened PBT/CNT nanocomposites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2019; 32: 815–830.
4.
RizzoFCuomoSPintoF, et al.Thermoplastic polyurethane composites for railway applications: experimental and numerical study of hybrid laminates with improved impact resistance. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2021; 34: 1009–1036.
5.
SwartzJLEllingBRCastanoI, et al.Copolymers prepared by exchange reactions enhance the properties of miscible polymer blends. Macromolecules2022; 55: 8548–8555.
6.
PrisacariuCScortanuEAgapieB. Effect of the hydrogen bonding on the inelasticity of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers. J Ind Eng Chem2013; 19: 113–119.
7.
JiangLZhangRXueP, et al.Research on the performance of three-dimensional-braided-glass fiber reinforced in-situ polymerized TPU. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2025; 38: 435–450.
8.
Van GorpJJDesalvoJWMillerR. Susterra® propanediol-renewability, sustainability and differentiating performance in urethane applications. EI du Pont de Nemours and Company Experimental Station in Wilmington and DuPont Tate & Lyle Bio Products Company, LLC in London, 2010.
MiralvarMRBabaieARezaeiM, et al.Coumarin-based polyurethane with triple-shape memory effect, photo-responsive self-healing, photolithography, and dual-mode encoding/decoding for smart data transfer. Eur Polym J2024; 221: 113528.
11.
HuSShouTGuoM, et al.Fabrication of new thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers with high heat resistance for 3D printing derived from 3, 3-dimethyl-4, 4′-diphenyl diisocyanate. Ind Eng Chem Res2020; 59: 10476–10482.
12.
GłowińskaEWolakWDattaJ. Eco-friendly route for thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers with bio-based hard segments composed of bio-glycol and mixtures of aromatic–aliphatic and aliphatic–aliphatic diisocyanate. J Polym Environ2021; 29: 2140–2149.
13.
ZhaoJZhuJZhangJ, et al.Review of research on thermoplastic self-healing polyurethanes. React Funct Polym2024; 199: 105886.
14.
IAfRoC. Re-evaluation of some organic chemicals, hydrazine and hydrogen peroxide. JARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum1999; 71: 319–335.
15.
RamachandranAAReghunadhanAMariaHJ, et al.Role of functional polymers in the compatibilization of polymer blends. Reactive and Functional Polymers Volume Two: Modification Reactions, Compatibility and Blends2020: 5–21.
16.
LosariaPMYimJ-H. A highly stretchable large strain sensor based on PEDOT–Thermoplastic polyurethane hybrid prepared via in situ vapor phase polymerization. J Ind Eng Chem2019; 74: 108–117.
17.
XanthosM. Reactive extrusion: principles and practice. Hanser Publishers, 1992, pp. 304.
18.
Mohd NoorNSendijarevicASendijarevicV, et al.Comparison of adipic versus renewable azelaic acid polyester polyols as building blocks in soft thermoplastic polyurethanes. J Americ Oil Chem Soc2016; 93: 1529–1540.
19.
JungCJanaSCGunesIS. Analysis of polymerization in chaotic mixers using time scales of mixing and chemical reactions. Ind Eng Chem Res2007; 46: 2413–2422.
20.
BetingytėVŽukienėKJankauskaitėV, et al.Influence of calcium carbonate fillers on the properties of recycled poly (e-caprolactone) based thermoplastic polyurethane. Mater Sci2012; 18: 243–249.
21.
ArashSAkbariBGhalebS, et al.Preparation of PLA-TPU-Nanoclay composites and characterization of their morphological, mechanical, and shape memory properties. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2023; 139: 105642.
22.
PowersDSVaiaRAKoernerH, et al.NMR characterization of low hard segment thermoplastic polyurethane/carbon nanofiber composites. Macromolecules2008; 41: 4290–4295.
23.
Noor AzammiAMSapuanSIshakM, et al.Mechanical and thermal properties of kenaf reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)-Natural rubber (NR) composites. Fibers Polym2018; 19: 446–451.
24.
ParnellSMinK. Reactive blending of thermoplastic polyurethane in situ with poly (vinyl chloride). Polym Eng Sci2005; 45: 876–887.
25.
YousefzadeOUgartemendiaJMSangronizL, et al.Reactive melt processing of poly (L-lactide) in the presence of thermoplastic polyurethane and carboxylated carbon nanotubes. J Mater Sci2019; 54: 14961–14974.
26.
JimenezGA. Characterization of poly (methyl methacrylate) and thermoplastic polyurethane-carbon nanofiber composites produced by chaotic mixing. University of Akron, 2007.
27.
XuDZhouYGuoJ, et al.Different component ratio of polyamide 1212/thermoplastic polyurethane blends: effect on phase morphology, mechanical properties, wear resistance, and crystallization behavior. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2022; 35: 249–260.
28.
BeneditoABuezasIGiménezE, et al.Dispersion and characterization of thermoplastic polyurethane/multiwalled carbon nanotubes by melt mixing. J Appl Polym Sci2011; 122: 3744–3750.
VerhoevenVWA. The reactive extrusion of thermoplastic polyurethane. 2006.
31.
Eyvazzadeh KalajahiARezaeiMAbbasiF, et al.The effect of chain extender type on the physical, mechanical, and shape memory properties of poly (ε-caprolactone)-based polyurethane-ureas. Polym-Plast Technol Eng2017; 56: 1977–1985.
32.
PattamapromCWuC-HChenP-H, et al.Solvent-free one-shot synthesis of thermoplastic polyurethane based on bio-poly (1, 3-propylene succinate) glycol with temperature-sensitive shape memory behavior. ACS Omega2020; 5: 4058–4066.
33.
BackesEHHarbSVPintoLA, et al.Thermoplastic polyurethanes: synthesis, fabrication techniques, blends, composites, and applications. J Mater Sci2024; 59: 1123–1152.
34.
HesamiSSadeghiVAziziA. Investigation of modified bitumen’s rheological properties with synthesized polyurethane by MDI-PPG reactive prepolymers. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2021; 34: 614–632.
35.
Yan-tingHZhengCWeiD, et al.Comparative study of in situ polymerized waterborne polyurethane/nano-silica composites and polyethersiloxanediol-modified polyurethane. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2017; 30: 107–120.
36.
YamasakiS. Industrial synthetic methods for rubbers. 8. Polyurethane elastomers. Int Polym Sci Technol2016; 43: 29–36.
37.
GaoZWangZLiuZ, et al.Hard block length distribution of thermoplastic polyurethane determined by polymerization-induced phase separation. Polymer2022; 256: 125236.
38.
MichaeliWGrefensteinA. Engineering analysis and design of twin‐screw extruders for reactive extrusion. Adv Polym Technol1995; 14: 263–276.
39.
ErcanNDurmusAKaşgözA. Comparing of melt blending and solution mixing methods on the physical properties of thermoplastic polyurethane/organoclay nanocomposite films. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2017; 30: 950–970.
40.
ZhangYLiuDChenZ. Production of C2–C4 diols from renewable bioresources: new metabolic pathways and metabolic engineering strategies. Biotechnol Biofuels2017; 10: 299–320.
41.
DuvalASarbuADalmasF, et al.2, 3-Butanediol as a biobased chain extender for thermoplastic polyurethanes: influence of stereochemistry on macromolecular architectures and properties. Macromolecules2022; 55: 5371–5381.
42.
ZhouSHuangJZhangQ. Mechanical and tribological properties of polyamide-based composites modified by thermoplastic polyurethane. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2014; 27: 18–34.
43.
LiYYangZDingL, et al.Feasible self-healing CL-20 based PBX: employing a novel polyurethane-urea containing disulfide bonds as polymer binder. React Funct Polym2019; 144: 104342.
DelebecqEPascaultJ-PBoutevinB, et al.On the versatility of urethane/urea bonds: reversibility, blocked isocyanate, and non-isocyanate polyurethane. Chem Rev2013; 113: 80–118.
46.
WangS-KSungCSP. Fluorescence and IR characterization of cure in polyurea, polyurethane, and polyurethane− urea. Macromolecules2002; 35: 883–888.
47.
BabaieARezaeiMSoflaRLM. Investigation of the effects of polycaprolactone molecular weight and graphene content on crystallinity, mechanical properties and shape memory behavior of polyurethane/graphene nanocomposites. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2019; 96: 53–68.
48.
Eyvazzadeh KalajahiARezaeiMAbbasiF. Preparation, characterization, and thermo-mechanical properties of poly (ε-caprolactone)-piperazine-based polyurethane-urea shape memory polymers. J Mater Sci2016; 51: 4379–4389.
49.
KurimotoYTakedaMKoizumiA, et al.Mechanical properties of polyurethane films prepared from liquefied wood with polymeric MDI. Bioresour Technol2000; 74: 151–157.
50.
FrickARochmanA. Characterization of TPU-Elastomers by thermal analysis (DSC). Polym Test2004; 23: 413–417.
51.
WangHZhangLPehKWE, et al.Effect of phase separation and crystallization on enthalpy relaxation in thermoplastic polyurethane. Macromolecules2022; 55: 8566–8576.
52.
SeymourRWCooperSL. Thermal analysis of polyurethane block polymers. Macromolecules1973; 6: 48–53.
53.
XuTShenWLinX, et al.Mechanical properties of additively manufactured thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) material affected by various processing parameters. Polymers2020; 12: 3010.
54.
BoubakriAHaddarNElleuchK, et al.Impact of aging conditions on mechanical properties of thermoplastic polyurethane. Mater Des2010; 31: 4194–4201.
55.
YoonPJHanCD. Effect of thermal history on the rheological behavior of thermoplastic polyurethanes. Macromolecules2000; 33: 2171–2183.
56.
HalimNHAAAminK. Rheological properties of cellulose nanocrystals isolated via mechanical methods in thermoplastic polyurethane matrix. Mater Today Proc2022; 57: 1021–1026.
