Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the antibacterial activity of dental material containing nanoparticles of the extract of
Keywords
Introduction
Denture teeth materials are frequently used to replace missing teeth. The material compositions have witnessed not only regular improvements but also revolutionary developments. However, the dental prosthesis is not without intricate challenges as the chewing forces and the presence of the acidic biofilms notably affect the prosthesis.
As a matter of fact, direct restorations have presented an annual failure, rating up to 7.9% with the main reasons of secondary caries and bulk fracture.1–3 It was reported that the 5-year failure rate of fixed dental prostheses was more than 10%, due to the common complications of caries and endodontic diseases.4,5 Although the implant survival has ranged from 92.8 to 97.1% reached over a follow-up period of 10 years, the peri-implantitis cannot be ignored. It is mainly originated by the biofilm accumulation.6,7 Dental materials are subjected to an aggressive attack by bacteria. The oral cavity seems of a complex ground for a noticeably high humidity, a moderate temperature, and an abundance of nutrients. It actually motivates the development of differentiated microorganisms as well as microbial biofilms.8,9
Accordingly, it is critically important to develop a denture teeth material with the capacity of minimizing the cropping up occurrence of recurrent caries and the presence of acidic biofilms. Research has focused on imparting antimicrobial properties to biomaterials using silver, zinc oxide, and quaternary ammonium compounds,8,10 which exhibit strong antibacterial effects but may pose risks such as cytotoxicity. In contrast, medicinal plant particles offer a natural and biocompatible alternative, rich in diverse bioactive compounds that reduce the risk of resistance and provide antioxidant benefits. Specifically, particles from
Moreover, there has been much discussion about the antibacterial activity of the extract of
The extraction of the
Materials and methods
Materials
A denture teeth material has been manufactured as a composite material by reinforcing resin with filler, classifying it within the composite material category. It is based on PMMA, which is used as an organic matrix. At the same time, different percentage of
Firstly,
Measurement of filler particle size
Extract particle size distributions have been measured on Malvern’s Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) instruments, the Zetasizer Nano S. This Zetasizer is a device, which measures the sized particles, having particle size of particles having a diameter, which ranges from 0.4 nm to 10 µm.
Composites processing
In order to improve the filler dispersion in the resin, the mixture of PMMA and the extract of
Antibacterial activity tests
The following oral cavity pathogen strains are selected to conduct antimicrobial activity tests, notably
Tribological tests
The experiments are conducted using a pin-on-disk tribometer (Figure 1). The dimensions of the cylindrical samples are of Ø25 mm × 4 mm per disk. The applied counter-face is an Alumina ball with a diameter of 6 mm per pin. The two loads of 5 and 10N are applied during the wear tests. The sliding velocity is 300 rpm for 2 hours meanwhile the diameter of the wear track is 6 mm. Actually, the sliding distance is equal to 0,678 Km. The set of tests are conducted under dry conditions at room temperature. For a more stimulation of the real wear conditions of the human teeth, the choice of these parameters is based on both the clinical experience and the literature itself. During the chewing process of human beings, the magnitude of the masticatory force in the oral cavity ranges from 3 to 36 N.
15
Furthermore, the dental restorative materials and teeth are subjected to 0.6 km per year sliding distance.
16
Pin-on-disk tribometer.
The worn surfaces of the specimens were scanned using a surface profilometer to obtain the wear volume (Figure 2). For each sample, ten passes were made, and the average was multiplied by the perimeter of the wear track to calculate the wear volume. Equally, in order to determine the wear mechanisms, the wear tracks are examined using a scanning electron microscope (ZEISS 1450VPSE). Profilometer investigation of typical wear track.
Mechanical tests
The bending strength, the bending modulus and the compressive strength of the elaborated composites are measured using a universal mechanical testing machine, known as TIME WDW-50E. The rectangular bar specimens with the dimensions of 64 mm × 10 mm × 3.3 mm are prepared for the three-point bending test, notably the 50 mm span and the 5 mm/min crosshead speed, However, the dental prosthesis is not without intricate challenges, notably the chewing forces and the presence of the acidic biofilms, which affect the prosthesis.
Complied with the requirements of the 20795-1:2013 ISO norm. The standard norm sets a limit of at least 65 MPa for bending strength and 2000 MPa for bending modulus to qualify composites as dental materials.
For the compressive test, the cylinder specimens dimensionally identified as Ø13 mm × 26 mm are prepared in accordance with ASTM D695 to measure compressive strength, using a loading rate of 1.3 mm/min.
Results and discussion
Extract of the particles size
The Particle size distribution of 
According to Damien et al, a nanocomposite is a multiphase solid material where one of the phases is nanofiller. Generally, a nanofiller is a filler, which has three distinct dimensions of less than 100 nm.
14
Accordingly, the
Antibacterial activity
The antibacterial activity of the Antibacterial activity of the extract of Inhibition zone of composites containing 10% and 20% of the extract of 

Once the antibacterial activity is confirmed, a check of the mechanical behavior of the material is necessary for dental use. Hence, the tribological and the bending characterization will be done. The findings are presented in the following sections.
Tribological response
Two important properties are investigated, which consist of the friction and the wear of the biocomposite with different rate of
Friction coefficient
The evolution of the friction coefficient for the composites containing different percentage of the extract, against different applied normal load, is displayed in Figure 6. It is clearly noted that the friction coefficient increases with the applied load. This finding is mainly due to the plastic deformation of the asperities in the contact. Specifically, the friction coefficient goes minimally, matching a transitional course from the elastic contact to the plastic one. It is worth noting that the load is likely to change the temperature of the visco-elastic transitions in polymers and accordingly the friction mechanism itself.
19
Friction coefficient of composites containing different percentage of the extract of 
More importantly, the findings reveal that the evolution of the friction coefficients of composites/alumina is not affected by the filler’s addition (Figure 6(b)), with the exception of the incorporation of 10% of the filler causing the decrease of the friction coefficient. Aguilera-Camacho et al. have found similar results with the incorporation of the calcium oxide (CaO) nanoparticles into the PMMA. 20 The incorporation of a small percentage of CaO shows a lower mean friction coefficient value, as an average for all the loads, compared to the PMMA. 20
Wear volume
Figure 7 shows the evolution of the wear volume in accordance with the percentage of the Wear volume of different composites under 5 and 10N normal loads.
As a conclusion, the optimal fraction of the extract, which gives higher wear resistance, is 10% with both applied loads.
Wear mechanism
The SEM micrographs, which are tested through 5 N and 10 N normal loads show wear tracks of PMMA.
From Figure 8(a) and (b), plastic deformations are found. Indeed, a crack network proves that the wear mechanism of PMMA at the lower normal load is both an adhesive and a fatigue wear. In fact, the adhesive wear is evidenced by the presence of the galling forms at the contact. A general principle of the feature of adhesive wear is the transfer of material from one surface to another due to localized bonding between the contacting solid surfaces.20,23 Several studies have reported similar adhesive wear for PMMA sliding against different counter-face.20,24,25 In addition, some micro-cracks are noticed due to the micro-fatigue phenomenon and the stress concentration on the surface of PMMA. These micro-cracks facilitate material removal, in the form of debris, during alumina ball sliding. Indeed, PMMA is a fragile material, demonstrating low fracture toughness KIC.
26
Consequently, the considerable ability of PMMA to create debris is related to its low fracture toughness. SEM of PMMA wear track under different normal load 5N (a and b) and 10N (c and d).
As a result, the more the normal load increases to 10N (Figure 8(c) and (d)), the more complicated the wear mechanism becomes. It is referred to the high deformation of the plastic. During the running-in period, the mechanism still remains a combination of adhesive and fatigue wear, leading to slight damage on the contact. With the evolution of cycles, the fatigue wear mechanism becomes much more severe and the generation of debris becomes more and more important. Consequently, the debris produced from the highly loaded surface contacts by fracture are trapped between the two sliding surfaces. They are crushed into finer particles. Consecutively, they become compacted into the wear track to form a stuck zone and smooth area at the contact surface. Just after the stuck zones are submitted to plastic, deformations and fractures appear, which again allow the detachment of the material and their evacuation outside the wear track. This mechanism is cyclically repeated.
After the incorporation of the filler, the SEM micrographs for ‘PMMA/10% SEM observation of PMMA (a and b) and composite (10% Extract of 
Mechanical properties (bending properties and compressive strength)
The bending strength (σf), the bending modulus (Ef) and the compressive strength (σc) of dental composites are presented in Figures 10–12 respectively. These figures show an obvious change with regard to the extract nanoparticles incorporation. Comparing to PMMA, the incorporation of the 10% extract has an enhancing effect on the final composite compressive strength. Nevertheless, the addition of the 15% and 20% extract lead to a reduction in the compressive strength. The bending strength (σf) and the bending modulus (Ef) are decreased by the increase of the filler’s percentage. However, they remained above the indicated limits of the standard norm by adding either 10% or 15% of the filler. Compressive strength (σc) of composites reinforced with different percentage of Bending modulus (Ef) of composites reinforced with different percentage of Bending strength (σf) of composites reinforced with different percentage of 


These findings are possibly associated with the size, the particles dispersion quality and the volume percentage of the nanofiller.14,27 Over the past few decades, research on dental composites has primarily focused on reducing the size of filler particles, transitioning from several microns (>10 µm) in traditional composites to sizes below 1 µm in modern composites. Smaller particles offer a more favorable surface area-to-volume ratio, leading to increased interaction with the organic matrix.14,28 It is expected that the mechanical properties of composites filled with nanoscopic extract can be enhanced by achieving a more homogeneous dispersion of nanoparticles in the organic matrix. The findings for the nanocomposite containing 10% extract demonstrate that the improvement in polymer compressive strength is associated with well-dispersed nanoparticles of the extract. However, if the percentage of incorporated nanoparticles increases, they tend to form mesoporous agglomerates.23,28 This agglomeration negatively affects the adhesion between the filler and the polymer, consequently impacting the mechanical properties.
Moreover, one of the key parameters governing the properties of nanocomposites is the interaction between the filler and the matrix. This interaction is largely influenced by the application of chemical treatments to the surface of the filler,14,29 which is feasible for most types of nanofillers. However, in the present case, the antibacterial activity of the used extract is significantly impacted, potentially leading to its degradation when the surface structure is altered.
Conclusions
A new denture teeth material incorporating
Footnotes
Declaration of conflicting interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
