Study on thermal properties of poly(vinyl alcohol) and polyurethane composites with multiwalled carbon nanotubes/silica nanohybrids

Abstract

Two kinds of multiwalled carbon nanotubes/silica nanohybrids (CNTs/SiO₂) were synthesized via a sol–gel method by coating SiO₂ on the surfaces of CNTs that had been functionalized with poly(sodium-p-styrenesulfonate) (PSS). The influence of the nanohybrids on the thermal properties of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) and polyurethane (PU) composites was investigated. Characterization of CNTs/SiO₂ nanohybrids, elucidated with scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction, showed that PSS played a key role in the final morphology and resulted in a “core/shell” and “candied haws on a stick”-like structure. The thermal degradation and thermo-oxidation of PVA and PU composites evaluated by thermogravimetic analyses suggested that the thermal properties of PVA/(CNTs/SiO₂) composites were improved at relative high temperature range when compared with pure PVA, and the improvement mainly depended on the loading fraction of the nanohybrids, while for PU/(CNTs/SiO₂) composites, a small fraction of the nanohybrids increased the materials thermal properties, but the improvements were influenced by the type of CNTs/SiO₂ nanohybrids.

Keywords

Multiwalled carbon nanotubes silica poly(vinyl alcohol)polyurethane thermal properties

Introduction

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have attracted considerable interest in polymeric composites since they can impart the materials a unique combination of mechanical-, thermal-, and flame-retardant properties.^1

–5 However, it is difficult to make CNTs disperse homogenously within the polymeric matrix due to the intrinsic attractive van der Waals forces among CNTs, which have become the main obstacle of their applications.^6,7

There are two strategies commonly employed to functionalized CNTs to enhance the compatibility between CNTs and polymeric matrix.^8

–11 One is the chemical functionalization, which enhances the solubility of CNTs by providing covalent linkage between the sidewalls and/or endcaps of CNTs and functional groups.^12
–14 Another way is adding polymer or surfactant to form non-covalent polymer wrapping and non-covalent surfactant-encapsulating CNTs.^15
–17 Besides these two approaches, inorganic oxides (IOs) such as silica (SiO₂), and metal oxides (MO) such as titanium dioxide and zinc oxide have been employed to fabricate CNTs/IO and CNTs/MO nanohybrids to surface modify CNTs, which holds high promise for new potential applications perhaps in polymeric materials.^18,19

As far as it is known, previous research studies mainly focus on the effect of covalent and/or non-covalent-functionalized CNTs on the improvement in physicochemical properties of polymeric nanocomposites, such as polystyrene, poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), and polyurethane (PU), but the influence of CNTs/IO and CNTs/MO nanohybrids on the mechanical, thermal properties, and flammability performance of polymeric materials are not well known.^19

–23

In the present work, two kinds of nanohybrids of multiwalled CNTs with different diameters encapsulated by SiO₂ (CNTs/SiO₂) were synthesized via a sol–gel method by encapsulating SiO₂ on non-covalent–modified CNTs with the aid of poly(sodium-p-styrenesulfonate) (PSS). Their corresponding PVA and PU composites were prepared by solution blending. Scanning electron microscopy and thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) were employed to study the morphology of CNTs/SiO₂ nanohybrids and the thermal properties of these polymeric materials, and the emphasis is to investigate how the nanohybrids influence the thermal degradation and thermo-oxidative behavior of the materials.

Experimental

Materials

Waterborne PU emulsion (PU, trade mark PU80, solid content 30 ± 1%) was purchased from Hefei Anke Fine Chemicals Co., Ltd (China). Multiwalled CNTs (CNT20 with a diameter of approximately 10–30 nm and CNT60 with a diameter of approximately 50–70 nm, trade mark HCNTs20 and HCNTs60, respectively) were provided by Shenzhen Susn Sinotech New Materials Co., Ltd (China). PSS ((C₈H₇NaO₃S) _n , average molecular weight 70,000 was obtained from J&K Scientific Ltd (Beijing, China). PVA (1750 ± 50, average molecular weight 70,000), tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, C₈H₂₀O₄Si), ammonium hydroxide (approximately 25–28% solution in water), and ethanol were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd (China). All chemicals were used as received.

Synthesis of CNTs/SiO₂ nanohybrids

Nanohybrids of CNT20 and CNT60 encapsulated by SiO₂, which were denoted as CNT20/SiO₂ and CNT60/SiO₂, respectively, were synthesized by a sol–gel process. In a typical procedure, 50 mg CNTs dispersion in 150 ml of 0.5 wt% PSS solution consisting of 75 ml deionized water and 75 ml ethanol were ultrasonic agitated for about 2 h and transferred into a three-necked round-bottomed flask. Then, 13.5 ml ammonium hydroxide was added into the above mixture. Subsequently, a TEOS solution (1 ml TEOS/13 ml ethanol) was dripped, followed by mechanical stirring for 24 h at 32°C. The precipitates were filtered using 0.45 μm microporous membrane, washed with deionized water and ethanol, and then dried in an oven at 60°C.

Preparation of PVA/(CNTs/SiO₂) and PU/(CNTs/SiO₂) composites

PVA composites with CNTs/SiO₂ nanohybrids were prepared by solution mixing method. A 10 wt% PVA aqueous solution (5 g PVA/45 g deionized water) was firstly prepared by stirring at 90°C. The desired amounts of CNTs/SiO₂ nanohybrids were dispersed in 10 ml deionized water with ultrasonication for 10 min, followed by introduction into the PVA aqueous solution with vigorous stirring for 6 h. The obtained solutions were poured into a case to get approximately 0.3 mm thick films and air dried at room temperature before a further vacuum drying at 60°C for 12 h. The formulations are given in Table 1.

Table 1.

Formulations and the TGA data of PVA/(CNTs/SiO₂) composites.

Sample	Thermal degradation			Thermo-oxidation
Sample	T _1max (°C)	T _2max (°C)	Residue (%, 350°C)	T _1max (°C)	T _2max (°C)	T _3max (°C)	T _4max (°C)
Pure PVA	262	431	26.9	132	250	430	512
PVA/(CNT20/SiO₂) 0.5%	257	432	28.5	126	253	430	482
PVA/(CNT20/SiO₂) 1.0%	261	432	31.2	126	253	430	478
PVA/(CNT20/SiO₂) 1.5%	262	434	32.7	126	253	430	504
PVA/(CNT60/SiO₂) 1.0%	252	422	30.5	135	250	433	500

TGA: thermogravimetric analysis; PVA: poly(vinyl alcohol); CNT: carbon nanotube; SiO₂: silica.

To obtain PU/(CNTs/SiO₂) composites, 20 mg CNTs/SiO₂ nanohybrids were firstly ultrasonic agitated in 10 ml of 0.5 wt% PSS solution for 10 min, followed by centrifugation at 2000 r min⁻¹ for 4 min, and the supernatants were then added into 5 g PU emulsion with magnetic stirring for 4 h at room temperature. The PU/(CNTs/SiO₂) films were obtained according to the above method.

Characterization

The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were measured on a D/max-TTRIII X-ray diffractometer equipped with a copper K _α radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) at room temperature. Morphology of the products was observed on a Sirion 200 field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM; FEI, Hillsboro, Oregon, USA). Thermal degradation and thermo-oxidative behaviors of the materials were investigated by TGA, which were conducted with a TA Q5000 thermoanalyzer instrument (TA Instruments, New Castle, Delaware, USA). In each case, approximately 5–10 mg specimens were heated from 30°C to 700°C at a heating rate of 10°C min⁻¹ under nitrogen or in air atmosphere at a flow rate of 40 ml min⁻¹.

Results and discussion

Thermal properties of CNTs/SiO₂ nanohybrids

Thermal properties of the selected samples of CNT20s and CNT20/SiO₂ nanohybrids are shown in Figure 1. It is clearly seen that CNT20s exhibit high thermal degradation stability under nitrogen atmosphere. Although they show high 5% weight loss temperature, also referred as onset temperature (T _5%) at about 600°C during thermo-oxidation, CNT20s lose a weight of about 61.3 wt% in the temperature range of approximately 600–700°C.

Figure 1.

TGA curves of CNT20s and CNT20/SiO₂ nanohybrids tested under nitrogen and in air atmospheres.

Compared to pristine CNT20s, both thermal degradation and thermo-oxidation of CNT20/SiO₂ nanohybrids start earlier due to the loss of absorbed water and low-molecular-weight residues from PSS and exhibit faster weight loss rate in the temperature range of approximately 100–600°C (Figure 1, right). However, there is only a weight loss of about 8.4 wt% of CNT20/SiO₂ nanohybrids in the temperature range of approximately 600–700°C, which is mainly caused by the condensation of SiO₂ precursor and the oxidation of CNT20s; meanwhile, it also suggests that the coating of SiO₂ on CNT20 surfaces enhances the thermo-oxidative stability of the nanohybrids.

Morphologies of CNTs/SiO₂ nanohybrids

Figure 2 shows the FESEM images of CNT20s and CNT20/SiO₂ nanohybrids. CNT20s entangle each other and randomly form an interconnecting structure (Figure 2(a)). Figure 2(b) shows that after coating, a “core/shell” structure was formed in CNT20/SiO₂ nanohybrids in which the SiO₂ layer was uniformly coated on the surfaces of CNT20s and resulted in a smoother surface with an increased diameter of around 100 nm. Meanwhile, a “candied haws on a stick”-like structure in which CNT20s pierced through SiO₂ nanoparticles is also found in the insert. It is postulated that CNTs were firstly non-covalently wrapped by PSS via π–π interactions, which was favorable to improve the solubility of CNTs in water/ethanol, and SiO₂ precursor was subsequently attached to the surfaces of CNTs through hydrogen bonds, which led to the formation of two different kinds of nanostructures.

Figure 2.

FESEM images of (a) CNT20s, (b) CNT20/SiO₂ nanohybrids, (c) CNT20/SiO₂ nanohybrids calcined at 300°C for 1 h, and (d) CNT20/SiO₂ nanohybrids calcined at 600°C for 3 h.

Figure 2(c) and (d) shows the CNT20/SiO₂ nanohybrids calcined in air atmosphere at two different temperatures, 300°C for 1 h and 600°C for 3 h inside a muffle furnace, respectively. Figure 2(c) demonstrates that at relatively low calcination temperature, the nanohybrids remain in the structure of the uncalcined counterpart. Calcinations at 600°C led to the formation of a gray-colored powder. Figure 2(d) shows that SiO₂ nanoparticles attached with irregular smaller particles can be observed, but it is hard to find the CNTs, which may indicate that CNT20s have been cut due to the air oxidation.

Figure 3 shows the FESEM images of CNT60s and CNT60/SiO₂ nanohybrids. Similar to the observations in CNT20/SiO₂ nanohybrids, SiO₂ layer and/or SiO₂ nanoparticles are found to be coated on the surface of CNT60; meanwhile, the high-temperature calcinations destroyed this structure.

Figure 3.

FESEM images of (a) CNT60s, (b) CNT60/SiO₂ nanohybrids, (c) CNT60/SiO₂ nanohybrids calcined at 300°C for 1 h, and (d) CNT60/SiO₂ nanohybrids calcined at 600°C for 3 h.

XRD studies of CNTs/SiO₂ nanohybirds

Figure 4 shows the XRD patterns of CNT20/SiO₂ and CNT60/SiO₂ nanohybrids calcined at different temperatures. The peaks at 24.6° and 43.1° of CNT20s shown in the insert in Figure 5 (left) correspond to the (002) and (101) diffraction reflections of graphite layers, respectively.²⁴ A weak and broad peak centered at 22° assigned to a typical reflection of amorphous SiO₂ appears in CNT20/SiO₂ nanohybrids, which is concurrent with the weak (002) diffraction peak of CNT20. Calcinations of CNT20/SiO₂ nanohybrids at 300°C leave the similar XRD pattern to that of the uncalcined counterpart. When the nanohybrids are calcined at 600°C, the peak at 22° becomes sharp, but the typical reflection at 24.6° still exists. According to FESEM observation, it is therefore deduced that during high-temperature calcinations, CNTs were oxidized to become shorter but still remained in their graphite-layered structure. As expected, CNT60/SiO₂ nanohybrids showed the similar XRD features to those of CNT20/SiO₂ nanohybrids.

Figure 4.

XRD patterns of CNT20/SiO₂ and CNT60/SiO₂ nanohybrids calcined at different temperatures in an air atmosphere.

Figure 5.

TGA curves of PVA/(CNT20/SiO₂) composites tested under nitrogen and in air atmospheres.

Thermal properties of PVA/(CNTs/SiO₂) composites

The influence of CNT20/SiO₂ nanohybrids on thermal behavior of PVA was investigated by TGA. The TGA data, including T _5% and maximum mass loss rate temperature (T _max; the temperature obtained from the derivative TGA curve (DTG)), and the residue remaining at 350°C are listed in Table 1.

Thermal degradation profiles of PVA/(CNT20/SiO₂) composites are shown in Figure 5 (left). The pure PVA undergoes a two-stage degradation, where the first maximum of the degradation occurs at 262°C (T _1max), which is mainly due to the elimination of residual acetate groups, followed by the second maximum at 431°C (T _2max) due to the cleavage of the PVA backbone degradation.²⁵ An early weight loss process in the temperature range of approximately 100–160°C is attributed to the loss of absorbed moisture.

When CNT20/SiO₂ nanohybrids are presented, all PVA/(CNT20/SiO₂) composites keep two weight loss stages as pure PVA. Although the incorporation of CNT20/SiO₂ nanohybrids does not change the thermal degradation feature of PVA at relatively low temperatures, the composites exhibit increased thermal degradation stability with elevating temperature above 290°C. Noticeably, the higher the loading of the CNT20/SiO₂ nanohybrids, the higher is the char formation of the composites, which is evident that the residues at 350°C are 28.5, 31.2, and 32.7 wt% for PVA composites with 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 wt% CNT20/SiO₂ nanohybrids, respectively.

The thermo-oxidation of PVA/(CNT20/SiO₂) composites in air atmosphere occurs as four successive processes (Figure 5, right): the loss of absorbed water, partial dehydration of PVA, degradation of polyene, and the thermo-oxidation of carbonized residue. It is noted that the incorporation of 0.5 and 1.0 wt% CNT20/SiO₂ nanohybrids imparts enhancement of PVA composites in stability in the temperature range of approximately 220–470°C slightly, while the presence of 1.5 wt% enhances the stability of PVA in the temperature range of approximately 220–500°C obviously. Unexpectedly, the carbonized residues from all composites exhibit worse thermo-oxidative stability, and they show a decrease of approximately 8–35°C in terms of T _4max (the temperature at the maximum of degradation of char) compared to pure PVA, which is possibly related to the destruction of CNT20/SiO₂ nanohybirds. The improvements in thermal behaviors of PVA/(CNT20/SiO₂) composites are postulated to be due to the covalent bonds (–Si–O–C–) formed between hydroxyl groups of PVA and hydroxyl groups on SiO₂ coated on CNTs surfaces, which help to increase the interactions between PAV and CNT20/SiO₂ and restrict the polymer chain motion.

Figure 6 demonstrates that thermal behavior of PVA is not obviously influenced by the types of CNTs since PVA/(CNT60/SiO₂) exhibits the similar TGA profiles to PVA/(CNT20/SiO₂) at the same 1.0 wt% loading, no matter whatever atmosphere is employed.

Figure 6.

TGA curves of PVA/(CNT60/SiO₂) composites tested under nitrogen and in air atmospheres.

Thermal properties of PU/(CNTs/SiO₂) composites

PU is widely used in various industries because of its excellent physical and chemical properties. Comparisons of thermal degradation and thermo-oxidative stability of PU with PU/(CNTs/SiO₂) composite are shown in Figures 7 and 8. The interactions between the surface hydroxyl groups on SiO₂ and the –NH and –COO groups of PU are expected to improve the thermal stability of the PU/(CNTs/SiO₂) composites.

Figure 7.

TGA and DTG curves of PU and PU/(CNT20/SiO₂) composites tested under nitrogen and in air atmospheres.

Figure 8.

TGA and DTG curves of PU and PU/(CNT60/SiO₂) composites tested under nitrogen and in air atmospheres.

Figure 7 (left) shows that when tested in an air atmosphere, the PU/(CNT20/SiO₂) composite exhibits enhanced thermo-oxidative stability above 340°C compared to pure PU. A broad and weak peak centered at 522°C (T _2max) caused by the thermo-oxidation of the carbonized residue from PU can be found from the DTG curve, while for PU/(CNT20/SiO₂) composite, it leaves much more residual char and the carbonized residue exhibits 23°C increase in thermo-oxidative stability (Table 2). As shown in Figure 7 (right), the thermal degradation of all samples occurs through three successive processes. PU/(CNT20/SiO₂) composite starts to thermal degrade earlier compared to pure PU, but with elevating temperature above 300°C it exhibits an approximate increase of 5–15°C in thermal stability and leaves greater residual char.

Table 2.

TGA data of PU/(CNTs/SiO₂) composites.

Sample	Thermo-oxidation		Thermal degradation
Sample	T _1max	T _2max	T _1max	T _2max	T _3max
Pure PU	306	522	268	340	383
PU/(CNT20/SiO₂)	319	545	255	347	384
PU/(CNT60/SiO₂)	328	550	253	331	379

TGA: thermogravimetric analysis; PU: polyurethane; CNT: carbon nanotube; SiO₂: silica.

Figure 8 shows the influence of CNT60/SiO₂ nanohybirds on the thermal behavior of PU. Figure 8 (left) demonstrates that CNT60/SiO₂ nanohybirds are more efficient than CNT20/SiO₂ in improving the thermo-oxidative stability of PU, which evidences that T _1max of PU/(CNT60/SiO₂) increases from 319°C to 328°C and the residual char is more stable than that from PU/(CNT20/SiO₂). However, the presence of CNT60/SiO₂ does not change the thermal degradation profile of pure PU, further deteriorating its thermal degradation stability. The differences in thermal behaviors of PU composites derived from the introducing of CNT20/SiO₂ and CNT60/SiO₂ may come from the differences in diameters of CNTs.

Conclusions

The influence of the CNTs/SiO₂ nanohybrids with nanostructures of core/shell and candied haws on a stick-like structures on PVA and PU composites were investigated. It is noteworthy that the types of CNTs, the loading of the nanohybrids, and the interaction between the nanohybrids and the polymer matrices play important roles in the thermal stability of the materials. The incorporation of CNTs/SiO₂ nanohybrids into the PVA matrix led to an increase in both thermal degradation and thermo-oxidative stability to some extent due to the formation of covalent bonds, but the improvements depend on the loading fraction of CNTs/SiO₂. In the case of PU composites, the improvements in thermal properties were strongly influenced by the type of CNTs/SiO₂ nanohybrids, and CNT20/SiO₂ nanohybrids were more efficient than CNT60/SiO₂ nanohybrids to enhance the thermal degradation stability of PU, but the tendency was contrary during thermo-oxidation.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 51276054 and 51403048), Program for Excellent Young Talents in University of Anhui Province, National Undergraduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Programs (grant nos. 201311059005 and 201311059006), and DAAD (Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst).

References

Spitalsky

Tasis

Papagelis

. Carbon nanotube-polymer composites: chemistry, processing, mechanical and electrical properties. Prog Polym Sci 2010; 35(3): 357–401.

Kashiwagi

Grulke

Hilding

. Thermal and flammability properties of polypropylene/carbon nanotube nanocomposites. Polymer 2004; 45(12): 4227–4239.

Winey

Kashiwagi

. Improving electrical conductivity and thermal properties of polymers by the addition of carbon nanotubes as fillers. MRS Bull 2007; 32(4): 348–352.

Schartel

Braun

Knoll

. Mechanical, thermal, and fire behavior of bisphenol a polycarbonater/multiwall carbon nanotube nanocomposties. Polym Eng Sci 2008; 48(1): 149–158.

Atieh

. Effect of functionalize carbon nanotubes with amine functional group on the mechanical and thermal properties of styrene butadiene rubber. J Thermoplast Compos 2011; 24(5): 613–624.

Ding

Xie

. A simple route to coat mesoporous SiO₂ layer on carbon nanotubes. J Mater Chem 2009; 19: 3725–3731.

Grzelczark

Correa-Duarte

Liz-Marzán

. Carbon nanotubes encapsulated in wormlike hollow silica shells. Small 2006; 2(10): 1174–1177.

Soulie-Ziakovic

Nicolay

Prevoteau

. Dispersible carbon nanotubes. Chem-Eur J 2014; 20(5): 1210–1217.

Paula

Stéfani

Souza Filho

. Surface chemistry in the process of coating mesoporous SiO₂ onto carbon nanotubes driven by the formation of Si-O-C bonds. Chem-Eur J 2011; 17: 3228–3237.

10.

Kim

. Surface modifications for the effective dispersion of carbon nanotubes in solvents and polymers. Carbon 2012; 50(1): 3–33.

11.

Dooher

Dixon

Mcllhagger

. Multiwalled carbon nanotube/polysulfone composites. J Thermoplast Compos 2011; 24(4): 499–515.

12.

Sinnott

. Chemical functionalization of carbon nanotubes. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2002; 2(2): 113–123.

13.

Omrani

Yen

Cheng

. Enhanced processability of MWCNT through surface treatment by octa(phenol) polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane nano-crosslinking. J Mol Struct 2014; 1056: 299–306.

14.

Mekki

Samanta

Singh

. Core/shell, protuberance-free multiwalled carbon nanotube/polyaniline nanocomposites via interfacial chemistry of aryl diazoniu salts. J Colloid Interf Sci 2014; 418: 185–192.

15.

Liu

. Modifications of carbon nanotubes with polymers. Eur Polym J 2005; 41(11): 2693–2703.

16.

Vermisoglou

Georgakilas

Kouvelos

. Sorption properties of modified single-walled carbon nanotubes. Micropor Mesopor Mat 2007; 99: 98–105.

17.

Zhao

Stoddart

. Noncovalent functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Accounts Chem Res 2009; 42(8): 1161–1171.

18.

Wang

Yao

. Synthesis of carbon nanotube/mesoporous TiO₂ coaxial nanocables with enhanced lithium ion battery performance. Carbon 2014; 75: 345–352.

19.

Zhu

Liao

Huang

. Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic properties of ZnO-coated multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Mater Sci Eng B 2009; 163: 194–198.

20.

Rios-Fachal

Gracia-Fernandez

Lopez-Beceiro

. Effect of nanotubes on the thermal stability of polystyrene. J Therm Anal Calorim 2013; 113(2): 481–487.

21.

Rahimi-Razin

Haddadi-Asl

Salami-Kalajahi

. Matrix-grafted multiwalled carbon nanotubes/poly(methyl methacrylate) nanocomposites synthesized by in situ RAFT polymerization: a kinetic study. Int J Chem Kinet 2012; 44(8): 555–569.

22.

Doudou

Vivet

Chen

. Hybrid carbon nanotube-silica/polyvinyl alcohol nanocomposits films: preparation and characterization. J Polym Res 2014; 21: 420–428.

23.

Russo

Lavorgna

Piscitelli

. Thermoplastic polyurethane films reinforced with carbon nanotubes: the effect of processing on the structure and mechanical properties. Eur Polym J 2013; 49(2): 379–388.

24.

Yang

Fan

. Facile fabrication of MWCNT-doped NiCoAl-layerd double hydroxide nanosheets with enhanced electrochemical performances. J Mater Chem A 2013; 1: 1963–1968.

25.

Wilkie