The primary aim of this study is to facilitate interactions among the generative school leadership of high school principals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, to take responsibility for student performance. Existing research suggests that generative leadership is based on the principles of inclusiveness, employee creativity, knowledge transfer and delegation. The sample is based from nine principals from large high schools. To investigate this issue, this qualitative study assesses and analyses interviews and comments from participants. The findings show the high degree of centralisation and traditionalism of the Saudi Arabian educational sector, affecting creativity and inclusiveness, have a strong impact on student performance. The author recommends implementing teacher practitioner training to implement open-ended tasks teaching practices.
AburizaizahSKimYFullerB (2016) Diverse schools and uneven principal leadership in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Educational Research80:37–48.
2.
AldiabAChowdhuryHKootsookosA, et al. (2017) Prospect of eLearning in higher education sectors of Saudi Arabia: a review. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on energy and power (ICEP2016), Melbourne, Australia, 14–16 December 2016, pp. 574–580.
3.
AlharthiEF (2017) Teacher Evaluation in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s (KSA) Schools – Moving Forward. Southampton: University of Southampton.
4.
AllenJWayJDCasillasA (2019) Relating school context to measures of psychosocial factors for students in grades 6 through 9. Personality and Individual Differences136:96–106.
5.
AriksonA (2008) Formalist (linguistic) criticism in an English language teacher education program: the reward approach. Iranian Journal of Language Studies2(4):417–430.
6.
AriratanaWSirisookslipSNgangTK (2015) Development of leadership soft skills among educational administrators. Social and Behavioral Sciences186:331–336.
7.
Asrar-ul-HaqMAnwarSHassanM (2017) Impact of emotional intelligence on teacher’s performance in higher education institutions of Pakistan. Future Business Journal3(2):87–97.
8.
Barrera-OsorioFGanimianA (2016) The barking dog that bites: test score volatility and school rankings in Punjab, Pakistan. International Journal of Educational Development49:31–54.
9.
BereczkiEOKárpátiA (2018) Teachers’ beliefs about creativity and its nurture: a systematic review of the recent research literature. Educational Research Review23:25–56.
CimentepeIBingolH (2017) Parent oriented teacher selection causes language diversity. Journal of Theoretical Biology429:142–148.
13.
ChengASzetoE (2016) Teacher leadership development and principal facilitation: Novice teachers’ perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education58:140–148.
14.
DanielJ (2011) Discipline polices, successful schools, and racil justice. National Education Policy Center: University of Colorado Boulder.
15.
DuaS (2016) Declaring breakdowns: Powerfully Creating a Future That Matters, Through 6 Simple Steps. SAGE.
16.
DesselleSRajaLAndrewsBluiJ (2018) Perceptions of organizational culture and organizational citizenship by faculty in U.S. colleges and schools of pharmacy. National library of medical10(4):403–412.
17.
CivitilloSJuangLSchachnerM (2018) Challenging beliefs about cultural diversity in education: a synthesis and critical review of trainings with pre-service teachers. Educational Research Review24:67–83.
18.
DuganJPKomivesSR (2010) Influences on college students’ capacities for socially responsible leadership. Journal of College Student Development51(5):525–549.
GencerMSamurY (2016) Leadership styles and technology: leadership competency level of educational leaders. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences229:226–233.
21.
Glogger-FreyIAmpatziadisYOhstA, et al. (2018) Future teachers’ knowledge about learning strategies: misconcepts and knowledge-in-pieces. Thinking Skills and Creativity28:41–55.
22.
HargreavesAO’ConnorM (2018) Leading collaborative professionalism. Centre for Strategic Education Seminar Series Paper #274, April 2018, Melbourne, Australia.
23.
HazyJKUhl-BienM (2014) Changing the rules: the implications of complexity science for leadership research and practice. In: DavidD (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Leadership and Organizations. Oxford Handbooks Online Available 17 December 2015, pp. 75–89.
24.
JayanMBingKMusaK (2016) Investigating the relationship of adaptive leadership and leadership capabilities on leadership effectiveness in Sarawak. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences224:540–545.
25.
KlimekKJRitzenheinESullivanKD (2008) Generative Leadership: Shaping New Futures for Today’s Schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
26.
KontagoraHWattsMAllsopT (2018) The management of Nigerian primary school teachers. International Journal of Educational Development59(C):128–135.
27.
MacauxWP (2012) Generative leadership: responding to the call for responsibility. The Journal of Management Development31:449–469.
28.
HuMZhangMWangY (2017) Why do audiences choose to keep watching on live video streaming platforms? An explanation of dual identification framework. Computers In Human Behavior75:594–606.
29.
NolanAMollaT (2017) Teacher confidence and professional capital. Teaching and Teacher Education62:10–18.
30.
RichardsonCMishraP (2018) Learning environments that support student creativity: Developing the SCALE. Thinking Skills and Creativity27:45–54.
31.
RobinsonEMTagherCG (2017) The companion dissertation: enriching the doctoral experience. Journal of Nursing Education56(9):564–566.
32.
SaqlainNAl-QarniFGhadiN (2013) Are English language teachers in Saudi Arabia ready to integrate technology?Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences103:146–153.
33.
SaundersMLewisPThornhillA (2015) Research Methods for Business Students, 7th edn. London: Pearson Education.
34.
SohK (2017) Fostering student creativity through teacher behaviors. Thinking Skills and Creativity23:58–66.
35.
SongD (2018) Learning analytics as an educational research approach. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches10(1):102–111.
36.
SergisSSampsonDGiannakosM (2018) Supporting school leadership decision making with holistic school analytics. Computers in Human Behavior89:355–366.
37.
ThawinkarnDTangKNAriratanaW (2018) Relationship between perceived directors’ leadership and classroom quality of primary schools in Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences39:230–235.
38.
The Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) (2015) Framework for Research Ethics. Swindon: ESRC.
39.
VanblaereBDevosG (2016) Relating school leadership to perceived professional learning community characteristics: a multilevel analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education57:26–38.
40.
VossTWagnerWKlusmannU, et al. (2017) Changes in beginning teachers’ classroom management knowledge and emotional exhaustion during the induction phase. Contemporary Educational Psychology51:170–184.
41.
WangLKokotsakiD (2018) Primary school teachers’ conceptions of creativity in teaching English as a foreign language (EFL) in China. Thinking Skills and Creativity29:115–130.
42.
WarrickD (2017) What leaders need to know about organizational culture. Business Horizons60(3):395–404.
43.
WassellAKerriganMHawrylakM (2018) Teacher educators in a changing Spain: examining beliefs about diversity in teacher preparation. Teaching and Teacher Education69:223–233.
44.
WeaverLRPadronYN (1994) Writing Instruction for Limited English Proficient Students: A Survey of Teachers' Perceptions. ERIC. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED372641
45.
WiddowsonH. (2002). Defining Issues In English Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46.
YadaASavolainenH (2017) Japanese in-service teachers’ attitudes toward inclusive education and self-efficacy for inclusive practices. Teaching And Teacher Education64: 222–229.
47.
ZimmermanM (1990) Taking aim on empowerment research: on the distinction between individual and psychological conceptions. American Journal of Community Psychology18(1):169–178.
