A business school is a university-level institution that confers degrees in Business Administration. This paper examines the causes of business school reputation using two competing perspectives: the meritocratic and the institutional. The meritocratic perspective is based on the belief that reputation is an outcome of the business school’s achievements, which act as signals of organisational reputation. The institutional perspective highlights the importance of the institutional context in explaining reputation (business school past reputation and parent university reputation), minimising the effect of outcomes as reputation signals. The two perspectives are tested on a sample of US business schools via the use of multiple regressions and path analysis. The results lend weight to the institutional thesis, which brings into doubt the efficiency of short-term strategies that look to increase business school reputation.
AdlerN.HarzingA. (2009) ‘When knowledge wins: transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings'. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8(1), 72–95.
2.
ArgentiP. (2000) ‘Branding b-schools: reputation management for MBA programs'. Corporate Reputation Review, 3(2), 171–8.
3.
ArmstrongJ. S.SperryT. (1994) ‘Business school prestige – research versus teaching’. Interfaces, 24(2), 13–43.
4.
ArpanL.RaneyA.ZivnuskaS. (2003) ‘A cognitive approach to understanding university image’. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 8(2), 97–113.
5.
BennisW.O’TooleJ. (2005) ‘How business schools lost their way’. Harvard Business Review, May, 96–104.
6.
BoydB. K.BerghD. D.KetchenD. J. (2010) ‘Reconsidering the reputation–performance relationship: a resource-based view’. Journal of Management, 36(3), 588–609.
7.
ChunR. (2005) ‘Corporate reputation: meaning and measurement’. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(2), 91–109.
8.
D’AveniR. A. (1996) ‘A multiple-constituency, status-based approach to interorganizational mobility of faculty and input-output competition among top business schools'. Organization Science, 7(2), 166–89.
DichevL. D. (1999) ‘How good are business schools rankings?’Journal of Business, 72(2), 201–13.
11.
DillD. D.SooM. (2005) ‘Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: a cross-national analysis of university ranking systems'. Higher Education, 49, 495–533.
12.
ElsbachK. D. (2006) Organizational Perception Management. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
EngwallL. (2007) ‘Management education: research and practice’. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 23(1), 4–35.
14.
FeeC. E.HadlockC. J.PierceJ. R. (2005) ‘Business school rankings and business school deans: a study of nonprofit governance’. Financial Management, 34(1), 143–66.
15.
FombrunC. (1996) Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
16.
FombrunC.ShandleyM. (1990) ‘What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy’. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–58.
17.
Gaines-RossL. (2000) ‘CEO reputation: a key factor in shareholder value’. Corporate Reputation Review, 3(4), 366–70.
18.
GioiaD. A.CorleyK. G. (2002) ‘Being good versus looking good: business schools rankings and the circean transformation from substance to image’. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1(1), 107–20.
19.
GrahamH. D.DiamondN. A. (1997) The Rise of American Research Universities: Elites and Challengers in the PostWar Era. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
20.
HairJ. F.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L.BlackW. C. (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
HelmS. (2006) Common Grounds in the Perception of Corporate Reputation? A Comparison of Three Stakeholder Groups. 10th Anniversary Conference on Reputation, Image, Identity and Competitiveness, New York, 25–28 May.
23.
JarvisC. B.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffP. M. (2003) ‘A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research’. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2): 199–218.
24.
KeithB. (1999) ‘The institutional context of departmental prestige in American higher education’. American Educational Research Journal, 39(3), 409–45.
25.
KeithB. (2001) ‘Organizational contexts and university performance outcomes: the limited role of purposive action in the management of institutional status'. Research in Higher Education, 42(5), 493–516.
26.
KimE. H.ZhuM. (2010) ‘Universities as firms: the case of US overseas programs'. In ClotfelterC. (ed.), American Universities in a Global Market. Chicago: NBER/University of Chicago Press, pp. 163–205.
27.
LockA. (1999) ‘Accreditation in business education’. Quality Assurance in Education, 7, 68–76.
28.
MacdonaldI. (2006) ‘Offshore university campuses: bonus or baggage?’ in Critical Visions: Proceedings of the 29th HERDSA Annual Conference, Western Australia, 10–12 July. Published by the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia, pp. 207–15.
29.
MonteroJ. (2010) Entry Modes: Implications of Reputation, Working Paper. University of Valencia.
30.
MorgesonF. P.NahrgangJ. D. (2008) ‘Same as it ever was: recognizing stability in the Business Week rankings'. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 7, 26–41.
31.
PascarellaE. T.TerenziniP. T. (1991) How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32.
PfefferJ.FongC. T. (2002) ‘The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye’. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1(1), 78–95.
33.
RindovaV. P.WilliamsonI. O.PetkovaA. P. (2010) ‘Reputation as an intangible asset: reflections on theory and methods in two empirical studies of business school reputations'. Journal of Management, 36(3), 610–19.
34.
RindovaV. P.WilliamsonI. O.PetkovaA. P.SeverJ. M. (2005) ‘Being good or being known: an empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation’. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6): 1033–49.
35.
SafónV. (2007) ‘Factors that influence recruiters' choice of business schools and their MBA graduates: evidence and implications for business schools'. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6(2): 217–33.
36.
SafónV. (2009) ‘Measuring the reputation of top US business schools: a MIMIC modeling approach’. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(3): 204–28.
37.
SchumackerR. E.LomaxR. G. (2004) A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd edn. New York: Psychology Press.
38.
ShapiroC. (1983) ‘Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputations'. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(4), 659–80.
39.
ShenkarO.Yuchtman-YaarE. (1997) ‘Reputation, image, prestige, and goodwill: an interdisciplinary approach to organizational standing’. Human Relations, 50(11), 1361–81.
40.
ShuganS. M. (1996) Models, Theory and Selecting Research Topics: A Discussion. Paul D. Converse Marketing Symposium, University of Illinois, Proceedings.
StandifirdS. S. (2005) ‘Reputation among peer academic institutions: an investigation of the US News and World Report’s rankings'. Corporate Reputation Review, 8(3), 233–44.
43.
SweitzerK.VolkweinF. (2009) ‘Prestige among graduate and professional schools: comparing the U.S. News'Graduate School Reputation Ratings between disciplines'. Research in Higher Education, 50(8), 812–36.
44.
TerenziniP. T.PascarellaE. T. (1994) ‘Living with myths: undergraduate education in America’. Change, 26(1), 28–32.
45.
TheusK. T. (1993) ‘Academic reputations: the process of formation and decay’. Public Relations Review, 19(3), 277–91.
46.
ThomasH.LiX. (2009) ‘Mapping globally branded business schools: a strategic positioning analysis'. Management Decision, 47(9), 1420–40.
47.
ToutkoushianR. K.DundarH.BeckerW. E. (1998) ‘The National Research Council Graduate Program Ratings: what are they measuring?’Review of Higher Education, 21, 427–43.
48.
TracyJ.WaldfogelJ. (1997) ‘The best business schools: a market-based approach’. Journal of Business, 70(1), 1–31.
49.
TrankC. Q.RynesS. L. (2003) ‘Who moved our cheese? Reclaiming professionalism in business education’. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2(2), 189–205.
50.
TurbanD. B.CableD. M. (2003) ‘Firm reputation and applicant pool characteristics'. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(6), 733–51.
51.
TurbanD. B.GreeningD. W. (1997) ‘Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees'. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658–72.
52.
TurbanD. B.KeonT. L. (1993) ‘Organizational attractiveness: an interactionist perspective’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 184–93.
53.
Van de VenA. H.JohnsonP. E. (2006) ‘Knowledge for theory and practice’. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–21.
54.
Vidaver-CohenD. (2007) ‘Reputation beyond the rankings: a conceptual framework for business school research’. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(4), 278–304.
55.
VolkweinJ. F.SweitzerK. V. (2006) ‘Institutional prestige and reputation among research universities and liberal arts colleges'. Research in Higher Education, 47(2), 129–48.
56.
WebsterD. S. (1992) ‘Reputational rankings of colleges, universities, and individual disciplines and fields of study from their beginnings to the present’. In SmartJ. C. (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. VIII. New York: Agathon Press, pp. 234–304.
57.
YangS. U.AlessandriS. W.KinseyD. F. (2008) ‘An integrative analysis of reputation and relational quality: a study of university–student relationships'. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 18(2): 145–70.
