Regional economic development research must engage with empirical questions and policy evaluations and America's underlying anti-urban bias, which shapes American cities and policy. Standard mathematical microeconomic-founded models are a limited guide to analysis and interpretation; empirical work should consider other disciplines in addition to diverse economic perspectives. Underlying structural factors may be difficult to analyze but need attention, including federal and state hostility to cities, fragmented metropolitan forms that maldistribute urban economic output, and structural racism's impact on economies, housing, and labor markets. Doing strong empirical work while de-emphasizing theory building seems the best way to proceed.
AhrendR.FarchyE.KaplanisI.LembeckeA. C. (2015). What makes cities more productive? Agglomeration economies and the role of urban governance: Evidence from 5 OECD countries. Spatial Economics Research Center (SERC), Discussion paper 178.
2.
AlkhaldiF.IherjirikaC.McCulloughE.TreuhaftS. (2022). Will ARPA’s local fiscal recovery funds advance racial equity? PolicyLink and the Institute on Race, Power, and Political Economy at The New School. https://www.policylink.org/ARPA-equity
3.
AlonsoW. (1964). Location and land use: Towards a general theory of land rent. Harvard University Press.
4.
AshleyS.AcsG.BrownS.DeichM.MacDonaldG.MarronD.BaluR.RogersM.McAfeeM.KirschenbaumJ.RossT.GardereA.TreuhaftS. (2022). Scoring federal legislation for equity: Definition, framework, and potential application. The Urban Institute and PolicyLink.
5.
AustinB.GlaeserE.SummersL. (2018). Jobs for the Heartland: Place-based policies in 21st-century America. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2018(1), 151‐255. https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2018.0002
6.
BartikT. J. (2020a). Smart place-based policies can improve local labor markets. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 39(3), 844‐851. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22224
7.
BartikT. J. (2020b). Using place-based jobs policies to help distressed communities. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(3), 99‐127. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.34.3.99
8.
BennerC.PastorM. (2012). Just growth: Inclusion and prosperity in America’s metropolitan regions. Routledge.
9.
BennerC.PastorM. (2015). Equity, growth, and community: What the nation can learn from America’s metro areas. University of California Press.
BoustanL. P. (2010). Was postwar suburbanization ‘White Flight’? Evidence from the Black migration. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1), 417‐443. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.1.417
12.
BriggsX. D.McGaheyR. M. (2022). Keeping score: Gauging the impacts of policy proposals on racial equity. The Brookings Institution.
CinangoF. (2014). Trends in income inequality and its impact on economic growth. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 163.
15.
DavidsonN. M.FosterS. R. (2013–2014). The mobility case for regionalism. University of California at Davis Law Review, 47(1), 63‐120.
16.
DerenoncourtE. (2022). Can you move to opportunity? Evidence from the Great Migration. American Economic Review, 112(2), 369‐408. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20200002
17.
GlaeserE. L. (2008). The economic approach to cities. John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, HKS Working Paper RWP08-00.
18.
GlaeserE. L. (2011). Triumph of the city: How our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier, and happier. Penguin Press.
19.
KatzB.NowakJ. (2017). The new localism. The Brookings Institution.
MasseyD. S.DentonN. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Harvard University Press.
24.
McGaheyR. (2023). Unequal cities: Overcoming anti-urban bias to reduce inequality in the United States. Columbia University Press.
25.
MillsE. S. (1967). An aggregative model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area. American Economic Review, 57(2), 197‐210.
26.
MorettiE. (2012). The new geography of jobs. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
27.
MuthR. F. (1969). Cities and housing. University of Chicago Press.
28.
MyersJ. E.KelloggK. C. (2022). State actor orchestration for achieving workforce development at scale: Evidence from four US states. ILR Review, 75(1), 28‐55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793920942767
29.
NeumarkD. (2020). Place-based policies: Can we do better than enterprise zones?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 39(3), 836‐844. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22225
30.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2016). Making cities work for all: Data and actions for inclusive growth. OECD Publishing.
31.
OstromE. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
32.
OstryJ. D.BergA.TsangaridesC. G. (2014). Redistribution, inequality, and growth. International Monetary Fund.
PetersA.FisherA. (2004). The failures of economic development incentives. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(1), 27‐37. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360408976336
35.
RobackJ. (1982). Wages, rents, and the quality of life. Journal of Political Economy, 90(6), 1257‐1278. https://doi.org/10.1086/261120
36.
RosenS. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34‐55. https://doi.org/10.1086/260169
37.
RothsteinR. (2017). The color of law: A forgotten history of how our government segregated America. W.W. Norton and Company.
38.
RutherfordM. (2001). Institutional economics: Then and now. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(3), 173‐194. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.3.173
39.
StiglitzJ. E. (1983). The theory of local public goods twenty-five years after Tiebout. In ZodrowG. R. (Ed.), Local provision of public services: The Tiebout model after twenty-five years (pp. 17‐53). Academic Press.
40.
StorperM. (2013). Keys to the city: How economics, institutions, social Interaction, and politics shape development. Princeton University Press.
41.
StorperM. (2011a). From retro to avant-garde: A commentary on Paul Krugman’s ‘The new economic geography, Now middle-aged’. Regional Studies, 45(1), 9‐15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.537130
42.
StorperM. (2011b). Why do regions develop and change? The challenge for geography and economics. Journal of Economic Geography, 11(2), 333‐346. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbq033
