Abstract
Each year, states collectively spend tens of billions of dollars on tax incentive programs. Despite being states’ largest investment in economic development, research from The Pew Charitable Trusts found in 2012 that no state regularly and rigorously evaluated the effectiveness of incentives. This left policy makers with very little information to guide decision making. Since 2012, there has been a sea change: More than two-thirds of states and several major cities now regularly produce high quality evaluations of their major incentives, using rigorous and creative methods to measure impact. Pew's research both informed and followed this shift in the field. In addition to assessing the effects of incentives, these evaluations also provide a wealth of valuable information on how to design more effective incentives. As a result, policy makers are better informed and capitalize on the new information as they launch, continue, modify, or repeal programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
An Act Concerning Evaluation of Business Assistance and Incentive Programs
. (2017 ). Connecticut General Assembly. https://www.cga.ct.gov/2017/ACT/pa/2017PA-00226-R00HB-07316-PA.htm
2.
An Act Making Unified Appropriations and Allocations from the General Fund and Other Funds for the Expenditures of State Government and Changing Certain Provisions of the Law Necessary to the Proper Operations of State Government for the Fiscal Years Ending June 30, 2023, June 30, 2024 and June 30, 2025
. (2023 ).
https://legislature.maine.gov/LawMakerWeb/summary.asp?ID=280085493
3.
An Act Relating to Sunset of Tax Credits, H.B. 2067
. (2009 ). 75th Oregon Legislative Assembly–2009. https://olis.oregonlegislature.gov/liz/2009R1/Downloads/MeasureDocument/HB2067/Enrolled
4.
An Act to Create and Enact a New Section to Chapter 54-35 of the North Dakota Century Code, Relating to the Legislative Management Assignment of Regular Legislative Interim Committee Review of Statutory Provisions Providing Economic Development Tax Incentives
. (2015 ).
https://ndlegis.gov/cencode/t54c35.pdf
5.
Economic Development Programs Evaluation
. (2024 ). The 2024 Florida Statutes (including 2025 Special Session C). http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0200-0299/0288/Sections/0288.0001.html
6.
Incentive Evaluation Commission - Incentive Approval Committee
. (2024 ).
http://webserver1.lsb.state.ok.us/OK_Statutes/CompleteTitles/os62.rtf
7.
Kansas Legislative Division of Post Audit
. (2023 ). Evaluating the Department of Commerce’s major economic development incentive programs . https://documents.ncsl.org/wwwncsl/Fiscal/evaluationDB/EvaluatingtheDepartmentofCo mmercesMajorEconomicDevelopmentIncentivePrograms.pdf
8.
Konopaski
K.
(2014 ). Guidance for drafting performance statements in tax preference legislation . State of Washington Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee. https://leg.wa.gov/media/ovrkm02j/legaudguidance-draftingtaxprefleg.pdf
9.
Louisiana Department of Revenue
. (2024 ). Return on investment analysis for selected Louisiana tax incentive programs . https://dam.ldr.la.gov/publications/R-21000(1_25)%20ROI%20Report%20d5%20(WEB).pdf
10.
Maine Office of Program Evaluation and Government Accountability
. (2017 ). Pine Tree Development Zones tax expenditure review . https://legislature.maine.gov/doc/1809
11.
Maine Office of Program Evaluation and Government Accountability
. (2020 ). Pine Tree Development Zones - A limited scope Review . https://legislature.maine.gov/doc/4702
12.
Maryland Department of Legislative Services
. (2017 ). Evaluation of the Research and Development Tax Credit . https://documents.ncsl.org/wwwncsl/Fiscal/evaluationDB/Draft_Evaluation_of_the_Rese arch_and_Development_Tax_Credit.pdf
13.
Maryland Department of Legislative Services
. (2024 ). Evaluation of the Research and Development Tax Credit . https://documents.ncsl.org/wwwncsl/Fiscal/evaluationDB/ EvaluationoftheResearchandDevelopmentTaxCredit.pdf
14.
Maryland Government Assembly
. (2021 ). Economic development – Research and development tax credit – alterations . https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/mgawebsite/Legislation/Details/SB0196?ys=2021rs
15.
National Conference of State Legislatures
. (2007–present ). State tax incentive evaluations database. In .
16.
New York City Finance Division
. (2019 ).
Does the Amazon deal deliver for New York residents?
17.
Research and Development Center Economic Development Programs and Tax Incentives Evaluation Act of 2014, MS Code § 57-13-107
. (2015 ).
https://law.justia.com/codes/mississippi/title-57/chapter-13/economic-development-programs-and-tax-incentives-evaluation-act-of-2014/section-57-13-107/
18.
Review, Analysis, and Evaluation of Tax Incentives
. (2024 ).
https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/title-2/article-5/chapter-3-2/section-2-5-3-2-1/
19.
Rhode Island Economic Development Tax Incentives Evaluation Act of 2013
. (2013 ).
https://webserver.rilegislature.gov/Statutes/TITLE44/44-48.2/44-48.2-4.htm
20.
21.
State of Oklahoma Incentive Evaluation Commission
. (2024 ). 2024 tax incentive evaluation report . https://oklahoma.gov/content/dam/ok/en/omes/documents/2024IECEvaluationReport.pdf
22.
State of Oklahoma Legislature, S.B. 577
. (2025 ).
https://www.oklegislature.gov/cf_pdf/2025-26%20ENGR/SB/SB577%20ENGR.PDF
23.
State of Rhode Island Department of Revenue
. (2024 ). Evaluation of Rebuild Rhode Island Tax Credit Act and Rhode Island Tax Increment Financing Act of 2015. https://dor.ri.gov/revenue-analysis/reports
24.
Study of Economic Development Incentives, H.B. 1020
. (2014 ). Indiana General Assembly. https://iga.in.gov/legislative/2014/bills/house/1020/details
25.
The Pew Charitable Trusts
. (2012 ). Evidence counts: Evaluating state tax incentives for jobs and growth . https://www.pew.org/en/research-and-analysis/reports/2012/04/12/ evidence-counts-evaluating-state-tax-incentives-for-jobs-and-growth
26.
The Pew Charitable Trusts
. (2012–2025 ). Economic development incentives evaluation toolkit. In
27.
The Pew Charitable Trusts
. (2016 ). Better incentive information . https://www.pew.org/en/research-and-analysis/issue-briefs/2016/04/better-incentive-information
28.
The Pew Charitable Trusts
. (2017 ). How states are improving tax incentives for jobs and growth . https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/reports/2017/05/how-states-are-improving-tax-incentives-for-jobs-and-growth
29.
The Pew Charitable Trusts
. (2017a ). Colorado tax incentive evaluation ratings . https://www.pew.org/en/research-and-analysis/fact-sheets/2017/05/state-tax-incentive-evaluation-ratings-colorado
30.
The Pew Charitable Trusts
. (2017b ). Florida tax incentive evaluation ratings . https://www.pew.org/en/research-and-analysis/fact-sheets/2017/05/state-tax-incentive-evaluation-ratings-florida
31.
The Pew Charitable Trusts
. (2017c ). Indiana tax incentive evaluation ratings . https://www.pew.org/en/research-and-analysis/fact-sheets/2017/05/state-tax-incentive-evaluation-ratings-indiana
32.
The Pew Charitable Trusts
. (2017d ). Iowa tax incentive evaluation ratings . https://www.pew.org/en/research-and-analysis/fact-sheets/2017/05/state-tax-incentive-evaluation-ratings-iowa
33.
The Pew Charitable Trusts
. (2017e ). Misssissippi tax incentive evaluation ratings . https://www.pew.org/en/research-and-analysis/fact-sheets/2017/05/state-tax -incentive-evaluation-ratings-mississippi
34.
The Pew Charitable Trusts
. (2017f ). Nebraska tax incentive evaluation ratings . https://www.pew.org/en/research-and-analysis/fact-sheets/2017/05/state-tax-incentive-evaluation-ratings-nebraska
35.
The Pew Charitable Trusts
. (2017g ). Oklahoma tax incentive evaluation ratings . https://www.pew.org/en/research-and-analysis/fact-sheets/2017/05/state-tax-incentive-evaluation-ratings-oklahoma
36.
The Pew Charitable Trusts
. (2017h ). Tennessee tax incentive evaluation ratings . https://www.pew.org/en/research-and-analysis/fact-sheets/2017/05/state-tax-incentive-evaluation-ratings-tennessee
37.
The Pew Charitable Trusts
. (2017i ). Washington tax incentive evaluation ratings . https://www.pew.org/en/research-and-analysis/fact-sheets/2017/05/state-tax-incentive-evaluation-ratings-washington
38.
The Pew Charitable Trusts
. (2018a ). How states can gather better data for evaluating tax incentives . https://www.pew.org/en/research-and-analysis/issue-briefs/2018/06/ how-states-can-gather-better-data-for-evaluating-tax-incentives
39.
The Pew Charitable Trusts
. (2018b ). Rhode Island tax incentive evaluations give lawmakers valuable insights . https://www.pew.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/ 2018/10/01/rhode-island-tax-incentive-evaluations-give-lawmakers-valuable-insights
40.
The Pew Charitable Trusts
. (2019a ). How states can consider and design effective tax incentives . https://www.pew.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/2019/03/06/how-states-can-consider-and-design-effective-tax-incentives
41.
The Pew Charitable Trusts
. (2019b ). How tax incentive evaluations have changed policy . https://www.pew.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/2019/08/26/how-tax-incentive-evaluations-have-changed-policy
42.
The Pew Charitable Trusts
. (2019c ). North Dakota tax incentive reviews yield informed policy decisions . https://www.pew.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/2019/08/26/north-dakota-tax-incentive-reviews-yield-informed-policy-decisions
43.
The Pew Charitable Trusts
. (2020 ). How states can design effective tax incentive evaluation plans . https://www.pew.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/2020/04/30/how-states-can-design-effective-tax-incentive-evaluation-plans
44.
Washington Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee
. (2024 ). 2024 tax preference review: Aerospace . https://leg.wa.gov/jlarc/taxReports/2024/aerospace/f_final/default.html