This article presents an “ethnographic revisit” of Making the Grade, Becker, Geer, and Hughes’s (1968) study of student–faculty interaction. A three-year ethnographic study of student–faculty interaction at a U.S. research university shows undergraduates engaging in practices of negotiation unheard of in the study by Becker, Geer, and Hughes. These practices of negotiation include (1) defining effort prior to interaction with faculty; (2) expressing entitlement to such definitions with references to “measurable virtues”; and (3) eliciting empathy to restore desired definitions of effort when they appear to be challenged. I refer to these practices altogether as “making my grade,” and I explain why privileged students are more likely to enact them.
ArmstrongElizabethHamiltonLaura. 2013. Paying for the Party. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
2.
ArumRichardRoksaJosipa. 2011. Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BabcockP.MarksM.2010. Leisure College USA. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
4.
BeckerHowardGeerBlancheHughesEverett. 1968. Making the Grade: The Academic Side of College Life. New York: John Wiley.
5.
BlumerHerbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
BurawoyMichael. 1998. “Extended Case Method.”Sociological Theory16 (1): 4–33.
7.
CentraJohn. 2009. Differences in Responses to the Student Instructional Report: Is It Bias?Washington, DC: Educational Testing Services.
8.
CharmazKathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory. New York: Sage.
9.
ChickeringArthurEhrmannSteven. 1996. “Implementing the Seven Principles: Technology as Lever.”AAHE Bulletin49:3–6.
10.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 2009. Black Feminist Thought, 2nd ed.London: Routledge.
11.
CollinsRandall. 1979. The Credential Society. New York: Academic.
12.
DemerathPeter. 2009. Producing Success. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
FiglioDavidShapiroMortonSoterKevin. 2013. “Are Tenure Track Professors Better Teachers?”NBER Working Paper No. 19406, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
14.
FriedmanHilary. 2013. Playing to Win. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
GamsonWilliam. 1992. Talking Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
GoffmanErving. 1989. “On Field Work.”Journal of Contemporary Ethnography18 (2): 123–32.
17.
Goldrick-RabSarah. 2006. “Following Their Every Move: An Investigation of Social Class Differences in College Pathways.”Sociology of Education79:61–79.
18.
GriffinWhitneySmithMargaret AustinBursonKristenChenYuJieBerndtsonRachel. 2014. “Why Don’t They Come? An Exploratory Study of Student Office Hour Use.”College Teaching.
19.
GrigsbyMary. 2009. College through the Eyes of Students. Albany: SUNY Press.
20.
HallRobertaSandlerBernice. 1982. The College Classroom: A Chilly Climate for Women. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges.
21.
HallettTim. 2010. “The Myth Incarnate: Recoupling Processes, Turmoil, and Inhabited Institutions in an Urban Elementary School.”American Sociological Review75:52–74.
22.
HallettTimVentrescaMarc. 2006. “Inhabited Institutions: Social Interactions and Organizational Forms in Gouldner’s Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy.”Theory and Society35:213–36.
23.
HeathShirley Brice. 1983. Ways with Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
HochschildArlie. 1983. The Managed Heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25.
HorowitzHelen. 1987. Campus Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
HurtadoSylviaEganKevinTranMinhNewmanChristopherChangMitchellVelascoPaolo. 2011. “‘We Do Science Here’: Underrepresented Students’ Interactions with Faculty in Different College Contexts.”Journal of Social Issues67 (3): 553–79.
27.
KatzJack. 1999. How Emotions Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
KimYoungSaxLinda. 2009. “Student-Faculty Interaction in Research Universities: Differences by Student Gender, Race, Social Class, and First-Generation Status.”Research in Higher Education50:437–459.
29.
KollerDaphne.2012. “Blended and Online Learning, Coursera.” Paper presented at Administration Building, College Park, MD, October 2012.
30.
KuhGeorgeKinzieJillianSchuhJohnWhittElizabeth. 2010. Student Success in College: Creating Conditions That Matter. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31.
LamontMichele. 1992. Money, Manners, Morals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
LareauAnnette. 2010. Unequal Childhoods, 2nd ed.Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
MilkmanKatherineAkinoleModupeChughDolly. 2014. “What Happens Before? An Experiment Exploring How Pay and Representation Differentially Shape Bias.”Social Science Research Council. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2063742.
34.
Pew. 2011. Is College Worth It?Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
35.
PorterStephen. 2011. “Do College Student Surveys Have Any Validity?”Review of Higher Education35 (1): 45–76.
36.
RojstaczerStuartHealyChristopher. 2012. “Where A Is Ordinary: The Evolution of American College and University Grading, 1940-2009.”Teachers’ College Record114 (7): 1–23.
37.
RutherfordMarkella. 2011. Adult Supervision Required. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
38.
StuberJenny. 2011. Inside the College Gates. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
39.
StreetSteveMaistoMariaMervesEstherRhoadesGary. 2012. “Who is Professor Staff and How Can This Person Teach So Many Classes?”Washington, DC: Center for the Future of Higher Education Policy.
40.
UmbachPaul. 2007. “How Effective Are They? Exploring the Impact of Contingent Faculty on Undergraduate Education.”Review of Higher Education30 (2): 91–123.
