Dark,gray,or bright creativity? (Re)investigating the link between creativity and dishonesty

Abstract

The question of whether and, if so, how creativity and unethical behavior such as dishonesty are related to each other has been addressed in multiple studies, with mixed results overall. The aim of this Registered Report is to shed further light on this issue. We first present a meta-analysis on the relation between creativity and dishonesty comprising the samples from a pre-registered multi-lab study (on a different topic), which indicated no relation between the constructs in question (k = 19, N = 2,154, r_p = .02). Next, we examined the relation between creativity and dishonesty in a study (N = 1,152), in which we addressed several limitations of previous research. Specifically, we examined relations between comprehensively assessed creativity and dishonesty using subjective and objective indicators for both constructs. We found mixed results concerning the relation between creativity and dishonesty. In the majority of the confirmatory statistical tests, subjective creativity was positively related, whereas objective creativity was negatively related to dishonesty in the mind game. However, in exploratory analyses, we found that neither subjective nor objective creativity was related to dishonesty in the second dishonesty measure, the sender–receiver game.

Keywords

creativity dishonesty unethical behavior HEXACO

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aloe

A. M.

(2014). An empirical investigation of partial effect sizes in meta-analysis of correlational data. The Journal of General Psychology, 141(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2013.853021

Aloe

A. M.

Thompson

C. G.

(2013). The synthesis of partial effect sizes. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 4(4), 390–405. https://doi.org/10.5243/jsswr.2013.24

Ambrose

Machek

G. R.

(2015). Identifying creatively gifted students: Necessity of a multi-method approach. Contemporary School Psychology, 19(3), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-014-0020-z

Aquino

Reed

II. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.6.1423

Arslan

R. C.

Walther

M. P.

Tata

C. S.

(2019). formr: A study framework allowing for automated feedback generation and complex longitudinal experience-sampling studies using R. Behavior Research Methods, 52, 376–387. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01236-y

Ashton

M. C.

Lee

(2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907

Ashton

M. C.

Lee

(2009). The HEXACO–60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(4), 340–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890902935878

Bassarak

Leib

Mischkowski

Strang

Glöckner

Shalvi

(2017). What provides justification for cheating—producing or observing counterfactuals?: Justification for cheating. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(4), 964–975. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2013

Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, Intelligence, and Personality: A Critical Review of the Scattered Literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(4), 355--429. https://doi.org/10.3200/MONO.132.4.355-430

10.

Batey

(2012). The measurement of creativity: From definitional consensus to the introduction of a new heuristic framework. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.649181

11.

Beaussart

M. L.

Andrews

C. J.

Kaufman

J. C.

(2013). Creative liars: The relationship between creativity and integrity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.10.003

12.

Benedek

Mühlmann

Jauk

Neubauer

A. C.

(2013). Assessment of divergent thinking by means of the subjective top-scoring method: Effects of the number of top-ideas and time-on-task on reliability and validity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033644

13.

Bierly

P. E.

Kolodinsky

R. W.

Charette

B. J.

(2009). Understanding the complex relationship between creativity and ethical ideologies. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(1), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9837-6

14.

Biziou-van-Pol

Haenen

Novaro

Liberman

A. O.

Capraro

(2015). Does telling white lies signal pro-social preferences? Judgment & Decision Making, 10(6), 538–548.

15.

Byworth

(2008). Measuring personality constructs: The advantages and disadvantages of self-reports, informant reports and behavioural assessments. Enquire, 1(1), 1–19.

16.

Carson

S. H.

Peterson

J. B.

Higgins

D. M.

(2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4

17.

Champely

(2018). pwr: Basic functions for power analysis. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pwr

18.

Condon

D. M.

Revelle

(2014). The international cognitive ability resource: Development and initial validation of a public-domain measure. Intelligence, 43, 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.01.004

19.

Cropley

(2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391–404. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1803_13

20.

Diedrich

Jauk

Silvia

P. J.

Gredlein

J. M.

Neubauer

A. C.

Benedek

(2018). Assessment of real-life creativity: The Inventory of Creative Activities and Achievements (ICAA). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(3), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000137

21.

Dymit

K. M.

(2015). Exploring the dark side: Investigating the relationship between creativity and perceptions of dishonesty [Master’s thesis]. Illinois State University. https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd/474/

22.

Faul

Erdfelder

Buchner

Lang

A.-G.

(2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

23.

Gerlach

Teodorescu

Hertwig

(2019). The truth about lies: A meta-analysis on dishonest behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 145(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000174

24.

Gino

Ariely

(2012). The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026406

25.

Gneezy

(2005). Deception: The role of consequences. American Economic Review, 95(1), 384–394. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828053828662

26.

Gough

H. G.

(1979). A creative personality scale for the adjective check list. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1398–1405.

27.

Guilford

J. P.

(1967). The nature of human intelligence. McGraw-Hill.

28.

Heck

D. W.

Moshagen

(2018). RRreg: An R package for correlation and regression analyses of randomized response data. Journal of Statistical Software, 85(2), 1--29. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v085.i02

29.

Heck

D. W.

Thielmann

Moshagen

Hilbig

B. E.

(2018). Who lies? A large-scale reanalysis linking basic personality traits to unethical decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 13(4), 356–371.

30.

Heyman, T., Vankrunkelsven, H., Voorspoels, W., White, A., Storms, G., & Verheyen, S. (2020). When Cheating is an Honest Mistake: A Critical Evaluation of the Matrix Task as a Measure of Dishonesty. Collabra: Psychology, 6(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.294

31.

Hilbig

B. E.

Moshagen

Zettler

(2016). Prediction consistency: A test of the equivalence assumption across different indicators of the same construct. European Journal of Personality, 30(6), 637–647. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2085

32.

Jauk

Benedek

Neubauer

A. C.

(2014). The road to creative achievement: A latent variable model of ability and personality predictors. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1941

33.

Jiang

(2013). Cheating in mind games: The subtlety of rules matters. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93, 328–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.04.003

34.

Kaufman

J. C.

Waterstreet

M. A.

Ailabouni

H. S.

Whitcomb

H. J.

Roe

A. K.

Riggs

(2010). Personality and self-perceptions of creativity across domains. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 29(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.2190/IC.29.3.c

35.

Keem

Shalley

C. E.

Kim

Jeong

(2018). Are creative individuals bad apples? A dual pathway model of unethical behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(4), 416–431. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000290

36.

Lakens

(2017). Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617697177

37.

Lakens

Scheel

A. M.

Isager

P. M.

(2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963

38.

Lee

C. S.

Therriault

D. J.

(2013). The cognitive underpinnings of creative thought: A latent variable analysis exploring the roles of intelligence and working memory in three creative thinking processes. Intelligence, 41(5), 306–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.008

39.

Lee

Ashton

M. C.

(2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329–358. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8

40.

Mai

K. M.

Ellis

A. P. J.

Welsh

D. T.

(2015). The gray side of creativity: Exploring the role of activation in the link between creative personality and unethical behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.05.004

41.

Mazar

Amir

Ariely

(2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 633–644. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.6.633

42.

Mednick

(1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048850

43.

Moore

(2015). Moral disengagement. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.018

44.

Moshagen

Hilbig

B. E.

Zettler

(2018). The dark core of personality. Psychological Review, 125(5), 656–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000111

45.

Mumford

M. D.

(2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2–3), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2003.9651403

46.

Mumford

M. D.

Waples

E. P.

Antes

A. L.

Brown

R. P.

Connelly

Murphy

S. T.

Devenport

L. D.

(2010). Creativity and ethics: The relationship of creative and ethical problem-solving. Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410903579619

47.

Niepel

Mustafić

Greiff

Roberts

R. D.

(2015). The dark side of creativity revisited: Is students’ creativity associated with subsequent decreases in their ethical decision making? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 18, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.04.005

48.

Olteţeanu

A.-M.

Schultheis

Dyer

J. B.

(2018). Computationally constructing a repository of compound remote associates test items in American English with comRAT-G. Behavior Research Methods, 50(5), 1971–1980. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0965-8

49.

Palan

Schitter

(2018). Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004

50.

Park

N. K.

Chun

M. Y.

Lee

(2016). Revisiting individual creativity assessment: Triangulation in subjective and objective assessment methods. Creativity Research Journal, 28(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1125259

51.

Plucker

J. A.

Makel

M. C.

(2010). Assessment of creativity. In Kaufman

J. C.

Sternberg

R. J.

(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 48--73). Cambridge University Press.

52.

Rosenbaum

S. M.

Billinger

Stieglitz

(2014). Let’s be honest: A review of experimental evidence of honesty and truth-telling. Journal of Economic Psychology, 45, 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2014.10.002

53.

Schild

Heck

D. W.

Ścigała

K. A.

Zettler

(2019a). Revisiting REVISE: (Re)Testing unique and combined effects of REminding, VIsibility, and SElf-engagement manipulations on cheating behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 75, 102161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2019.04.001

54.

Schild

Lilleholt

Zettler

(2019b). Behavior in cheating paradigms is linked to overall approval rates of crowdworkers. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 34, 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2195

55.

Schwarzer

(2007). Meta-analysis with R. R News, 7(3), 40–45.

56.

Shalvi

Gino

Barkan

Ayal

(2015). Self-serving justifications: Doing wrong and feeling moral. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(2), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414553264

57.

Shen

Yuan

Liu

Zhan

(2019). A theoretical and critical examination on the relationship between creativity and morality. Current Psychology, 38, 469–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9613-9

58.

Silvia

P. J.

(2011). Subjective scoring of divergent thinking: Examining the reliability of unusual uses, instances, and consequences tasks. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2010.06.001

59.

Silvia

P. J.

(2015). Intelligence and creativity are pretty similar after all. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 599–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9299-1

60.

Silvia

P. J.

Nusbaum

E. C.

Beaty

R. E.

(2017). Old or new? Evaluating the old/new scoring method for divergent thinking tasks. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(3), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.101

61.

Silvia

P. J.

Wigert

Reiter-Palmon

Kaufman

J. C.

(2012). Assessing creativity with self-report scales: A review and empirical evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024071

62.

Silvia

P. J.

Winterstein

B. P.

Willse

J. T.

Barona

C. M.

Cram

J. T.

Hess

K. I.

Martinez

J. L.

Richard

C. A.

(2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.68

63.

Spiro

R. J.

Feltovich

P. J.

Jacobson

M. J.

Coulson

R. L.

(1992). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 24–33). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

64.

Sutter

(2009). Deception through telling the truth?! Experimental evidence from individuals and teams. The Economic Journal, 119(534), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02205.x

65.

Tett

R. P.

Burnett

D. D.

(2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500

66.

Verschuere

Meijer

E. H.

Jim

Hoogesteyn

Orthey

McCarthy

R. J.

Skowronski

J. J.

Acar

O. A.

Aczel

Bakos

B. E.

Barbosa

Baskin

Bègue

Ben-Shakhar

Birt

A. R.

Blatz

Charman

S. D.

Claesen

Clay

S. L.

, . . . Yıldız

(2018). Registered replication report on Mazar, Amir, and Ariely (2008). Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918781032

67.

Viechtbauer

(2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1--48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03

68.

Vincent

L. C.

Kouchaki

(2016). Creative, rare, entitled, and dishonest: How commonality of creativity in ones group decreases an individuals entitlement and dishonesty. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1451–1473. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.1109

69.

Walczyk

J. J.

Runco

M. A.

Tripp

S. M.

Smith

C. E.

(2008). The creativity of lying: Divergent thinking and ideational correlates of the resolution of social dilemmas. Creativity Research Journal, 20(3), 328–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802355152

70.

Zettler

Thielmann

Hilbig

B. E.

Moshagen

(2020). The nomological net of the HEXACO model of personality: A large-scale meta-analytic investigation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(3), 723–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619895036

71.

Zheng

Qin

Liu

Liao

(2019). Will creative employees always make trouble? Investigating the roles of moral identity and moral disengagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(3), 653–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3683-3

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.41 MB