Recognizing the multiple interacting layers of pedagogical content knowledge, in this article, we present the findings from a study that examined the extent to which participation in case-based instruction about self-generated visual representations (VRs) supported special education pre-service teachers (N = 25) in enhancing their (a) knowledge of VRs, specifically what and how to teach, as a strategy for solving mathematics problems, and (b) applied instructional practices, specifically analysis of student knowledge and instructional planning, about VRs for students with disabilities (SWDs) to solve mathematics problems. The data revealed that case-based instruction about VRs in a special education mathematics methods course enriched pre-service teachers personal understanding about VRs and their ability to target SWDs learning needs regarding VRs. Implications for pre-service teacher preparation and research are provided.
BallL. D.ThamesM. H.PhelpsG. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
2.
BenedictA.HoldheideL.BrownellM.FoleyA. M. (2016). Learning to teach: Practice-based preparation in teacher education [Special issues brief]. Center on Great Teachers and Leaders.
3.
BergB. L. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (5th ed.). Pearson.
4.
BoonenA. J.van WeselF.JollesJ.van der SchootM. (2014). The role of visual representation type, spatial ability, and reading comprehension in word problem solving: An item-level analysis in elementary school children. International Journal of Educational Research, 68, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2014.08.001
5.
BransfordJ. D.BrownA. L.CockingR. R. (2000). How people learn (Vol. 11). National Academy Press.
BrownellM. T.BenedictA. E.LekoM. M.PeytonD.PuaD.Richards-TutorC. (2019). A Continuum of pedagogies for preparing teachers to use high-leverage practices. Remedial and Special Education, 40(6), 338–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518824990
8.
BrownellM. T.JonesN. D.SohnH.StarkK. (2020). Improving teaching quality for students with disabilities: Establishing a warrant for teacher education practice. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0888406419880351
9.
BrownellM. T.LauterbachA. A.DingleM. P.BoardmanA. G.UrbachJ. E.LekoM. M.. . .ParkY. (2014). Individual and contextual factors influencing special education teacher learning in literacy learning cohorts. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948713487179
10.
BrownellM. T.SindelarP. T.KielyM. T.DanielsonL. C. (2010). Special education teacher quality and preparation: Exposing foundations, constructing a new model. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291007600307
11.
BybeeR. (2015). The BSCS 5E instructional model. NSTA press.
12.
CaiJ.LesterF. K.Jr. (2005). Solution representations and pedagogical representations in Chinese and US classrooms. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3-4), 221–237. https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jmathb.2005.09.003
13.
CarlsonJ.DaehlerK. R. (2019). The refined consensus model of pedagogical content knowledge in science education. In HumeA.CooperR.BorowskiA. (Eds.), Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers’ knowledge for teaching science (pp. 77–92). Springer.
14.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (pp. 181–223). SAGE.
15.
CrottyM. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. SAGE.
16.
DoablerC. T.FienH. (2013). Explicit mathematics instruction: What teachers can do for teaching students with mathematics difficulties. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48(5), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451212473151
17.
DreherA.KuntzeS. (2015). Teachers’ professional knowledge and noticing: The case of multiple representations in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(1), 89–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9577-8
18.
FengL.SassT. R. (2010). What makes special-education teachers special? Teacher training and achievement of students with disabilities [Working paper No. 49]. National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research,. CALDER The Urban Institute.
19.
GerstenR.ChardD. J.JayanthiM.BakerS. K.MorphyP.FlojoJ. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1202–1242. https://doi.org/10.2307/40469093
20.
GriffinC. C.JitendraA. K.LeagueM. B. (2009). Novice special educators’ instructional practices, communication patterns, and content knowledge for teaching mathematics. Teacher Education and Special Education, 32(4), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0888406409343540
21.
GunnA. A.BennettS. V.WelshJ.PetersonB. (2018). Teaching cases as pedagogical tools for transformative praxis. In LopezA.OlanE. L. (Eds.), Transformative pedagogies for teacher education: Moving towards critical praxis in an era of change (pp. 123–140). Information Age.
22.
HiebertJ.GrouwsD. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In LesterF. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371–404). Information Age.
23.
HiebertJ.MorrisA. K.BerkD.JansenA. (2007). Preparing teachers to learn from teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487106295726
24.
HiebertJ.MorrisA. K.GlassB. (2003). Learning to learn to teach: An “experiment’’ model for teaching and teacher preparation in mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6(3), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025162108648
25.
HillH. C.BallD. L.SchillingS. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 372–400. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40539304
26.
HudsonP.MillerS. (2006). Designing and implementing mathematics instruction for students with diverse learning needs. Pearson.
27.
HughesK.BellisM. A.HardcastleK. A.SethiD.ButchartA.MiktonC.JonesL.DunneM. P. (2017). The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Public Health, 2(8), e356–e366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30118-4
28.
HuntJ.TzurR. (2017). Where is difference? Processes of mathematical remediation through a constructivist lens. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48, 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.06.007
29.
JitendraA. K.NelsonG.PullesS. M.KissA. J.HouseworthJ. (2016). Is mathematical representation of problems an evidence-based strategy for students with mathematics difficulties?Exceptional Children, 83(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915625062
30.
JuarezS. W.PurperC. (2018). Toward a model of learning and transfer: A review of instructional methods and learning outcomes in special education teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 41(4), 292–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406417727041
KingsdorfS.KrawecJ. (2014). Error analysis of mathematical word problem solving across students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(2), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12029
33.
KoencyG.SwansonJ. (2000). The special case of mathematics: Insufficient content knowledge a major obstacle to reform. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
34.
Koro-LjungbergM.Yendol-HoppeyD.SmithJ. J.HayesS. B. (2009). (E)pistemological awareness, instantiation of methods, and uninformed methodological ambiguity in qualitative research projects. Educational Researcher, 38(9), 687–699. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x09351980
35.
KrawecJ. L. (2014). Problem representation and mathematical problem solving of students of varying math ability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412436976
36.
LekoM. M.BrownellM. T. (2011). Special education pre-service teachers’ appropriation of pedagogical tools for teaching reading. Exceptional Children, 77(2), 229–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291107700205
37.
LekoM. M.BrownellM. T.SindelarP. T.KielyM. T. (2015). Envisioning the future of special education personnel preparation in a standards-based era. Exceptional Children, 82(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915598782
38.
MaL. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
MontagueM.ApplegateB. (1993). Mathematical problem-solving characteristics of middle school students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 27(2), 175–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699302700203
40.
MontagueM. (2008). Self-regulation strategies to improve mathematical problem solving for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/30035524
41.
MorrisA. K.HiebertJ.SpitzerS. M. (2009). Mathematical knowledge for teaching in planning and evaluating instruction: What can pre-service teachers learn?Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40, 491–529. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40539354
42.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics.
43.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics.
44.
National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. The National Academies Press.
45.
OrrillC. H.SextonS.LeeS.GerdeC. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ abilities to use and make sense of drawn representations. ICLS.
46.
PapeS. J.TchoshanovM. A. (2001). The role of representation (s) in developing mathematical understanding. Theory into Practice, 40(2), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4002_6
47.
PfannenstielK. H.BryantD. P.BryantB. R.PorterfieldJ. A. (2015). Cognitive strategy instruction for teaching word problems to primary-level struggling students. Intervention in School and Clinic, 50(5), 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451214560890
48.
ScheuermannA. M.DeshlerD. D.SchumakerJ. B. (2009). The effects of the explicit inquiry routine on the performance of students with learning disabilities on one-variable equations. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32(2), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.2307/2774036
49.
ShulmanJ. (Ed.). (1992). Case methods in teacher education. Teachers College Press.
SindelarP. T.BrownellM. T.BillingsleyB. (2010). Special education teacher education research: Current status and future directions. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33(1), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406409358593
52.
StylianouD. A. (2010). Teachers’ conceptions of representation in middle school mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(4), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-010-9143-y
53.
TurnerF. (2008). Beginning elementary teachers’ use of representations in mathematics teaching. Research in Mathematics Education, 10(2), 209–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794800802233795
54.
van GarderenD. (2007). Teaching Students With LD to Use Diagrams to Solve Mathematical Word Problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(6), 540–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194070400060501
55.
van GarderenD.MontagueM. (2003). Visual-spatial representation, mathematical problem solving, and students of varying abilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(4), 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.0007
56.
van GarderenD.ScheuermannA.JacksonC. (2013). Examining how students with diverse abilities use diagrams to solve mathematics word problem. Learning Disability Quarterly, 36(3), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948712438558
57.
van GarderenD.ScheuermannA.PochA. (2014). Challenges students with learning disabilities experience when using diagrams as a visualization tool to solve mathematics word problems. ZDM. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(1), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0519-1
58.
van GarderenD.ScheuermannA.PochA.MurrayM. M. (2018). Visual representation in mathematics: Special education teachers’ knowledge and emphasis for instruction. Teacher Education and Special Education, 41(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406416665448
59.
van GarderenD.ScheuermannA.PochA. (2019). Special education teachers’ perceptions of students’ with disabilities ability, instructional needs, and difficulties using visual representations to solve mathematics problems. Teacher Education & Special Education, 42(2) 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406418793929
60.
WoodwardJ.BeckmannS.DriscollM.FrankeM.HerzigP.JitendraA.KoedingerK. R.OgbuehiP. (2012). Improving mathematical problem solving in grades 4 through 8. IES practice guide. NCEE 2012-4055. What works clearinghouse. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/MPS_PG_043012.pdf
61.
XinY. P.JitendraA. K.Deatline-BurchmanA. (2005). Effects of mathematical word problem-solving instruction on middle school students with learning problems. The Journal of Special Education, 39(3), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F00224669050390030501
62.
ZawojewskiJ. S.LeshR. (2003). A models and modeling perspective on problem solving. In LeshR.DoerrH. M. (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 317–336). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
