Assistive technology (AT) is critical for students with disabilities to access and engage in the general education curriculum, but research has consistently reported a lack of AT knowledge among general and special education teachers. This synthesis reviewed the literature on AT instruction in teacher preparation programs. A total of 14 studies were selected using specific selection criteria. Findings indicated that after receiving AT instruction, pre-service teachers showed positive gains in self-reported AT skills/knowledge, assessed AT skills/knowledge, and attitudes/perspectives toward AT, regardless of modality, incorporated instructional methods, or measurement. Despite the promising effects of AT instruction, this synthesis highlights the scarcity of research in the realm of such instruction within teacher preparation programs and emphasizes the need for more robust research methodologies in this area.
References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the synthesis.
2.
AlghamdiR. (2021). Teachers’ perceptions of assistive technology use for students with disabilities. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 38(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2021.1998812
3.
AlqurainiT.GutD. (2012). Critical components of successful inclusion of students with severe disabilities: Literature review. International Journal of Special Education, 27(1), 42–59. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ979712
4.
Americans with Disabilities Act. (1990). 42 U.S.C. §§12101 et seq.
5.
AndersonC. L.Petch-HoganB. (2001). The impact of technology use in special education field experience on preservice teachers’ perceived technology expertise. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16(3), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434010160030
6.
Arslan-AriI.BaşerD. (2022). Assistive technology training within an educational technology course: Perceptions of preservice special education teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2022.2137606
7.
Assistive Technology Act. (1988). 29 U.S.C. § 3.
8.
AtangaC.JonesB. A.KruegerL. E.LuS. (2020). Teachers of students with learning disabilities: Assistive technology knowledge, perceptions, interests, and barriers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 35(4), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643419864858
9.
BauschM. E.AultM. J. (2012). Status of assistive technology instruction in university personnel preparation programs. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 8(1), 1–14.
10.
BauschM. E.HasselbringT. S. (2004). Assistive technology: Are the necessary skills and knowledge being developed at the preservice and in service levels?Teacher Education and Special Education, 27(2), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840640402700202
11.
BenderP.HavlicekZ.LohrV.HavranekM. (2011). ICT helps to overcome disabilities. Agris On-line Papers in Economics and Informatic, 3(4), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.120244
12.
BouckE. C. (2016). Assistive technology. Sage.
13.
BryantD.ErinJ.LockR.AllanJ.RestaP. (1998). Infusing a teacher preparation program in learning disabilities with assistive technology. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949803100106
14.
ChandR.AlasaV. M.ChitiyoJ.PietrantoniZ. (2022). Preparation of Pre-Service teachers: Assessment of generation Z students. In Handbook of Research on Digital-Based Assessment and Innovative Practices in Education (pp. 116–130).
15.
ChukwuemekaE. J.SamailaD. (2019). Teachers’ perception and factors limiting the use of high-tech assistive technology in special education schools in Northwest Nigeria. Contemporary Educational Technology, 11(1), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.646841
16.
ConnorC.BeardL. A. (2015). Increasing meaningful assistive technology use in the classrooms. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(9), 640–642. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.030908
17.
ConnorC.SnellM.GansnederB.DexterS. (2010). Special education teachers’ use of assistive technology with students who have severe disabilities. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18, 369–386.
18.
CookA. M.PolgarJ. M. (2007). Cook and Hussey’s assistive technologies: Principles and practice. Mosby.
19.
CostiganF. A.LightJ. (2010). A review of preservice training in augmentative and alternative communication for speech-language pathologists, special education teachers, and occupational therapists. Assistive Technology, 22(4), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2010.492774
20.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2017). High-leverage practices in special education. Teaching Exceptional Children, 49(5), 355–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059917713206
21.
CourtadC. A. (2012). Educators: Are web-based resources an effective means for increasing knowledge in higher educations?Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 8(1), 15–31. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ998799
22.
CozbyP. C. (2007). Methods in behavioral research (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
23.
CriderT. K.JohnstonL.RutledgeV.DoolittleA. L.BeardL. (2014). Assistive technology at the University of Tennessee-Chattanooga: Providing pre-service educators with the opportunity to utilize assistive technology as an instructional strategy. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(4), 326–329. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1053902
24.
CummingM. M.BettiniE.ChowJ. C. (2023). High-quality systematic literature reviews in special education: Promoting coherence, contextualization, generativity, and transparency. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 412–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221146576
25.
DellA. G.NewtonD. A.PetroffJ. G. (2016). Assistive technology in the classroom: Enhancing the school experiences of students with disabilities (3rd ed.). Pearson.
26.
DissingerF. (2003). Core curriculum in assistive technology: In-Service for special educators and therapists. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18(2), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340301800203
27.
DreonO.Jr DietrichN. I. (2009). Turning lemons into lemonade: Teaching assistive technology through Wikis and embedded video. TechTrends, 53(1), 78–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0241-6
28.
DunstC. J.TrivetteC. M.MeterD.HambyD. W.Orelena Hawks Puckett Institute. (2011). Influences of contrasting types of training on practitioners’ and parents’ use of assistive technology and adaptations with infants, toddlers and preschoolers with disabilities. Practical Evaluation Reports, 3(1), 1–35. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED565255
29.
FlanaganS.BouckE. C.RichardsonJ. (2013). Middle school special education teachers’ perceptions and use of assistive technology in literacy instruction. Assistive Technology, 25(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2012.682697
30.
GrossmanP.HammernessK.McDonaldM. (2009). Redefining teaching: Re-Imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15, 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600902875340
31.
HlasA. C.HlasC. S. (2012). A review of high-leverage teaching practices: Making connections between mathematics and foreign languages. Foreign Language Annals, 45(S1), S76–S97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2012.01180.x
JeffsT.BanisterS. (2006). Enhancing collaboration and skill acquisition through the use of technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(2), 407–433. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ766524
34.
JonesB. A.Peterson-AhmadM.FieldsM.WilliamsN. (2021). Training preservice teachers to match assistive technology to student needs. Journal of Special Education Technology, 36(4), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643420918337
35.
JonesB. A.RudingerB.WilliamsN.WitcherS. (2019). Training pre-service general educators in assistive technology competencies for students with visual impairments. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 37(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619618814066
36.
JudgeS.SimmsK. A. (2009). Assistive technology training at the pre-service level. Teacher Education and Special Education, 32(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406408330868
37.
Kamei-HannanC.HoweJ.HerreraR. R.ErinJ. N. (2012). Perceptions of teachers of students with visual impairments regarding assistive technology: A follow-up study to a university course. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 106(10), 666–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482x1210601011
38.
KanL.DegotardiS.LiH. (2022). The impact of COVID-19 on the delivery of preservice teacher education: A scoping review. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09816-y
39.
KimmC. H.KimJ.BaekE. O.ChenP. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ confidence in their ISTE technology-competency. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 36(2), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2020.1716896
40.
KingL. H.AllenA. E. (2018). Beyond preservice special educators: Embedding assistive technology content throughout a teacher education program of study. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 37(4), 228–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870518773474
41.
KunduA.BejT.DeyK. N. (2020). Indian educators’ awareness and attitude towards assistive technology. Journal of Enabling Technologies, 14(4), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/JET-04-2020-0015
42.
LeeY.VegaL. A. (2005). Perceived knowledge, attitudes, and challenges of AT use in special education. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(2), 60–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340502000208
43.
MaichK.van RhijnT.WoodsH.BrochuK. (2017). Remote assistive technology training in Newfoundland and Labrador’s rural schools: Is there a need?Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.21432/T2J682
44.
MaushakN. J.KelleyP.BlodgettT. (2001). Preparing teachers for the inclusive classroom: A preliminary study of attitudes and knowledge of assistive technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(3), 419–431. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED455781
45.
McDonaldM.KazemiE.KavanghS. S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113493807
46.
McLeskeyJ.BillingsleyB.BrownellM. T.MaheadyL.LewisT. J. (2019). What are high-leverage practices for special education teachers and why are they important?Remedial and Special Education, 40(6), 331–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518773477
47.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G.the PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
48.
MorrisonW. F.JeffsT. L. (2005). Outcomes of preservice teacher’s technology use. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 2(1), 71–78. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1002120
49.
NaraianS.SurabianM. (2014). New literacy studies: An alternative frame for preparing teachers to use assistive technology. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(4), 330–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406414538843
50.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). Students with disabilities. Condition of education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cgg
51.
NelsonG.CookS. C.ZarateK.PowellS. R.MagginD. M.DrakeK. R.KissA. J.FordJ. W.SunL.EspinasD. R. (2022). A systematic review of meta-analyses in special education: Exploring the evidence base for high-leverage practices. Remedial and Special Education, 43(5), 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932521106349
52.
O’FlahertyJ.BealE. M. (2018). Core competencies and high leverage practices of the beginning teacher: A synthesis of the literature. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44(4), 461–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2018.1450826
53.
OnivehuA. O.OhawuiroO. E.OyeniranB. J. (2017). Teachers’ attitude and competence in the use of assistive technologies in special needs schools. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 10(4), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.10.4.3
54.
O’SullivanK.McGraneA.LongS.MarshallK.MaclachlanM. (2021). Using a systems thinking approach to understand teachers perceptions and use of assistive technology in the republic of Ireland. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 18(5), 502–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2021.1878297
55.
PageM. J.MoherD.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.ShamseerL.TetzlaffJ. M.AklE. A.BrennanS. E.ChouR.GlanvilleJ.GrimshawJ. M.HróbjartssonA.LaluM. M.LiT.LoderE. W.McDonaldS.McGuinnessL. A.StewartL. A.McKenzieJ. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372. Article n160.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
56.
ParetteP.SchererM. (2004). Assistive technology use and stigma. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39(3), 217–226. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ754131
57.
ParkJ.BagwellA.BryantD. P. (2022). Integrating assistive technology into a teacher preparation program. Teacher Education and Special Education, 45(2), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064211001447
58.
PoelE. S.WoodJ.SchimidtN. (2013). Including assistive technology in teacher preparation: Exploring one approach. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 19(1), 29–37. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1013986
59.
RobinsonL.SchneiderC.HutingerP. (2007). Providing curriculum access to young children: Online workshops for educators. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 4(1), 46–61. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ899367
60.
SchaafD. N. (2018). Assistive technology instruction in teacher professional development. Journal of Special Education Technology, 33(3), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417753561
61.
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. (1973). 34 C. F. R. Part 104.
62.
ShadishW.CookT.CampbellD. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton-Mifflin.
63.
ShinoharaK. (2018). Design for social accessibility: Incorporating social factors in the design of accessible technologies [Publica[tion No. 10289705. Doctoral dissertations, University of Washington], ProQuest dissertations and Theses Global.
64.
SiddawayA. P.WoodA. M.HedgesL. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803
65.
Technology Related Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities Act. (1988). 29 U.S.C. §§ 2201-2216.
66.
ThomasC. N.PeeplesK. N.KennedyM. J.DeckerM. (2019). Riding the special education technology wave: Policy, obstacles, recommendations, actionable ideas, and resources. Intervention in School and Clinic, 54(5), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451218819201
67.
van LaarhovenT.CondermanG. (2011). Integrating assistive technology into special education teacher preparation programs. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 19(4), 473–497.
68.
van LaarhovenT.MunkD.ZuritaL.LynchK.ZuritaB.SmithT.ChandlerL. (2008). The effectiveness of video tutorials for teaching preservice educators to use assistive technologies. Journal of Special Education Technology, 23(4), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340802300403
69.
van LaarhovenT.MunkD. D.ChandlerL. K.ZuritaL.LynchK. (2012). Integrating assistive technology into teacher education programs: Trials, tribulations, and lessons learned. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 8(1), 32–47.
70.
van LaarhovenT.MunkD. D.LynchK.BosmaJ.RouseJ. (2007). A model for preparing special and general education preservice teachers for inclusive education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(5), 440–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487107306803
71.
WindschitlM.ThompsonJ.BraatenM.StroupeD. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96, 878–903. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21027
72.
WojcikB. W.Peterson-KarlanG.WattsE. H.ParetteP. (2004). Assistive technology outcomes in a teacher education curriculum. Assistive Technology Outcomes & Benefits, 1(1), 21–32.
73.
ZhouL.AjuwonP. M.SmithD. W.Griffin-ShirleyN.ParkerA. T.OkunguP. (2012). Assistive technology competencies for teachers of students with visual impairments: A national study. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 106(10), 656–665. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1210601010
