This study examines prosecutorial decision-making for seeking the death penalty in Kentucky death-eligible cases between 2000 and 2016. The analysis includes both propensity score matching (PSM) and logistic regression. PSM allows researchers to better identify sentencing disparities in sentencing concerning the defendant and victim’s race. Using both sets of official court records compiled by the Kentucky Department of Public Advocacy and the Jefferson County Public Defender’s Office, we examined all death-eligible Kentucky homicide cases from 2000 to 2016 (N = 944). The results offer support to the Focal Concerns theory. Prosecutors treated defendants who took a female’s life as more blameworthy. Unlike previous Kentucky-based studies, homicide cases featuring a Black defendant and a White victim did not attract prosecutorial attention. The findings support that protection of the community is the foremost reason why a prosecutor would seek the death penalty.
AlbonettiC. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38(2), 247–266.
2.
American Bar Association. (2011). Evaluating fairness and accuracy in state death penalty systems: The Kentucky death penalty assessment report—An analysis of Kentucky’s death penalty laws, procedures and practices.
3.
BaldusD.PulaskiC.WoodworthG. (1983). Comparative review of death sentences: An empirical study of the Georgia experience. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 74, 661–753.
4.
BaumerE.MessnerS.FelsonR. (2000). The role of victim characteristics in the disposition of murder cases. Justice Quarterly, 17(2), 281–307.
5.
BaumerE. P. (2013). Reassessing and redirecting research on race and sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 30(2), 231–261.
6.
BeardsleyM.KaminS.MarceauJ.PhillipsS. (2015). Disquieting discretion: Race, geography, & the Colorado death penalty in the first decade of the twenty-first century. Denver University Law Review, 92(4), 432–452.
7.
BedauH. (1964). Death sentences in New Jersey 1907-1964. Rutgers Law Review, 19, 1–49.
8.
BerkR.BogerJ.WeissR. (1993). Chance and the death penalty. Law and Society Review, 27, 89–110.
9.
BlackwellM.IacusS.KingG.PorroG. (2009). Cem: Coarsened exact matching in Stata. The stata journal, 9(4), 524–546.
10.
BohmR. (2017). Deathquest: An introduction to the theory and practice of capital punishment in the United States. Routledge.
11.
BowersW. (1983). The pervasiveness of arbitrariness and discrimination under post-Furman capital statutes. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 74, 1067–1100.
12.
CochranJ.BrownW.CamachoJ.JenningsW.SmithM.BjerregaardB.FogelS. (2017). Overkill? An examination of comparatively excessive death sentences in North Carolina. Justice Quarterly, 34(2), 297–323.
13.
CurryT. (2010). The conditional effects of victim and offender ethnicity and victim gender on sentences for non-capital cases. Punishment & Society, 12(4), 438–462.
14.
CurryT.LeeG.RodriquezS. (2004). Does victim gender increase sentence severity? Further explorations of gender dynamics and sentencing outcomes. Crime & Delinquency, 50(3), 319–343.
15.
DemuthS.SteffensmeierD. (2004). Ethnicity effects on sentence outcomes in large urban courts: Comparisons among White, Black and Hispanic defendants. Social Science Quarterly, 85(4), 994–1011.
16.
DonohueJ. JIII. (2014). An Empirical Evaluation of the Connecticut Death Penalty System Since 1973: Are There Unlawful Racial, Gender, and Geographic Disparities?. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 11(4), 637–696.
17.
GarsonG. D. (2007). Univariate GLM, ANOVA, and ANOCVA. Topics in Multvariate Analysis.
18.
GillespieL.LoughranT.SmithM.FogelS.BjerregaardB. (2014). Exploring the role of victim sex, victim conduct, and victim offender relationship in capital punishment. Homicide Studies, 18(2), 175–195.
19.
GrossoC. M.FaganJ.LaurenceM.BaldusD.WoodworthG.NewellR. (2019). Death by stereotype: Race, ethnicity, and California’s failure to implement Furman’s narrowing requirement. UCLA Law Review, 66, 1394.
20.
HindsonS.PotterH.RadeletM. (2006). Race, gender, region and death sentencing in Colorado, 1980 - 1999. University of Colorado Law Review, 77(3), 549–594.
21.
HolcombJ. E.WilliamsM. R.DemuthS. (2004). White female victims and death penalty disparity research. Justice Quarterly, 45(4), 877–902.
22.
HorowitzJ. A. (1996). Prosecutorial discretion and the death penalty: Creating a committee to decide whether to seek the death penalty. Fordham Law Review, 65, 2571.
23.
HowellK. (2014). Prosecutorial discretion and the duty to seek justice in an overburdened criminal justice system. Georgia Journal of Legal Ethics, 27, 285–335.
24.
KauttP.SpohnC. (2015). Assessing blameworthiness and assigning punishment: Theoretical perspectives on judicial decision making. In MaguireE.DuffeeD. (Eds.), Criminal justice theory: Explaining the nature and behavior of criminal justice (pp. 211–242). Routledge.
25.
Kavanaugh-EarlJ.CochranJ.SmithM.FogelS.BjerregaardB. (2008). Racial bias and the death penalty. In LynchM.PattersonE.ChildsK. (Eds.), Racial and ethnic biases in the criminal justice system (pp. 147–196). Criminal Justice Press.
26.
KeilT.VitoG. (1990). Race and the death penalty in Kentucky murder trials: An analysis of post-Gregg outcomes. Justice Quarterly, 7, 189–207.
27.
KeilT.VitoG. (1991). Kentucky prosecutors’ decisions to seek the death penalty: A LISREL model. In BohmR. (Ed.), The death penalty in America: Current research (pp. 53–70). Anderson Publishing.
28.
KeilT.VitoG. (1995). Race and the death penalty in Kentucky murder trials, 1976-1991. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 20, 17–36.
29.
KeilT.VitoG. (2006). Capriciousness or fairness? Race and prosecutorial decisions to seek the death penalty in Kentucky. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 4(3), 27–49.
30.
KingG.NielsenR. (2019). Why propensity scores should not be used for matching. Political analysis, 27(4), 435–454.
31.
KingN. (2004). How different is death? Jury sentencing in capital and non-capital cases compared. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 2, 195–214.
32.
LenzaM.KeysD.GuessT. (2005). The prevailing injustices in the application of the Missouri death penalty (1978 to 1996). Social Justice, 32, 151–166.
33.
MarkowiczP. (2017). Prosecutorial discretion power at its zenith: The power to protect liberty. B.U. Law Review, 97, 490–549.
34.
MietheT. D. (1987). Charging and plea bargaining practices under determinate sentencing: An investigation of the hydraulic displacement of discretion. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 78, 155.
35.
O’BrienR. M. (2007). A caution regading rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690.
36.
OkparaC.HendricksA.CobbL. (2021). Beyond aggravating and mitigating factors: The analysis of Colorado’s death penalty cases (1999-2010). Justice Evaluation Journal, 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2021.1877090
37.
PampelF. C. (2000). Logistic regression: A primer. Sage.
38.
PaternosterR.BrameR. (2008). Reassessing race disparities in capital cases. Criminology, 46(4), 971–1008.
39.
PaternosterR.BrameR.BaconS.DitchfieldA. (2004). Justice by geography and race: The administration of the death penalty in Maryland. Margins: University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class, 1–98.
40.
PetersenN. (2017). Examining the sources of racial bias in potentially capital cases: A case study of police and prosecutorial discretion. Race and Justice, 7(1), 7–34.
41.
PetersenN.LynchM. (2012). Prosecutorial discretion, hidden costs, and the death penalty: The case of Los Angeles county. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 102(4), 1233–1274.
42.
PierceG. L.RadeletM. L. (2002). Race, region and death sentencing in Illinois, 1988-1997. Oregon Law Review, 1–38.
43.
PokorakJ. J. (1997–1998). Probing the capital prosecutor’s perspective: Race of the discretionary actors. Cornell Law Review, 1811–1820.
44.
RadeletM.PierceG. (1985). Race and prosecutorial discretion in homicide cases. Law and Society Review, 19, 587–621.
45.
RichardsT.JenningsW.SmithM.SellersC.FogelS.BjerregaardB. (2016). Explaining the “female victim effect” in capital sentencing: An examination of sex-specific models of juror sentence decision-making. Crime & Delinquency, 62(7), 875–898.
46.
RichardsT.JenningsW.SmithM.SellersC. B. B.FogelS. (2014). Explaining the female victim effect in capital punishment: An examination of sex specific models of juror sentence decision-making. Crime & Delinquency, 62(7), 875–898.
47.
RichardsT.SmithM.JenningsW.BjerregaardB.FogelS. (2014). An examination of defendant sex disparity in capital sentencing: A propensity score matching approach. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(4), 681–697.
48.
RosenbaumP.RubinD. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician, 39(1), 33–38.
49.
SchlesingerT. (2005). Racial and ethnic disparity in pretrial criminal processing. Justice Quarterly, 22(2), 170–192.
50.
ShatzS.PierceG.RadeletM. (2020). Race, ethnicity and the death penalty in San Diego County: The predictable consequences of excessive discretion. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 51(3), 1073–1096.
51.
SlanskyD. (2017). The nature and function of prosecutorial power. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 106(3), 473–520.
52.
SlanskyD. (2018). The problems with prosecutors. Annual Review of Criminology, 1, 451–469.
53.
SmithR.LevinsonJ. (2012). The impact of implicit racial bias on the exercise of prosecutorial discretion. Seattle Law Review, 35, 795–826.
54.
SongerM.UnahI. (2006). The effect of race, gender and location on prosecutorial discretion to seek the death penalty in South Carolina. South Carolina Law Review, 58, 161–210.
55.
SorensenJ.WallaceD. (1999). Prosecutorial discretion in seeking death: An analysis of racial disparity in the pretrial stages of case processing in a Midwestern county. Justice Quarterly, 16, 559–578.
56.
SpohnC.BeichnerD. (2000). Is preferential treatment of female offenders a thing of the past? A multi-site study of gender, race and imprisonment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11(2), 149–184.
57.
SpohnC.DeLoneM. (2000). When does race matter? An analysis of the conditions under which race affects sentence severity. Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance, 2, 305–327.
58.
StaufferA.SmithM.CochranJ.FogelS.BjerregaardB. (2006). The interaction between victim race and gender on sentencing outcomes in capital murder trials. Homicide Studies, 10(2), 98–117.
59.
SteffensmeierD. (1980). Assessing the impact of the women’s movement on sex-based differences in the handling of adult criminal defendants. Crime & Delinquency, 26(3), 344–357.
60.
SteffensmeierD.DemuthS. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. federal courts: Who is punished more harshly?American Sociological Review, 65(5), 705–729.
SteffensmeierD.DemuthS. (2006). Does gender modify the effects of race-ethnicity on criminal sanctioning? Sentences for male and female White, Black, and Hispanic defendants. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 241–261.
63.
SteffensmeierD.KramerJ.StriefelC. (1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 31(3), 411–446.
64.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ.KramerJ. (1998). The interaction of race, gender and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black, and male. Criminology, 36(4), 763–797.
65.
TomischE.RichardsT.GoverA. (2014). A review of sex disparities in the “key players” of the capital punishment process: From defendants to jurors. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(4), 732–752.
66.
UllmerJ.KramerJ.ZajakG. (2020). Race of defendants and victims in Pennsylvania death penalty decisions: 2000-2010. Justice Quarterly, 37(5), 955–983.
67.
UlmerJ.HanrathL.ZajakG. (2022). Racialized gender differences in capital decision making in Pennsylvania. Justice Quarterly, 39(5), 1104–1127.
68.
UlmerJ.KramerJ. (1996). Court communities under sentencing guidelines: Dilemma of formal rationality and sentencing disparity. Criminology, 34(3), 383–408.
69.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1990). Death penalty sentencing: Research indicates pattern of racial disparities.
70.
VitoA. G.VitoG. F.HigginsG. E. (2021). Examining the sentence of life without parole in Kentucky homicide cases. Justice Evaluation Journal, 4(1), 98–111.
71.
VitoG. (2010). The racial justice act in Kentucky. Northern Kentucky Law Review, 37(2), 273–285.
72.
VitoG.HigginsG.VitoA. (2014). Capital sentencing in Kentucy, 2000 - 2010. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(4), 753–770.
73.
VitoG.KeilT. (1988). Capital sentencing in Kentucky: An analysis of the factors influencing decision making in the post-Gregg period. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 79, 483–503.
74.
WangJ. (2021). To use or not to use propensity score matching?. Pharmaceutical Statistics, 20(1), 15–24.
75.
WeissR.BerkR.LeeC. (1996). Assessing the capriciousness of death penalty charging. Law and Society Review, 30(3), 607–626.
76.
WilliamsM.DemuthS.HolcumbJ. (2007). Understanding the influence of victim gender in death penalty cases: The importance of victim race, sex-related victimization, and jury decision making. Criminology, 45(4), 865–891.
77.
WilliamsM.HolcombJ. (2001). Racial disparity and death sentences in Ohio. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29(3), 207–218.
78.
WilliamsM.HolcombJ. (2004). The interactive effects of victim race and gender on death sentence disparity findings. Homicide Studies, 8(4), 350–376.
79.
ZeiselH. (1981). Race bias in the administration of the death penalty: The Florida experience. Harvard Law Review, 95, 456.
