The U.S. prison population has fallen 15% overall, 28% for Blacks, and 21% for Hispanics since the Great Recession began. These trends occurred despite rising defendant criminal histories and the continued presence of the punitive policies that drove “mass incarceration.” We test the central hypothesis that court actors employed several discretionary tools available under Florida's sentencing system to reduce prison use, which in turn reduced direct and indirect racial disparities.
Methods
To test this hypothesis, we utilized 20 years of felony cases. Our analyses employ current best practices for testing interactive effects and decomposition models to identify changes in prison use and the factors associated with these changes.
Results
We find criminal history scores rose sharply, but prison use and racial disparities therein fell markedly in the past decade. The key factors driving these trends are reductions in the influence of criminal history on decision-making, increased use of mitigated departures, and the flexibility of Florida's sentencing system to accommodate mitigated departures. In fact, if Florida's sentencing rules had been followed more closely, racial disparities in prison sentences would have grown.
Conclusions
This research has implications for reforms aimed at ending mass incarceration and reducing racial disparities in imprisonment.
AbrahamseAllan F.MorrisonPeter A.BoltonNancy Minter. 1994. “Surname Analysis for Estimating Local Concentration of Hispanics and Asians.” Population Research and Policy Review13:383‐98.
2.
AlbonettiCelesta A. 1991. “An Integration of Theories to Explain Judicial Discretion.” Social Problems38(2):247‐66.
3.
AlexanderMichelle. 2010. The new Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the age of Colorblindness. New York: The New Press.
4.
ArazanChristine L.BalesWilliam D.BlombergThomas G.. 2019. “Courtroom Context and Sentencing.” American Journal of Criminal Justice44(1):23‐44.
5.
BaumerEric P. 2013. “Reassessing and Redirecting Research on Race and Sentencing.” Justice Quarterly30(2):231‐61.
6.
BeckAllen J.BlumsteinAlfred. 2012. “Trends in Incarceration Rates: 1980–2010.” Washington, DC: Paper prepared for the National Research Council Committee on the Causes and Consequences of High Rates of Incarceration.
7.
Bonilla-SilvaEduardo. 1997. “Rethinking Racism: Toward a Structural Interpretation.” American Sociological Review 62(3): 465‐80.
8.
BontragerStephanieBalesWilliamChiricosTed. 2005. “Race, Ethnicity, Threat and the Labeling of Convicted Felons.” Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal43(3):589‐622.
BrennanPauline K. 2006. “Sentencing Female Misdemeanants: An Examination of the Direct and Indirect Effects of Race/Ethnicity.” Justice Quarterly23(1):60‐95.
11.
BridgesGeorge S.SteenSara. 1998. “Racial Disparities in Official Assessments of Juvenile Offenders: Attributional Stereotypes as Mediating Mechanisms.” American Sociological Review63(4):554‐70.
12.
BrownElizabeth K. 2012. “Foreclosing on Incarceration? State Correctional Policy Enactments and the Great Recession.” Criminal Justice Policy Review24(3):317‐37.
13.
BushwayShawn D.ForstBrian. 2013. “Studying Discretion in the Processes That Generate Criminal Justice Sanctions.” Justice Quarterly30(2):199‐222.
14.
CampbellMichael C.SchoenfeldHeather. 2013. “The Transformation of Americas Penal Order: A Historicized Political Sociology of Punishment 1.” American Journal of Sociology118(5):1375‐423.
15.
CarsonE. Ann. 2019. Prisoners in 2018. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
16.
CarsonE. Ann. 2020. Prisoners in 2019. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
17.
CarsonE. AnnMulako-WangotaJoseph. 2020a. “Count of new court commitments: Generated Using the Corrections Statistical Analysis Tool.” Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
18.
CarsonE. AnnMulako-WangotaJoseph. 2020b. “Imprisonment rates of total jurisdiction population: Generated using the Corrections Statistical Analysis Tool.” Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
19.
ChiricosTheodore G.BalesWilliam D.. 1991. “Unemployment and Punishment: An Empirical Assessment.” Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal29(4):701‐24.
20.
ClearTodd R.AustinJames. 2009. “Reducing Mass Incarceration: Implications of the Iron law of Prison Populations.” Harvard Law & Policy Review3:307‐24.
21.
CochranJoshua C.TomanElisa L.ShieldsRyan T.MearsDaniel P.. 2021. “A Uniquely Punitive Turn? Sex Offenders and the Persistence of Punitive Sanctioning.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency58(1):74‐118.
22.
CrawfordCharles. 2000. “Gender, Race, and Habitual Offender Sentencing in Florida.” Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal38(1):263‐80.
23.
CrowMatthew S. 2008. “The Complexities of Prior Record, Race, Ethnicity, and Policy.” Criminal Justice Review33(4):502‐23.
24.
CrowMatthew S.GertzMarc. 2008. “Sentencing Policy and Disparity: Guidelines and the Influence of Legal and Democratic Subcultures.” Journal of Criminal Justice36(4):362‐71.
25.
CrowMatthew S.BalesWilliam. 2006. “Sentencing Guidelines and Focal Concerns: The Effect of Sentencing Policy as a Practical Constraint on Sentencing Decisions.” American Journal of Criminal Justice30(2):285‐304.
26.
FeldmeyerBenUlmerJeffery T.. 2011. “Racial/Ethnic Threat and Federal Sentencing.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency48(2):238‐70.
27.
FeldmeyerBenWarrenPatricia Y.SiennickSonja E.NeptuneMalisa. 2015. “Racial, Ethnic, and Immigrant Threat: Is There a new Criminal Threat on State Sentencing?” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency52(1):62‐92.
28.
FischmanJoshua B.SchanzenbachMax M.. 2012. “Racial Disparities Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: The Role of Judicial Discretion and Mandatory Minimums.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies9(4):729‐64.
29.
Florida Department of Corrections & Office of the State Courts Administrator. 2012. “Florida Criminal Punishment Code.”. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Corrections & Office of the State Courts Administrator.
30.
FraseRichard S. 2019. “Forty Years of American Sentencing Guidelines: What Have We Learned?” Crime and Justice48(1):79‐135.
31.
GelbachJonah B. 2014. “B1X2: Stata Module to Account for Changes When X2 is Added to a Base Model with X1.” Statistical Software Components S457814, Boston College Department of Economics.
32.
GelbachJonah B. 2016. “. “When do Covariates Matter? And Which Ones, and how Much?”.” Journal of Labor Economics34(2):509‐43.
33.
GortonJoeBoiesJohn L.. 1999. “Sentencing Guidelines and Racial Disparity Across Time: Pennsylvania Prison Sentences in 1977, 1983, 1992, and 1993.” Social Science Quarterly80(1):37‐54.
34.
GrisetPamala L. 2002. “New Sentencing Laws Follow old Patterns: A Florida Case Study.” Journal of Criminal Justice30(4):287‐301.
35.
Haney LopezIan F. 2000. “Institutional Racism: Judicial Conduct and a new Theory of Radical Discrimination.” The Yale Law Journal109(8):1717‐884.
36.
HawkinsDarnell F. 1981. “Causal Attribution and Punishment for Crime.” Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal2(3):207‐30.
37.
HenrichsonChristianSchattner-ElmalehEitalKang-BrownJacobHindsOliverWallace-LeeJames. 2019. Incarceration Trends in Florida. New York: Vera Institute of Justice. 2019.
38.
HesterRhysFraseRichard S.RobertsJulian V.MitchellKelly Lyn. 2018. “Prior Record Enhancements at Sentencing: Unsettled Justifications and Unsettling Consequences.” Crime and Justice47(1):209‐54.
39.
Kang-BrownJacobMontagnetChaseHeissJasmine. 2021. People in Jail and Prison in 2020. New York: Vera Institute of Justice, 2021.
40.
KennedyRandall. 1997. Race, Crime, and the law. New York: Pantheon.
41.
KingRyan D. 2019. “Cumulative Impact: Why Prison Sentences Have Increased.” Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal57(1):157‐80.
42.
KingRyan D.LightMichael T.. 2019. “Have Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Sentencing Declined?” Crime and Justice48(1):365‐437.
LightMichael T. 2021. “The Declining Significance of Race in Criminal Sentencing: Evidence from US Federal Courts.” Social Forces100(3):1110‐1141.
45.
LongJ. ScottMustilloSarah A.. 2018. “Using Predictions and Marginal Effects to Compare Groups in Regression Models for Binary Outcomes.” Sociological Methods & Research 50(3): 1‐37.
46.
MataAlberto G. 1998 “Stereotyping by Politicians: Immigrant Bashing and Nativist Political Movements.” Pp. 151‐67 in Images of Color, Images of Crime, edited by MannCoramae RicheyZatzMarjorie S.. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
47.
MirandéAlfredo. 1987. Gringo Justice. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
48.
MitchellOjmarrh. 2005. “A Meta-Analysis of Race and Sentencing Research: Explaining the Inconsistencies.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology21(4):439‐66.
49.
MitchellOjmarrh. 2018 “The Paradox of a Black Incarceration Boom in an Era of Declining Black Crime: Causes and Consequences.” Pp. 343‐67 in Making a Black Criminology: Race, Theory, and Crime: Advances in Criminological Theory, Vol. 24, edited by UnneverJames D.GabbidonShaun L.ChouhyCecilia. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
50.
MitchellOjmarrhCochranJoshua C.MearsDaniel P.BalesWilliam D.. 2017. “The Effectiveness of Prison for Reducing Drug Offender Recidivism: A Regression Discontinuity Analysis.”.” Journal of Experimental Criminology13:1‐27.
51.
MizeTrenton D. 2019. “Best Practices for Estimating, Interpreting, and Presenting Nonlinear Interaction Effects.” Sociological Science6:81‐117.
52.
MuhammadKhalil Gibran. 2011. The Condemnation of Blackness: Race, Crime, and the Making of Modern Urban America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
MustardDavid B. 2001. “Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. Federal Courts.” Journal of Law and Economics44(1):285‐314.
54.
MustilloSarah A.LizardoOmar A.McVeighRory M.. 2018. “Editors’ Comment: A few Guidelines for Quantitative Submissions. Los Angeles, CA: ” Sage Publications Sage CA.
55.
National Research Council. 2014. The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
56.
NealDerekRickArmin. 2016. “The Prison Boom and Sentencing Policy.” The Journal of Legal Studies45(1):1‐41.
57.
OmoriMarisaPetersenNick. 2020. “Institutionalizing Inequality in the Courts: Decomposing Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Detention, Conviction, and Sentencing.” Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal58:678‐713.
58.
PérezLisandro. 1986. “Cubans in the United States.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science487(1):126‐37.
59.
Pew Center on the States. 2010. Prison County 2010: State Population Declines for the First Time in 38 Years. Washington, DC: The PEW Charitable Trusts.
60.
PfaffJohn F. 2017. Locked In: The True Causes of Mass Incarceration—and how to Achieve Real Reform. New York: Basic Books.
61.
RaphaelStevenStollMichelle A.. 2013. Why are so Many Americans in Prison?New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
62.
RehaviM. MaritStarrSonja B.. 2012. Racial Disparity in Federal Criminal Charging and Its Sentencing Consequences. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Law School, Program in Law & Economics Working Paper Series, Paper No. 12-002.
63.
SchlesingerTraci. 2011. “The Failure of Race Neutral Policies: How Mandatory Terms and Sentencing Enhancements Contribute to Mass Racialized Incarceration.” Crime & Delinquency57(1):56‐81.
64.
ShenYinzhiBushwayShawn D.SorensenLucy C.SmithHerbert L.. 2020. “Locking up my Generation: Cohort Differences in Prison Spells Over the Life Course.” Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal58:645‐77.
65.
SmallMario L.PagerDevah. 2020. “Sociological Perspectives on Racial Discrimination.” Journal of Economic Perspectives34(2):49‐67.
66.
SpohnCassia. 2000 “Thirty Years of Sentencing Reform: The Quest for a Racially Neutral Sentencing Process.” Pp. 427‐501 in Criminal Justice 2000, Volume 3: Policies, Processes, and Decisions of the Criminal Justice System, edited by HorneyJulie. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.
67.
SpohnCassia. 2015. “Race, Crime, and Punishment in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries.” Crime & Justice44:49‐97.
68.
SpohnCassiaHolleranDavid. 2000. “The Imprisonment Penalty Paid by Young, Unemployed Black and Hispanic Male Offenders.” Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal38(1):281‐306.
69.
SpohnCassiaGruhlJohnWelchSusan. 1981. “The Effect of Race on Sentencing: A Re-Examination of an Unsettled Question.” Law & Society Review16(1):71‐88.
70.
SteffensmeierDarrellUlmerJefferyKramerJohn. 1998. “The Interaction of Race, Gender, and age in Criminal Sentencing: The Punishment Cost of Being Young, Black and Male.” Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal36(4):763‐97.
71.
SteffensmeierDarrellPainter-DavisNoahUlmerJeffery. 2017. “Intersectionality of Race, Ethnicity, Gender, and Age on Criminal Punishment.” Sociological Perspectives60(4):810‐33.
72.
StolzenbergLisaD'AlessioStewart J.. 1994. “Sentencing and Unwarranted Disparity: An Empirical Assessment of the Long-Term Impact of Sentencing Guidelines in Minnesota.” Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal32(2):301‐10.
73.
TonryMichael. 2013. “Sentencing in America, 1975–2025.” Crime and Justice42(1):141‐98.
74.
TonryMichael. 2014. “Remodeling American Sentencing: A ten-Step Blueprint for Moving Past Mass Incarceration.” Criminology & Public Policy13(4):503‐33.
75.
TonryMichael. 2016. Sentencing Fragments: Penal Reform in America, 1975–2025. New York: Oxford University Press.
76.
UlmerJeffery T. 1997. Social Worlds of Sentencing: Court Communities Under Sentencing Guidelines. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
77.
UlmerJeffery T.ParkerBrandy R.. 2020. “Federal Sentencing of Hispanic Defendants in Changing Immigrant Destinations.” Justice Quarterly37(3):541‐70.
78.
UlmerJeffrey T.KramerJohn H.. 1996. “Court Communities Under Sentencing Guidelines: Dilemmas of Formal Rationality and Sentencing Disparity.” Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal34(3):383‐408.
79.
UlmerJeffery TLaskorunskyJulia A. 2016. “The Role of Juvenile Adjudications in the Disproportional Incarceration of African-American and Hispanic Defendants.” Journal of Crime and Justice39(1):9‐27.
80.
UlmerJeffrey T.LightMichael T.KramerJohn H.. 2011. “Racial Disparity in the Wake of the Booker/Fanfan Decision: An Alternative Analysis to the USSC's 2010 Report.” Criminology & Public Policy10(4):1077‐118.
81.
UlmerJefferyPainter-DavisNoahTinikLeigh. 2016. “Disproportional Imprisonment of Black and Hispanic Males: Sentencing Discretion, Processing Outcomes, and Policy Structures.” Justice Quarterly33(4):642‐81.
Van CleveNicole Gonzalez. 2016. Crook County: Racism and Injustice in America’s Largest Criminal Court. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
84.
WarrenPatricia Y.CochranJoshuaShieldsRyan T.FeldmeyerBenBaileyCarolineStewartEric A.. 2020. “Sentencing Departures and Female Defendants: Assessing the Effects of Racial and Ethnic Threat.” Crime & Delinquency66(1):59‐92.
85.
WeiIris I.VirnigBeth A.JohnDolly A.MorganRobert O.. 2006. “Using a Spanish Surname Match to Improve Identification of Hispanic Women in Medicare Administrative Data.” Health Research and Educational Trust41(4):1469‐81.
86.
WesternBruce. 2006. Punishment and Inequality in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
87.
WooldredgeJohn. 2009. “Short- Versus Long-Term Effects of Ohio’s Switch to More Structured Sentencing on Extra-Legal Disparities in Prison Sentences in an Urban Court.” Criminology & Public Policy8(2):285‐312.
88.
WooldredgeJohnFrankJamesGouletteNatalieTravisLawrenceIII. 2015. “Is the Impact of Cumulative Disadvantage on Sentencing Greater for Black Defendants?” Criminology & Public Policy14(2):187‐223.
WordDavid L.PerkinsColby R.. 1996. Building a Spanish Surname List for the 1990s—a New Approach to an Old Problem. U.S. Census Bureau Technical Working Paper No. 13. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
91.
ZatzMarjorie S.2000 “The Convergence of Race, Ethnicity, Gender, and Class on Court Decisionmaking: Looking Toward the 21st Century.” Pp. 503‐52 in Criminal Justice 2000, Volume 3: Policies, Processes, and Decisions of the Criminal Justice System, edited by HorneyJulie. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
