Despite debates about the “material militarization” of the police, relatively little information on mass public opinion about police weapons, equipment, and gear currently exists. We analyze data from a national, opt-in panel of survey participants to assess public opinion regarding police use of 10 different types of weapons and equipment for use in confrontations with citizens. We find that public opinion defies easy classification into “militarized” versus “routine” equipment categories. Multivariate analyses indicate that perceptions of (a) police efficacy and (b) the frequency with which officers experience physical assaults on the job are the most consistent predictors of support for a range of weapons and gear, whereas perceptions of police misconduct and bias predict opposition to some types of tools. Partisan differences in attitudes between Democrats, Republicans, and Independents are less consistent predictors than broader perceptions about policing, but the effects of partisanship that are evident are substantively large.
AnsolabehereS.SchaffnerB. F. (2014). Does survey mode still matter? Findings from a 2010 multi-mode comparison. Political Analysis, 22(3), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpt025
2.
AnsolabehereS.SchaffnerB. F. (2018). Taking the study of political behavior online. In AtkesonL. R.AlvarezR. M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of polling and survey methods (pp. 76–96). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190213299.013.6
BielerS. (2016). Police militarization in the USA: The state of the field. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 39(4), 586–600. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-03-2016-0042
BrownB.BenedictW. R. (2002). Perceptions of the police. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 25(3), 542–580. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510210437032
10.
BrunsonR. K. (2007). “Police don’t like Black people”: African-American young men’s accumulated police experiences. Criminology & Public Policy, 6(1), 71–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2007.00423.x
BurkhardtB. C.BakerK. (2019). Agency correlates of police militarization: The case of MRAPs. Police Quarterly, 22(2), 161–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611118800780
13.
CallananV. J.RosenbergerJ. S. (2011). Media and public perceptions of the police: Examining the impact of race and personal experience. Policing and Society, 21(2), 167–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2010.540655
CarrP. J.NapolitanoL.KeatingJ. (2007). We never call the cops and here is why: A qualitative examination of legal cynicism in three Philadelphia neighborhoods. Criminology, 45(2), 445–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00084.x
16.
ChangL.KrosnickJ. A. (2009). National surveys via RDD telephone interviewing versus the internet comparing sample representativeness and response quality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(4), 641–678. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp075
17.
CobbinaJ. E. (2019). Hands up, don’t shoot: Why the protests in Ferguson and Baltimore matter, and how they changed America. New York University Press.
DesmondM.PapachristosA. V.KirkD. S. (2016). Police violence and citizen crime reporting in the Black community. American Sociological Review, 81(5), 857–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122416663494
DrakulichK.HaganJ.JohnsonD.WozniakK. H. (2017). Race, justice, policing, and the 2016 American presidential election. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 14(1), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X1600031X
22.
DrakulichK.WozniakK. H.HaganJ.JohnsonD. (2020). Race and policing in the 2016 presidential election: Black lives matter, the police, and dog whistle politics. Criminology, 58, 370–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12239
EnnsP. K. (2016). Incarceration nation: How the United States became the most punitive democracy in the world. Cambridge University Press.
27.
FarmerA. K.Rabe-HempC. E.TaylorJ. (2019). Police militarization: Implications for communities of color. In Rabe-HempC. E.LindN. (Eds.), Political authority, social control and public policy (Vol. 31, pp. 27–41). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2053-769720190000031003
28.
FixR. L.FixS. T. (2020). How wide is the political divide? Respondent political affiliation and victim criminal background affects perceived guilt of police who shoot children. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 865–879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09522-8
29.
FormanJ. (2017). Locking up our own: Crime and punishment in Black America. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
30.
FortnerM. J. (2015). Black silent majority: The Rockefeller drug laws and the politics of punishment. Harvard University Press.
31.
FoxB.MouleR. K.ParryM. M. (2018). Categorically complex: A latent class analysis of public perceptions of police militarization. Journal of Criminal Justice, 58, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.07.002
32.
FoxJ. (1991). Regression diagnostics: An introduction. SAGE.
GauthierJ. F.GrazianoL. M. (2018). News media consumption and attitudes about police: In search of theoretical orientation and advancement. Journal of Crime and Justice, 41(5), 504–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2018.1472625
35.
GrazianoL. M.GauthierJ. F. (2018). Media consumption and perceptions of police legitimacy. Policing: An International Journal, 41(5), 593–607. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-12-2016-0177
HeenM. S. J.LiebermanJ. D.MietheT. D. (2014). A comparison of different online sampling approaches for generating national samples (CCJP 2014-01). Center for Crime and Justice Policy, University of Nevada, Las Vegas.
HintonE. (2016). From the war on poverty to the war on crime: The making of mass incarceration in America. Harvard University Press.
42.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
43.
IlchiO. S.FrankJ. (2020). Public servants or soldiers? A test of the police-military equivalency hypothesis. Journal of Crime and Justice, 43, 228–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2019.1653217
44.
InslerM. A.McMurreyB.McQuoidA. F. (2019). From broken windows to broken bonds: Militarized police and social fragmentation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 163, 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.04.012
KoslickiW. M.WillitsD. (2018). The iron fist in the velvet glove? Testing the militarization/community policing paradox. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 20(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461355718774581
47.
KraskaP. B. (2007). Militarization and policing—Its relevance to 21st century police. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 1(4), 501–513. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pam065
48.
KraskaP. B.CubellisL. J. (1997). Militarizing mayberry and beyond: Making sense of American paramilitary policing. Justice Quarterly, 14(4), 607–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829700093521
49.
KraskaP. B.KappelerV. E. (1997). Militarizing American police: The rise and normalization of paramilitary units. Social Problems, 44(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/3096870
50.
LawsonE. (2019). TRENDS: Police militarization and the use of lethal force. Political Research Quarterly, 72(1), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918784209
51.
LockwoodB.DoyleM. D.ComiskeyJ. G. (2018). Armed, but too dangerous? Factors associated with citizen support for the militarization of the police. Criminal Justice Studies, 31(2), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2017.1420652
52.
LoweryW. (2016). They can’t kill us all: Ferguson, Baltimore, and a new era in America’s racial justice movement. Little, Brown.
53.
Mac DonaldH. (2016). The war on cops: How the new attack on law and order makes everyone less safe. Encounter Books.
54.
MacInnisB.KrosnickJ. A.HoA. S.ChoM.-J. (2018). The accuracy of measurements with probability and nonprobability survey samples: Replication and extension. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(4), 707–744. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy038
55.
MaguireE. R. (2015). New directions in protest policing. Saint Louis University Public Law Review, 35(1), 67–108.
56.
MaseraF. (2019). Police safety, killings by the police and the militarization of U.S. law enforcement (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3342922). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3342922
57.
MouleR. K.BurrussG. W.ParryM. M.FoxB. (2019). Assessing the direct and indirect effects of legitimacy on public empowerment of police: A study of public support for police militarization in America. Law & Society Review, 53(1), 77–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12379
58.
MouleR. K.FoxB. H.ParryM. M. (2019). The long shadow of Ferguson: Legitimacy, legal cynicism, and public perceptions of police militarization. Crime & Delinquency, 65(2), 151–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128718770689
59.
MouleR. K.ParryM. M.FoxB. (2019). Public support for police use of SWAT: Examining the relevance of legitimacy. Journal of Crime and Justice, 42(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2018.1556862
60.
MummoloJ. (2018). Militarization fails to enhance police safety or reduce crime but may harm police reputation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(37), 9181–9186.
National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders, & KernerO. (1968). Report of the national advisory commission on civil disorders. U.S. Government Printing Office.
PeckJ. H. (2015). Minority perceptions of the police: A state-of-the-art review. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 38(1), 173–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-01-2015-0001
67.
PeffleyM.HurwitzJ. (2010). Justice in America: The separate realities of Blacks and Whites. Cambridge University Press.
PhillipsS. W. (2016). Military-style weapons in policing: A limited test of diffusion theory. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 38(3), 168–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2016.1173943
70.
PickettJ. T.CullenF. T.BushwayS. D.ChiricosT.AlpertG. (2018). The response rate test: Nonresponse bias and the future of survey research in criminology and criminal justice. The Criminologist, 43(1), 7–11.
71.
President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. (2015). Final report of the president’s task force on 21st century policing. Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
72.
ProwseG.WeaverV. M.MearesT. L. (2020). The state from below: Distorted responsiveness in policed communities. Urban Affairs Review, 56(5), 1423–1471. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419844831
73.
RadilS. M.DezzaniR. J.McAdenL. D. (2017). Geographies of U.S. police militarization and the role of the 1033 program. The Professional Geographer, 69(2), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2016.1212666
74.
RameyD. M.SteidleyT. (2018). Policing through subsidized firepower: An assessment of rational choice and minority threat explanations of police participation in the 1033 program. Criminology, 56(4), 812–856. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12193
75.
RiosV. M. (2011). Punished: Policing the lives of Black and Latino boys. New York University Press.
76.
SilverJ. R.PickettJ. T. (2015). Toward a better understanding of politicized policing attitudes: Conflicted conservatism and support for police use of force. Criminology, 53(4), 650–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12092
77.
SimckesM.HajatA.RevereD.Rowhani-RahbarA.WillitsD. (2019). A conceptualization of militarization in domestic policing. Police Quarterly, 22(4), 511–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611119862070
78.
SimmonsA. D.BoboL. D. (2015). Can non-full-probability internet surveys yield useful data? A comparison with full-probability face-to-face surveys in the domain of race and social inequality attitudes. Sociological Methodology, 45(1), 357–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081175015570096
79.
SteidleyT.RameyD. M. (2019). Police militarization in the United States. Sociology Compass, 13(4), e12674. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12674
80.
ThompsonA. J.PickettJ. T. (2020). Are relational inferences from crowdsourced and opt-in samples generalizable? Comparing criminal justice attitudes in the GSS and five online samples. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 36, 907–932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-019-09436-7
81.
TilleyB. P. (2020). “I am the law and order candidate”: A content analysis of Donald Trump’s race-baiting dog whistles in the 2016 presidential campaign. Psychology, 11(12), 1941–1974. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2020.1112123
82.
TurnerF. W.FoxB. H. (2019). Public servants or police soldiers? An analysis of opinions on the militarization of policing from police executives, law enforcement, and members of the 114th congress U.S. house of representatives. Police Practice and Research, 20(2), 122–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2017.1371600
83.
TylerT. R. (2006). Why people obey the law (Vol. 2). Princeton University Press.
84.
WozniakK. H.CalfanoB.DrakulichK. (2020). Exposure to images of police-civilian interactions and public opinion about law enforcement and government: An experimental test. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2020-02-14. https://doi.org/10.3886/E117544V1
85.
WozniakK. H.DrakulichK. M.CalfanoB. R. (2020). Do photos of police-civilian interactions influence public opinion about the police? A multimethod test of media effects. Journal of Experimental Criminology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-020-09415-0
86.
YeagerD. S.KrosnickJ. A.ChangL.JavitzH. S.LevenduskyM. S.SimpserA.WangR. (2011). Comparing the accuracy of RDD telephone surveys and internet surveys conducted with probability and non-probability samples. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(4), 709–747. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr020
87.
ZoorobM. (2019). Blue endorsements matter: How the fraternal order of police contributed to Donald Trump’s victory. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(2), 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096518001841
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
