This research seeks to add a new dimension to the growing body of literature investigating disparities in sentencing outcomes. Our study used multilevel modeling techniques to incorporate legal and extralegal individual-level variables with macro-level data in an examination of the factors influencing the formal application of the criminal label when identical noncriminal sanctions are available. Results suggest that measures of police racial profiling are predictive of unfavorable plea outcomes and subsequent application of a criminal label. Findings indicated that the likelihood of receiving an unfavorable criminal plea bargain was greater for men, non-Whites, defendants with a prior arrest, defendants arrested in areas of low concentrated disadvantage, and defendants arrested in areas with high levels of racial profiling. In addition, both concentrated disadvantage and stop disparity conditioned the effect of race on plea outcome.
AdamsK.CutshallC. R. (1987). Refusing to prosecute minor offenses: The relative influence of legal and extralegal factors. Justice Quarterly, 4, 596-609.
2.
AlbonettiC. A. (1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcome for drug offenses, 1991-1992. Law and Society Review, 31, 789-822.
3.
AlbonettiC. A. (1998a). Direct and indirect effects of case complexity, guilty pleas, and offender characteristics on sentencing for offenders convicted of a white-collar offense prior to sentencing guidelines. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14, 353.
4.
AlbonettiC. A. (1998b). The role of gender and departures in the sentencing of defendants convicted of a white-collar offense under the federal sentencing guidelines. Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance, 1, 3-48.
5.
AlpertG. P.DunhamR. G.SmithM. R. (2007). Investigating racial profiling by the Miami-Dade Police department: A multimethod approach. Criminology & Public Policy, 6(1), 25-55.
6.
BattonC.KadleckC. (2004). Theoretical and methodological issues in racial profiling research. Police Quarterly, 7(1), 30-64.
7.
BaybeckB. (2006). Sorting out the competing effects of racial context. Journal of Politics, 68, 386-396.
8.
BeckerH. S. (1973). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York, NY: Free Press.
9.
BrittC. L. (2000). Social context and racial disparities in punishment decisions. Justice Quarterly, 17, 707-732.
10.
CashmoreE. (2001). The experiences of ethnic minority police officers in Britain: Under-recruitment and racial profiling in a performance culture. Ethnic & Racial Studies, 24, 642-659.
11.
ChampionD. J. (1989). Private counsel and public defenders: A look at weak cases, prior records and leniency in plea bargains. Journal of Criminal Justice17, 509-525.
12.
ChurchT. (1979). In defense of "bargain justice."Law and Society, 13, 509-525.
13.
CollinsP. H. (2006). The racial threat. British Journal of Sociology, 57, 205-208.
14.
DalyK. (1987). Structure and practice of familial-based justice in criminal court. Law & Society Review21, 267-290.
15.
DalyK.TonryM. (1997). Gender, race, and sentencing. In TonryM. (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (pp. 201-252). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
EisensteinJ.JacobH. (1977). Felony justice: An organizational analysis of criminal courts. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
17.
EitleD.D’AlessioS. J.StolzenbergL. (2002). Racial threat and social control: A test of the political, economic, and threat of Black crime hypotheses. Social Forces, 81, 557-576.
18.
EngelR. S. (2005). Citizens’ perceptions of distributive and procedural injustice during traffic stops with police. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 42, 445-481.
19.
EngelR. S. (2008). A critique of the "outcome test" in racial profiling research. JQ: Justice Quarterly, 25(1), 1-36.
20.
EngelR. S.CalnonJ. M. (2004). Comparing benchmark methodologies for police-citizen contacts: Traffic stop data collection for the Pennsylvania State Police. Police Quarterly, 7(1), 97-125.
21.
FarrellA. (2004). Measuring judicial and prosecutorial discretion: Sex and race disparities in departures from the federal sentencing guidelines. Justice Research and Policy, 6(2), 45-78.
22.
FarrellA.McDevittJ.CroninS.PierceE. (2003). Rhode Island Traffic Stop Statistics Act—Final report. Boston, MA: Northeastern University, Institute on Race and Justice.
23.
FarrellA.WardG.RousseauD. (2009). Race-effects of representation among federal court workers: Does Black workforce representation reduce sentencing disparities?The Annals of the Academy of Political and Social Science, 623(1), 121-133.
24.
FearnN. E. (2005). A multilevel analysis of community effects on criminal sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 22, 452-487.
25.
GoddardW. H. (1972). Plea bargaining. California Law Review, 60, 894.
26.
HillG. D.HarrisA. R.MillerJ. L. (1985). The etiology of bias: Social heuristics and rational decision making in deviance processing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22, 135-162.
27.
HowellS. E.PerryH. L.VileM. (2004). Black cities/White cities: Evaluating the police. Political Behavior, 26(1), 45-68.
28.
JacksonP. I. (1989). Minority group threat, crime and policing. New York, NY: Praeger.
29.
JacobsD.CarmichaelJ. T. (2004). Ideology, social threat, and the death sentence: Capital sentences across time and space. Social Forces, 83(1), 249-278.
30.
JohnsonB. D. (2003). Racial and ethnic disparities in modes of conviction. Criminology, 41, 449-490.
31.
JohnsonB. D. (2005). Contextual disparities in guidelines departures: Courtroom social contexts, guidelines compliance, and extralegal disparities in criminal sentencing. Criminology, 43, 761-796.
32.
JohnsonB. D. (2006). The multilevel context of criminal sentencing: Integrating judge- and county-level influences. Criminology, 44, 259-298.
33.
JohnsonB. D.UlmerJ. T.KramerJ. H. (2008). The social context of guideline circumvention: The case of federal district courts. Criminology, 46, 373-783.
34.
JohnsonL. M.SimonsR. L.CongerR. D. (2004). Criminal justice system involvement and continuity of youth crime: A longitudinal analysis. Youth & Society, 36(1), 3-27.
35.
JonesJ. B. (1973). Prosecutors and the disposition of criminal cases: An analysis of plea bargaining rates. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology69, 402-412.
36.
KingR. D.WheelockD. (2007). Group threat and social control: Race, perceptions of minorities and the desire to punish. Social Forces, 85, 1255-1280.
37.
KramerJ. H.UlmerJ. T. (1996). Sentencing disparity and departures from guidelines. Justice Quarterly, 13(1), 81-106.
38.
LoftflandJ. (1969). Deviance and identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
39.
MillerL.EisensteinJ. (2005). The federal/state criminal prosecution nexus: A case study in cooperation and discretion. Social Inquiry, 30, 239-268.
40.
MillsC. W. (1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review, 5, 904-913.
41.
MisnerR. L. (1996). Recasting prosecutorial discretion. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 83, 717.
42.
MnookinR. L.LewisK. (1979). Bargaining in the shadow of the law. Yale Law Journal, 88, 950-997.
43.
MyersM. A. (1990). Economic threat and racial disparities in incarceration: The case of Postbellum Georgia. Criminology, 28, 627-656.
44.
MyersM. A.TalaricoS. (1986). The social contexts of criminal sentencing. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
45.
NagelI. H.HaganJ. (1983). Gender and crime: Offense patterns and criminal court sanctions. In TonryM.MorrisN. (Eds.), Crime and justice (vol. 4, pp. 91-144). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
46.
NovakK. J. (2004). Disparity and racial profiling in traffic enforcement. Police Quarterly, 7(1), 65-96.
47.
PagerD. (2007). Marked: Race, crime, and finding work in an era of mass incarceration. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48.
ParkerK. F.StultsB.RiceS. K. (2005). Racial threat, concentrated disadvantage and social control: Considering the macro-level sources of variation in arrests. Criminology, 43, 1111-1134.
49.
RamirezD.McDevittJ.FarrellA. (2000). A resource guide on racial profiling data collection systems: Promising practices and lessons learned. Boston, MA: Northeastern University.
50.
RidgewayG. (2006). Assessing the effect of race bias in post-traffic stop outcomes using propensity scores. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22(1), 1-29.
51.
RoneckD. W. (1991). Using logit coefficients to obtain the effects of independent variables on changes in probabilities. Social Forces, 70, 509-518.
52.
RoneckD. W.SwattM. L. (2006). For those who like odds: A direct interpretation of the logit coefficient for continuous variables. Social Science Quarterly, 87, 731-738.
53.
RosettA.CresseyD. (1979). Justice by consent: Plea bargaining in the American courthouse. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
54.
SchulhofferS. (1984). Is plea bargaining inevitable?Harvard Law Review, 97, 1039-1107.
55.
SealockM. D.SimpsonS. S. (1998). Unraveling bias in arrest decisions: The role of juvenile offender type-scripts. Justice Quarterly, 15, 427-457.
56.
SkolnickJ. H. (1966). Justice without trial: Law enforcement in democratic society. New York, NY: Wiley.
57.
SkolnickJ. H. (1975). Justice without trial. New York, NY: John Wiley.
58.
SmithB. W.HolmesM. D. (2003). Community accountability, minority threat, and police brutality: An examination of civil rights criminal complaints. Criminology, 41, 1035-1062.
59.
SmithD. A.VisherC. A.DavidsonL. A. (1984). Equity and discretionary justice: The influence of race on police arrest decisions. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 75(1), 234-249.
60.
SmithR. W.OsborneL. T.CrimD.RhuA. H. (1986). Labeling theory as applied to learning disabilities: Survey findings and policy suggestions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19(4), 195-202.
61.
SpohnC. C. (2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
62.
SpohnC. C.FornangoR. (2009). U.S. attorneys and substantial assistance departures: Testing for interprosecutor disparity. Criminology, 47, 813-486.
63.
SpohnC. C.GruhlJ.WelchS. (1987). The impact of ethnicity and gender of defendants on the decision to reject or dismiss felony charges. Criminology, 25, 175-191.
64.
SpohnC. C.HolleranD. (2000). The imprisonment penalty paid by young, unemployed Black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38(1), 281-306.
StolzenbergL.D’AlessioS. J.EitleD. (2004). A multilevel test of racial threat theory. Criminology, 42, 673-698.
67.
StraussA. (1978). Negotiations: Varieties, processes, context, and social order. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
68.
StuntzW. J. (2004). Plea bargaining and criminal law’s disappearing shadow. Harvard Law Review, 117, 2548-2569.
69.
TolbertC. J. (2003). Revisiting the racial threat hypothesis: White voter support for California’s Proposition 209. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 3(2), 183.
70.
TriplettR. (1993). The conflict perspective, symbolic interactionism, and the status characteristics hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 10, 540-558.
71.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2002). Rhode Island, 2000 census of population and housing. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. Census Bureau.
72.
U.S. Department of Justice: Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2006). Uniform crime reporting program data [United States]: County-level detailed arrest and offense data, 2000. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03451.v4
73.
UlmerJ. T.JohnsonB. D. (2004). Sentencing in context. Criminology, 42(1), 137-178.
74.
VisherC. A. (1983). Gender, police arrest decisions, and notions of chivalry. Criminology, 21(1), 5-28.
75.
WardG. (2009). Does racial balance in workforce representation yield equal justice? Race relations of sentencing in Federal court organizations. Law and Society Review, 43, 757-805.
76.
WardG.FarrellA.RousseauD. (2009). Race-effects of representation among federal court workers: Does Black workforce representation reduce sentencing disparities?The Annals of the Academy of Political and Social Science, 623(1), 121-133.
77.
WarrenP.Tomaskovic-DeveyD.SmithW.ZingraffM.MasonM. (2006). Driving while Black: Bias processes and racial disparity in police stops. Criminology, 44, 709-738.
78.
WeitzerR.TuchS. A. (2002). Perceptions of racial profiling: Race, class, and personal experience. Criminology, 40, 435.
79.
WilsonG.DunhamR.AlpertG. (2004). Prejudice in police profiling: Assessing an overlooked aspect in prior research. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 896-909.
80.
ZatzM. S. (2000). The convergence of race, ethnicity, gender, and class on court decision making: Looking toward the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
