Individuals who are charged for traditional crimes are substantially more likely to plead guilty than individuals who are charged under the same statutes but who are officially involved in terrorism (Smith & Damphousse, 1998). Relying on a structural–contextual theory framework, a quantitative analysis not only confirmed that terrorists plead guilty more often than traditional offenders but that the defendant’s age and number of counts in the indictment are important predictors. Directions for future research are suggested.
Albonetti, C. A. (1990). Race and the probability of pleading guilty. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 6,315-315.
2.
Albonetti, C. A. (1998). Direct and indirect effects of case complexity, guilty pleas, and offender characteristics on sentencing for offenders convicted of a white-collar offense prior to sentencing guidelines. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14, 353-353.
3.
Alschuler, A. (1975). The prosecutor’s role in plea bargaining. University of Chicago Law Review, 36, 50-50.
4.
Brickey, S. L., & Miller, D. E. (1975). Bureaucratic due process: An ethnography of a traffic court. Social Problems, 22, 688-688.
5.
Buckle, S., & Buckle, L. (1977). Bargaining for justice: Case disposition and reform in the criminal courts.New York: Praeger.
6.
Champion, D. J. (1987). District attorneys and plea bargaining: An analysis of the prosecutorial priorities influencing negotiated pleas. Prosecutor, 20, 25-25.
7.
Champion, D. J. (1989). Private counsels and public defenders: A look at weak cases, prior records, and leniency in plea bargaining. Journal of Criminal Justice, 17, 253-253.
8.
Corley, S., Smith, B., & Damphousse, K. (2005). The changing face of American terrorism. In L. Snowden & B. Whitsel (Eds.) Terrorism: Research, readings, and realities (pp. 49-62).Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9.
Damphousse, K. R., & Smith, B. L. (2004). Terrorism and empirical testing: Using indictment data to assess changes in terrorist conduct. In M. Deflem (Ed.),Terrorism and counter-terrorism: Criminological perspectives (pp. 75-92). Philadelphia: Elsevier Science.
10.
Emmelman, D. S. (1996). Trial by plea bargain: Case settlement as a product of recursive decisionmaking. Law & Society, 309, 335-335.
11.
Frazier, C. E., & Bock, E. W. (1982). Effects of court officials on sentence severity: Do judges make a difference?Criminology, 20, 257-257.
12.
Hagan, J. (1989a). Structural criminology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
13.
Hagan, J. (1989b). Why is there so little criminal justice theory? Neglected macro-and micro-level links between organization and power. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 26, 116-135.
14.
Hagan, J., Nagel, I., & Albonetti, C. (1980). The differential sentencing of white-collar offenders in ten federal district courts. American Sociological Review, 45, 802-820.
15.
Harris, R. A., & Springer, J. F. (1984). Plea bargaining as a game: An empirical analysis of negotiated sentencing decisions. Policy Studies Review, 4(2), 245-245.
16.
Heumann, M. (1977). Plea bargaining: The experience of prosecutors, judges, and defense attorneys. London: University of Chicago Press.
17.
Holmes, M. D., Daudistel, H. C., & Taggart, W. A. (1992). Plea bargaining policy and state district court caseloads: An interrupted time series analysis. Law & Society Review, 26(1), 139-139.
18.
Klein, J. F. (1976). Inducements to plead guilty: Frontier justice revisited. In P. Wickman & P. Whitten (Eds.),Readings in criminology. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
19.
Kramer, J. H., & Ulmer, J. T. (1996). Sentencing disparity and departures from guidelines. Justice Quarterly, 13, 401-401.
20.
LaFave, W. L. (1978). The prosecutor’s discretion in the United States. American Journal of Comparative Law, 18,532-532.
21.
LaFree, G. D. (1980). Variables affecting guilty pleas and convictions in rape cases: Toward a social theory of rape processing. Social Forces, 58, 833-833.
22.
Lagoy, S., Hussey, F., & Kramer, J. (1979). The prosecutorial function and its relation to determiniate sentencing structures. In W. F. McDonald (Ed.),The prosecutor (pp. 209-238). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23.
Lagoy, S., Senna, J., & Siegel, L. (1976). An empirical study on information usage for prosecutorial decision making in plea negotiations. American Criminal Law Review, 13, 435-435.
24.
Mather, L. M. (1979). Plea bargaining or trial? The process of criminal case disposition. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
25.
McAllister, H. A. (1990). Effects of eyewitness evidence on plea-bargain decisions by prosecutors and defense attorneys. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 1461-1461.
26.
McAllister, H. A. & Bregman, N. J. (2001). Plea bargaining by defendants: A decision theory approach. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 106-106.
27.
Meyer, J., & Gray, T. (1997). Drunk drivers in the courts: Legal and extra-legal factors affecting pleas and sentences. Journal of Criminal Justice, 25, 155-155.
28.
Mileski, M. (1971). Courtroom encounters: An observation study of a lower criminal court. Law and Society Review, 5, 473-473.
29.
Newman, D. (1966). Conviction: The determination of guilt or innocence without trial. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
30.
Parnas, R. (1979). Empirical data, tentative conclusions, and difficult questions about plea bargaining in three California counties. Federal Probation, 22, 12-12.
31.
Simon, H. (1976). Administrative behavior. New York: Free Press.
32.
Smith, B. L. (1994). Terrorism in America: Pipe bombs and pipe dreams. Albany: State of University New York Press.
33.
Smith, B. L., Damphousse, K., Yang, S., & Ginther, C. (2005). Prosecuting politically motivated offenders: The impact of the “terrorist” label on criminal case outcomes. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 42, 209-226.
34.
Smith, B. L., & Damphousse, K. R. (1996). Punishing political offenders: The effect of political motive on federal sentencing decisions. Criminology, 34, 289-289.
35.
Smith, B. L., & Damphousse, K. R. (1998). Terrorism, politics, and punishment: A test of structural contextual theory and the “liberation hypothesis.”Criminology, 36, 67-92.
36.
Utz, P. (1977). Settling the facts.Lexington, MA: Heath/Lexington.
37.
White. L. (1971). A proposal for reform of the plea bargaining process. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 119, 437-437.
38.
Wooldredge, J. D. (1989). The impact of jurisdiction size on guilty plea rates in 569 state courts. Sociology and Social Research, 74, 26-26.
39.
Worden, A. P. (1990). Policymaking by the prosecutors: The use of discretion in regulating plea bargaining. Judicature, 73, 335-335.
