Is a Plea Really a Bargain? An Analysis of Plea and Trial Dispositions in New York City

Abstract

The study challenges the common notion that plea bargaining is necessarily beneficial to defendants. It examines the factors influencing the likelihood of taking a misdemeanor case to trial, and the probability of acquittal upon reaching trial. Defendants charged with more serious crimes, persons crimes, crimes with victims, and represented by private attorneys were more likely to go to trial than to be pleaded out. By contrast, very few factors influenced trial outcomes, and the effect of race was fairly weak. Perhaps most important is the finding that two in five cases going to trial resulted in acquittal, showing that guilt is not a foregone conclusion which may provide leverage to defendants in the plea-bargaining process.

Keywords

plea bargaining trial acquittal prosecution

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrams

D. S.

(2011). Is pleading really a bargain? Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, S1, 200-221.

Albonetti

C. S.

(1987). Prosecutorial discretion: The effects of uncertainty. Law & Society Review, 21, 291-314. doi:10.2307/3053523

Albonetti

C. S.

(1990). Race and the probability of pleading guilty. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 6, 315-334.

Albonetti

C. S.

(1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38, 247-266.

Albonetti

C. S.

(1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines. Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentencing outcomes for drug offenses, 1991-1992. Law & Society Review, 31, 789-822.

Alschuler

(1974). The defense attorney’s role in plea bargaining. University of Chicago Law Review, 84, 1179-1315.

Anderson

J. M.

Heaton

(2012). How much difference does the lawyer make? The effect of defense counsel on murder case outcomes. Yale Law Journal, 122, 154-217.

Baker

Mezzetti

(2001). Prosecutorial resources, plea bargaining, and the decision to go to trial. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 17, 149-167.

Ball

J. D.

(2006). Is it a prosecutor’s world? Determinants of count bargaining decisions. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 22, 241-260. doi:10.1177/1043986206292369

10.

Beichner

Spohn

(2005). Prosecutorial charging decisions in sexual assault cases: Examining the impact of a specialized prosecution unit. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 16, 461-498. doi:10.1177/0887403405277195

11.

Bjerk

(2007). Guilt shall not escape or innocence suffer? The limits of plea bargaining when defendant guilt is uncertain. American Law and Economics Review, 9, 305-329. doi:10.1093/aler/ahm010

12.

Brereton

Casper

J. D.

(1981-1982). Does it pay to plead guilty? Differential sentencing and the functioning of criminal courts. Law & Society Review, 16, 45-70.

13.

Bushway

S. D.

Redlich

A. D.

Norris

R. J.

(2014). An explicit test of plea bargaining in the “shadow of the trial.” Criminology, 52, 723-754. doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12054

14.

Champion

D. J.

(1989). Private counsels and public defenders: A look at weak cases, prior records, and leniency in plea bargaining. Journal of Criminal Justice, 17, 253-263. doi:10.1016/0047-2352(89)90031-7

15.

Cohen

T. H.

(2014). Who is better at defending criminals? Does type of defense attorney matter in terms of producing favorable case outcomes. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25, 29-58. doi:10.1177/0887403412461149

16.

Cohen

T. H.

Kauder

N. B.

Ostrom

B. J.

(2000). A renewed interest in low-level crime. Caseload Highlights: Examining the World of State Courts, 6, 1.

17.

Devine

D. J.

Buddenbaum

Houp

Studebaker

Stolle

D. P.

(2009). Strength of evidence, extraevidentiary influence, and the liberation hypothesis: Data from the field. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 136-148. doi:10.1007/s10979-008-9144-x

18.

Devine

D. J.

Caughlin

D. E.

(2014). Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20, 109-134. doi:10.1037/law0000006

19.

Devine

D. J.

Clayton

L. D.

Dunford

B. B.

Seying

Price

(2001). Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 622-727. doi:10.1037//1076-8971.7.3.622

20.

Eisenberg

Hannaford-Agor

P. L.

Hans

V. P.

Waters

N. L.

Munsterman

G. T.

Schwab

S. J.

Wells

M. T.

(2005). Judge-jury agreement in criminal cases: A partial replication of Kalven and Zeisel’s The American Jury. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2, 171-206.

21.

Eisenberg

Hans

V. P.

(2009). Taking a stand on taking the stand: The effect of a prior criminal record on the decision to testify and on trial outcomes. Cornell Law Review, 94, 1353-1390.

22.

Franklin

T. W.

(2010). The intersection of defendants’ race, gender, and age in prosecutorial decision making. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 185-192. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.12.001

23.

Frederick

Stemen

(2012). The anatomy of discretion: An analysis of prosecutorial decision-making: Technical report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.

24.

Freedman

J. L.

Krismer

MacDonald

J. E.

Cunningham

J. A.

(1994). Severity of penalty, seriousness of the charge, and mock jurors’ verdicts. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 189-202.

25.

Frenzel

E. D.

Ball

J. D.

(2007). Effects of individual characteristics on plea negotiations under sentencing guidelines. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 5, 59-82. doi:10.13OO/J222vO5nO4_O3

26.

Garrett

B. L.

(2008). Judging innocence. Columbia Law Review, 108, 55-142.

27.

Greene

Chopra

S. R.

Kovera

M. B.

Penrod

S. D.

Rose

V. G.

Schuller

Studebaker

C. A.

(2002). Jurors and juries: A review of the field. In Ogloff

J. R.

(Ed.), Taking psychology and law into the twenty-first century. Perspectives in law and psychology (pp. 225-284). New York, NY: Kluwer-Plenum.

28.

Greene

Dodge

(1995). The influence of prior record evidence on juror decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 67-78.

29.

Harlow

C. W.

(2000). Defense counsel in criminal cases. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.

30.

Hartley

R. D.

Maddon

Spohn

C. C.

(2007). Concerning conceptualization and operationalization: Sentencing data and the focal concerns perspective—A research note. Southwest Journal of Criminal Justice, 4, 58-78.

31.

Hartley

R. D.

Miller

H. V.

Spohn

C. C.

(2010). Do you get what you pay for? Type of counsel and its effect on criminal court outcomes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 1063-1070. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.07.009

32.

Hoffman

M. B.

Rubin

P. H.

Shepherd

J. M.

(2005). An empirical study of public defender effectiveness: Self-selection by the “marginally indigent.” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 3, 223-255.

33.

Jacoby

J. E.

Mellon

L. R.

Ratledge

E. C.

Turner

S. H.

(1982). Prosecutorial decision making: A national study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.

34.

Johnson

B. D.

Betsinger

(2009). Punishing the “model minority”: Asian-American criminal sentencing outcomes in federal district courts. Criminology, 47, 1045-1090.

35.

Johnson

B. D.

Spohn

King

R. D.

Kutatelaze

(2014). Understanding guilty pleas: The National Science Foundation’s Research Coordination Network. The Criminologist, 39, 1-6.

36.

Kalven

Jr. Zeisel

(1966). The American jury. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

37.

Kerr

N. L.

(1978). Severity of prescribed penalty and mock jurors’ verdicts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1431-1442.

38.

King

N. J.

Soule

D. A.

Steen

Weidner

R. R.

(2005). When process affects punishment: Differences in sentences after guilty plea, bench trial, and jury trial in five guidelines states. Columbia Law Review, 105, 959-1009.

39.

Kramer

G. M.

Wolbransky

Heilbrun

(2007). Plea bargaining recommendations by criminal defense attorneys: Evidence strength, potential sentence, and defendant preference. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25, 573-585. doi:10.1002/bsl.759

40.

Kutateladze

B. L.

Andiloro

N. R.

(2014). Prosecution and racial justice in New York County (Technical Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.

41.

Kutateladze

B. L.

Andiloro

N. R.

Johnson

B. D.

(2016). Opening Pandora’s box: How does defendant race influence plea bargaining. Justice Quarterly, 33, 398-426. doi:10.1080/07418825.2014.915340

42.

Kutateladze

B. L.

Andiloro

N. R.

Johnson

B. D.

Spohn

C. C.

(2014). Cumulative disadvantage: Examining racial and ethnic disparity in prosecution and sentencing. Criminology, 52, 514-551. doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12047

43.

Kutateladze

B. L.

Lawson

V. Z.

Andiloro

N. R.

(2015). Does evidence really matter? An exploratory analysis of the role of evidence in plea bargaining in felony drug cases. Law and Human Behavior, 39, 431-442. doi:10.1037/lhb0000142

44.

Kutateladze

Lynn

Liang

(2012). Do race and ethnicity matter in prosecution? A review of empirical studies. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice.

45.

LaFountain

Schauffler

Strickland

Bromage

Gibson

Mason

(2010). Examining the work of state courts: An analysis of 2008 state court caseloads. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.

46.

LaFree

G. D.

(1985). Adversarial and nonadversarial justice: A comparison of guilty pleas and trials. Criminology, 23, 289-312. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1985.tb00338.x

47.

Laudan

Allen

R. J.

(2011). The devastating impact of prior crimes evidence and other myths of the criminal justice process. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 101, 493-527.

48.

Lieberman

J. D.

Carrell

D. A.

Miethe

T. D.

Krauss

D. A.

(2008). Gold versus platinum: Do jurors recognize the superiority and limitations of DNA evidence compared to other types of forensic evidence? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14, 27-62. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.14.1.27

49.

Mazzella

Feingold

(1994). The effects of physical attractiveness, race, socioeconomic status, and gender of defendants and victims on judgments of mock jurors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1315-1344.

50.

McAllister

H. A.

Bregman

N. J.

(1986a). Plea bargaining by defendants: A decision theory approach. The Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 105-110. doi:10.1080/00224545.1986.9713576

51.

McAllister

H. A.

Bregman

N. J.

(1986b). Plea bargaining by prosecutors and defense attorneys: A decision theory approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 686-690. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.71.4.686

52.

McCoy

(2005). Plea bargaining as coercion: The trial penalty and plea bargaining reform. Criminal Law Quarterly, 50, 67-107.

53.

Mitchell

(2005). A meta-analysis of race and sentencing research: Explaining the inconsistencies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21, 439-466. doi:10.1007/s10940-005-7362-7

54.

Mitchell

T. L.

Haw

R. M.

Pfeifer

J. E.

Meissner

C. A.

(2005). Racial bias in mock juror decision-making: A meta-analytic review of defendant treatment. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 621-637. doi:10.1007/s10979-005-8122-9

55.

Myers

M. A.

(1982). Common law in action: The prosecution of felonies and misdemeanors. Sociological Inquiry, 52, 1-15.

56.

Myers

M. A.

Hagan

(1979). Private and public trouble: Prosecutors and the allocation of court resources. Social Problems, 26, 439-451. doi:10.2307/800507

57.

Nardulli

P. F.

(1986). “Insider” justice: Defense attorneys and the handling of felony cases. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 77, 379-417.

58.

Pastore

A. L.

Maguire

(2005). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics—2003. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.

59.

Pezdek

O’Brien

(2014). Plea bargaining and appraisals of eyewitness evidence by prosecutors and defense attorneys. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20, 222-241. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2013.770855

60.

Pickel

K. L.

(1995). Inducing jurors to disregard inadmissible evidence: A legal explanation does not help. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 407-424.

61.

Piehl

A. M.

Bushway

S. D.

(2007). Measuring and explaining charge bargaining. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23, 105-125. doi:10.1007/s10940-006-9023-x

62.

Rhodes

W. M.

(1979). Plea bargaining: Its effect on sentencing and convictions in the District of Columbia. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 70, 360-375.

63.

Roberts

(2011). Why misdemeanors matter: Defining effective advocacy in the lower criminal courts. University of California, Davis Law Review, 45, 277-372.

64.

Smith

D. A.

(1986). The plea bargaining controversy. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 77, 949-968. doi:10.2307/1143445

65.

Smith

R. J.

Levinson

J. D.

(2012). The impact of implicit bias on the exercise of prosecutorial discretion. Seattle University Law Review, 35, 795-826.

66.

Spohn

C. C.

(2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. In Horney

(Ed.), Criminal justice 2000 (Vol. 3, pp. 427-501). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

67.

Spohn

Cederblom

(1991). Race and Disparities in Sentencing: A Test of the Liberation Hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 8, 305-27.

68.

Spohn

Holleran

(2000). The imprisonment penalty paid by young, unemployed, Black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38, 281-306.

69.

Spohn

Holleran

(2001). Prosecuting sexual assault: A comparison of charging decisions in sexual assault cases involving strangers, acquaintances, and intimate partners. Justice Quarterly, 18, 651-688. doi:10.1080/07418820100095051

70.

Steffensmeier

(1980). Assessing the impact of the women’s movement on sex-based differences in the handling of adult cases. Crime & Delinquency, 26, 344-357. doi:10.1177/001112878002600305

71.

Steffensmeier

Kramer

Streifel

(1993). Gender and imprisonment issues. Criminology, 31, 411-446. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01136.x

72.

Steffensmeier

Ulmer

Kramer

(1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-797. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01265.x

73.

Sweeney

L. T.

Haney

(1992). The influence of race on sentencing: A meta-analytic review of experimental studies. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 10, 179-195.

74.

Uhlman

T. M.

Walker

N. D.

(1979). A plea is no bargain: The impact of case disposition on sentencing. Social Science Quarterly, 60, 218-234.

75.

Ulmer

J. T.

(2012). Recent developments and new directions in sentencing research. Justice Quarterly, 29, 1-40.

76.

Ulmer

J. T.

Bradley

M. S.

(2006). Variations in trial penalties among serious violent offenders. Criminology, 44, 631-670. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00059.x

77.

Ulmer

J. T.

Eisenstein

Johnson

B. D.

(2010). Trial penalties in federal sentencing: Extra-guidelines factors and district variation. Justice Quarterly, 27, 560-592. doi:10.1080/07418820902998063

78.

Vidmar

(1972). Effects of decision alternatives on the verdicts and social perceptions of simulated jurors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 211-218.

79.

Williams

M. R.

(2013). The effectiveness of public defenders in four Florida counties. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 205-212. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.05.004

80.

Wilson

J. Q.

Kelling

G. L.

(1982). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. Atlantic Monthly, 249, 29-38.

81.

Wissler

R. L.

Saks

M. J.

(1985). On the inefficiency of limiting instructions: When jurors use prior conviction evidence to decide on guilt. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 37-48.

82.

York Cornwell

. (2014/2015). The trials of indigent defense: Type of counsel and case outcomes in felony jury trials. Albany Law Review, 78, 1239-1259.