Previous research on judicial decision making has shown that legal factors, such as offense severity and prior criminal record, exert a strong impact on sentencing decisions. In addition, studies have demonstrated that demographic factors, such as race and gender, also influence sentencing decisions. This study utilized a sample of (n = 975) cases collected by New Jersey’s Criminal Disposition Commission, tracked from arrest through disposition, to assess the factors that influence sentencing decisions, with a specific focus on the role of pretrial release status. The authors found that pretrial detention does not influence the decision to incarcerate; however, pretrial detention does significantly and negatively affects the length of the sentence in cases that involve a sentence of incarceration.
AlbonettiC. A. (1990). Race and the probability of pleading guilty. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 6, 315-334.
2.
AlbonettiC. A. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial decision making. Social Problems, 38, 247-266.
3.
AlbonettiC. A. (1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses, 1991-1992. Law & Society Review, 31, 789-822.
4.
AlderdenM. A.LaveryT. A. (2007). Predicting homicide clearances in Chicago: Investigating disparities in predictors across different types of homicide. Homicide Studies, 11, 115-132.
5.
AllanA.AllanM.GilesM.DrakeD.FroylandI. (2005). An observational study of bail decision-making. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 12, 319-333.
6.
AresC.RankinA.SturzH. (1963). The Manhattan Bail Project: An interim report on the pre-trial use of pre-trial parole. New York University Law Review, 38, 67-95.
7.
BaradaranS.McIntyreF. L. (2012). Predicting violence. Texas Law Review, 90, 497-540.
8.
BreenR. (1996). Regression models: Censored, sample selected, or truncated data. Thousand Oaks, CA. SAGE.
9.
BrownD. L.WarnerB. D. (1992). Immigrants, urban politics, and policing in 1900. American Sociological Review, 57, 293-305.
BushwayS.JohnsonB. D.SlocumL. A. (2007). Is the magic still there: The use of the Heckman Two-Step Correction for selecting bias. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23, 151-178.
12.
ChiricosT.BalesW. (1991). Unemployment and punishment: An empirical assessment. Criminology, 29, 701-724.
13.
CohenT. H.ReavesB. A. (2007). State court processing statistics, 1990-2004: Pretrial release of felony defendants in state courts. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
14.
DemuthS. (2003). Racial and ethnic differences in pretrial release decisions and outcomes: A comparison of Hispanic, black and white felony arrestees. Criminology, 41, 873-907.
15.
DemuthS.SteffensmeierD. (2004). The impact of gender and race-ethnicity in the pretrial release process. Social Problems, 51, 222-242.
16.
EngenR. L.GaineyR. R. (2000). Modeling the effects of legally relevant and extralegal factors under sentencing guidelines: The rules have changed. Criminology, 38, 1207-1225.
17.
FeeleyM. M. (1979). The process is the punishment. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
18.
FooteC. (1954). Compelling appearance in court: Administration of bail in Philadelphia. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 102, 1031-1079.
19.
FreeM. D.Jr.(2004). Bail and pretrial release decisions: An assessment of the racial threat perspective. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 2, 23-44.
20.
FreiburgerT. (2009). Race and the sentencing of drug offenders: An examination of the focal Concerns perspective. The Southwest Journal of Criminal Justice, 6, 163-176.
21.
FrenzelE. D.BallJ. D. (2007). Effects of individual characteristics on plea negotiations under sentencing guidelines. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 5, 59-82.
22.
GibbsA. (1998). Probation partnerships: A study of roles, relationships and meanings (Probation Studies Unit Report No. 7). Oxford, UK: University of Oxford.
23.
GoldkampJ. S. (1980). The effects of detention on judicial decisions: A closer look. Justice System Journal, 5, 234-257.
24.
GottfredsonM. R.GottfredsonD. M. (1988). Decision-making in criminal justice: Toward the rational exercise of discretion. New York, NY: Plenum.
25.
GottfredsonM. R.GottfredsonD. M. (1990). Decision making in criminal justice: Toward the rational exercise of discretion (2d ed.). New York, NY: Plenum.
26.
GreenwoodP. W.AbrahamseA. (1982). Selective incapacitation. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
27.
HarringtonM. P.SpohnC. (2007). Defining sentence type: Further evidence against use of the total incarceration variable. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44, 36-63.
28.
HolleranD.SpohnC. (2004). On the use of the total incarceration variable in sentencing research. Criminology, 42, 211-240.
29.
HolmesM. D.DaudistelH. C. (1984). Ethnicity and justice in the Southwest: The sentencing of Anglo, Black and Mexican origin defendants. Social Science Quarterly, 65, 265-277.
30.
JenkinsP. (1994). “The ice age”: The social construction of a drug panic. Justice Quarterly, 11, 7-31.
31.
JohnsonB. D. (2003). Racial and ethnic disparities in sentencing departures across modes of conviction. Criminology, 41, 449-489.
32.
KelloughG.WortleyS. (2002). Remand for plea: Bail decisions and plea bargaining as commensurate conditions. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 186-210.
33.
KernR. P.KolmetzP. F. (1986). Development of a pretrial risk assessment instrument: A pilot study. Richmond: Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services, Statistical Analysis Center.
34.
KramerJ.SteffensmeierD. (1993). Race and imprisonment decisions. Sociological Quarterly, 34, 357-376.
35.
LuskinM. L.LuskinR. C. (1986). Why so fast, why so slow?: Explaining case processing time. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 77, 190-214.
36.
McCoyC. (2007). Caleb was right: Pretrial decisions determine mostly everything. Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law, 12, 135-149.
37.
MertlerC. A.VannattaR. A. (2005). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: Practical application and interpretation (2nd ed.). Glendale, CA: Pyrczak Publishing.
38.
NeubauerD. W. (2002). America’s courts and the criminal justice system. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
39.
NobilingT.SpohnC.DeLoneM. (1998). A tale of two counties: Unemployment and sentence severity. Justice Quarterly, 15, 459-486.
40.
PhillipsM. T. (2008). Pretrial detention and case outcomes. Part 2: Felony cases. New York: New York City Criminal Justice Agency.
41.
PhillipsM. T. (2011). Effect of release type on failure to appear. New York: New York City Criminal Justice Agency.
42.
OstromB. J.HansonR. A. (1999). Efficiency, timeliness, and quality: A new perspective from nine state criminal trial courts. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice and the State Justice Institute.
43.
RankinA. (1964). The effect of pretrial detention. New York University Law Review, 39, 641-655.
44.
SacksM.AckermanA. (in press). Pretrial detention and guilty pleas: If they can’t afford bail they must be guilty. Criminal Justice Studies.
45.
SchlesingerT. (2005). Racial and ethnic disparity in pretrial criminal processing. Justice Quarterly, 22, 170-192.
46.
SpohnC. (2000). Offender Race and Case Outcomes, Do Crime Seriousness and Strength of Evidence Matter?: Final Activities Report Submitted to the national Institute of Justice. Washington, DC: National Criminal Justice Reference Service, U.S. Department of Justice.
47.
SpohnC.BeichnerD. (2000). Is preferential treatment of female offenders a thing of the past? A Multisite study of gender, race and imprisonment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11, 149-184.
48.
SpohnC.CederblomJ. (1991). Race and disparities in sentencing: A test of the liberation hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 8, 601-623.
49.
SpohnC.GruhlJ.WelchS. (1981). The effect of race on sentencing: A re-examination of an unsettled question. Law and Society Review, 16, 71-88.
50.
SpohnC.HolleranD. (2000). The imprisonment penalty paid by young, unemployed black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38, 281-306.
51.
SteenS.EngenR. L.GaineyR. R. (2005). Images of danger and culpability: Racial stereotyping, case processing, and criminal sentencing. Criminology, 43, 435-468.
52.
SteffensmeierD. (1980). Assessing the impact of the women’s movement on sex-based differences in the handling of adult criminal defendants. Crime and Delinquency, 26, 344-357.
53.
SteffensmeierD.DemuthS. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. federal Courts: Who is punished more harshly?American Sociological Review, 65, 705-729.
SteffensmeierD.DemuthS. (2006). Does gender modify the effects of race—ethnicity of criminal sanctions? Sentences for male, female, White, Black and Hispanic defendants. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 241-261.
56.
SteffensmeierD.KramerJ.StreifelC. (1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 31, 411-446.
57.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ.KramerJ. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-798.
58.
SullivanL. (2010, January22). Inmates who can’t make bail face stark options. National Public Radio.
59.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York, NY: HarperCollins.
60.
TartaroC.SedelmaierC. M. (2009). A tale of two counties: The impact of pretrial release, race, and ethnicity upon sentencing decisions. Criminal Justice Studies, 22, 203-221.
61.
ThomasW. H. (1976). Bail reform in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
62.
TittleC. R.CurranD. A. (1988). Contingencies for dispositional disparities in juvenile justice. Social Forces, 67, 23-58.
63.
ToborgM. (1981). Pretrial release: A national evaluation of practices and outcomes. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
64.
TravisJ. (2005). But they all come back: Facing the challenges of prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
65.
TurnerK. B.JohnsonJ. B. (2005). A comparison of bail amounts for Hispanics, Whites, and African Americans: A single county analysis. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 35-56.
66.
UlmerJ.JohnsonB. D. (2004). Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42, 137-175.
67.
Vera Institute of Justice. (1977). Felony arrests: Their prosecution and disposition in New York City courts. New York, NY: Longman.
68.
WesternB. (2002). The impact of incarceration on wage mobility and inequality. American Sociological Review, 67, 526-546.
69.
WesternB. (2006). Punishment and inequality in America. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
70.
WilliamsM. (2003). The effect of pretrial detention on imprisonment decisions. Criminal Justice Review, 28, 299-316.
71.
WillisonD. (1984). The effects of counsel on the severity of criminal sentences: A statistical assessment. The Justice Journal, 9, 87-101.
