Using a combination of NCIC and local police data from Wyoming, this study focuses on the short-term effects of the drug court intervention on offender criminal trajectories. Wyoming's drug courts operate in a manner consistent with most drug courts around the nation by focusing on offender supervision, judicial oversight, frequent and random drug testing, and intensive substance abuse treatment. The results of this outcome analysis suggest dramatic reductions in criminal offending both during the drug court program and for the year immediately following the program participation.
Alcohol and Drug Abuse Institute. (2000, August 11). Analysis of Washington State patrol arrest data for King, Pierce, Spokane, Thurston, Skagit, and Kitsap counties. NW HIDTA/DASA drug court evaluation. Seattle, WA: Author/University of Washington.
2.
Belenko, S. (1998). Research on drug courts: A critical review. National Drug Court Institute Review, I(1), 1-42.
3.
Belenko, S. (1999). Research on drug courts: A critical review: 1999 update. National Drug Court Institute Review, II(2), 1-58.
4.
Belenko, S. (2001). Research on drug courts: A critical review: 2001 update. New York: National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University.
5.
Butler, S., Heck, C., Powell, S.C., Binder, D.M., & May, C.K. (2005). Drug courts in Wyoming, FY 2005: Statewide and local evaluation. Report to the Wyoming Department of Health, Substance Abuse Division. Laramie: University of Wyoming, Wyoming Survey and Analysis Center.
6.
Carey, S., & Finigan, M. (2003, July). A detailed cost analysis in a mature drug court setting: A cost-benefit evaluation of the Multnomah County drug court . Portland, OR: NPC Research.
7.
Coumans, M., & Spreen, M. (2003). Drug use and the role of homelessness in the process of marginalization. Substance Abuse and Misuse, 38(3), 311-338.
8.
Cox, G., Brown, L., Morgan, C., & Hansten, M. (2001, July 13). NW HIDTA/DASA drug court evaluation project: Final report. Seattle: University of Washington, Alcohol and Drug Abuse Institute.
9.
Dawkins, M. (1997). Drug use and violent crime among adolescents. Adolescence, 32(2), 395-406.
10.
Farrington, D.P. (1986). Age and crime. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 7, pp. 189-250). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Gottfredson, D.C., Najaka, S.S., & Kearley, B. (2003). Effectiveness of drug treatment courts: Evidence from a randomized trial. Criminology & Public Policy, 2(2), 171-196.
12.
Government Accountability Office (1995, May). Drug courts: Information on a new approach to address drug-related crime. Report to congressional committees. Washington, DC: Author.
13.
Government Accountability Office (1997, July). Drug courts: Overview of growth, characteristics, and results. Report to congressional committees. Washington, DC: Author.
14.
Government Accountability Office (2002, April). Drug courts: Better DOJ data collection and evaluation efforts needed to measure impact of drug court programs. Report to congressional requesters . Washington, DC: Author.
15.
Government Accountability Office (2005, February). Adult drug courts: Evidence indicates recidivism reductions and mixed results for other outcomes. Report to congressional committees. Washington, DC: Author.
16.
Hagedorn, J.M. (1994). Neighborhoods, markets, and gang drug organization . Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31(3), 264-294.
17.
Heck, C. (2006). Local drug court research: Navigating performance measures and process evaluations (Monograph Series 6). Alexandria, VA: National Association of Drug Court Professionals, National Drug Court Institute.
18.
Heck, C., & Roussell, A. (2007). State administration of drug courts: Exploring issues of authority, funding, and legitimacy. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 18, 418-433.
19.
Heck, C., & Thanner, M. (2006). Evaluating drug courts: A model for process evaluation . Drug Court Review, V(2), 51-82.
20.
Huddleston, C.W., Freeman-Wilson, K., & Boone, D. (2004, May). Painting the current picture: A national report card on drug courts and other problem solving courts, I(1). Alexandria, VA: National Association of Drug Court Professionals, National Drug Court Institute.
21.
Huddleston, C.W., Freeman-Wilson, K., Marlowe, D.B., & Roussell, A. (2005, May). Painting the current picture: A national report card on drug courts and other problem solving courts, I(2). Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute.
22.
Laub, J.H., & Sampson, R.J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
Logan, T.K., Hoyt, W., & Leukefeld, C. (2002). Kentucky drug court outcome evaluation: Behavior, costs, and avoided costs to society. Lexington: University of Kentucky, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research.
24.
Marlowe, D.B. (2005). Drug court efficacy vs. effectiveness. Offender Substance Abuse Report, 5, 1-2/15-16 (Reprinted from www.jointogether.org, Sept. 29, 2004).
25.
Marlowe, D.B., Dematteo, D.S., & Festinger, D.S. (2003). A sober assessment of drug courts. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 16, 153-157.
26.
Marlowe, D.B., Festinger, D.S., Lee, P.A., Dugosh, K.L., & Benasutti, K.M. (2006). Matching judicial supervision to clients' risk status in drug court. Crime & Delinquency , 52(1), 52-76.
27.
Moffitt, T.E. (1993). Adolescent limited and life-course-persistent anti-social behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100(1), 674-701.
28.
National Association of Drug Court Professionals. (1997, January). Defining drug courts: The key components . Washington, DC: Drug Courts Program Office, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice.
29.
National Center for State Courts. (2007). Wyoming Drug Court Performance Measures Project. Denver, CO: Author, Court Consulting Services.
30.
Rempel, M. (2006). Recidivism 101: Evaluating the impact of your drug court. Drug Court Review, V(2), 83-112.
31.
Rempel, M., Fox-Kralstein, D., Cissner, A., Cohen, R., Labriola, M., Farole, D., et al. (2003). The New York State adult drug court evaluation: Policies, participants, and impacts. New York: Center for Court Innovation.
32.
Roman, J., Townsend, W., & Bhati, A.S. (2003, July). Recidivism rates for drug court graduates: Nationally based estimates, final report. San Diego, CA: Caliber Associates and the Urban Institute.
33.
Satel, S.L. (2000). Drug treatment: The case for coercion. National Drug Court Institute Review, III(1), 1-22.
34.
Schroeder, R.W., Giordano, P.C., & Cernkovich, S.A. (2007). Drug use and desistance processes. Criminology, 45(1), 191-217.
