A wealth of research has been amassed documenting the effectiveness of drug treatment courts in addressing the needs of substance-abusing individuals involved with the criminal justice system. However, there is a relative dearth of research that examines the long-term impact of these programs on recidivism rates for both drug treatment court graduates and those unsuccessfully discharged from the program. In this study, we examine which demographic and programmatic/legal factors influence program disposition and recidivism rates of participants (both graduates and those unsuccessfully discharged) across the 5 years following their discharge from a drug treatment court program located in a suburban city in the Midwest. The study sample consists of 249 (N = 249) male participants who have been out of the program for more than 5 years. Results from the univariate and multivariate analyses are provided, as well as policy implications, directions for future research, and study limitations.
BelenkoS. (2001). Research on drug courts: A critical review. Washington, DC: The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University.
2.
DannerbeckA.HarrisG.SundetP.LloydK. (2006). Understanding and responding to racial differences in drug court outcomes. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 5, 1-22.
3.
DeschenesE.TurnerS.GreenwoodP. W. (1995). Drug court or probation: An experimental evaluation of Maricopa County Drug Court. Justice System Journal, 18, 55-73.
4.
FulkersonA. (2009). The drug treatment court as a form of restorative justice. Contemporary Justice Review, 12, 253-267.
5.
FulkersonA.KeenaL. D.O’BrienE. (2012). Understanding success and nonsuccess in the drug court. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 20, 1-20.
6.
GallagherJ. R. (2014). Predicting criminal recidivism following drug court: Implications for drug court practice and policy advocacy. Journal of Addictions & Offender Counseling, 35, 15-29.
7.
GallagherJ. R.NordbergA.DeranekM. S.IvoryE.CarltonJ.MillerJ. W. (2015). Predicting termination from drug court and comparing recidivism patterns: Treating substance use disorders in criminal justice settings. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 33, 28-43.
8.
GottfredsonD.NajakaS.KearleyB. (2003). Effectiveness of drug treatment courts: Evidence from a randomized trial. Criminology & Public Policy, 2, 171-196.
9.
GrayA. R.SaumC. A. (2005). Mental health, gender and drug court completion. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 55-69.
10.
HartleyR. E.PhillipsR. C. (2001). Who graduates from drug courts?American Journal of Criminal Justice, 26, 107-119.
11.
HeckC.ThannerM. (2006). Drug court performance measurement: Suggestions from the National Research Advisory Committee. Drug Court Review, 5, 33-50.
12.
HickertA. O.BoyleS. W.TollefsonD. R. (2009). Factors that predict drug court completion: Findings from an evaluation of Salt Lake County’s adult felony drug court. Journal of Social Service Research, 35, 149-162.
13.
KoetzleD.ListwanS.GuastaferroW. P.KobusK. (2015). Treating high-risk offenders in the community: The potential of drug courts. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59, 449-465.
14.
KrebsC. P.LindquistC. H.KoetseW.LattimoreP. K. (2007). Assessing the long-term impact of drug court participation on recidivism with generalized estimating equations. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 2, 57-68.
15.
ListwanS. J.ShafferD. K.HartmanJ. L. (2009). Combating methamphetamine use in the community: The efficacy of the drug court model. Crime & Delinquency, 54, 627-644.
16.
ListwanS. J.SundtJ.HolsingerA. M.LatessaE. J. (2003). The effect of drug court programming on recidivism: The Cincinnati experience. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 389-411.
17.
MarloweD. (2008). Introductory handbook for DWI court program evaluations. Washington, DC: The National Center for DWI Courts.
18.
MerrallE.BirdS. (2009). A statistical perspective on the design of drug court studies. Evaluation Review, 33, 257-280.
19.
MitchellO.WilsonD. B.EggersA.MackenzieD. L. (2012). Assessing the effectiveness of drug courts on recidivism: A meta-analytic review of traditional and non-traditional drug courts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 60-71.
20.
MullanyJ. M.PeatB. (2008). Process evaluation of a County Drug Court: An analysis of descriptors, compliance and outcomes—Answering some questions while raising others. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19, 491-508.
21.
Newton-TaylorB.PatraJ.GliksmanL. (2009). Toronto drug treatment court: Participant intake characteristics as predictors of “successful” program completion. Journal of Drug Issues, 39, 965-987.
22.
RomanJ.TownsendW.BhatiA. S. (2003). Recidivism rates for drug court graduates, nationally based estimates. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
23.
ShafferD. K. (2006). Reconsidering drug court effectiveness: A meta-analytic review. Las Vegas: University of Nevada.
24.
ShafferD. K. (2011). Looking inside the black box of drug courts: A meta-analytic review. Justice Quarterly, 28, 493-521.
25.
ShafferD. K.HartmanJ. L.ListwanS. J. (2009). Drug abusing women in the community: The impact of drug court involvement on recidivism. Journal of Drug Issues, 4, 1045-1069.
26.
ShanahanM. E.LanscarM.HaasB.LindD.WeatherburnS.ChenS. (2004). Cost-effectiveness analysis of the New South Wales adult drug court program. Evaluation Review, 28, 3-27.
27.
TaxmanF. S.BouffardJ. A. (2006). Treatment as part of drug court. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 42, 23-50.
28.
Van VoorhisP.BraswellM.LesterD. (2009). Correctional counseling and rehabilitation (7th ed.). New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis.
29.
WilsonD.MitchellO.MackenzieD. (2006). A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 459-487.
30.
WolfeE.GuydishJ.TermondtJ. (2002). A drug court outcome evaluation comparing arrests in a two-year follow-up period. Journal of Drug Issues, 32, 1155-1172.
