Substance abuse continues to be a pressing social problem in the United States today. As the country battles an opioid epidemic, many jurisdictions have adopted the problem-solving court model in response. These specialized courts, known as drug courts, offer a rehabilitative approach to offender management. Drug courts balance substance abuse rehabilitation with community-based supervision and operate with the philosophy that addressing the addiction will result in a decrease in criminal offending. The current study examines the recidivism rates for 50 participants who have been separated (i.e., completed or terminated) from one rural drug court program in the Midwest for at least 3 years. Findings indicate that successful completion of drug court is associated with decreases in misdemeanor offending, and more importantly, decreases in felony offending. While preliminary, the findings of this research provide support for the drug court model in the rural Midwest. Further research in this area is highly recommended.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (4th ed.).
2.
BanksD.GottfredsonD. (2004). Participation in drug treatment court and time to rearrest. Justice Quarterly, 21(3), 637–658.
3.
BavonA. (2001). The effect of the Tarrant County drug court project on recidivism. Evaluation and Program Planning, 24, 13–22.
4.
BelenkoS. (1998). Research on drug courts: A critical Review. The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse. Columbia University.
5.
BelenkoS. (2001). Research on drug courts: A critical review 2001 update. The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse. Columbia University.
6.
BouffardJ. A.SmithS. (2005). Programmatic, counselor, and client-level comparison of rural versus urban drug court treatment. Substance Use & Misuse, 40, 321–342.
7.
BrewsterM. (2001). An evaluation of the Chester County (PA) Drug Court program. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 177–206.
BrownR. (2011). Drug court effectiveness: A matched cohort study in the Dane County Drug Treatment Court. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 59, 191–201.
10.
CollinsC.HubbardM.SmuddeS.HatchD.ZschauT. (2015). Demographic and abuse severity indicators of participant progress in a rural drug court. Journal of Young Investigators, 29(4), 24–30.
11.
ConleyT. B.Allen-BlakneyH.StoeckelE. (2013). The development of a standardized drug court data system in the rural Western state of Montana. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 13(2), 127–142.
12.
Definitions. Problem-Solving and Drug Courts. Nebraska Supreme Court Rules. §6-1206. (2007).
13.
DeMatteoD.FiloneS.DavisJ. (2015). Substance use and crime. In CutlerB. L.ZapfP. A. (Eds.), APA handbook of forensic psychology: Vol. 1. Individual and situational influences in criminal and civil contexts (pp. 325–349). American Psychological Association.
14.
DuroseM.CooperA.SnyderH. (2014). Recidivism of prisoners released in 30 states in 2005: Patterns from 2005–2010. U.S Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
GottfredsonJ.NajakaS.KearleyB. (2003). Effectiveness of drug courts: Evidence from a randomized trial. Criminology and Public Policy, 2, 171–194.
17.
KalichD.EvansR. (2006). Drug court: An effective alternative to incarceration. Deviant Behavior, 27(6), 569–590.
18.
KrebsC.LindquistC.KoetseW.LattimoreP. (2007). Assessing the long-term impact of drug court participation on recidivism with generalized estimating equations. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 91, 57–68.
19.
Mateyoke-ScrivnerA.WebsterJ.StatonM.LeukefeldC. (2004). Treatment retention predictors of drug court participants in a rural state. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 30(3), 605–625.
20.
Midwest Nebraska Drug Court. (2006). Participant handbook.
NolanJ. L. (2001). Reinventing justice: The American drug court movement. Princeton University Press.
23.
PattenR.MesserS.CandelaK. (2015). “I don’t see myself as prison material”: Motivations for entering a drug court. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59, 1188–1202.
24.
PetersR.HaasA.MurrinM. (1999). Predictors of retention and arrest in drug courts. National Drug Court Institute Review, II(1), 33–60.
25.
PetersR.MurrinM. (2000). Effectiveness of treatment-based drug courts in reducing criminal recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(1), 72–96.
26.
SchiffM.TerryW. (1997). Predicting graduation from Broward County’s Dedicated Drug Treatment Court. The Justice System Journal, 19(3), 291–310.
27.
ShafferD. (2011). Looking inside the black box of drug courts: A meta-analytic review. Justice Quarterly, 28(3), 493–521.
28.
ShannonL. M.JonesA. J.NewellJ.NashS.NicholsE. (2020). Examining contextual differences in participant characteristics and during-program occurrences with drug court completion. Journal of Drug Issues, 50(2), 191–208.
29.
SomersJ.CurrieL.MoniruzzamanK.EiboffF.PattersonM. (2012). Drug treatment court of Vancouver: An empirical evaluation of recidivism. International Journal of Drug Policy, 23, 393–400.
30.
SomersJ.RezansoffS.MoniruzzamanA. (2014). Comparative analysis of recidivism outcomes following drug treatment court in Vancouver, Canada. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58(6), 655–671.
31.
SpohnC.PiperR.MartinT.FrenzelE. (2001). Drug courts and recidivism: The results of an evaluation using two comparison groups and multiple indicators of recidivism. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 149–176.
Vander KooiG. P. (2015). The impact of diversion on recidism rates in a rural Michigan county: A local perspective. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 11(1), 9–18.
38.
WarnerB. D.LeukefeldC. G. (2001). Rural-urban differences in substance use and treatment utilization among prisoners. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 27(2), 265–280.
39.
WilsonD.MitchellO.MackenzieD. (2006). A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 459–487.
40.
WolfeE.GuydishJ.TermondtJ. (2002). A drug court outcome evaluation comparing arrests in a two-year follow-up period. Journal of Drug Issues, 32(4), 1155–1171.
