Since the Supreme Court ruled in 1976 that the death penalty was not inherently unconstitutional, most states have adopted capital punishment statutes. Yet execution rates vary considerably from state to state. The objective of this work is to analyze the degree by which political culture is a determinant of states' implementation of capital punishment. This article finds that political culture, as measured by Daniel Elazar's prototype classifications of American political subcultures, is an important determinant of the adoption of death penalty statutes and the frequency of executions. Specifically, states that are characterized by a more traditionalistic political culture are more likely to have adopted a death penalty statute and to execute inmates more frequently. The link between political culture and the death penalty remains strong and stable even when controlling for a host of other factors that have been linked to the death penalty in prior research.
Bailey, W. (1980). Deterrence and the celerity of the death penalty: A neglected question in deterrence research. Social Forces, 58, 1308-1334.
2.
Bailey, W. (1990). Murder, capital punishment, and television: Execution publicity and homicide rates. American Sociological Review, 55, 628-634.
3.
Becker, G. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169-217.
4.
Beckett, K. (1997). Making crime pay: Law and order in contemporary American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Belsley, D., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. (1998). Regression diagnostics. New York: Wiley.
6.
Bentham, J., & Beccaria, C. (1963). On crimes and punishments. Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall. (Original work published 1764)
7.
Black, T., & Orsagh, T. (1978). New evidence on the efficacy of sanctions as a deterrent to homicide. Social Science Quarterly, 58, 616-631.
8.
Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., & Nagin, D. (Eds.). (1978). Deterrence and incapacitation: Estimating the effects of criminal sanctions on crime rates. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
9.
Bowers, W., & Pierce, G. (1975). The illusion of deterrence in Issac Ehrlich's research on capital punishment. Yale Law Journal, 85, 187-208.
10.
Bowers, W., & Pierce, G. (1980). Deterrence or brutalization: What is the effect of executions. Crime & Delinquency, 26, 453-484.
11.
Breusch, T., & Pagan, A. (1979). A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica, 47, 1287-1294.
12.
Clarke, J. (1998). Without fear or shame: Lynching, capital punishment and the subculture of violence in the American South. British Journal of Political Science, 28, 269-289.
13.
Clear, T. (1994). Harm in American penology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
14.
Cochran, J., Chamlin, M., & Seth, M. (1994). Deterrence or brutalization? An impact assessment of Oklahoma's return to capital punishment. Criminology, 32, 107-134.
15.
Cook, R., & Weisberg, S. (1983). Diagnostics for heteroscedasticity in regression. Biometrika, 70, 1-10.
16.
Cullen, F., Pratt, T., Levrant, S., & Moon, M. (2002). Dangerous liaison: Rational choice theory as the basis for correctional intervention. In A. R. Piquero & S. G. Tibbetts (Eds.), Rational choice and criminal behavior: Recent research and future challenges(pp. 279-298). New York: Routledge.
17.
Currie, E. (1998). Crime and punishment in America. New York: Henry Holt.
18.
Decker, S., & Kohfield, C. (1990). The deterrent effect of capital punishment in the five most active execution states: A time series analysis. Criminal Justice Review, 15, 173-191.
19.
Ehrlich, I. (1975). The deterrent effect of capital punishment: A question of life and death. American Economic Review, 65, 397-417.
20.
Elazar, D. (1982). Steps in the study of political culture. In J. Kincaid (Ed.), Political culture, public policy, and the American states(pp. 223-232). Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.
21.
Elazar, D. (1984). American federalism: A view from the states(3rd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.
22.
Ellis, R. (1993). American political cultures. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Erikson, R., Wright, G., & McIver, J. (1993). Statehouse democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Fox, J. (1991). Regression diagnostics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25.
Fox, J., & Monette, G. (1992). Generalized collinearity diagnostics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 178-183.
26.
Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972).
27.
Gastil, R. (1971). Homicide and a regional culture of violence. American Sociological Review, 36, 412-427.
28.
Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976).
29.
Hackney, S. (1969). Southern violence. American Historical Review, 74, 906-925.
30.
Herzik, E. (1985). The legal-formal structuring of state politics: A cultural explanation. Western Political Quarterly, 38, 413-423.
31.
Huff-Corzine, L., Corzine, J., & Moore, D. (1986). Southern exposure: Deciphering the South's influence on homicide rates. Social Forces, 64, 906-924.
32.
Johnson, R. (1990). Death work: A study of the modern execution process. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
33.
Kincaid, J. (1982). Introduction. In J. Kincaid (Ed.), Political culture, public policy, and the American states (pp. 3-15). Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.
34.
Lieske, J. (1993). Regional subcultures of the United States. Journal of Politics, 55, 888-913.
35.
Lyon, J., & Tsai, C. (1996). A comparison of tests for heteroscedasticity. Statistician, 45, 337-349.
36.
Maddala, G. (1992). Introduction to econometrics. New York: Macmillan.
37.
Mauer, M. (1999). Race to incarcerate. New York: Free Press.
38.
Messner, S., & Rosenfeld, R. (1997). Political restraint of the market and levels of criminal homicide: A cross-national application of institutional anomie. Social Forces, 75, 1393-1416.
39.
Moon, M., Wright, J., Cullen, F., & Pealer, J. (2000). Putting kids to death: Specifying public support for juvenile capital punishment. Justice Quarterly, 17, 663-684.
40.
Mooney, C., & Lee, M. (1999). The temporal diffusion of morality policy: The case of death penalty legislation in the American states. Policy Studies Journal, 27, 766-780.
41.
Nagin, D. (1998). Deterrence and incacipation. In M. Tonry (Ed.), The handbook of crime and punishment (pp. 346-361). New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
Nelson, L., & Foster, B. (2001). Death watch: A death penalty anthology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
43.
Nice, D. (1992). The states and the death penalty. Western Political Quarterly, 45, 1037-1048.
44.
Norrander, B. (2000). The multi-layered impact of public opinion on capital punishment implementation in the American states. Political Research Quarterly, 53, 771-793.
45.
Paternoster, R. (1987). The deterrent effect and the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: A review of the evidence and the issues. Justice Quarterly, 4, 173-218.
46.
Peterson, R., & Bailey, W. (1988). Murder and capital punishment in the evolving context of the post-Furman era. Social Forces, 66, 774-808.
47.
Peterson, R., & Bailey, W. (1991). Felony murder and capital punishment: An examination of the deterrence question. Criminology, 29, 367-395.
48.
Phillips, D. (1980). The deterrent effect of capital punishment: Evidence on an old controversy. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 139-148.
49.
Pratt, T., & Cullen, F. (in press). Assessing macrolevel predictors and theories of crime. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50.
Pratt, T., & Godsey, T. (2002). Social support and homicide: A cross-national test of an emerging criminological theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 589-601.
51.
Pratt, T., & Godsey, T. (2003). Social support, inequality, and homicide: A cross-national test of an integrated theoretical model. Criminology, 41, 611-644.
52.
Pratt, T., Maahs, J., & Stehr, S. (1998). The symbolic ownership of the corrections “problem”: A framework for understanding the development of corrections policy in the United States. The Prison Journal, 78, 451-464.
53.
Ritt, L. (1982). Political cultures and political reform. In J. Kincaid (Ed.), Political culture, public policy and the American states(pp. 143-149). Philadelphia: Institute for Study of Human Issues.
54.
Savolainen, J. (2000). Inequality, welfare state, and homicide: Further support for the institutional anomie theory. Criminology, 38, 1021-1042.
55.
Sellin, T. (1959). The death penalty. Philadelphia: American Law Institute.
56.
Sellin, T. (1967). Capital punishment. New York: Harper and Row.
57.
Sharkansky, I. (1969). The utility of Elazar's political culture. Polity, 2, 66-83.
58.
Sherman, L. (1990). Police crackdowns: Initial and residual deterrence. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research(Vol. 12, pp. 38-55). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59.
Stack, S. (1987). Publicized executions and homicide 1950-1980. American Sociological Review, 52, 532-540.
60.
Stack, S. (1990). Execution publicity and homicide in South Carolina: A research note. Sociological Quarterly, 31, 599-612.
61.
Wildavsky, A. (1998). Federalism and political culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
