Cross-national research on the determinants of criminal penalties has generally recognized that the amount of crime is an insufficient explanation for the use of punishment. Some research supports conflict explanations, reporting that economic inequality and the presence of ethnic minorities threatens elites who respond by advocating increased punishments largely aimed at minority groups. Other research reports that democratized nations in which citizens enjoy many civil liberties have lower levels of punishment. This study uses event history and logistic analyses to identify the social and political factors that shape the existence of the death penalty in 92 nations over a 23-year period. The results largely support conflict explanations for the existence of this punishment by finding that nations with high-income inequality and large ethnic minority populations have the lowest likelihood of abolition.
Allison, P.D. ( 1984). Event history analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
2.
Amnesty International. (2005). Death penalty: Abolitionist and retentionist countries. Retrieved December 15, 2007, from http://www.amnesty.org/
3.
Abolitionist and Retentionist Countries.Amnesty International (2009). Retrieved on 1/10/2009, from http://www.amnesty.org/en/death-penalty/abolitionist-and-retentionist-countries , accessed.
4.
Blalock, H. ( 1967). Towards a theory of minority group relations. New York: Capricorn.
5.
Blumer, H. ( 1958). Race prejudice as a sense of group position. Pacific Sociological Review, 1, 3-7.
6.
Bobo, L., & Hutchings, V. ( 1996). Perceptions of racial group competition: Extending Blumer’s theory of group position in a multiracial social context. American Sociological Review, 61, 951-972.
7.
Box-Steffensmeier, J.M., &, Jones, B.S. ( 2004). Event history modeling: A guide for social scientists. Analytical methods for social research series. Cambridge University Press.
8.
Burstein, R. ( 1998). Discrimination, jobs, and politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Chambliss, W.J. ( 1964). A sociological analysis of the law of vagrancy. Social Problems, 12, 67-77.
10.
Chambliss, W.J., & Seidman, R. ( 1980). Law, order, and power. Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley.
11.
D’Alessio, S.J., Stolzenberg, L., & Eitle, D. ( 2002). Racial threat and social control: A test of the political, economic, and threat of black crime hypotheses. Social Forces , 81, 557-576.
12.
Elias, N. ( 1982). The civilizing process II: Power and civility. New York: Pantheon.
13.
Freedom House. ( 2005). Freedom in the world. Retrieved from: http://www.freedomhouse.org/
14.
Galliher, J.F., Koch, L.W., Keys, D.P., & Guess, T.J. ( 2002). America without the death penalty. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
15.
Garland, D. ( 1990). Punishment and modern society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Greenberg, D.F. ( 1999). Punishment, division of labor, and social solidarity . In W. S. Laufer & F. Adler (Eds.), The criminology of criminal law (pp. 283-362). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
17.
Hodgkinson, P. ( 2004). Capital punishment: Improve it or remove it? In P. Hodgkinson & W. Schabas (Eds.), Capital punishment (pp. 1-35). New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Hood, R. ( 1996). The death penalty: A worldwide perspective. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
19.
Hosmer, D.W., & Lemeshow, S. ( 1999). Applied survival analysis: Regression modeling of time to event data. New York: John Wiley .
20.
Isaac, L.W., & Griffin, L.J. ( 1989). Ahistoricism in time-series analyses of historical process: Critique, redirection, and illustrations from U.S. labor history. American Sociological Review, 54, 873-890.
21.
Jackson, P.I. ( 1989). Minority group threat, crime and policing. New York: Praeger.
22.
Jacobs, D., & Carmichael, J.T. (2002). The political sociology of the death penalty: A pooled time-series analysis. American Sociological Review, 67, 109-131.
23.
Jacobs, D., Carmichael, J.T., & Kent, S.L. ( 2005). Vigilantism, current racial threat, and death sentences . American Sociological Review, 67, 109-131.
24.
Jacobs, D., & Helms, R. ( 1996). Towards a political model of incarceration: A time-series examination of multiple explanations for prison admission rates. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 323-357.
25.
Jacobs, D., & Kent, S.L. ( 2007). The determinants of executions since 1951: How politics, protests, public opinion, and social divisions shape capital punishment. Social Problems, 54, 297-318.
26.
Jacobs, D., & Kleban, R. ( 2003). Political institutions, minorities, and punishment: A pooled cross-national analysis of imprisonment rates. Social Forces, 82, 725-755.
27.
Jacobs, D., Qian, Z., Carmichael, J.T., & Kent, S.L. ( 2007). Who survives on death row? An individual and contextual analysis. American Sociological Review, 72, 610-632.
28.
Kent, S.L., & Jacobs, D. ( 2004). Social divisions and coercive control in advanced societies: Law enforcement strength in eleven nations from 1975 to 1994. Social Problems, 51, 343-361.
29.
Kent, S.L., & Jacobs, D. ( 2005). Social divisions and coercive control in advanced societies: Law enforcement strength in eleven nations from 1975 to 1994. Social Problems, 51, 343-361.
30.
Killias, M. ( 1986). Power, concentration, legitimation crisis, and penal severity. In W. B. Groves & G. Newman (Eds.), Punishment and privilege (pp. 95-118). New York: Harrow and Heston.
31.
Koch, L.W., & Galliher, J.F. (1993). Michigan’s continuing abolition of the death penalty and the conceptual components of symbolic legislation . Social and Legal Studies, 2, 323-346.
32.
Lehrman, W.G. ( 1994). Diversity in decline: Institutional environment and organizational failure in the American life insurance industry. Social Forces , 73, 605-635.
33.
Liska, A.E., Lawrence, J.J., & Benson, M. ( 1981). Perspectives on the legal order. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 412-426.
34.
Liska, A.E., Lawrence, J.J., & Sanchirico, A. (1982). Fear of crime as a social fact. Social Forces, 60, 760-71.
35.
Miethe, T., Lu, H., & Deibert, G.R. ( 2006). Cross-national variability in capital punishment: Exploring the sociopolitical sources of its differential legal status. International Criminal Justice Review, 20, 1-15.
36.
Minorities at Risk Project. (2005). College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management . Retrieved on December 15, 2007, from http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/mar/
37.
Neapolitan, J.L. ( 2001). An examination of cross-national variation in punitiveness . International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45, 691-710.
38.
Paternoster, R. ( 1991). Capital punishment in America. New York: Lexington.
39.
Pridemore, W.A. ( 2008). A methodological addition to the cross-national empirical literature on social structure and homicide: A first test of the poverty-homicide thesis. Criminology, 46, 133-153.
40.
Robinson, M.B. ( 2007). Death nation. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41.
Ruddell, R., & Urbina, M.G. ( 2004). Minority threat and punishment: A cross-national analysis . Justice Quarterly, 21, 903-931.
42.
Rusche, G., & Kirchheimer, O. (1939). Punishment and social structure . New York: Russell and Russell .
43.
Schabas, W. ( 2004). Public opinion and the death penalty. In P. Hodgkinson & W. Schabas (Eds.), Capital punishment (pp. 309-331). New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Shaw, M., Van Dijk, J., & Rhomberg, W. ( 2003). Determining trends in global crime and justice: An overview of results from the United Nations Surveys of Crime Trends and Operations of Criminal Justice Systems. Forum on Crime and Society, 3, 35-63.
45.
Stucky, T.D. ( 2005). Local politics and police strength. Justice Quarterly, 22, 139-169.
46.
Sutton, J.R. ( 2004). The political economy of imprisonment among affluent western democracies, 1960-1990. American Sociological Review , 69, 170-189.
47.
Taylor, M.C. ( 1998). How white attitudes vary with the racial composition of local populations. American Sociological Review, 63, 512-535.
48.
United Nations. (1999). Global report on crime and justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
49.
United States Department of the State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor. (2005). Country reports on human rights practices. Retrieved on December 15, 2007 from http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2005/
50.
Wacquant, L. ( 2000). The new particular institution: On the prison as surrogate ghetto. Theoretical Criminology, 4, 377-389.
51.
Walmsley, R. ( 2003). World prison population list, fourth edition. London: Great Britain Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate.
52.
Wilkins, L.T., & Pease, K. ( 1987). Public demand for punishment. The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 7, 16-29.
53.
World Institute for Development Economics Research of the United Nations University (UNU-WIDER). (2004). World income inequality database. Retrieved on 1/10/2009, from http://www.wider.unu.edu/
54.
Zimring, F.E., & Hawkins, G. ( 1986). Capital punishment and the American agenda. New York: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Zimring, F.E. ( 2003). The contradictions of American capital punishment. New York: Oxford University Press.
