Abstract
Fiber art installations placed in specific areas of non-residential buildings are required to be flame resistant. When needed, topical flame-retardant treatments are often used by artists to provide flame resistance. This study was a preliminary investigation of two application methods for a topical flame-retardant treatment on a fiberwork and an evaluation of flammability characteristics relative to add-on. Six commercial and two nonproprietary flame retardants were applied to a handwoven fabric consisting of identical linen warp and three separate sections of weft fiber content: cotton, rayon, and wool. Two methods of application, spraying and dipping, were investigated ANOVA was used to test for differences in add-on as a function of fabric, application, and product. Flame resistance was assessed by the National Fire Protection Association's Field Test: Match Flame Test. Data indicated that, in general, dipping results in greater add-on than spraying; however, this varies by flame retardant and fiber content of the installation. All samples except four passed the Field Test. It was not possible to determine if failure to pass was due to difficulty in obtaining satisfactory flame resistance with certain fiber combinations, to application methods, or to limitations of the Field Test. Although not evaluated in this study, there was visible evidence of undesirable characteristics that may result from topical flame-retardant treatments: color change, shrinkage, visible residue, and stiffness. Further research is needed to help artists and fire safety experts gain a better understanding of the complexities of topical flame-retardant treatments on fiber art installations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
