This study investigated how inconsistencies between corporate moral responsibility (CMR) messages and CMR actions undertaken by corporations impact consumers’ positive and negative word-of-mouth (PWOM and NWOM) intentions using the expectancy violation theory. It also investigated the moderation effect of different types of CMR issues and consumers’ shared values on the relation. Analyses of data collected from 1296 U.S. consumers revealed that participants’ word-of-mouth (WOM) intentions, both positive and negative, were impacted by inconsistencies between CMR initiatives and actions. When inconsistency was absent, highest PWOM intention was generated for issues related to workers and least for shareholders. Shared values significantly moderated the relation as well. When CMR message action was consistent, PWOM intention was higher for participants with high shared value (vs. low shared value). These findings add knowledge to the literature of CMR and guide corporate CMR-related communications.
AlexandrovA.LillyB.BabakusE. (2013). The effects of social-and self-motives on the intentions to share positive and negative word of mouth. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(5), 531–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-012-0323-4
2.
AllenM. W. (2002). Human values and product symbolism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(12), 2475–2501.
3.
AzemiY.OzuemW.HowellK. E. (2020). The effects of online negative word-of-mouth on dissatisfied customers. Psychology & Marketing, 37(4), 564–577.
4.
BhaduriG.Ha-BrookshireJ. E. (2011). Do transparent business practices pay?Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 29(2), 135–149.
5.
BhaduriG.Ha-BrookshireJ. E.LeshnerG. (2017). Too good to be true? Effect of consumers’ brand schemas on apparel brands’ fair labor marketing MessagesClothing and Textiles Research Journal, 35(3), 187–203.
6.
BhaduriG.JungS.Ha-BrookshireJ. E. (2021). Effects of CSR messages on apparel consumers’ word-of-mouth. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X211055984
7.
BhaduriG.StanforthN. (2017). To (or not to) label products as artisanal. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 26(2), 177–189.
BrownJ.BroderickA. J.LeeN. (2007). Word of mouth communication within online communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(3), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20082
10.
BurgoonJ. K. (2015). Expectancy violations theory. In C. R. Berger & M. E. Roloff (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication (pp. 1–9). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic0102
11.
BurgoonJ. K.HaleJ. L. (1988). Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors. Communications Monographs, 55(1), 58–79.
ChaneyD.MartinD. (2017). The role of shared values in understanding loyalty over time. Journal of Travel Research, 56(4), 507–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287516643411
14.
ChungA.LeeK. B. (2022). Corporate apology after bad publicity: A dual-process model of CSR fit and CSR history on purchase intention and negative word of mouth. International Journal of Business Communication, 59(3), 406–426.
15.
De RoeckK.El AkremiA.SwaenV. (2016). Consistency matters! How and when does corporate social responsibility affect employees’ organizational identification?Journal of Management Studies, 53(7), 1141–1168.
16.
FediukT. A.CoombsW. T.BoteroI. C. (2010). Exploring crisis from a receiver perspective. In W T. Coombs, S. J. Holladay, T. A. Fediuk & I. C. Botero (Eds.), The handbook of crisis communication (pp. 635–656). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444314885.ch31
Ha-BrookshireJ. (2017). Toward moral responsibility theories of corporate sustainability and sustainable supply chain. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2847-2
19.
Helm, S., & Tolsdorf, J. (2013). How does corporate reputation affect customer loyalty in a corporate crisis? Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 21(3), 144–152.
20.
HessK. M. (2013). “If You Tickle Us….”: How corporations can be moral agents without being persons. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 47(3), 319–335.
JordanJ.DiermeierD. A.GalinskyA. D. (2012). The strategic Samaritan: How effectiveness and proximity affect corporate responses to external crises. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(4), 621–648. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201222442
23.
JungS.Ha-BrookshireJ. (2017). Perfect or imperfect duties? Developing a moral responsibility framework for corporate sustainability from the consumer perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(4), 326–340.
LeeE. M.ParkS. Y.RapertM. I.NewmanC. L. (2012). Does perceived consumer fit matter in corporate social responsibility issues?Journal of Business Research, 65(11), 1558–1564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.02.040
27.
LeeS. H.WorkmanJ. E. (2013). Gossip, self-monitoring, and fashion consumer groups. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 31(2), 67–80.
28.
MacLeanT.LitzkyB. E.HoldernessD. K. (2015). When organizations don’t walk their talk. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2), 351–368.
29.
MacMillan, K., Money, K., Downing, S., & Hillenbrand, C. (2005). Reputation in relationships: Measuring experiences, emotions and behaviors. Corporate Reputation Review, 8, 214–232.
30.
Markman, G., & Krause, D. (2014). Special topic forum on theory building surrounding sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(3), 98.
MirandaS.DuarteM. (2022). How perfectionism reduces positive word-of-mouth: The mediating role of perceived social risk. Psychology & Marketing, 39(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21593
34.
National Resources Defense Council. (2019). GE’s climate hypocrisy: building coal plants while touting clean energy. https://www.nrdc.org/media/2019/190909
35.
ParkS. Y.ChoM.KimS. (2021). The effect of CSR expectancy violation: Value from expectancy violation theory and confirmation bias. Journal of Marketing Communications, 27(4), 365–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2019.1671478
RichardsonJ. T. (2011). Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001
38.
RyuS.ParkJ. (2020). The effects of benefit-driven commitment on usage of social media. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 102094.
39.
SkarmeasD.LeonidouC. N. (2013). When consumers doubt, watch out! the role of CSR skepticism. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1831–1838.
40.
TalwarM.TalwarS.KaurP.IslamA. N.DhirA. (2021). Positive and negative word of mouth (WOM) are not necessarily opposites. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 63, 102396.
41.
ThorsonE.WicksR.LeshnerG. (2012). Experimental methodology in journalism and mass communication research. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(1), 112–124.
VoT. T.XiaoX.HoS. Y. (2019). How does corporate social responsibility engagement influence word of mouth on twitter. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(2), 525–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3679-z
44.
WagnerT.LutzR. J.WeitzB. A. (2009). Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 77–91.https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.6.77
45.
ZhaoH.ZhouJ. (2017). Review and prospect of research on pseudo-social responsibility of foreign enterprises. Journal of Capital University of Economics and Business, 19(1), 96–103.
46.
ZhigangW.LeiZ.XintaoL. (2020). Consumer response to corporate hypocrisy from the perspective of expectation confirmation theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 580114. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580114
