We aim to provide companies an insight into what to consider when communicating their corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices with their consumers. We developed a model, grounded in the hierarchy of effects theory, to determine whether the extent to which information perceived to be substantial delivers significant predictability of consumers’ cognitive beliefs, affect, and behavioral intentions toward an apparel brand when exposed to the brand’s CSR information. Through modeling with data collected from an online survey with 340 nationwide consumers, we demonstrated the significant direct effects of perceived CSR information substantiality on perceived quality of corporate responsibility and brand trustworthiness as well as its indirect effects on brand likability, purchase intention, and social media word-of-mouth intention. We offer managerial implications for firms to maximize the effects of their CSR efforts in drawing positive perceptions and behavioral outcomes among their consumers and therefore gain the momentum to continue such efforts.
ArnoldM. J.ReynoldsK. E. (2009). Affect and retail shopping behavior: Understanding the role of mood regulation and regulatory focus. Journal of Retailing, 85, 308–320.
2.
AugerG. A. (2014). Trust me, trust me not: An experimental analysis of the effect of transparency on organizations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26, 325–343.
3.
BarryT. F.HowardD. J. (1990). A review and critique of the hierarchy of effects in advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 9, 121–135.
4.
BeckwithN. E.LehmannD. R. (1975). The importance of halo effects in multi-attribute attitude models. Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 265–275.
5.
BhaduriG.Ha-BrookshireJ. E. (2011). Do transparent business practices pay? Exploration of transparency and consumer purchase intention. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 29, 135–149.
6.
BhattacharyaC. B.SenS. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47, 9–24.
7.
ChaudhuriA.HolbrookM. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65, 81–93.
8.
ChuS.-C.KimY. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising, 30, 47–75.
9.
Chun-ChangL.Yun-LingW.Wen-HsinH.Yu-ChenL.Pei-RuC.Hsin-RouL.Ya-WenC. (2016). Information disclosure, social responsibility, trust, and attitude affect loyalty to housing agents. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 44, 717–726.
10.
DachL.AllmendingerK. (2013). Sustainability in corporate communications and its influence on consumer awareness and perceptions: A study of H&M and Primark. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 130, 409–418.
11.
DicksonM. A.EckmanM. (2006). Social responsibility: The concept as defined by apparel and textile scholars. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 24, 178–191.
12.
DiddiS. (2014). Understanding ethical consumption decisions: The role of values, attitudes and expectations in the apparel purchasing context (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved fromhttp://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/14002
FombrunC. J.GardbergN. A.SeverJ. M. (2000). The reputation quotient: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. Journal of Brand Management, 7, 241–255.
16.
FornellC.LarckerD. G. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
17.
FreemanE. R.McVeaJ. (2001). A stakeholder approach to strategic management (Darden Business School Working Paper No. 01-02). Retrieved fromhttp://ssrn.com/abstract=263511
18.
Gaskill-FoxJ.HyllegardK. H.OgleJ. P. (2014). CSR reporting on apparel companies’ websites: Framing good deeds and clarifying missteps. Fashion and Textiles, 1, 1–22.
19.
HatchC. D.StephenS. K. (2015). Gender effects on perceptions of individual and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 17, 63–71.
HongI.ChaH. (2013). The mediating role of consumer trust in an online merchant in predicting purchase intention. International Journal of Information Management, 33, 927–939.
22.
HutterK.HautzJ.DennhardtS.FüllerJ. (2013). The impact of user interactions in social media on brand awareness and purchase intention: The case of MINI on Facebook. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 22, 342–351.
23.
IslamM. A.McPhailK. (2011). Regulating for corporate human rights abuses: The emergence of corporate reporting on the ILO’s human rights standards within the global garment manufacturing and retail industry. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22, 790–810.
24.
JengS.-P. (2016). The influences of airline brand credibility on consumer purchase intentions. Journal of Air Transport Management, 55, 1–8.
25.
JohnsonD.GraysonK. (2005). Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships. Journal of Business Research, 58, 500–507.
26.
JungS.Ha-BrookshireJ. (2017). Perfect or imperfect duties? Developing a moral responsibility framework for corporate sustainability from the consumer perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24, 326–340.
27.
KangJ.HustvedtG. (2014). The contribution of perceived labor transparency and perceived corporate giving to brand equity in the footwear industry. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 32, 296–311.
28.
KozlowskiA.SearcyC.BardeckiM. (2015). Corporate sustainability reporting in the apparel industry: An analysis of indicators disclosed. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64, 377–397.
29.
LavidgeR. J.SteinerG. A. (1961). A model for predictive measurements of advertising effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 25, 59–62.
30.
MarkovicS.IglesiasO.SinghJ. J.SierraV. (2015). How does the perceived ethicality of corporate services brands influence loyalty and positive word-of-mouth? Analyzing the roles of empathy, affective commitment, and perceived quality. Journal of Business Ethics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2985-6
31.
NewellS. J.GoldsmithR. E. (2001). The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility. Journal of Business Research, 52, 235–247.
32.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
33.
ÖbersederM.SchlegelmilchB. B.MurphyP. E.GruberV. (2014). Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibility: Scale development and validation. Journal of Business Ethics, 124, 101–115.
PomeringA.DolnicarS. (2009). Assessing the prerequisite of successful CSR implementation: Are consumers aware of CSR initiatives?Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 285–301.
36.
RawlinsB. (2009). Give the emperor a mirror: Toward developing a stakeholder measurement of organizational transparency. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21, 71–99.
37.
ReynoldsS. J.SchultzF. C.HekmanD. R. (2006). Stakeholder theory and managerial decision-making: Constraints and implications of balancing stakeholder interests. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 285–301.
38.
SheaL. J. (2010). Using consumer perceived ethicality as a guideline for corporate social responsibility strategy: A commentary essay. Journal of Business Research, 63, 263–264.
39.
SinghJ.IglesiasO.Batista-FoguetJ. (2012). Does having an ethical brand matter? The influence of consumer perceived ethicality on trust, affect and loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics, 111, 541–549.
40.
SinhN. H. (2013). The hierarchy model of advertising effects: A debate. Journal of Development and Integration, 8, 92–96.
41.
SolomonM. R.RaboltN. J. (2009). Consumer behavior: In fashion. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
42.
SpearsN.SinghS. N. (2004). Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 26, 53–66.
43.
TillB. D.BuslerM. (2000). The match-up hypothesis: Physical attractiveness, expertise, and the role of fit on brand attitude, purchase intent and brand beliefs. Journal of Advertising, 29, 1–13.
WalshG.BeattyS. E. (2007). Customer-based corporate reputation of a service firm: Scale development and validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35, 127–143.
48.
WigleyS. (2008). Gauging consumers’ responses to CSR activities: Does increased awareness make cents?Public Relations Review, 34, 306–308.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
