The New York Posture Rating (NYPR) was evaluated for assessing postural alignment changes in a garment study as captured in photographs and body scans. The posture of 15 pre-menopausal females aged 40 to 55 were assessed while wearing a control and a posture support garment. The scale was successfully applied with good rater reliability for photographs (0.77) and body scans (0.91). Overall photographic posture assessments were not significant, however, two body segments showed improvement. Overall body scan posture assessments revealed significant improvement for the posture support garment, and improvement in one body segment (neck). Paired t –test comparison of NYPR from photographs and body scans were not significantly different in the posture support garment and significantly different for the control. Possible solutions are discussed. Overall results, support the potential use of the NYPR in studies of garment effects on posture and the body scans as an assessment tool.
ArnoldC. M.BeattyB.HarrisonE.OlszynskiW. (2000). The reliability of five clinical postural alignment measures for women with osteoporosis. Physiotherapy Canada, 52, 287–294.
2.
AshdownS. P.NaH. (2008). Comparison of 3-D body scans data to quantify upper-body postural variation in older and younger women. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 26, 292–307.
3.
BarrowH.McGeeR.TritschlerK. (1989). Practical measurement of physical education and sport (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.
4.
BriedenhannD. (2004). Implementation of an off-season training programme to enhance throwing performance in high school athletes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, South Africa.
5.
CarlsonK. J.EisenstatS. A.ZiporynT. D. (2004). The new Harvard guide to women’s health (1st ed., pp. 530–531). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
ChoY.KomatsuT.InuiS.ShimizuY.ParkH. (2006). Individual patternmaking using computerized draping method for clothing. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 76, 646–654.
7.
DwyerG. B.DavisS. E. (Eds.). (2008). ACSM’s health-related physical fitness assessment manual (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
8.
GeorgeD.MalleryP. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
9.
GuarigliaD. A.PacciniM. K. (2011). Relação entre assimetria postural e flexibilidade em mulheres sedentárias. Revista Hórus, 4, 246.
10.
HennesseyL.WatsonW. S. (1993). Flexibility and posture assessment in relation to hamstring injury. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 27, 243–246.
11.
HowleyE.FranksB. (1992). Health fitness instructor’s handbook (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books, A Division of Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc.
12.
HuckJ.KimY. (1997). Coveralls for grass fire fighting. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 9, 346–359.
13.
JohnsonB.NelsonJ. (1986). Practical measurements for evaluation in physical education. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess.
14.
JonesJ. B. (1974). The effect of a physical activity program on asthmatic children (Unpublished master’s thesis). Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX.
15.
KendallF. P.McCrearyE. K.ProvanceP. G.RodgersM. M.RomaniW. A. (2005). Muscles: Testing and function with posture and pain (5th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
16.
KrenzerG.StarrC.BransonD. (2005). Excellence in design – Development of a sports bra prototype. Clothing & Textiles Research Journal, 23, 131–134.
New York State Education Department. (1958). New York physical fitness test: A manual for teachers of P.E. New York, NY: Author (Division of Health Physical Education and Recreation).
19.
PacciniM. K.CyrinoE. S.GlanerM. F. (2007). Efeito de un exercício contra-resistência na postura de mulheres. Revista da Educacao Fisica/UEM, 18, 169–175.
20.
PankeyB.WoosleyJ.GlendenningM. (2004, April). Differences in posture between third- grade and fifth-grade males and females as measured by the New York State posture rating chart. AAHPERD National Convention and Exposition Presentation, Florianopolis, Brazil. Retrieved December 3, 2011, fromhttp://aahperd.confex.com/aahperd/2004/preliminaryprogram/abstract_5022.htm
21.
PhamV. M.HoulliezA.CarpentierA.HerbauxB.SchillA.ThevenonA. (2008). Determination of the influence of the Chêneau brace on quality of life for adolescent with idiopathic scoliosis. Annales de Réadaptation et de Médecine Physique, 15, 3–8.
22.
RhodesM. (1996, January/February). Back in balance. Women’s Sports & Fitness, 18, 44–48.
23.
Rutherford-BlackC.KhanS. (1995). Texas tech police bicycle patrol: Encounter with a uniform. Campus Law Enforcement Journal, 25, 26–28.
24.
SantosM.KanekarN.AruinA. (2010). The role of anticipatory postural adjustments in compensatory control of posture: Biomechanical analysis. Journal of Electromyography and of Kinesiology, 20, 398–405.
25.
SchaferR. C. (1983). Clinical biomechanics: Musculoskeletal actions and reactions. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins Publishers. Retrieved March 30, 2012, fromhttp://www.chiro.org/ACAPress/Body_Alignment.html
