Social Support,Research Interest,Stress,and Research Productivity of Textiles and Apparel Faculty

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between work stress and research productivity among faculty members in the field of textiles and apparel. Work stress and research productivity were studied in relation to four antecedent variables: collegial or institutional support, chair's support, professional organization support, and research interest. In addition, rank, institution type, position description, expertise, and degrees offered were examined in relation to the variables. Data from 173 members of the International Textile and Apparel Association (ITAA) classified as assistant professors (n = 63), associate professors (n = 63), and professors (n = 47) were analyzed. Results show research interests to be the only significant factor to influence research productivity. No variables in this study significantly influenced work stress. Respondents with higher research productivity were from 4-year, land-grant institutions with graduate programs and had a lower teaching load. Further investigation in examining research productivity of faculty members is recommended.

Keywords

academic faculty research productivity stress support

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baldwin, R.G. (1990). Faculty vitality beyond the research university: Extending a contextual concept. Journal of Higher Education , 61(2), 160-180.

Beehr, T.A. , Walsh, J.T. , & Taber, D.T. (1976). Relationship of stress to individually and organizationallyvalued states: Higher order needs as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 41-47.

Blackburn, R.T. , & Bentley, R.J. (1993). Faculty research productivity: Some moderators of associated stressors. Research in Higher Education, 34(6), 725-745.

Blackburn, R.T. , Bieber, J.P. , Lawrence, J.H. , & Trautvetter, L. (1991). Faculty at work: Focus on research, scholarship, and service. Research in Higher Education, 32(4), 385-413.

Bland, C.J. , Center, B.A. , Finstad, D.A. , Risbey, K.R. , & Staples, J. (2006). The impact of appointment type on the productivity and commitment of full-time faculty in research and doctoral institutions . The Journal of Higher Education, 77(1), 89-123.

Gappa, J.M. , Austin, A.E. , & Trice, A.G. (2005, November/December). Rethinking academic work and workplaces. Change, 37(6), 32-39.

Gmelch, W.H. , Lovrich, N.P. , & Wilke, P.K. (1984). Sources of stress in academe: A national perspective. Research in Higher Education, 20(4), 477-490.

Gmelch, W.H. , Wilke, P.K. , & Lovrich, N.P. (1986). Dimensions of stress among university faculty: Factor-analytic results from a national study. Research in Higher Education, 24(3), 266-286.

Gupta, N. , & Beehr, T.A. (1979). Job stress and employee behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 373-387.

10.

Hagedorn, L.S. (1994). Retirement proximity's role in the prediction of satisfaction in academe. Research in Higher Education, 35(6), 711-728.

11.

Hotard, D. , Tanner, J. , & Totaro, M.W. (2003). Differing faculty perceptions of research and teaching emphasis. Educational Research Quarterly, 27(4), 9-22.

12.

House, J.S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

13.

Jamal, M. (1985). Job stress and performance relationships. Human Relations, 38, 409-426.

14.

Kirsch, G.E. (1993). Women writing the academy: Audience, authority, and transformation. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

15.

Laughlin, J. , & Kean, R.C. (2002). Unit administrators' perceived importance of faculty outcomes, and potential effect on productivity. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 20(2), 86-98.

16.

Lease, S.H. (1999). Occupational role stressors, coping, support, and hardiness as predictors of strain in academic faculty: An emphasis on new and female faculty. Research in Higher Education, 40(3), 285-307.

17.

McCall, B. (2006, February 17). Academics suffer more stress than A & E staff. Times Higher Education Supplement, p. 64.

18.

Neumann, Y. , & Finaly-Neumann, E. (1990). The support-stress paradigm and faculty research publication. Journal of Higher Education , 61(5), 565-580.

19.

Parsuraman, S. , & Alutto, J.A. (1984). Sources and outcomes of stress in organizational settings: Toward the development of a structural model. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 330-350.

20.

Shim, S. , O'Neal, G. , & Rabolt, N. (1998). Research attitude and productivity among faculty at four-year U.S. institutions: A socialization perspective. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 16(3), 134-144.

21.

Smith, E. , Anderson, J.L. , & Lovrich, N.P. (1995). The multiple sources of workplace stress among land-grant university faculty. Research in Higher Education , 36(3), 261-282.

22.

Teodorescu, D. (2000). Correlates of faculty publication productivity: A cross-national analysis. Higher Education, 39, 201-222.

23.

Thoits, P.A. (1982). Conceptual, methodological, and theoretical problems in studying social support as a buffer against life stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 23, 145-154.

24.

Tien, F.F. , & Blackburn, R.T. (1996). Faculty rank system, research motivation, and faculty research productivity: Measure refinement and theory testing. Journal of Higher Education, 67(1), 2-22.