Intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) is a public health and social responsibility issue affecting women worldwide. The role of society is essential to help victims to get out of the violent relationship and reduce their risk of revictimization. In this regard, the social response to IPVAW depends to some extent on public beliefs and attitudes toward IPVAW. Hence, this research explores the direct relationship between sexism and the willingness to intervene in cases of IPVAW, indirectly through acceptance of myths of IPVAW, perceived severity of IPVAW, risk assessed of victims’ health and life as well as to the establishment of equal relations, attribution of the responsibility to the aggressor, and victim blaming. A Spanish sample of 487 participants was collected through incidental sampling. Participants responded to an online survey that was disseminated via email and social media. A parallel path analysis model showed that greater sexism was associated with lower willingness to intervene in cases IPVAW, via greater acceptance of the myths of IPVAW and less attribution of responsibility to the aggressor. IPVAW perceived severity, risk assessed, and victim blaming did not explain the effect of sexism on willingness to intervene. This research emphasizes the need to focus on egalitarian education that mitigates sociocultural risk factors such as patriarchal beliefs and attitudes that explain IPVAW and favors a climate of acceptance and tolerance of this problem, making it difficult for victims to break with the violent relationship.
Andrés-PueyoA.EcheburúaE. (2010). Valoración del riesgo de violencia: Instrumentos disponibles e indicadores de aplicación [Assessment of the risk of violence: Available instruments and application indicators]. Psicothema, 22(3), 403–409.
2.
Badenes-SastreM. (2023). Perception of intimate partner violence against women and its influence on risk assessment and decision-making aimed at protecting potential victims. University of Granada, TESEO.
3.
Badenes-SastreM.Beltrán-MorillasA. M.ExpósitoF. (2023a). Absence versus presence of intimate partner violence in a sample of Spanish women: Conflict resolution strategies and associated variables. Violence Against Women, 30(3–4), 832–853. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012221147907
4.
Badenes-SastreM.ExpósitoF. (2021). Perception and detection of gender violence, and identification as victims: A bibliometric study. Annals of Psychology, 37(2), 341–351. doi:10.6018/analesps.434611
5.
Badenes-SastreM.LorenteM.Beltrán-MorillasA. M.ExpósitoF. (2023b). Transformative effect of intimate partner violence against women based on sociocultural factors trapping women in a violent relationship. Current Psychology, 43, 10786–10800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05101-2
6.
Badenes-SastreM.LorenteM.ExpósitoF. (2023c). Future health-professionals: Attitudes, perceived severity, and willingness to intervene in cases of intimate partner violence. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 14(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.23923/j.rips.2023.01.061
7.
BandalosD. L. (2018). Measurement theory and applications for the social sciences. The Guildford Press.
8.
BanyardV. L. (2015). Springer briefs in criminology. Toward the next generation of bystander prevention of sexual and relationship violence: Action coils to engage communities. Springer Science + Business Media.
9.
Bosch-FiolE.Ferrer-PerezV. (2000). Gender violence: From a private issue to a social problem. Intervención Psicosocial, 9(1), 7–19.
10.
Bosch-FiolE.Ferrer-PerezV. (2019). The pyramid model: A feminist alternative for analyzing violence against women. Revista Estudos Feministas, 27(1), e54189. https://doi.org/101590/1806-9584-2019v27n254189
11.
BrewerN. T.WeinsteinN. D.CuiteC.HerringtonJ. E. (2004). Risk perceptions and their relation to risk behavior. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 27(2), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2702_7
12.
CinquegranaV.CostanzaA.PagliaroS. (2018). Intimate partner violence and bystanders’ helping behaviour: An experimental study. Journal of Aggression, Conflict, and Peace Research, 10(4), 0243. https://doi.org/10.1108/JACPR-08-2016-0243
13.
CorradiC.StöcklH. (2014). Intimate partner homicide in 10 European countries: Statistical data and policy development in a cross-national perspective. European Journal of Criminology, 11(5), 601–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370814539438
14.
CortinaJ. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
15.
DischL.HawkesworthM. (2016). The Oxford handbook of feminist theory. Oxford University Press.
16.
EndersC. K. (2001). The performance of the Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimator in multiple regression models with missing data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(5), 713–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164401615001
17.
EstebanJ.SchneiderG. (2008). Polarization and conflict: Theoretical and empirical issues. Journal of Peace Research, 45(2), 131–141. http://doi.org/10.1177/0022343307087168
Ferrer-PérezV. A.Bosch-FiolE.Ferreiro-BarsutoV.Delgado-AlvarezC.Sánchez-PradaA. (2020). Comparing implicit and explicit attitudes toward intimate partner violence against women. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2127. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02147
20.
Ferrer-PérezV.A.Bosch-FiolE.Sánchez-PradaA.Delgado-ÁlvarezC. (2019). Beliefs and attitudes about intimate partner violence against women in Spain. Psicothema, 31(1), 38–45. https://www.psicothema.com/pdf/4512.pdf
21.
FieldA. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
22.
FloodM.PeaceB. (2009). Factors influencing attitudes to violence against women. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838009334131
23.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109
24.
GraciaE. (2004). Unreported cases of domestic violence against women: Towards an epidemiology of social silence, tolerance, and inhibition. Journal of Epidemiology Community Health, 58, 536–537. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.019604
25.
GraciaE.GarcíaF.LilaM. (2009). Public responses to intimate partner violence against women: The influence of perceived severity and personal responsibility. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12(2), 648–656. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600002018
26.
GraciaE.HerreroJ. (2006). Public attitudes toward reporting partner violence against women and reporting behavior. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 759–768. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3838890
27.
GraciaE.LilaM.SantirsoF. A. (2020). Attitudes toward intimate partner violence against women in the European Union. A systematic review. European Psychologist, 25(2), 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000392
28.
GraciaE.Martín-FernándezM.MarcoM.SantirsoF. A.VargasV.LilaM. (2018). The willingness to intervene in cases of intimate partner violence against women (WI-IPVAW) scale: Development and validation of the long and short versions. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1146. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01146
29.
HerreraM. C.ExpósitoF. (2009). Shared responsability: Media influence in culpability and justification’s atribution in couple violence. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 19(1), 103–119.
30.
KilpatrickF.CantrilH. (1960). Self-anchoring scaling: a measure of individuals’ unique reality worlds. Journal of Individual Psychology, 16, 158–173. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1967.25.2.471
31.
KuijpersK.BlocklandA. J.MercerN. C. (2021). Gendered perceptions of intimate partner violence normality: An experimental study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(3–4), 1412–1440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517746945
32.
LeónC. M.AizpuruaE.RolleroC. (2022). None of my business? An experimental analyzing willingness to formally report incidents of intimate partner violence against women. Violence Against Women, 28(9), 2163–2185. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012211025990
33.
LorenteM. (2022). Pacto de Estado contra el machismo [State Pact against machismo]. Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez, 2(Protocolo II), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.30827/acfs.vi.25192
34.
LorenteM. (2007). Violencia de género, educación y socialización: Acciones y reacciones [Gender violence, education and socialization: Actions and reactions]. Revista de Educación, 342, 19–35.
35.
Martín-FernándezM.GraciaE.LilaM. (2018). Assessing victim blaming attitudes in cases of intimate partner violence against women: Development and validation of the VB-IPVAW scale. Psychosocial Intervention, 27, 133–143. https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2018a18
36.
McCulloughM. E.TsangJ. A.FinchamF. (2003). Forgiveness, forbearance, and time: Temporal unfolding of transgression-related interpersonal motivations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 540–557. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.540
37.
MegíasJ.Toro-GarcíaV.Carretero-DiosH. (2018). The acceptance of myths about intimate partner violence against women (AMIVAW) Scale: Development and validation in Spanish and English. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317742638
38.
Mora-PelegrínM.VázquezM. A.Armenteros-MartínezE.ArandaM.Montes-BergesB. (2022). Creation and validation of the distorted thoughts on gender violence aggressors inventory. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 10(2), 3414. https://doi.org/10.13129/2282-1619/mjcp-3414
39.
MoschellaE. A.BanyardV. L. (2020). Reactions to actions: Exploring how types of bystander action are linked to positive and negative consequences. Journal of Primary Prevention, 41, 585–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-020-00618-9
40.
NgocK.WeissB.PollackA. (2013). Cultural beliefs, intimate partner violence and mental health functioning among Vietnamese women. Journal of Family Violence, 28(2), 153–171. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-012-9478-5
41.
PagliaroS.PacilliM. G.GiannellaV. A.GiovannelliI.SpaccatiniF.BaldryA. C. (2018). Legitimizing intimate partner violence: Moral evaluations, attribution of responsibility, and (reduced) helping intentions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(5–6), 2929–2941. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518760611
42.
ParkerM.LehmanE.AbramM. C.WeismanC.McCall-HosenfeldJ. (2020). Actions taken by women in response to intimate partner violence and intimate partner violence status at 1-year follow-up. Women’s Health Issues, 30(5), 330–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2020.04.005
43.
Puente-MartínezA.Ubillos-LandaS.EcheburúaE.Páez-RoviraD. (2016). Factores de riesgo asociados a la violencia sufrida por la mujer en la pareja: Una revisión de meta-análisis y estudios recientes [Risk factors associated with intimate partner violence experienced by women: A review of meta-analyses and recent studies]. Annals of Psychology, 32(1), 295–306. http://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.1.189161
44.
RiddleK.DiZ. (2020). Are caregivers concerned about media violence? A survey of U.S. parents’ beliefs about specific media violence effects. Journal of Children and Media, 14, 438–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2020.1717564
45.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
46.
Sánchez-PradaA.Delgado-AlvarezC.Bosch-FiolE.Ferreiro-BasurtoV.Ferrer-PerezV. (2020). Bystanders of intimate partner violence against women and their willingness to intervene: An analysis of secondary data in Spain (2005–2020). PLoS One17(9): e0274822. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274822
47.
Serrano-MontillaC.Garrido-MacíasM.Sáez-DíazJ.SáezG. (2025). Assessing police attitudes toward intervention in gender violence: The role of training, perceived severity, and myths about intimate partner violence against women. Journal of Family Violence, 40, 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-023-00605-8
48.
SmithR. H.WebsterJ. M.ParrottW. G.EyreH. L. (2002). The role of public exposure in moral and nonmoral shame and guilt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 138–159. https://doi.org/10.1037%2F0022-3514.83.1.138
WaltermaurerE. (2012). Public justification of intimate partner violence: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13(3), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838012447699
YamawakiN.Ochoa-ShippM.PulsipherC.HarlosA.SwindlerS. (2012). Perceptions of domestic violence: The effects of domestic violence myths, victim’s relationship with her abuser, and the decision to return to her abuser. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(16), 3195–3212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512441253
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
