Dating Aggression,Sexual Coercion,and Aggression-Supporting Attitudes Among College Men as a Function of Participation in Aggressive High School Sports
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2006
Dating Aggression,Sexual Coercion,and Aggression-Supporting Attitudes Among College Men as a Function of Participation in Aggressive High School Sports
Aggressive male sports have been criticized as bastions of sexism and training grounds for aggression against women, but there have been few empirical demonstrations of these alleged relationships. The authors studied self-reported dating aggression and sexual coercion in 147 college men. Men who had participated in aggressive high school sports, as compared with other men, engaged in more psychological aggression, physical aggression, and sexual coercion toward their dating partners, caused their partners more physical injury, were more accepting of violence, had more sexist attitudes and hostility toward women, were more accepting of rape myths, and were less tolerant of homosexuality. Results indicate that participation in aggressive high school sports is one of the multiple developmental pathways leading to relationship violence.
Adams-Curtis, L. E., & Forbes, G. B. (2004). College women’s experiences of sexual coercion: A review of cultural, perpetrator, victim, and situational variables. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 5, 91-122.
2.
Benedict, J. R. (1997). Public heroes private felons: Athletes and crimes against women. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
3.
Benedict, J. R. (1998). Athletes and acquaintance rape. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Blumstein, A., & Benedict, J. (1999). Criminal violence of NFL players compared with the general population. Chance, 12, 12-15.
5.
Boeringer, S. B. (1999). Associations of rape-supportive attitudes with fraternal and athletic participation. Violence Against Women, 5, 81-90.
6.
Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York: Simon & Schuster.
7.
Burt, M. A. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
8.
Check, J. V. P., Malamuth, N. M., Elias, B., & Barton, S. (1985, April). On hostile ground. Psychology Today, pp. 56-61.
9.
Coakley, J. (2001). Sport in society: Issues and controversies (7th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
10.
Coakley, J. (2002). Using sports to control deviance and violence among youth: Let’s be critical and cautious. In M. Gatz, M. A. Messner, & S. J. Ball-Rokeach (Eds.), Paradoxes of youth and sport (pp. 13-30). Albany: State University of New York Press.
11.
Cook, S. L. (2002). Self-reports of sexual, physical, and nonphysical abuse perpetration: A comparison of three measures. Violence Against Women, 8, 541-565.
12.
Crosset, T. (1990). Masculinity, sexuality, and the development of modern sport. In M. A. Messner & D. F. Sabo (Eds.), Sport, men, and the gender order: Critical feminist perspectives (pp. 45-54). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
13.
Crosset, T. (2002). Athletic affiliation and violence against women: Toward a structural prevention project. In J. McKay, M. A. Messner, & D. Sabo (Eds.), Masculinities, gender relations, and sport (pp. 147-161). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Crosset, T. W., Benedict, J. R., & McDonald, M. A. (1995). Male student-athletes reported for sexual assault: A survey of campus police departments and judicial affairs offices. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 19, 126-140.
15.
Crosset, T. W., & Ptacek, J. (1996). Male student-athletes and violence against women: A survey of campus judicial affairs offices. Violence Against Women, 2, 163-179.
16.
Currie, D. H. (1998). Violent men or violent women? Whose definition counts? In R. K. Bergen (Ed.), Issues in intimate violence (pp. 97-111). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Curry, T. J. (1991). Fraternal bonding in the locker room: A profeminist analysis of talk about competition and women. Sociology of Sport Journal, 8, 119-135.
18.
Dabbs, E. E. (1998). Intentional fouls: Athletes and violence against women. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, 31, 167-199.
19.
Dean, K. E., & Malamuth, N. M. (1997). Characteristics of men who aggress sexually and men who imagine aggressing: Risk and moderating variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 449-455.
20.
DeKerseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (1998). Male peer support and woman abuse in postsecondary school courtship: Suggestions for new directions in sociological research. In R. K. Bergen (Ed.), Issues in intimate violence (pp. 83-96). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Dwyer, D. (2000). Interpersonal relationships. New York: Routledge.
22.
Ewing, M. E., Gano-Overway, L. A., Branta, C. F., & Seefeldt, V. D. (2002). The role of sports in youth development. In M. Gatz, M. A. Messner, & S. J. Ball-Rokeach (Eds.), Paradoxes of youth and sport (pp. 31-47). Albany: State University of New York Press.
23.
Forbes, G. B., & Adams-Curtis, L. (2001). Experiences with sexual coercion in college males and females: Role of family conflict, sexist attitudes, acceptance of rape myths, self-esteem, and the big-five personality factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 865-889.
24.
Forbes, G. B., Adams-Curtis, L. E., & White, K. B. (2004). First and second generation measures of sexism, rape myths and related beliefs, and hostility toward women: Their interrelationships and association with college students’ experiences with dating aggression and sexual coercion. Violence Against Women, 10, 236-261.
25.
Frintner, M. P., & Rubinson, L. (1993). Acquaintance rape: The influence of alcohol, fraternity membership, and sports team membership. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 19, 272-284.
26.
Gelles, R. J. (1974). The violent home. Beverly Hill, CA: Sage.
27.
Gelles, R. J. (1979). Family violence. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
29.
Glick, P. J., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119-135.
30.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109-118.
31.
Humphrey, S. E., & Kahn, A. S. (2000). Fraternities, athletic teams, and rape: Importance of identification with a risky group. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 1313-1322.
32.
Kann, L., Kinchen, S. A., Williams, B. I., Ross, J. G., Lowry, R., Grunbaum, J. A., et al. (2000). Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 1999. Journal of School Health, 70, 271-285.
33.
Kidd, B. (1990). The Men’s Cultural Centre: Sports and the dynamic of women’s oppression/men’s repression. In M. A. Messner & D. F. Sabo (Eds.), Sport, men, and the gender order: Critical feminist perspectives (pp. 31-43). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
34.
Kimmel, M. S. (2002). “Gender symmetry” in domestic violence: A substantive and methodological review. Violence Against Women, 8, 1263-1332.
35.
Koss, M. P. (1988). Hidden rape: Sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of students in higher education. In A. W. Burgess (Ed.), Rape and sexual assault: II (pp. 3-25). New York: Garland.
36.
Koss, M. P., & Gaines, J. A. (1993). The prediction of sexual aggression by alcohol use, athletic participation, and fraternity affiliation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 94-108.
37.
Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and Prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162-170.
38.
Lanier, C. A. (2001). Rape-accepting attitudes: Precursors to or consequences of forced sex. Violence Against Women, 7, 876-885.
39.
Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133-164.
40.
Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 704-711.
41.
Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
Malamuth, N. M. (1986). Predictors of naturalistic sexual aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 953-962.
43.
Malamuth, N. M. (1998). The confluence model as an organizing framework for research on sexually aggressive men: Risk moderators, imagined aggression, and pornography consumption. In R. G. Geen & E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Human aggression: Theories, research, and implications for social policy (pp. 229-245). New York: Academic Press.
44.
Malamuth, N. M., Heavey, C. L., & Linz, D. (1993). Predicting men’s antisocial behavior against women: The interaction model of sexual aggression. In G. C. N. Hall, R. Hirschman, J. R. Graham, & M. S. Zaragoza (Eds.), Sexual aggression: Issues in etiology, assessment, and treatment (pp. 63-97). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
45.
Malamuth, N. M., Linz, D., Heavey, C. L., Barnes, G., & Aker, M. (1995). Using the confluence model of sexual aggression to predict men’s conflict with women: A 10-year follow-up study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 353-369.
46.
Malamuth, N. M., Sockloskie, J. S., Koss, M. P., & Tanaka, J. S. (1991). Characteristics of aggressors against women: Testing a model using a national sample of college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 670-681.
47.
McPherson, D. G. (2002). Sport, youth, violence, and the media: An activist athlete’s point of view. In M. Gatz, M. A. Messner, & S. J. Ball-Rokeach (Eds.), Paradoxes of youth and sport (pp. 241-247). Albany: State University of New York Press.
48.
Messner, M. A., & Sabo, D. F. (1990). Toward a critical feminist reappraisal of sport, men, and the gender order. In M. A. Messner & D. F. Sabo (Eds.), Sport, men, and the gender order: Critical feminist perspectives (pp. 1-15). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
49.
Messner, M. A., & Stevens, M. A. (2002). Scoring without consent: Confronting male athletes’ violence against women. In M. Gatz, M. A. Messner, & S. J. Ball-Rokeach (Eds.), Paradoxes of youth and sport (pp. 225-239). Albany: State University of New York Press.
50.
Morrison, T. G., Parriag, A. V., & Morrison, M. A. (1999). The psychometric properties of the Homonegativity Scale. Journal of Homosexuality, 37, 111-126.
51.
Nack, W., & Munson, L. (1995, July 31). Sports’ dirty secret. Sports Illustrated, pp. 62-70.
52.
Nelson, M. H. (1994). The stronger women get, the more men love football: Sexism and the American culture of sport. New York: Harcourt Brace.
53.
Overholster, J. C., & Beck, S. (1986). Multimethod assessment of rapists, child molesters, and three control groups on behavioral and psychological measures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 682-687.
54.
Rennison, C. (2002). Criminal victimization 2001: Changes 2000-01 with trends 1993-2001. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
55.
Sabo, D. F., & Pamepinto, J. (1990). Football ritual and the social reproduction of masculinity. In M. A. Messner & D. F. Sabo (Eds.), Sport, men, and the gender order: Critical feminist perspectives (pp. 115-127). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
56.
Sanday, P. R. (1981). The socio-cultural context of rape: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 5-7, 9-18, 22-27.
57.
Sanday, P. R. (1996a). Rape-prone versus rape-free campus cultures. Violence Against Women, 2, 191-208.
58.
Sanday, P. R. (1996b). A woman scorned: Acquaintance rape on trial. New York: Doubleday.
59.
Sawyer, R. G., Thompson, E. E., & Chicorelli, A. M. (2002). Rape myth acceptance among intercollegiate student athletes: A preliminary examination. American Journal of Health Studies, 18, 19-25.
60.
Silverman, J. G., Raj, A., Mucci, L. A., & Hathaway, J. E. (2001). Dating violence, violence against adolescent girls and associated substance use, unhealthy weight control, sexual risk behavior, pregnancy, and suicidality. Journal of the American Medical Association, 286, 572-579.
61.
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scales. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41, 75-88.
62.
Straus, M. A. (1990). The Conflict Tactics Scale and its critics: An evaluation and new data on validity and reliability. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families (pp. 49-73). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
63.
Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., & Steinmetz, S. K. (1980). Behind closed doors. Garden City, NJ: Anchor Press.
64.
Straus, M. A., Hambly, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Developmental and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316.
65.
Tolman, D. L., Spencer, R., Rosen-Reynoso, M., & Porche, M. V. (2003). Sowing the seeds of violence in heterosexual relationships: Early adolescents narrate compulsory heterosexuality. Journal of Social Issues, 59, 159-178.
66.
Velicer, W. F., Huckel, L. H., & Hansen, C. E. (1989). A measurement model for measuring attitudes toward violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 349-364.
67.
Weir, T. (1990, May 17). Athletes must play by society’s rules. USA Today, p. 3C.
68.
Weir, T. (1995, September 13). Players must learn abuse of women is not part of the playbook. USA Today, p. 2C.
69.
White, J. W., Donat, P. L. N., & Bondurant, B. (2001). A developmental examination of violence against girls and women. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 343-357). New York: John Wiley.
70.
Whitson, D. (1990). Sport in the social construction of masculinity. In M. A. Messner & D. F. Sabo (Eds.), Sport, men, and the gender order: Critical feminist perspectives (pp. 19-29). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
