As the empirical evidence accumulates, so does confidence that carefully designed and delivered rehabilitation approaches can reduce risk. Yet little is known about how to rehabilitate some specialized groups, such as high-risk violent offenders: career criminals with an extensive history of violent behavior. Since 1998, New Zealand’s Rimutaka Violence Prevention Unit (RPVU) has provided intensive cognitive-behavioral rehabilitation to violent men. In this evaluation, 112 medium- and high-risk prisoners who entered the program after 1998 are case matched to 112 untreated men. Reconviction outcome data over an average of 3.5 years postrelease show that 10% to 12% fewer program completers were reconvicted for violence compared to their untreated controls. High-risk completers also are less likely to be reconvicted for any offense. Those men who opted out of the study are a slightly higher-risk group than those who completed it, but noncompletion does not further increase their risk. Given the lack of program theory, and formidable practical challenges involved in working with such a high-risk group, these results are very promising.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnoastic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author .
2.
Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. ( 2006). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson .
3.
Andrews, D.A., & Dowden, C. ( 2005). Managing correctional treatment for reduced recidivism: A meta-analytic review of programme integrity. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 173-187.
4.
Andrews, D.A., & Dowden, C. ( 2006). Risk principle of case classification in correctional treatment: A meta-analytic investigation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 50, 88-100.
5.
Bakker, L., Riley, D., & O’Malley, J. (1999). Risk of reconviction: Statistical models predicting four types of re-offending. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Corrections Psychological Service.
6.
Beck, A.T., & Freeman, A.M. ( 1990). Cognitive therapy of personality disorders. New York: Guilford.
7.
Berry, S. ( 2003). Stopping violent offending in New Zealand: Is treatment an option? New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 32, 92-100.
8.
Bowen, E., & Gilchrist, E. ( 2006). Predicting dropout of court-mandated treatment in a British sample of domestic violence offenders. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 12, 573-587.
9.
Campbell, M.A., French, S., & Gendreau, P. ( 2007). Assessing the utility of risk assessment tools and personality measures in the prediction of violent recidivism for adult offenders (No. 2007-04). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
10.
Cortoni, F., Nunes, K., & Latendresse, M. (2006). An examination of the effectiveness of the Violence Prevention Program (No. R-178). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Correctional Service of Canada.
11.
Di Placido, C., Simon, T.L., Witte, T.D., Gu, D., & Wong, S.C.P. ( 2006). Treatment of gang members can reduce recidivism and institutional misconduct. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 93-114.
12.
Dishion, T.J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. ( 1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior . American Psychologist, 54, 755-764.
13.
Dowden, C., & Andrews, D.A. ( 2000). Effective correctional treatment and violent reoffending: A meta analysis. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 42, 449-467.
14.
Dowden, C., Blanchette, K., & Serin, R. ( 1999). Anger management programming for federal male inmates: An effective intervention (Research ReportR-82). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Correctional Service of Canada.
15.
Henry, W.P., Strupp, H.H., Butler, S.F., Schacht, T.E., & Binder, J.L. ( 1993). Effects of training in time-limited dynamic psychotherapy: Changes in therapist behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 434-440.
16.
Hollin, C. R., & Palmer, E. J. (Eds.). (2006). Offending behavior programmes: Development, application, and controversies. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
17.
Howells, K., Day, A., Bubner, S., Jauncey, S., Parker, A., Williamson, P., et al. (2001). An evaluation of anger management programs with violent offenders in two Australian states. Adelaide , Australia: University of South Australia Forensic and Applied Psychology Research Group.
18.
Hudson, S.M., Wales, D.S., Bakker, L., & Ward, T. ( 2002). Dynamic risk factors: The Kia Marama evaluation. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 103-119.
19.
Lösel, F. ( 2001). Evaluating the effectiveness of correctional programs: Bridging the gap between research and practice. In G. A. Bernfeld, D. P. Farrington, & A. W. Leschied (Eds.), Offender rehabilitation in practice (pp. 67-92). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
20.
Lowenkamp, C.T., Latessa, E.J., & Holsinger, A.M. (2006). The risk principle in action: What have we learned from 13,676 offenders and 97 correctional programs?Crime & Delinquency, 52, 77-93.
21.
McGuire, J. ( 2004). Understanding psychology and crime: Perspectives on theory and action. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
22.
McMurran, M. ( 2006). Drug and alcohol programmes: Concept, theory, and practice . In C. R. Hollin & E. J. Palmer (Eds.), Offending behavior programmes: Development, application, and controversies (pp. 179-207). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
23.
McMurran, M., & Theodosi, E. ( 2007). Is treatment non-completion associated with increased reconviction over no treatment?Psychology, Crime and Law , 13, 333-343.
24.
Nadesu, A. ( 2007). Reconviction patterns of released prisoners: A 36-months follow-up analysis. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Corrections Policy Development unpublished report.
25.
Polaschek, D.L.L., Calvert, S.W., & Gannon, T.A. ( 2009). Linking violent thinking: Implicit theory-based research with violent offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence . 24, 75-96.
26.
Polaschek, D.L.L., & Collie, R.M. ( 2004). Rehabilitating serious violent adult offenders: An empirical and theoretical stocktake. Psychology, Crime and Law, 10, 321-334.
27.
Polaschek, D.L.L., Wilson, N.J., Townsend, M., & Daly, L. ( 2005). Cognitive-behavioral rehabilitation for high-risk violent offenders: An outcome evaluation of the Violence Prevention Unit. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1611-1627.
28.
Rice, M.E. ( 1997). Violent offender research and implications for the criminal justice system. American Psychologist, 52, 414-423.
29.
Rice, M.E., & Harris, G.T. ( 2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 615-620.
30.
Ruddle, H.V., & Bradshaw, C.M. (1982). On the estimation of premorbid intellectual functioning: Validation of Nelson & McKenna’s formula, and some new normative data. British Journal of Clinical Psychology , 21, 159-164.
31.
Skeem, J.L., Polaschek, D.L.L., & Manchak, S. ( 2009). Appropriate treatment works, but how? Rehabilitating general, psychopathic, and high-risk offenders. In J. L. Skeem, K. Douglas, & S. Lilienfeld (Eds.), Psychological science in the courtroom: Controversies and consensus (pp. 358-384). New York: Guilford.
32.
Wilson, N.J. ( 2002, August). Montgomery House VPP Re-imprisonment analysis . Internal memorandum, Department of Corrections Psychological Service, Wellington, New Zealand.
33.
Wilson, D.B., Bouffard, L.A., & MacKenzie, D.L. (2005). A quantitative review of structured, group-oriented, cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 172-204.
34.
Wong, S., Gordon, A., & Gu, D. ( 2007). Assessment and treatment of violence-prone forensic clients: An integrated approach. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190(Suppl. 49), 66-74.
35.
Wormith, J.S., Althouse, R., Simpson, M., Reitzel, L.R., Fagan, T.J., & Morgan, R.D. ( 2007). The rehabilitation and reintegration of offenders: The current landscape and some future directions for correctional psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 879-892.
36.
Wormith, J.S., & Olver, M.E. ( 2002). Offender treatment attrition and its relationship with risk, responsivity, and recidivism. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 29, 447-471.
37.
Zamble, E., & Quinsey, V.L. ( 1997). The criminal recidivism process. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
